Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval=

Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Snowfur (Q) - For Approval
Thar she blows! I wanted to do a white cat because I haven't done one since.. Whiteberry. 16:04 Fri Nov 8

Define the shading. Pretty!

Define the eye depth a bit, too? 21:16, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Reups! Thanks!    Ѽ    A M B E R    Ѽ     P  U  M  P  K  I  N   V  S   O  R  E  O  11:31 Sun Nov 10

I think her eyes still need to be defined better. Maybe make her black pupils wider? Amazing job, Amber! -- 19:28, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Could you smooth out the shading on the upper chest just a bit? It's a bit blotched. Great job! 00:41 Tue Nov 12

Reups! Hi. Thank yooou,    Ѽ    A M B E R    Ѽ     P  U  M  P  K  I  N   V  S   O  R  E  O  18:40 Tue Nov 12

recheck your lightsource use a sig sub page maooo >;c 03:08 Fri Nov 15

Could you specify what you mean? Just saying that is extremely vague and not really helpful at all, imho.

Lol you're right. The tail and belly read that the light coming from our right, and the hind leg off the ground as well as the face read coming from the left, and the other legs are too flat to read. I'll make a tutorial and put it up on a subpage of mine, I'm working on it. 18:33 Sat Nov 16

Could you smooth out the shading on the chest? It's starting to get a tad blotchy. 23:29, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

I think the ear <--- this way needs a bit more gray.

Reups 16:07 Wed Nov 20

Where's your light source coming from? 00:40, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that's great, Amber! Her pupils need to be more wider.  *Swanflutter*  Warriors is my life~  06:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Eye style is artist's choice Swan.

Still working? 02:05, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

The top left sorry I've been ill 17:32 Thu Nov 28

Can you smudge the gray on the ear tips maybe a bit, as it looks a bit hard-edged at this moment.

Still working? 20:22, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Reups It's been a month tomorrow *wails* 16:27 Fri Dec 6

CBA?

Sorry to interrupt, but could you smooth out and define the tail shading some, and define the light on the furthest hind foot? 20:48, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Also, have the shading run along this >> side of the belly, as it's throwing off the light source? 02:01 Wed Dec 11

Reups 16:19 Thu Dec 12

Mapleshade (A) ~ Declined
This is my apprentice charart of Mapleshade. Comments please? Ⓐngel Ⓢⓣⓤⓓⓘⓞ (talk) 22:42, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Wow! This is awesome for your first charart! Great job! Maybe define your tail and paw shading, and I think there's a bit of waste around the image. 22:52, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the black line at the earpink. Looks pretty, Angel. c:  23:24, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

This needs to be named File:Mapleshade.apprentice.png, other than that this is very pretty! -- 07:17 Sun Dec 1

I don't think she'd get the ragged fur, as she was described with it in TLH, as a rogue, but I could be wrong. 19:44, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

Does she need texture? I'm not sure if it's the shading on her other ones. 21:20, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Still working?

Ears need to be tweaked, the earpink seems to be covering the whole ear. <span style="padding: 0px 5px 0px 5px; border: Dotted 2px #EB234E; background: #0A7AFA; -moz-border-radius: 0em 0em 0em 0em; -webkit-border-radius: 0em 0em 0em 0em; border-radius: 0em 0em 0em 0em;"> *Swanflutter*  Warriors is my life~  02:15, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

I think you kinda just repeated what Frosty said. Avoid repeating comments in the future. <span style="">23:54 Wed Dec 11

Declining due to lack of work. Sorry! ;-;

Splashnose (Q) - For Approval
Just in time <span style="">16:49 Sat Nov 30

I can't see the stripes at all?

I can see them fine? I think it's just your monitor... And as for the tail, it's mottled and doesn't have stripes. <span style="">19:00 Sat Nov 30

No, I can barely see them. 19:05, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

The mottles will have to go, as she has /no/ cite for them.

