Warriors Wiki talk:World

FA January 2012
Since PC has started discussion on this, we might as well do too. We have many completed articles, so there are a lot of choices to choose from. Recently, this project has been pretty inactive, so we haven't particularly worked on anything. Suggestions? 00:06, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

LeopardClan? 00:11 Tue Dec 6

I think we need a break from nominating Clans now. :P Our last two have been Clans. Prophecies and Omens looks amazing right now, so I would highly suggest that. 00:29, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Darnn! But I'm ok with that. 00:32 Tue Dec 6

Also, Prophecies and Omens seems like a "new year" type thing to nominate, so yeah... XD 00:37, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Prophecies and Omens is great! I was thinking about that too. I'm sure LeopardClan would be featured next month, I was hoping to see it become FA too. 05:57, Tue, Dec, 6, 2011

I support Prophecies and Omens as well. :D If no one comments, we can put up the vote in a few days. 00:16, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but lets see if anyone has anything else to suggest. Also, DJCandyBud, I know you weren't here when I said this so I don't blame you, but let's please try not to reserve any articles for feature next month already, ok? We should be focused on this month and not reserve any articles. Everyone should have a chance to discuss what they think the next FA should be, so we shouldn't put dibs on anything already. 01:44, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay, I understand. 08:22, Thu, Dec, 8, 2011

CBV? Still open for comments though. :3 01:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Vote is up! Comments are still welcomed. 04:02, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Cow - Silver Nomination
Mmm, I'm proud of this article. I hope this falls under the guidlines. Comments? 00:09, Sat, Dec, 10, 2011

Nice job! I'm so proud when users actually work on pages to nominate them for the project. =) It needs a little more work, though. Can you expand the Introduction? Also, the Description section looks good, but it needs to be more of a research paper based on facts, not on what the cats think they look like. For help, see Rat, Sheep, or Wolf. The stuff you have in the description now can be scattered throughout the history. 01:48, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the history description, I'll get onto expanding the intro. Does the introduction need to have facts too? I've seen other creature article with facts in the introduction. 08:03, Sun, Dec, 11, 2011

No, the intro doesn't have to have facts, but it could. Like right now, the intro sentence would work. It would just need a little more expanding. 19:19, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Is this better for the intro? 06:01, Wed, Dec, 14, 2011

Yes, that's fine. Is Scribd a valid reference? It sounds like a place where anyone can make a Presentation about a topic. Also, Wiki Answers is NOT a trusted source to reference to. Instead, I highly recommend this website: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Bos_taurus.html. We have used it on pretty much all the silver Creature Articles, and I would like it if this article used it as well. 02:00, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Something like this better? I know the description needs expanding. 23:04, Fri, Dec, 16, 2011

Yes, sources look a lot better. 03:08, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Expand Sunset. 17:15 Sat Dec 17

Did cows appear in Sunset, because i'm not sure if they did or did you mean Sunrise? 05:48, Tue, Dec, 20, 2011

Weren't the cows also told to be brown or so? If they weren't, I believe the image should have black and white cows, it just makes more sense. 00:39, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

I guess that's an ok idea... I don't really have an opinion about it. Stoneclaw, can you find a good black and white cow picture that's an exact square? If so, put the link on, and I'll see if it's ok. Also, I'm sure Sweetflower meant Sunrise, as cows aren't meant at all in Sunset. 03:07, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

This is the best one I could find... |This

Oops, bad link, |here

It's not a square. It's 375x500. The image needs to be a square to fit into the template. Also, please sign with your signature. 03:20, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, you know what? There's lots of grass on the bottom. I'll crop it. 03:25, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Ahh, I forgot to sign. Dx 03:28, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Is it up to me to add the new picture to the page. 06:13, Wed, Dec, 21, 2011

Expanded Sunrise 03:20, Fri, Dec, 23, 2011

The Description does still need expanding. The other descriptions of the creature pages are 2-4 detailed paragraphs. 00:42, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Squirrelflame fro the link, that helped me a lot. Now I love this article. Expanded description. 01:04, Tue, Dec, 27, 2011

Oh my gosh, this looks amazing now! I cut the references down a little. If everything in the paragraph is cited by the same source, you can just cite at the end of the paragraph. ;) Other than that, the Description looks great. Is it possible to expand the Relation to cats more? If not, it's fine. :) 01:09, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Join Request ~ Moonflight Of SkyClan
I would love to join! I have read all of the books and know I can help you guys!

