Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval= Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Mothflight (Queen) - For Approval
I am horribal at shading, but i'll fix it later Belllastar (talk) 16:19, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

You didnt reserve this. Also proper file naming and spelling are part of the rules. Please follow them. If you do get to keep this image, define shading depth and your light source. And don't align your images. 16:30, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

Umm.. your not a senoir warrior, I tryed to spell it right but I make mistakes. I'm kind of new to the project (I already said the shadings bad i might redo it) (I unalign it) Belllastar (talk) 22:36, December 15, 2015 (UTC)

You forgot a date on the reservation. Again, if you do get to keep it I don't think the eye colour matches. Either that or lighten the shading and/or the green 00:12, December 16, 2015 (UTC)

I know I'm not, but you need to follow the rules, Bella. Please use proper spelling and grammar. Just because you're new to the project is not an excuse to misspell words. You can use spellcheck. This file needs to be renamed File:Mothflight.queen.png 00:22, December 16, 2015 (UTC)

I renamed the file for you. Please remember to use proper grammar and follow the rules. 01:48, December 16, 2015 (UTC)\

I'm sorry if I was a little rude, I was just really just tired (the eyes are color picked from her warrior image, and I don't use shading.) Belllastar (talk) 03:59, December 16, 2015 (UTC)

If you don't use shading then how are you shading your image? Whatever it is, it should be smoothed out and defined. 04:08 Wed Dec 16

It doesn't match the rest of the her images though. I think you should colour pick from something which has larger eyes (say, the ES or her StarClan image). 04:29, December 16, 2015 (UTC)

nah, I'm sure Bella is telling the truth. I think it matches enough- the only problem with the image right now is only that the shading is overblurred and undefined. Perhaps try to erase some of the shading where it wouldn't be needed, then run the blur tool over the edges carefully? 13:24, December 17, 2015 (UTC)

Define the light on the legs?  ❄ Blossomstream White Christmas  13:57, December 17, 2015 (UTC)

Add some depth to the shading. — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  16:14, December 18, 2015 (UTC)

Still working? 14:16, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Yes I have a week full of tests so I have been busy can I upload tomorrow?

You have until the end of day tomorrow (22 December) to upload. If you don't, then it'll need to be declined, as per PCA's rules.

REups tryed to fix shading, I think I will redo it though --Belllastar (talk) 18:56, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I think you should get rid of the eyelashes since the blanks don't have eyelashes anymore. 23:46, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I think the shading could be defined more.-- 23:48, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Define the light on the legs, chest, and tail. Also, define the shading depth a little. 23:54, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Remove the eyelashes. 02:02, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Try not to use pure white as the base (unless the base is acctullly pure white) but it just seems to bright. 16:01, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Pure white as a base is perfectly acceptable. I use pure white all the time (and none of my cats have anything but pure white as their base), as do many other users. Saying "try not to use pure white" gives off the air that using pure white is forbidden, when it's very much not. I actually think it's not too bright at all.

oh. ok. Well could you darken and define the shading? I can't see it on my computer. 20:33, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

Stagleap (GC) (Star) ~ For Approval
I tried to match it. I really did. 14:37 Sat Dec 19

Define the shading and make the earpink larger. 14:55, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

I think the stripes are thicker on the warrior. 14:59, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

Where the light is coming from? Also stripes... they shouldn't be horizontal. They should be perpendicular to his back, directed towards belly. S i l v e r t w i g  15:02, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

The source is over -->, and a bit downwards. To me the shading seems very dark... Could I have a second opinion on that? (I'll fix the stripes and earpink soon) 20:51 Sat Dec 19

Maybe not necessarily darkened but I think it could be thickened. 21:36 Sat Dec 19

Smooth out the shading by whatever means you pick; I don't care if you smudge or blur it, tbh.

The stripes on the warrior are going in one direction; towards the stomach. Could you tweak it so the stripes run towards the belly? — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  12:46, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Thickened and reorientated stripes, defined and smudged shading, and enlarged earpink. 22:27 Mon Dec 21

The earpink should be enlarged more. <span style="">04:45 Tue Dec 22

That's the earpink style I'm using, it's supposed to be small. It's very similarly sized on the warrior image. <span style="">19:02 Tue Dec 22

earpink size and shape doesnt have to match. I think it should be enlarged too. 16:03, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded *holds up hands in defeat* I've been outvoted. More realistic this way anyway. <span style="">4:04 Thu Dec 24

The way your shading is it seems like there's blurred lineart and the light source isn't exactly realistic. Could you switch the shading down near the paws and expand it some more? 15:08, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

this is so osm!

The stripes don't seem to match the warrior very well. On the warrior, the stripes are kind of broken up and are arranged in a more orderly pattern.

The stripes are more long and horizontal (to the body) and there aren't many Ys. They are also denser I think. Do you need the file?

Dew (ES)- Declined
<font color="#9facf4">S <font color="#90b0f0">i <font color="#80b4ec">l <font color="#71b9e9">v <font color="#61bde5">e <font color="#52c1e1">r <font color="#54c7df">t <font color="#55cddd">w <font color="#57d2da">i <font color="#58d8d8">g  15:04, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth out the shading on the tail, and please do not align your images. 14:23, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Remove the eyelashes- we are no longer using different blanks for different genders.

