Warriors Wiki talk:Characters

Sharptooth
Hello! I was talking to Jayce and Echo on Discord, and we were discussing whether we should make a general page for all Sharptooths (since that is what mountain lions are called in both DotC and NP) and include Moonrise's Sharptooth as a major example, or keep the article we have for Sharptooth (NP) and create a separate general Sharptooth page. Personally, I like the first option better, as that contains all the information about all Sharptooths in the series on one article. What are everyone's thoughts? 23:00, December 10, 2018 (UTC)

They should definitely be separate, since the Sharptooth article we have now is referring to one character, not a species as a whole. Given they were mentioned in at least two arcs, it's not like it's just a one-off mention. If other species also get pages (Stoats just got one, I think), I'm pretty sure they should be separate. The discussion would start here due to the Sharptooth page itself falling to PC. ​

I'm all for the second option you provided, Hawkey, since like Jayce said the Sharptooth in TNP was pivotal character in the series, though the species as a whole is still worth having its own article. 02:34, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

Yeah sure, they are characters after all^^ Not sure if they've ever appeared in the field guides, but we could try to find their images if they have them 18:33, December 16, 2018 (UTC)

I think we should have two separate articles, seeing as the one in Moonrise played an important part and deserves an article to themselves.

Yeah I think there should be a species page then a character page for the Sharptooth in NP, since it was pretty important.Stealth f🔥re ❤Warriors Forever!❤  23:16, December 24, 2018 (UTC)

I like the idea~Owlmask

yeah, sure. 00:37, December 26, 2018 (UTC)

Shadowkit ~ Silver Nomination
04:01, December 27, 2018 (UTC)

Lightkit ~ Silver Nomination
04:01, December 27, 2018 (UTC)

Pouncekit ~ Silver Nomination
04:01, December 27, 2018 (UTC)

ravenpaw and barley
so relooking at this cite, I think ravenpaw and barley should be listed as mates. youd associate living with each other (and being in love obvs) as partners, and its not refuting anything thats ever been said in the books, rf specificially. not to mention one of violets kits asking them if they had kits, as well as spottedleaf telling ravenpaw barley would not love him any less for dying and leaving him behind....seems to really say it all. kits have never been a concrete requirement for mates anyway, like squirrelfight and brambleclaw and twigbranch and finleap. 18:17, December 28, 2018 (UTC)

we should add them as mates. although it doesn’t state barley loved ravenpaw back as much, we still have plenty of proof in the books.

18:29, December 28, 2018 (UTC)

There's an abundance of evidence, especially in Ravenpaw's Farewell and the mangas. Like, to the point where it's obvious that the authors really want to explicitly call them mates but they simply aren't allowed to by the editors/publishers. I agree that they should be listed as mates. 18:33, December 28, 2018 (UTC)

<3 Please, please, please let's do this. 21:49, December 28, 2018 (UTC)

I agree with adding this^^

One-off cites
Wanted to bring up something that we have several instances of - from what I can remember, on Mudfur (mottled), Firestar (dark ginger), Jayfeather (mottled?), Tawnypelt's pale cite. As a standard though, when cats are mentioned many many many times, I think it's bad precedent to include these descriptors on their articles. Some of these cats has PoVs, books to themselves....take Mudfur, who's solid in his image appearance in manga, yet has one mottled cite, so it sticks yet contradicting that. While we haven't given images credence in the past, PCA has deemed to recognize that these images are official, so perhaps PC should too.

Flametail was mentioned as dark ginger in his very first appearance, but in the hundreds of mentions afterwards, he's just as ginger, and is reflected in his official artwork. The most notable case is probably Firestar, who is flame-colored. Fire provides light... and in his artwork (barring a nighttime shot in RP where the lighting ids dark) he is shown as bright. While nothing directly contradicts, I personally believe we should not be listing him as dark ginger, and everyone said to look like him made to be dark ginger, due to one mention in FQ based on everything else we have. Why should we continue to list these, when they contradict evidence to the contrary? If they are mentioned more than once, and nothing else contradicts, they would be valid, but in these and other cases I believe they're null. I believe we should alter the guidelines on descriptions officially in PC, to account for cases like this. Thoughts?

Icons
An idea thought up by Icy, for the infoboxes. Thoughts?

Graystripe's parents
For the longest time, we have had Willowpelt and Patchpelt listed as Graystripe's parents. Except for the fact that they... are brother and sister. Per this, I believe that we should remove this cite from Graystripe's page. It was mentioned once, and the precedence of the fact that the two are siblings should ride over this mention. 02:43, December 29, 2018 (UTC)