Reuploaded I think the color should be good now. I don't want to lose that dusty hue so I'd prefer to keep them as-is. And though I removed the tail mottles, I did take it from a reference image. <span style="">09:28 Sun Dec 1

Define the earpink a bit? Wonderful job! 15:08, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

I still can't tell what are stripes and what aren't... please try and differentiate between the two, and it's not my monitor, because it's been on multiple settings and I still can't tell them apart. Also it doesn't matter if it's from a reference image; if she has no cite for them, she doesn't get them.

Well umm what do you want me to do about it <span style="">20:09 Sun Dec 1

Well, perhaps make it so the stripes can be told apart from the base? I mean, it also doesn't seem like there are any stripes on the belly at all, but instead just random streaks of brown? And the base seems far too dark, and she looks almost black and brown. Perhaps try changing things around a bit? I'm sorry but I really cannot tell what's part of the base and what's the stripes? I can't see if the brown is the base and the "blackish" color are the stripes or vise-versa?

Reuploaded. I'm not going any lighter than this. <span style="">20:28 Sun Dec 1

The base still looks a bit too dark. Maybe thin out the stripes a touch and lighten the shading, or lighten the base and stripe color just a touch more. 20:41, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded. I was /not/ willing to lighten the base pelt and I forgot how I did those stripes so I screwed around a little bit and deleted 2 of my shading layers and added highlights. This isn't even dusty any more imho but whatever <span style="">02:03 Tue Dec 3

Dusty brown is a light-colored gray-brown. I think to make it look more dusty you'll need to lighten and desaturate the colors of the stripes a bit more, for their dark, bold color, (and the sheer amount of her pelt they take up) are taking away from that dusty color you just described being unable to see. 03:36, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded. Ok there we go. Thanks so much Legs <span style="">07:15 Tue Dec 3

Okay really stupid question. Are the stripes darker or lighter in this case? I'm sorry, I know I sound stupid, but I'd kinda like to know so I don't critique the wrong thing. Like, the only thing that even makes me question this is the belly/back areas? Especially along the upper back, there doesn't appear to be any stripes? Unless the darker color are the stripes, which if it is, completely disregard me... I seriously can't tell, I apologize. x.x

They're the darker color... And as for the back, (this isn't my reference image) large stripe-colored patches do exist on some marble tabbies. <span style="">00:09 Wed Dec 4

I think the stripes need to be lightened a bit more, as I believe when she was described as dusty-brown, the erins meant for her stripes, as well. They look too dark to be dusty still. (And for future reference, those aren't patches, those are still stripes. Very thick, clumped stripes.) 00:02, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Still working?

Ahaha life I totally forgot about this lol. I believe the end of the seventh day is deadline, right? So as long as I upload some time today it won't be declined, right? <span style="">06:46 Tue Dec 10

Reuploaded because I'm stupid. <span style="">00:23 Wed Dec 11

Thin out her back stripe, and I think the tabby pattern will be fine after that. 05:19, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's fine- back to the "reference" image. Plus, I made this so long ago I forgot how to do the stripes lol <span style="">08:55 Thu Dec 12

The stripe on that one isn't as thick as the one on your image, imho. A little thinning out never hurt anyone, I think.

Mothflight (Kit) - For Approval
Comments? -Feather 17:16, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

Define and expand the shading. <span style="">22:35 Sat Nov 30

I think the body shading itself is fine and doesn't need to be expanded, but it does on the feet and maybe on the tail.

Thicken the shading along her side/back. 20:41, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. -Feather 16:33, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Define the leg shading just a bit, and her back paw looks a bit flat. Maybe darken the shading around the edges? 19:24, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. -Feather 11:46, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

There's waste around the paws. Also, assuming your light source is coming from, you should probably erase some shading on/add a highlight to the tail. 13:21, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. -Feather 15:58, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

CBA?

Sorry to interrupt, but there's some light from the chest leaking into the haunch area. Fill that part in, and I'll re-CBA. 20:51, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. -Feather 18:26, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Blur her shading a little more- it looks blotchy almost, in some sections. Smooth it all out, so the transition is less choppy. 05:18, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Mitzi (KP) (Q) ~ For Approval
Evrett's a lazy bum and didn't feel like making the image himself. xD He says she's also got darker patches so Imma go fix that now.