Could you fix the pupils it looks as though there are none. -- 00:28, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I think eyes are artist's choice. Do you mind smoothing out the main body shading just a bit as well? <span style="">04:43 Tue Dec 22

We no longer use eyelashes to define gender. Could you remove them? — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  16:30, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Still working?

omg this is osm!---coffeelover

Coffeelover, compliments are nice, but they are considered as spam. Please do not make a comment if you do not offer any critique.

Declined due to lack of work. 02:22, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Blue Whisker (Alt. Q) ~ CBA


Also, I know there's waste. I'll get rid of it.

smudge the tail and back leg/that area around the base of her tail so it isn't as hard edged. 10:44, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Killed all the waste too.

This is amazing! Are the gray streaks on her chest texture or shading? Either way, it could be smoothed out/smudged a tad.  ❄ Blossomstream White Christmas  03:11, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Thank you so much :) It's texture.

Remove the eyelashes, we don't need them anymore. — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  16:29, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

re-uploaded i thought i removed them... :/

oh my gosh this is so beautiful the fox girl! - cheese!

CBA? 02:21, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Blue Whisker (Ki) ~ For Approval
shulk from nintendo (thanks for uploading for me David) <span style="">14:05 Sun Dec 20

For reference, the base color is #ffd25a, the stripes are #d19d11 on multiply. The legs have a pale color (#ffedd0). There are two layers of texture. (#deb74e on multiply and #f1e1b6 on screen) I think you matched this pretty well.

Define the main body shading and the facial shading. 14:21, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Still working?

Yes, I just haven't had the time to upload this week. I'll try to get it up tomorrow. <span style="">14:14 Sun Dec 27

Pearnose (MCA) ~ CBA
Comments? 10:31, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

Lighten up the shading some? 17:31, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

Reups  23:52, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

Reups Removed eyelashes 00:58, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

define shading on the herbs. nice! 16:04, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Reuploaded 00:48, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Comments before approval? 22:41, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Bubbling Stream (Ki) ~ CBA
^.^ <span style="">14:39 Mon Dec 21

There's white waste around the right side.

Define the shading everywhere?  ❄ Blossomstream White Christmas  03:28, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

reup <span style="">12:42 Tue Dec 22

reup Changed the shading tint to match ES. <span style="">14:34 Thu Dec 24

Comments? (Am I allowed to ask...second upload was only because the tint looked a little weird to me) <span style="">12:23 Sat Dec 26

CBA? <span style="">19:11 Sun Dec 27

Mud Paws (ES) - CBA
I used highlights for the first time in like four years <span style="">21:42 Mon Dec 21

Smudge the earpink and define the shading. 02:19, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I honestly think the highlights could be dulled down or smoothed out much more- right now it makes him look shiny, like he was made out of plastic. 06:12, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

define shading on the tail. There is extra waste between his upper neck part and the whiskers. 16:06, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

reuploaded. how's this? I lowered the highlight opacity quite a bit. <span style="">07:54 Thu Dec 24

Comments before approval? 02:38, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

I know I'm not in PCA so I might not know what I'm talking about, but it seems like there is a sudden transition from the neck to the face (it's bright above the chin, and is suddenly darker below). 16:02, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

reuploaded-ish. I think what you're seeing is texture. I blurred the shading layer around that area and smudged the texture upwards around that area, but it might've been too small of a change to be noticed. <span style="">19:11 Sun Dec 27

No, I can see the difference. I'm pretty much clueless on what texture and shading and all of that is, but regardless I think it's better now ^.^ 19:25, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-CBA? 22:40, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Spider Paw (Ki) ~ For Approval
14:10, December 22, 2015 (UTC

Is there a way you can represent his extra toe? -- 18:59, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I tried, but with the size of the paw it's near impossible, sorry. It just looked silly. 21:23, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

It's fine don't worry -- 23:20, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Instead of a lineart change, maybe try shaping the toes with shading? That way, it would be easier to define that extra toe feature. I'm sure you could ask jayie for tips, considering she does that on a majority of her chararts. 21:48, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

I've tried doing what Jayie does with the toes before, but that ended in disaster. Is it really necessary? Besides, the early settler's extra toe is on the left side of the (our) left paw - on this blank, with the paw angle, it's going to look too awkward. 00:00, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

whiskers and such weren't edited on featherwhisker and such because there was no lineart for it, I think the same applies here. (to the toes obviously) 00:01, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

If there's no lineart, then it's not necessary unless you're feeling up to it. If you've already tried and couldn't get anywhere, then it's fine as it is. We didn't add anything to Featherwhisker's kit, so we can use the same logic here.

Okay I've been sitting at my computer for the last hour trying to do something with that toe, but nothing's working out, so I don't think I can do anything with it. 14:38, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

Define the shading depth, please.

This is awesome! Maybe you could sharpen the ear-pink? 02:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Mouse (MFV) (Rogue) - For Evaluation
This is my first character art! I know it probably needs work.

