Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval= Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Stagleap (GC) (Star) ~ For Approval
I tried to match it. I really did. 14:37 Sat Dec 19

Define the shading and make the earpink larger. 14:55, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

I think the stripes are thicker on the warrior. 14:59, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

Where the light is coming from? Also stripes... they shouldn't be horizontal. They should be perpendicular to his back, directed towards belly. S i l v e r t w i g  15:02, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

The source is over -->, and a bit downwards. To me the shading seems very dark... Could I have a second opinion on that? (I'll fix the stripes and earpink soon) 20:51 Sat Dec 19

Maybe not necessarily darkened but I think it could be thickened. 21:36 Sat Dec 19

Smooth out the shading by whatever means you pick; I don't care if you smudge or blur it, tbh.

The stripes on the warrior are going in one direction; towards the stomach. Could you tweak it so the stripes run towards the belly? — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  12:46, December 20, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Thickened and reorientated stripes, defined and smudged shading, and enlarged earpink. 22:27 Mon Dec 21

The earpink should be enlarged more. 04:45 Tue Dec 22

That's the earpink style I'm using, it's supposed to be small. It's very similarly sized on the warrior image. <span style="">19:02 Tue Dec 22

earpink size and shape doesnt have to match. I think it should be enlarged too. 16:03, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded *holds up hands in defeat* I've been outvoted. More realistic this way anyway. <span style="">4:04 Thu Dec 24

The way your shading is it seems like there's blurred lineart and the light source isn't exactly realistic. Could you switch the shading down near the paws and expand it some more? 15:08, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

this is so osm!

The stripes don't seem to match the warrior very well. On the warrior, the stripes are kind of broken up and are arranged in a more orderly pattern.

The stripes are more long and horizontal (to the body) and there aren't many Ys. They are also denser I think. Do you need the file?

Re-uploaded Yes, please, I would like the file. My email is butterflycupcakeprincess@gmail.com. I'm not really seeing what you mean about the shading looking like blurred lineart, Appledash, and I can't switch the shading on the paws. The light is from the --> of the paws. Could you explain what you mean? <span style="">2:26 Mon Dec 28

I actually realized I don't have the file on this computer... I got it done at school which means I can't get it until someday in January. But I can tell you that I did the stripes with a 2px or 3px brush (depends on the detailed-ness) and smudged along the direction of the stripes with a 2px brush. I hope that helps. The stripes are also more like "" shapes rather than just thick lines.

Re-uploaded Redid stripes and shading. It still doesn't look right. <span style="">16:27 Mon Dec 28

Add some more stripes on the tail to match the warrior. You're doing great! — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  16:37, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! There are the same number of stripes on the warrior's tail, the blank is simply smaller. I can make them bigger, if you think that's a good idea. <span style="">17:16 Mon Dec 28

Sounds good to me. — ☆ paper  ·  finches  ★  17:25, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Thickened stripes. <span style="">18:24 Mon Dec 28

Define the earpink. 19:16, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded <span style="">2:32 Tue Dec 29

I really love this shading you have now! So I managed to actually did the file out in google drive (might have chucked it after getting it done ages ago) so the file should be sent to your email now^^

Re-uploaded Thanks! Matched the colors from the file. <span style="">15:04 Tue Dec 29

I love that shading, CBA?

the chin looks black ---coffeelover

It doesn't look black... Although some light could be added to it so that it doesn't look too flat. .incandescentflame (talk) 07:50, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Define the shading on the tail. 11:18, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Thanks, Fox! Defined tail shading; defined light on chin. <span style="">16:51 Wed Dec 30

The stripes don't look like they flow with the fur or the back. Sorry for the bad explanation but can you move them around so they do flow with the fur? 21:46, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Could you explain where I should move them to? <span style="">22:56 Wed Dec 30

Spider Paw (Ki) ~ For Approval
14:10, December 22, 2015 (UTC

Is there a way you can represent his extra toe? -- 18:59, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I tried, but with the size of the paw it's near impossible, sorry. It just looked silly. 21:23, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

It's fine don't worry -- 23:20, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Instead of a lineart change, maybe try shaping the toes with shading? That way, it would be easier to define that extra toe feature. I'm sure you could ask jayie for tips, considering she does that on a majority of her chararts. 21:48, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

I've tried doing what Jayie does with the toes before, but that ended in disaster. Is it really necessary? Besides, the early settler's extra toe is on the left side of the (our) left paw - on this blank, with the paw angle, it's going to look too awkward. 00:00, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

whiskers and such weren't edited on featherwhisker and such because there was no lineart for it, I think the same applies here. (to the toes obviously) 00:01, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

If there's no lineart, then it's not necessary unless you're feeling up to it. If you've already tried and couldn't get anywhere, then it's fine as it is. We didn't add anything to Featherwhisker's kit, so we can use the same logic here.