Re-uploaded. <internal screaming because pattern>

The white looks a bit gray, mostly on the face, belly and tail. Absolutley sponetaneous 15:46, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

It's not white, Sorrel. It's supposed to be gray.

Blur or lighten up the stomach shading a tad? It makes it look like a different color compared to the rest of the gray. 19:23, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

I don't actually get what you mean? It looks to be the same color to me...

I think the stomach shading is fine as well, since it's shading, but some of it is leaking where it meets the arm ouo 20:52, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Define the shsding on the tail a bit? 02:29, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. "shsding"? What's that? =P

Remove a little of her forehead shading, and sharpen your shoulder shading a touch more. 05:18, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Huzzah.

Leopardfoot (Q) - For Approval
Dear StarClan... * gapes*  All colors are from her old queen and apprentice. Changes here 01:55, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Round out the darker spots a bit. 03:44, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Changes 04:12, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Smudge the spots. This is lovely~ <span style="">1:28 Wed Dec 4

I'm not sure how to describe this, but it really doesn't look like it matches, pelt-wise. The shape of the spots seem to be it, and how they don't flow with the rest of the pelt, like how it does on the other images?? 00:00, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 05:27, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Maybe put the layer with the spots below the mottles? Emberpoppy7 (talk) 23:42, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 17:38, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

CBA? 23:03, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to interrupt, but can you like make them larger, and more ovally? <span style="">01:56 Wed Dec 11


 * I think they're fine 03:31, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

It just doesn't seem like it matches entirely, pattern-wise. Maybe lessen the lighter ginger? 04:41, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 04:54, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

You missed making mottles on a smallish patch where her chest meets the foreleg furthest from us. <span style="">23:51 Wed Dec 11


 * I still think it's fine, what you're seeing is her pale chest. Her old queen and apprentice have it too 02:45, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

CBA?

Comparing this to her StarClanner, the two barely match. Are we going for the look of her StarClanner more, or her warrior? 05:16, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Cloud (KM) (Q) - For Approval
-phew- c: 23:59, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Ooh, purty! Smuge the pelt into the ear-pink a bit more and maybe thin the shading a bit on the legs 00:05, December 4, 2013 (UTC)

Define the light on the back leg closest to us. Love the eyes! <span style="">16:32 Fri Dec 6

Reuploaded. wheee. 00:31, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Why are the mudspots on the belly paler and more blurred? Or is that my monitor? <span style="">03:21 Wed Dec 11

I think the mudspots look fine. The shading looks a tad bit harsh, could you lighten it or tint the shading more? 18:25, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Mistmouse (Q) ~ For Approval
Did anyone notice the changes to wikia? Comments? <span style="">23:54 Wed Dec 4

Thicken the stripes a bit? tiny shnoflakes  19:19, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Define shading a little? Pretty! 20:34, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thank you! <span style="">0:10 Fri Dec 6

May I ask for comments? <span style="">21:36 Mon Dec 9

Define the shading on the front-right leg. Looks pretty, Hawky. c: 00:20, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thanks Frosty! :D <span style="">21:43 Tue Dec 10

Cinders (Q) - Withdrawn
Omg <span style="">16:30 Fri Dec 6

The light source makes no sense, and the white is gray in areas. Also, smudge the white into the black more. <span style="">21:42 Fri Dec 6

Also, you are missing the gray patches. <span style="">23:59 Fri Dec 6

Still working? 23:04, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

It's not supposed to be white, I think. It's an off-white, or pale gray, as that's how she's shown in the graphic novels.

Withdrawing coz I wanna work on Maple's apprentice. <span style="">17:50 Thu Dec 12

Redscar (Star) ~ CBA
He was very fun to make. Comments? <span style="">5:06 Sat Dec 7

I'm sorry Hawky, but you can only have one original image up at a time, since Mistmouse didn't have a queen image before. You'll have to either withdraw him or her. 05:08, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Oh whoops, I forgot about that. XD My bad. Oh well, I will withdraw him. <span style="">18:18 Sat Dec 7

Reuploaded. I took overrrrr 23:43, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Define the eye depth. Puurty <span style="">13:27 Sun Dec 8

Re-uploaded. yo 05:59, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

CBA?

