Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Accepted 123

Petalfur (Q) - Approved
Comments? 18:12, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Define the shading 19:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Personally I think it's fine. It's rather clear, and defining it any more will make it look too dark. 20:04, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading and thicken it a bit around the belly and define it on the face and on her lifted forleg. I think there's also some waste on her back 03:24, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the tail shading, and I agree with Shinx- I think it could use some definition.

Smudge the earpink into the fur or vice versa. and if you have no clue what vice versa means don't sweat it. It is Latin--I think--literally meaning other way around. It currently looks too neat for a long furred cat. Keep it up! 17:21, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Smudging the ear pink is not required on these blanks. I don't smudge them on mine, and I know a couple others that don't either. Plus, it already looks like Feather smudged it- it's just not extravagant.

Re-uploaded. 17:52, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

She's looking a teensy bit cross eyed. Well done! Tigerbird-The-Great 01:15, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Thicken the shading on the belly and add depth all around. Define the light on the lifted forepaw 04:42, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Define the leg shading. 08:02, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

'''Re-uploaded. '''I left the eyes as they are: they look fine to me.

the hind leg shading seems off with the rest, its implying the light source is coming from the back while the rest says otherwise. swap it around? 11:29, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Brighten the white on the chest, legs, and paws. This is nice!! 18:14, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

It looks fine, imho. Theres shading there; of course its not going to look pure white. The only thing i think could be lightened would be the chest, and maybe the right leg. Also, define the facial shading. 02:23, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

'''Re-uploaded. ''' 15:57, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

CBA? I love this. 22:05 Sat Sep 20

Approved. 20:51, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Lizardpaw (A) ~ Approved
I love playing with texture c: Shading is dark on purpose to be defined and it is smudged so no blurring here. 03:44, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Blur and shicken the shading on the back and define your light source 04:40, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Or if you won't blur it, smudge it a bit more. It also causes the texture to get lost in it, so perhaps tweak the coloring of the shading a bit?

Re-uploaded. Lightened the shading a smidge, and smudged the back shading more. I also defined the texture under the shading some more so it'd be more visible, and I unshaded and shaded some things to make the light source more obvious. 13:46, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

It's probably just my phone screen but the shading is throwing off the colour a bit (making the image look a strange colour where it is). Maybe try tinting it? Dark red and dark blue with the layer on multply usually work well. however if it /is/ just me feel free to let me know/ignore this comment. 14:43 Sat Sep 13

I think it looks fine. But I'll look at it closely when I do another upload and check it out but to me it works with the color well. 14:59, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

What source are you using? I'm comparing it to the sources for multiple apprentice images, and I can't seem to find what source you're using. Enlighten me, if you don't mind? pun intended I think there'd be more shading on the haunch, and the back shading wouldn't be so thick.

Lol. Um I visioned this light source like the apprentice is on top of a hill watching the sunset. So it'd be almost straight at him but downwards a bit if ya get me. So I might need a bit more shading on the haunch and the tail so let me add those and then you tell me what ya think. 23:22, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Hope that makes a bit more sense. I'm not too good at shading apprentices. x.x 03:00, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Define and darken the shading a bit. I know it's there, but I'm having a rough time seeing where exactly it's placed.

Re-uploaded. Not going to touch the shading anymore, I don't want it to look weird or overworked. 12:34, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

There are ways to play with shading without making it "look weird". What are your settings, colors, ect? Also, what color is your base and texture? He's kinda looking a bit orange...or that could be my eyes. Idk about that last part- may want to get a second opinion.

It doesn't look orange to me. Looks light brown. My base color is #8b5531 and the texture color is #c17545 which turns him light brown. And my shading is a standard black. And you know what? "Look weird" was stupid wording on my end I really just meant to say overworked, so I'm striking "weird" out. 20:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I gotta agree with Skye here - he's looking orange. Try putting the texture layer on multiply, and then lighten it a bit 20:45, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Did what you suggested, Beebs. Thanks it looks so much better now. So much more light brown-y than before this. =D 23:16, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

May I have some comments? c: 20:45, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

You can have a CBA instead. 22:03 Sat Sep 20

Approved. 20:51, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Ashfur (TC) (Alt W) - Approved
He's cited pale gray, and he's said to have a dark pelt in Eclipse. I checked before I reserved, and he's not in any shadow at all- it's daylight. He's in undergrowth, but the dark pelt thing is mentioned before there's any indication of there being undergrowth.