I made a new section. 22:14 Sun Dec 18

And we would love to have you! :D Make sure to look at the Guidelines before nominating any pages, and welcome to Project World! 00:18, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the project! 17:22 Wed Dec 21

Thank you! =3

Rockpile ~ Silver Nomination
I've expanded the article from one small paragraph in each history section to...5 huge paragraphs in each book, so I'm proud of it. xD I also found a reference for the top description. Comments? 01:30, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * And I've added a description and references for it. 01:46, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, this looks amazing! I can tell you've put a lot of work into it. ;) Has the Rockpile been mentioned in The Rescue or Beyond the Code? 03:17, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

They aren't mentioned by name in The Rescue, and the pictures don't prove anything. Can someone with Beyond the Code check? 00:50, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

I have BTC and i could check for you. 10:02, Mon, Dec, 26, 2011

That would be great! Thanks so much. =) 00:59, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

The rockpile is not named in BTC, and the pictures don't prove anything :/ so it would be the same as The Rescue, I'm assuming. <span style="">02:01, Thu, Dec, 29, 2011

Category: Clans
I would like to suggest that the be renamed as Category:Clans/Groups. In my opinion, this would better categorize, and fit in with the Guidelines more. Fitting in with the Guidelines is important to be able to directly find any PW article under the category. Comments? 05:51, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

In addition, all the other PW Categories fit the Guidelines, so I'm pretty sure this is needed. I'd just like to consult with fellow members of PW first. ;) 05:53, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. I don't really like the fact that there is a / between clans and groups, is there a better word that can cover both things? <span style="">23:41, Thu, Dec, 22, 2011

I don't think so... I was just thinking Clans/Groups. 00:48, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

That's okay, it was just.. kinda.. bugging me.

No, if you have a better idea, I'm all ears, but I certainly can't think of anything. Please sign with your signature. 00:40, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

I agree. If there are no objections, this category will be renamed. 00:52, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Moonstone/Mothermouth/Highstones
This has been tugging at my attention for days. I have a proposal: we should combine these three pages into a new one. My reasons are as following. These pages are interlinked anyway. I find that when writing about one in the History, it is hard not to mention the other. Mothermouth is completely infiltrated with any mentions of the Moonstone. Highstones can hardly be mentioned without Mothermouth. Really, Mothermouth is just a cave etched into Highstones. And the Moonstone is just a stone deep in the caverns of both. I see no reason why these pages shouldn't be merged; it simply makes sense to me. However, I'd like to hear opinions of all you. Yes, you. So comment! ;) 06:00, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

I agree. The page could be set out the same as the guidelines say under locations, but we could have maybe a heading or sub-heading of Mouthermouth or Moonstone, although I prefere Mouthermouth, becasue it's the bigger thing and contains the Moonstone. The new title to the whole page could be Highstones, since that is the area, and Mothermouth and Moonstone are contained in it. <span style="">23:47, Thu, Dec, 22, 2011

I also agree. The Forest territories aren't divided either, so ya. -- 00:15, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

I agree too. They are /basically/ the same thing. At least two of them are. <span style="">22:51 Fri Dec 23

This is a great idea! I completely agree. Any more comments? 00:54, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

I support, they're within the same region and all connected in many ways. And I agree with DJ, the article should be named Highstones as it's the title of the whole region. 22:19, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

I support as well. It's hard to edit Highstones without mentioning Mothermouth or Moonstone, and plus they're all basically the same anyways. They're in the same region anyways. 20:54, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Join Request ~ Mistypebble
Hi! I was wondering if I could join? 06:17, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Oops, sorry I didn't add you in sooner. Of course you can join! I'll add you in, and make sure to look at the Guidelines before nominating any pages. Welcome to the project! 21:55, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the project! <span style="">21:59 Wed Dec 28

Thank you! ^-^  01:10, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to PW Misty! <span style="">01:57, Thu, Dec, 29, 2011

Leaving
I've decided to leave this wiki....if you want to know why, look at my userpage. 10:19, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Aw! Bye Rainwillow :( <span style="">19:03 Thu Dec 29