Alder (Ki) ~ For Approval
hi changes are here and I'll do stuff when I get home from work.

Smudge the gray some more? 20:44, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. I don't want to smudge it too terribly much, I hope you don't mind.

Mind defining the shading on the paws a little more? I like this a lot. c:  22:16, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's fine for now, but if others agree with you, I'll go ahead and do it.

Just a little more. <span style="">0:10 Mon Dec 9

Re-uploaded. i redid it again because my layers merged ;-; plus I like this

Define the shading? This is sooo cute o.o 18:54, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Hmm

Mind telling me which direction the light source is coming from? 20:49, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Looks like to me it's coming from the upper right ouo. Could you define the tail shading, perhaps? I have to squint to see it. 20:53, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Ah! That would make more sense. Thanks, Beebs. cx Cloudy, may you define the tail shading please? 20:58, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

I know white pattern realism isn't something that's enforced, so it's your choice, but I'd still strongly recommend using a more realistic white pattern. This one's fairly unrealistic, and I think the image would look better as a whole with a more plausible pattern. But as I said, it's up to you since it's not an enforced rule or requirement.

Darkfrost, please don't repeat Beebs' comment. Also, Paleh, I'll go ahead and fix it up a bit since I'm really not in the mood to have the image nominated or a dozen comments telling me to change it.

The only reason I repeated, is because I thought you'd say that the tail shading was fine, when it definitely wasn't. So, my apologizes. 13:08, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Okay can you try and not be offensive, please? Perhaps next time, you could phrase it a little nicer? ._. Anyways, re-uploaded and I basically just went back to the other pattern I had with a few fixes.

I wasn't being offensive? I'm sorry if it sounded like that, but it really wasn't. 23:56, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

"...because I thought you'd say that the tail shading was fine, when it {definitely wasn't}." brackets inserted by me seems a little offensive imho, just for future reference. Moving on, smudge the markings a teensy tiny bit more? This is cute! OuO <span style="">01:54 Wed Dec 11

I'd rather not smudge them but if someone else agrees then I guess I'll do it?

Smudge the white marking a little more, because she's in a long-haired blank and her fur would be a touch more crazy. x3 05:14, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Beep.

Sorry if I sound rude, but the way you smudged the patches doesn't flow with the fur. Like, at the top (I guess the white is kind of shaped like a cross, so) under the extended parts at the sides, it's smudged downwards, but at the lower part, its smudged side-to-side. Either have the majority of it side to side (with a little curve when necessary) or Down (which is probably more realistic)? I'm sorry if I sound offensive. <span style="">09:07 Thu Dec 12

White placement isn't an enforced part of the whole "realism thing", which I still think we're getting far too out of hand with that , and I'd think smudging would apply to that. Honestly, I think it's fine, and it's not that bad...

Owl Eyes (Ki) ~ For Approval
this is little owl eyes please rate --Velvetmoon (talk) 00:06, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

The lineart seems to be a different color than black. Also, define/add shading, the image looks choppy, and the eyes look cross-eyed. Also, please remove the alignment. <span style="">0:50 Sun Dec 8

I'm pretty sure there's no citation for Owl Eyes as a kit? 02:49, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Yes there is in Thunder Rising. --Neverendingmoon (talk) 02:57, December 8, 2013 (UTC)Neverendingmoon

Yes, he's Turtle Tail's kit. Is the lineart blurred, or is it my screen? 03:02, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

My bad, I don't own that book. He already has a kit image, so a SW will have to decline this, I'm afraid. 03:03, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

But they're not confirmed to be the same, Dazzle, no matter what the similarity - we'll have to wait for it to be confirmed. Until then, he gets this. This should be named 'Owl Eyes.kit.png', upload it over Amber's old version. 03:19, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