-- 15:16, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I renamed the file for you. Make sure to upload it under Mouse (MFV).rogue.png whenever you do changes. Also, define the shading and make the graying muzzle more visible. 15:39, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed shading and added grading muzzle

Define shading depth and remove the waste(on his back) 16:05, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload cleaned up lineart and attempted to define shading depth.

Define the shading on the legs,and i think you could darken it a bit 17:30, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Don't forget to sign your signature. Blur the transition from highlight to pelt, and add some more depth to the shading as well. <span style="">17:37 Tue Dec 22

'Reupload ' I cleaned it up a bit -- 18:31, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth it out here http://www.ezimba.com/work/151223C/ezimba11233719670500.png and define tail shading 18:43, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload  I fixed what was said. -- 18:55, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Define light on the legs? <span style="">19:04 Tue Dec 22

Reupload I defined the light on the legs but if I did it any lighter it would not be brown. -- 23:49, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I still think the light could be defined more on the legs. Also, blur the main body shading. 22:59, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload added more light to legs and blurred body -- 23:49, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Don't thumb your images, please.

Sorry I never knew -- 05:17, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Could you add some light to the back leg furthest away from us?  ❄ Blossomstream White Christmas  05:21, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

There isn't meant to be any? -- 05:31, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

This looks really nice! Could you define the shading on the tail a little? <span style="">05:23 Wed Dec 23

Reupload defined shading, changed to full size and added some light to backleg -- 05:37, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Nice! Add light to the leg furthest away from us. 06:11, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed light issue with back leg-- 06:44, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

the shading looks over blurred. Also, define the shading on the legs closest to us a blur it slightly more on the ones farthest from us. the tail shading could be smoothed out as well. 15:58, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload I defined shading but I don't see how it is over blurred. -- 17:16, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth the shading out a lot more.

Reupload tried to smooth it but if I smooth it out to much I lose the shading. -- 11:13, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

Please reupload under File:Mouse (MFV).rogue.png. This is the only file that can be used once it gets approved, and you were already asked once about using the proper file name.

Reupload I apologise but I made a mistake no need to get angry, I'm new. -- 21:48, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not angry. I'm just telling you that you were already asked before about the proper file name. Define the shading too.

Reupload defined shading 13:13, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Needlepaw (A) ~ For Approval
i'll probably alter that shading later 22:39, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

reuploaded tweaked it 22:53, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Can you define the chest shading? 01:56, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

reuploaded 17:19, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

Define the haunch shading. 02:36, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

withdrawing 23:01, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded: I took over so uh I don't know if I need to archive it or not. 23:55, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Red Claw (ES) - For Approval
All colors from the loner and rogue.

CBA? 02:20, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Again, I'm not in PCA so you might not want to take my word for it, but the shadow for the neck seems a bit too dark... Also, I don't know if it's just me, but there seems to be some odd bit of extra lineart to the very left of where the chin and body meet. 17:13, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Remember to change the title when you interrupt a CBA. 22:38, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. It wasn't lineart, it was harder-edged shading.

Robinwing (Star) - For Approval
15:04, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

Define the facial shading a bit?

with the eye style you're going for, I think the white that surrounds a cat eye would probably be visible. your choice though. 17:17, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

Re-ups 18:49, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

the eyes look strange can u fix that

no, they don't. and leave a signature when you comment. 06:02, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

how do u do that???---coffeelover

To sign, place 4 "~"s after you comment.

Could you smooth out the transition from shading to pelt a little more? This looks lovely. <span style="">08:18 Sat Dec 26

Could you add some depth to the face? You've made her look so beautiful. — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  14:50, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-ups Thanks c: 15:33, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Rooktail (Star) - For Approval
'Sup. Still not dropping the fact he looks like a piece of coal. If there are comments, I'd appreciate it. .incandescentflame (talk) 09:24, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Since this is your first image, the title should be "For Evaluation" (I've changed it for you) for the image, you should try to define the earpink by using a dull pink color. Nice^^

so pretty omg i wanna hang this!!!!!!!

The eyes are gorgeous! Could you blur the chest shading a bit? <span style="">21:52 Sat Dec 26

Could you define the shading? It blends in with his coat colour. — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  23:48, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

You didn't reserve this. I'll reserve it for you this time, and this is nice for your first image. 02:05, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thank you to all the compliments, I really appreciate it. Anyway, I realized I forgot the earpink layer haha. I did everything people asked me to, so here we go. .incandescentflame (talk) 02:12, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Nice job, incandescent, I'll promote you into an apprentice. You seem to know what you are doing well. 02:42, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Should this not be named for evaluation? 12:27, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Burnt promoted Incandescent to apprentice, so no, it shouldn't be 'for evaluation' anymore. 14:37, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Isn't that against rules I thought to become an apprentice you needed to have one piece of art approved? Sorry if that seemed rude just trying to understand. 15:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

kits become apprentices when it's deemed they have a good enough understanding of a charart. it doesn't have to be aporoved for that. 16:40, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Tiny Branch (Ki) ~ For Approval
13:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Tanglefur (E) ~ For Approval
23:58, December 27, 2015 (UTC)