Okay I've been sitting at my computer for the last hour trying to do something with that toe, but nothing's working out, so I don't think I can do anything with it. 14:38, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

Define the shading depth, please.

This is awesome! Maybe you could sharpen the ear-pink? 02:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Reups 15:59, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth out the shading some more? This is cute!

I think the shading looks pretty messy, not to offend. It looks like it was smudged out in completely random directions- Perhaps either do what The Fox Girl suggested, or try and neaten the smudge marks with a small smudge tool brush. .incandescentflame (talk) 07:11, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

I think the shading looks fine, it just needs to be defined more 12:06, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

I don't think it needs to be defined, I can see it just fine. But I do agree with Fox. 13:31, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Mouse (MFV) (Rogue) - For Evaluation
This is my first character art! I know it probably needs work.

-- 15:16, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I renamed the file for you. Make sure to upload it under Mouse (MFV).rogue.png whenever you do changes. Also, define the shading and make the graying muzzle more visible. 15:39, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed shading and added grading muzzle

Define shading depth and remove the waste(on his back) 16:05, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload cleaned up lineart and attempted to define shading depth.

Define the shading on the legs,and i think you could darken it a bit 17:30, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Don't forget to sign your signature. Blur the transition from highlight to pelt, and add some more depth to the shading as well. <span style="">17:37 Tue Dec 22

'Reupload ' I cleaned it up a bit -- 18:31, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth it out here http://www.ezimba.com/work/151223C/ezimba11233719670500.png and define tail shading 18:43, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload  I fixed what was said. -- 18:55, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Define light on the legs? <span style="">19:04 Tue Dec 22

Reupload I defined the light on the legs but if I did it any lighter it would not be brown. -- 23:49, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

I still think the light could be defined more on the legs. Also, blur the main body shading. 22:59, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload added more light to legs and blurred body -- 23:49, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Don't thumb your images, please.

Sorry I never knew -- 05:17, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Could you add some light to the back leg furthest away from us?  ❄ Blossomstream White Christmas  05:21, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

There isn't meant to be any? -- 05:31, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

This looks really nice! Could you define the shading on the tail a little? <span style="">05:23 Wed Dec 23

Reupload defined shading, changed to full size and added some light to backleg -- 05:37, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Nice! Add light to the leg furthest away from us. 06:11, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed light issue with back leg-- 06:44, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

the shading looks over blurred. Also, define the shading on the legs closest to us a blur it slightly more on the ones farthest from us. the tail shading could be smoothed out as well. 15:58, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload I defined shading but I don't see how it is over blurred. -- 17:16, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth the shading out a lot more.

Reupload tried to smooth it but if I smooth it out to much I lose the shading. -- 11:13, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

Please reupload under File:Mouse (MFV).rogue.png. This is the only file that can be used once it gets approved, and you were already asked once about using the proper file name.

Reupload I apologise but I made a mistake no need to get angry, I'm new. -- 21:48, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not angry. I'm just telling you that you were already asked before about the proper file name. Define the shading too.

Reupload defined shading 13:13, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Velvet, please don't re-upload your image under any name except File:Mouse (MFV).rogue.png. Define the shading a bit more. 14:07, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed naming issue ( sorry my bad I didn't even think) and I redid the whole image in gimp on my computer instead of the app I was using on my ipad. 20:40, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Define and darken the shading.