I fixed cross eyes and all the line arts there and no blured line art. --Velvetmoon (talk) 09:49, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Define the shading? I can't see any. 22:15, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Currently the image is a .jpg, could you please upload it as a .png? Also, there appears to be a background, that needs to be made transparent. <span style="">23:19, 12/8/2013

Eyes need to be enlarged, since those are what he's named for. Also there's waste everywhere. If you're not already, try using layers in your image. 12:22, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about all the problems I fixed what I could so theres that --Velvetmoon (talk) 23:51, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

I still don't ssee any shading. If you'd like, I could send you a charart tutorial video to your email. It will help you get a basic understanding..If you want me to, let me know your email and I'll send it once I finish the video. Also, your lineart is blurred/shaded over with colors other thaan black. 00:18, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Eyes need to be amber instead of yellow. 19:13, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Withdrawn--Velvetmoon (talk) 23:32, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Well, I'm not sure how big his eyes should be. Let me know if they should be bigger. 01:12, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Define the eye depth and define the light source. I think this would be a good example of a light source that makes sense. <span style="">1:24 Wed Dec 11

Smudge the earpink. 09:48, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Mistystar (Q) ~ For Approval
Comments? I adore the falling snow on the screen 02:24, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the shading more. This is lovely! <span style="">3:49 Sun Dec 8

Reups thank you c: 03:57, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

The shading's leaking away form the bottom of the belly and the back of the tail. 17:43, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Reups 20:46, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Define the facial shading a bit? 20:53, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Reups 18:41, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Me too The chest is a little flat. Good job! I may or may not have wanted this <span style="">03:16 Wed Dec 11

Reups 22:52, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Sharpen her shading a little more. It looks particularly over-blurred on her shoulder. 05:13, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Clovertail (Q) ~ CBA
Comments? <span style="">3:49 Sun Dec 8

Define your earpink a smidge? She's gorgeous o.o 04:33, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thank you, Sorrel. <3 <span style="">4:50 Sun Dec 8

CBA?

Heathertail (Alt W) - For Approval
I should probably go do my homework now. 06:58, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Sharpen the white a little? This is pretty~! <span style="">07:41 Sun Dec 8

Reuploaded. Sharpest I could get it without having colored pixels pop up everywhere. 10:56, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the shading a bit.

Define the shading on the front paw farthest from us, and add some shading on the head between the ears, since the ears would cause it to be shaded. 19:18, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded. 01:26, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Changes. 01:28, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Sharpen the edges of her shading a bit more. This is pretty .o. 05:11, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Ferncloud (Alt Q) ~ For Approval
Comments? 19:24, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Nice work! I would say define the shading on the tail, it's a bit hard to see. 22:03, Dec. 9, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's fine, unless someone else disagrees ouo 19:14, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think it needs defined..maybe add more depth to it? Looks pretty, Beebs. c:  19:15, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

The depth itself is fine, I think. Although since she is dark gray, would you object to adding a little bit of light in the non-shaded areas so it doesn't appear to be all in shading? If you add the lighter parts (but not all that light), that might make it seem a little more... "depth-y" for lack of a better word?

re-up 19:26, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

The face's highlights, particularly on her left cheek, seem a bit bright for the light coming behind her. The head would block most light, especially on that side of the face, causing no shading. Hawk Swoop is an example of what I'm trying to describe..her light is coming form behind her and a little to her right, so you'd get thin, narrow highlights on one side of her face. 05:10, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

re-up I removed that highlight but that's it - I don't think her face highlights aren't that bright, imo ouo  20:18, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Ashfoot (Q) ~ For Approval
She's purrty. c: Comment away~ 22:12, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Smooth out and define the shading on the belly. The defining only needs a little bit though. Nice job, Frosty! <span style="">0:09 Mon Dec 9

Re-uploaded. Thank you, Hawky! c: 16:08, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Define the overall shading, especially on the tail and all four legs/paws, and perhaps darken it a little bit as well.

