Warriors Wiki talk:Reality

To-Do list
Hi all! Currently we have four more year pages to finish, two "chats" (Erin Hunter Answers Your Questions), illustrators, and the facebook pages.

We currently have three illustrators that still need silver status but the issue is there is little information on them from what I can find. What's on those three pages for the authors/illustrators currently is just about as much as possible we can find, or at least what I can find. I don't really want to give them silver status as they are now. So how do we want to move forward? We can merge the three illustrator pages into one, though the problem with that is we'd have to merge all illustrator articles of which some of them are quite good. We can also delete them since there is little information about them.

I'd also like to move onto how we're going to organize the role-play phenomenon. As of now, we have several pages of role-play websites scattered about so what should we do about those? I'm inclined to say that we should coalesce them into one page like we have with the Fanshrines and Fansites.

If I missed any major topics, please bring them up and I encourage everyone to answer all questions in a complete manner. Thanks, 22:59, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

I think you're right about this. I think that maybe the illustrator pages could be merged. For some of the persons articles, I have tried searching more information on them countless times, however, I have never found anything much.

As of the roleplay pages however, I'm not exactly sure, but merging could be useful. Currently ideas are lacking in my head, but indeed I'll comment if I come up with anything. (BTW, sorry about my inactivity lately in PR, due to all the computer stuff going on, but I'll become more active now that everything's fixed)

I'm in between on leaving the illustrator pages as they are and on merging them, because like 'Teldy said, some are wonderful and at great legnth, while others are stubs. I think we should merge the roleplay pages, as it would make everything more organized, but would adding those into PR mean that once the page or pages are finished would we be able to nominate them or not? x3 02:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

It's been nearly three months, and we haven't reached a conclusion. I feel as though we're mostly in agreement with merging the roleplay pages, but we're still at a loss with the illustrator pages. 02:41, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

I support both. Only makes sense to merge very related things if they don't have enough information to have their own pages, or all the pages aren't needed. 04:14, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Except some illustrator's pages are really amazing standing alone as their own page while some just have absolutely no information on them. 16:40, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

How about we do what we have with the Erin Hunter page? Compile a list of all illustrators, have small blurbs on each of them, so it'll cover the illustrators that don't have enough information to stand alone as pages while also allowing the well-done pages to be left alone. 17:25, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

That sounds great. ^ 04:39, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

Page for Kate's Blog
So, I said this awhile ago, back when we were discussing Facebook pages, but the discussion was archived, due to like no comments in awhile. But anyway, I think that we should have a page for Kate's blog, it has answered countless questions and it would be useful to have a page to keep all of it organized. We have one for Vicky's facebook, and I just think it would be nice, so yeah... x3 00:01, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

(casually pokes head in) This is a good idea. If we've got one for Vicky's facebook, we should have one for Kate's blog. Kate is a little more active on her blog than her facebook anyways, I believe.

I agree- Kate's blog has been used by us more frequently than her facebook....even if that's not true, (I gotta check x.x), we still use her blog frequently- if Vicky gets a FB page, why not give Kate's blog a page? We use them both. 15:45, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. 02:41, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

I also believe her blog should get a page. 11:10, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

I see why not, as the facebook pages got their own pages. However a layout would need to be decided on, as the same layout as the facebook pages wouldn't quite work. It should most likely include something about each blog, as well as a section for all comments responded too, and it will need to be organized by date I think. 03:36, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

I agree too. If they get facebook pages, why not for Kate's Blog? Anyways, a lot of information on the wiki comes from her blog, so it seems like a good idea.

I agree that it should be organized by date, and, possibly, a template similar to the facebook template might work also. owo 21:52, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

I feel like the Facebook template would work quite well as it is basically the same concept. The difference I see is that we would need a subpage of all the screenshots from this blog page since the pages of the blog constantly change as well as a current link. So speak now or "forever" hold your peace. 18:17, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Featured Article for August?
Since PR has very few pages within it, a featured article every month is a bit taxing of which I mean it'll quickly become harder to find new articles to feature. Granted, we can always repeat articles, but we can also perhaps change the cycle of switching FAs from one month to two months. So repeat or change the cycle? And if we want to keep with the one month cycling, then go ahead and suggest something for August. =) 18:27, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

I think we should go with two month cycling, because, like you said, PR has a very limited number of pages, so it'd be easier and it'd make more sense if we just went with a two month cryle. x3 18:29, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Personally, I think it would be best to just keep the one month cycle. Repeating pages wouldn't hurt.

And if we do that, why not just keep moving down the list of Erins? Vicky, maybe? 18:48 Sun Jul 14 2013

Join
Could I possibly join? I would like to join a couple projects and this one seems good. is this in the right place?</small

Request to Join
May I join? I'll try my best at all times. 20:18, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Erica
On this thread (only viewable to forum members, though), an editor named Erica sat through and answered some questions, including some about herself. She's an editor for all three series, but if any more information on her is released during the Q and A, could a page be made for her? 00:48, August 10, 2013 (UTC)