Maybe add some shading to the head and the legs? .incandescentflame (talk) 07:07, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

you spelt it wrong. it's rogue, not rouge. 11:15, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload apologies for the file name mix up 12:02, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Define the shading on the front legs and tail. Also, please don't align your images. 12:11, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload fixed shading and I have never aligned my images 17:19, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload I have spent an hour trying to fix the shading on the front legs but I just can't 21:21, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload ah ha fixed it 00:04, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Rooktail (Star) - CBA
'Sup. Still not dropping the fact he looks like a piece of coal. If there are comments, I'd appreciate it. .incandescentflame (talk) 09:24, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Since this is your first image, the title should be "For Evaluation" (I've changed it for you) for the image, you should try to define the earpink by using a dull pink color. Nice^^

so pretty omg i wanna hang this!!!!!!!

The eyes are gorgeous! Could you blur the chest shading a bit? <span style="">21:52 Sat Dec 26

Could you define the shading? It blends in with his coat colour. — ☆ ｐａｐｅｒ  ·  ｆｉｎｃｈｅｓ  ★  23:48, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

You didn't reserve this. I'll reserve it for you this time, and this is nice for your first image. 02:05, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thank you to all the compliments, I really appreciate it. Anyway, I realized I forgot the earpink layer haha. I did everything people asked me to, so here we go. .incandescentflame (talk) 02:12, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Nice job, incandescent, I'll promote you into an apprentice. You seem to know what you are doing well. 02:42, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Should this not be named for evaluation? 12:27, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Burnt promoted Incandescent to apprentice, so no, it shouldn't be 'for evaluation' anymore. 14:37, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

Isn't that against rules I thought to become an apprentice you needed to have one piece of art approved? Sorry if that seemed rude just trying to understand. 15:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

kits become apprentices when it's deemed they have a good enough understanding of a charart. it doesn't have to be aporoved for that. 16:40, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

wow but the tail looks like a popsicle!

I'm confused.... How does it look like a popsicle? It looks perfectly like a cat's tail, I'll be honest. And I don't think I can tweak the linear art, but if other agree that it looks like a popsicle, then I'll gladly tweak it. .incandescentflame (talk) 04:14, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't look like a popsicle. Don't tweak it - it's the lineart. 04:15, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

Could you define the earpink in the shading a little more? <span style="">07:57 Mon Dec 28

Re-uploaded. Of course I can, Splook. .incandescentflame (talk) 11:06, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

This is very nice for your first Charart. Let's go CBA.

Excuse me, The Fox Girl, but what's a CBA? Does this mean my image is rejected or approved? .incandescentflame (talk) 07:05, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

CBA means 'comments before approval', which is like a 'last call for comments'. If there are none in 24 hours then your image is approved. <span style="">07:52 Wed Dec 30

Ok, Splook, I see. Thank you Fox, for the CBA, I really appreciate it. .incandescentflame (talk) 07:53, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Tiny Branch (Ki) ~ CBA
13:43, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

CBA? <span style="">22:40 Tue Dec 29

Tanglefur (E) ~ CBA
23:58, December 27, 2015 (UTC)

oh god so beautiful but the head looks too big!!!

It doesn't look too big. He's supposed to use the proper linear art. 03:58, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

Also make sure to sign when you leave a comment. 03:58, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

it says thick, knotted fur, so that's what I did. 07:52, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

CBA?

Mothflight (Q) - For Approval
Relying on a senior's speed to write a 2000 word essay for vacation potential isn't fun... But anyway, let's try this again. 10:38, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Smooth out the shading a little on the back leg closest to us and on the tail. 14:23, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 03:57, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

she looks like she has makeup on! can u fix? ---coffeelover

I don't really think she looks like she has makeup on... My voice is just one in the whole project, though. .incandescentflame (talk) 07:09, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

She doesn't look like she has make up on. Don't change it.

I thought we didn't use eyelashes anymore? 08:08, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Re-uploaded Removed eyelashes. 08:40, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Rockfall (Star) - For Approval
me: complains about shading a gray cat. me: does another gray cat. <span style="">21:39 Tue Dec 29

She looks a tad darker than the rest of her images. Maybe define the shape of the shading and see if that helps. 02:41, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Maybe give the shading a careful blur along the edges with a 5 pixel brush so that it won't look like it's leaking as much as it is right now. .incandescentflame (talk) 07:07, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

reuploaded. Too hard edged? <span style="">22:03 Wed Dec 30

Thunderstar (Alt L.) ~ For Approval
21:28, December 30, 2015 (UTC)