Blur/smudge the shading, it kinda looks solid and you can't see the texture through it. This looks pretty, Cloudy! 22:14, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. I just redid the texture and tweaked the shading since it was kinda sloppy. I like this a lot more.

define the shading on his front leg. 11:22, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded.

Very pretty; CBA? 19:22, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Earpink? 19:00, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

I'll let this stay on CBA, since I think the earpink's fine. Please be specific with critiques. 19:52, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Approved. 20:51, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Sunstrike (Star) ~ Approved
As much as I tried, I couldn't bring much justice to her and her awesome name. Comments? 19:38, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Smudge the patches in the direction of her fur a bit more to match her other images. She looks great! 19:40, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's fine on the face and tail; I'm assuming you're talking aobut the main body, right? 19:43, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I meant along the back. I should've been more specific x3 19:51, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

re-up 20:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I can't see the earpink in ---> this ear. This is very pretty, Beebs! 22:17, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

White is looking a little gray. Nice job, Beelby! 10:27 PM, Wed Sep 17, 2014

Then what do you want me to do about it, Dark? It has shading - of course it'll appear a bit gray. re-up for Rocket's comment 23:30, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

re-up thank skt 23:34, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Define the tail shading a bit. This is lovely 10:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

re-up 20:43, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Can you smudge the white a little bit more? Like, on her belly and such? This is really stunning. *.*

re-up 19:29, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

This is lovely, so CBA? 20:30 Sun Sep 21

Approved. 20:51, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Whitetail (WC) (E) ~ Approved
Sooper happeh with how this came out, minus the earpink. Any help on that would be greatly appreicated. 4:34 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Make the shading more defined, I think it blurs out into the white a bit too much, it's looking a little gray. Jayie Unwritten words~ 16:46, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

reup 8:01 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Define the tail shading. Nice job! Tigerbird-The-Great 21:03, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

#thanx 9:16 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Define the depth of the shading some more. This is nice Rocket!! :) 21:28, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

I think the shading depth looks fine. Define the light on the tail? 14:28, September 14, 2014 (UTC)



Expand the light on the tail- I'd think there would be at least some there, that way it doesn't look all gray.

ship it never thought that onexwhite would be a couple so here have some tail white someone please kill tail shading forever thanx   6:50 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

Blur the light on the tail. 19:36, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

blurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 7:55 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

(I'msorry) Define the light on the front paws? 20:08, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

sooper (it'sokay) 12:20 AM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

What's up with this shading? o.o Did you forget to blur or smudge or accidentally erase something?

That's just my layers going haywire. I'll try to fix it. 3:05 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

fixed it so it's 10000000% more sooper B) 9:50 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

Rocket, changes are not showing for me. Mind giving a site to a photo viewer? 02:33, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

'''is it sooper yet? B) 10:16 PM, Wed Sep 17, 2014

Haha almost. It still looks a little like the shading is a straight line on the shoulder and chest. Give it a little blur over and I think this will be sooper =D 01:20, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

MOAR SOOPER 5:27 PM, Thu Sep 18, 2014

Blur the shoulder shading a bit more, looks a little solid still. Make it epically sooper!!! =] 18:08, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

much sooper someone take my keyboard away   8:15 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

There's waste all around the image. <span style="">22:02 Sat Sep 20

I don't see where there's waste but I'll check in the morning. <span style="">12:10 AM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

I don't see any waste, either. o_o However, define the belly shading a TIIIIIIIIIINY bit? 13:06, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

There's no waste, and also the light source I use does not have any shading on the belly. <span style="">2:27 PM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

Yes, there is waste. I print-screened this and pasted it onto paint. Then, I paint bucket filled the outside with black. Whatever is pale blue means that there's waste there, seen as paint doesn't care whether or not the colors are similar. The colors aren't the same, it doesn't fill that area. <span style="">17:05 Sun Sep 21

reup <span style="">5:19 PM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

CBA? Well done, dear.

Approved. 20:51, September 22, 2014 (UTC)