Errr..I hope you don't mind me saying no to that? I looked over the deputy for shading strategy, colors, etc. And this shading is how light and defined the deputy's shading is. Unless there is a certain part that doesn't match up the deputy's shading, then tell me what part.. 20:43, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Very well, I defined it a teensy bit more. I wish not to touch the shading anymore, because I wish to keep it like this. 21:10, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Facial shading looks rather blotchy; smooth it out a little? 18:38, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Darkfrost, different blanks have different shading needs. Just gonna point this out, but what works on one image, like the deputy blanks, might not work on another image. I actually am gonna ask you to define the shading on <-- back leg, as it appears rather flat.

Re-uploaded. 00:09, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the shading in the shoulder tons, as well as the belly. <span style="">02:04 Wed Dec 11

Mosspelt (Alt Q)~ For Approval
I don't know if this should be for approval or evaluation since Alder got declined, but here she is anyway. Click here if the wiki is being a butt.

Make the highlights less bright, and define the unshaded parts on the front legs. I believe she would get this. <span style="">2:11 Tue Dec 10

Reups I think the highlights are fine, personally, but I'll lower the opacity if others agree. Here if wikia is being a butt again Emberpoppy7 (talk) 23:03, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

I agree. However, I don't think you should lower the opacity, just make it an orangey color and set it on overlay, that should do the trick. <span style="">01:11 Wed Dec 11

Reups I can do zat Emberpoppy7 (talk) 21:08, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

They're still a little bright. Layer mode>Multiply, then colorize if you use GIMP. Not sure what to do if you don't, though. <span style="">23:47 Wed Dec 11

I use photoshop elements. I'll see what I can do though. Reups Emberpoppy7 (talk) 23:53, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

If the texture is supposed to be tabby stripes, perhaps define their shape a little? They look almost like darker tortie patches, which they shouldn't be. If it's texture, then thin it out, so that it looks like lines of hair instead of giant patches. 05:08, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

This better? Emberpoppy7 (talk) 13:31, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Tawnypelt (Alt Q) ~ For Approval
Let's try this again; I'm sure this is alright now 19:20, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Can you tint the shading to more of a reddish-brown? 18:13, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. 21:39, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Ivy... the shading is kind of blotchy on the belly. Smooth it out? <span style="">21:44 Wed Dec 11

Leaf (Alt Ro) - For Approval
If you recognize this pattern just shaddup <span style="">01:05 Wed Dec 11

Also would anyone mind checking if I named the file right? Lol idk how to name alts. <span style="">02:03 Wed Dec 11

It should be File:Leaf.rogue.alt.png in case you were wondering. This is amazing, Kelp! <span style="">2:29 Wed Dec 11

Renamed/Reuploaded. The white was so pink on my iPad I couldn't bear it, so I changed to pure white. <span style="">02:52 Wed Dec 11

Ok, I'm having trouble and being the "tech expert" not really that I am, I have absolutely no clue how to rename... Can someone do that for me? <span style="">02:54 Wed Dec 11

You can do it on your computer. Go ahead and name both of your layered and png images as above, and then when you upload it to the Wiki, the image will be under the new name. A mod can then delete this image. 18:12, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Renamed. After wikia finally realized I have the full knowledge that this file is a "duplicate" .-. <span style="">23:45 Wed Dec 11

Nettlespot (Q) - For Approval
All colors came from her warrior and old queen. Comments? 04:22, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Add a little more light to the tail? It seems to be all in shadow... either that or it's just dark.

Re-uploaded 04:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

The shadow behind the head and along the shoulder seems to just provide a ring around the head, and it looks kind of funny. Perhaps round it out to show that there's a shoulder there, and that the belly itself is very round and prominent? (This is hard to word, sorry D:) 05:06, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Poppycloud (Q) ~ For Approval
miaow 04:49, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the smudges just a liiiiittle bit? Damn she be sexy Imma steal her.

<Small> Gosh darn edit conflicts, Cloudy! Darken the shading a bit more 04:51, December 12, 2013 (UTC)