User talk:Moons-A-Glow Werecat/Archive 2

eagles
I arleady told you, stop talking about this! It's becoming extremely annoying. I didn't say that there's a page about eagles, I just said that I wanted to create one, because two cats were killed and many others were almost killed by eagles.

When I saw the message, I would bet that the sender was you.

Falcon 49 (talk) 20:51, February 8, 2016 (UTC)Falcon 49Falcon 49 (talk) 20:51, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

that's ok,but now please stop. Can you please delete our discussion on Werebeasts Wikia?

Falcon 49 (talk) 21:26, February 8, 2016 (UTC)Falcon 49Falcon 49 (talk) 21:26, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Listen
I hope this doesn't come across a rude but midnight is not going to get art because she isn't a cat also you can't just post blanks, they need to be discussed first then voted on and finally submitted. I just thought I should tell you.

If we were to have one you would need to post a small paragraph on the talk page of project characters art stating why you think we need that blank but since it's not a real rank you can't really do anything. I'm sorry. 22:06, February 8, 2016 (UTC)

Blanks
Hi Moon. Please do not make any more images for the ranks of cats you think need "improvement". They are fine the way they are, and if you think they aren't, you need to take it up with PC/PCA on their talk pages, not post the art on the approval page. 00:37, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Images
Hi Moon. Just popping in to let you know you are only allowed one image on your userpage. Please delete all but one image (probably not the one in your charcat template), or the admins will have to delete all of them. Thanks! 19:15, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Hi I saw your comment on Snow's page, SnowedLightning has only one image it just has two cats in it. 23:53, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Bright Stream
Hey, Moons-A-Glow Werecat, would you mind being careful with your words about what you said about Bright Stream on your profile? Because that is really offensive to many people who are or have been depressed and/or may be having suicidal thoughts. Also, that is pretty harsh about what you said about Bright Stream. Thanks.

Midnight
We do not use artwork as references. And given that the location of their original territories is actually based upon somewhere in England, I very much doubt the legitimacy of your statement. If you can back it up with citations from the authors that this series does take place in America, then I think you can add it back. Other than that, this series is fictional and as far as I know, does not take place in any specific country.

The picture we had was more than acceptable, so if you want to change it, you're going to need a reason as to why. If you claim it's an American Badger, you need citations from the authors that show this; artwork is not a valid citation here, as there have been many mistakes before, and bound to be many mistakes in the future.

You want to change what's been here for the longest time, based on something you have no evidence for. We have a badger's description, and we have a picture of a badger. While it's not the one that you agree with, burden of proof falls on you to provide a citation as to which kind of badger we should depict, considering there is nothing wrong with what we have. The authors are British, and one of the main locations is based upon something in England. I believe that is why we have the picture we do. You want to change it, then you need a citation. We don't need to provide evidence- we have it.

As I've said before, artwork is not a valid citation for this wiki.

Block
Hello. Due to your constant disruptiveness and editing articles despite what other users say and constant bickering, you have been granted a one week block. Please refresh yourself on the rules prior to editing once more. Regards, 17:51, February 14, 2016 (UTC) (Was blocked for being autistic lol)

yes I should've but stop complaining. it's disgusting and inappropriate for a wiki aimed at children. 19:10, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

literally anyone? you don't know who's on this site at any given time. and it doesn't matter. it's inappropriate and like icy said if it goes back you'll get in trouble for it. 19:25, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

no, she didn't. she banned you because you refused to listen to anything. :/ and because a lot of people don't want to read that? 19:30, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

you add it back again and you'll end up blocked again, and it's not my fault lol. 19:35, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

Re:
Do not put it back. I didn't ban you because I didn't like you or you're autistic, and I didn't remove that because I didn't like you. Do not put that back in. That is way too innapropriate for this wiki and you are not allowed to put it back. 19:57, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

Yes it violates rules. No you are not allowed to put it back regardless if you change it or not. It's extremely innappropriate. 23:10, February 23, 2016 (UTC)

Alright, so.
Moon, you were not banned because you're autistic. Trust me, that's the furthest thing from the truth. You were constantly adding things without proper citations (as I've explained, your wiki that you created is not a valid citation), and getting into edit wars (as well as being extremely rude) with the other users when you are told "no".

What you have is not a bad thing. We do not discriminate here. To do so would be extremely hypocritical. I have the same thing you do, and I'm an administrator. I can relate on not totally following directions, because I often don't understand what I'm told. But, at the same time, saying "I don't listen because I'm autistic" is actually kinda rude itself, and you're blaming your actions on what you have, instead of taking responsibility for your actions.

Your quote is extremely graphic, and many of us here are avid animal lovers. It's not appropriate for children, or anyone for that matter, and it needed to be removed. Sure, I doubt many people are going to see it, but what if a little kid is clicking around and comes across it? If their parents see that, the child isn't going to be allowed to use the wiki anymore, and maybe not even read the series. What parent would actually allow a child to continue to visit a website with graphic content such as that on editors' userpages?

It's a fact of life that you're going to find people who don't agree with you. If you're saying something we don't believe, then find a citation to back it up. Burden of proof doesn't fall on the people who disagree with you in order to prove you wrong. It means you need to prove yourself right. I've been in many disagreements like that before, and it's a rough thing to deal with.

do you have to message me every time I revert an edit of yours? the website said they have blunt claws, not that they're unable to leave claw marks. you can't put what you think in there and say the source said it when it didn't. 17:00, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

too bad. if it doesn't outright say they can't scratch, it's not being added. 17:08, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

Re:
Leave it alone. Your source was a game website. Dogs can leave marks. Do you think my dog hasn't scratched me and I haven't bled tremendously? 17:34, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/search?q=dog+scratches&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=969&site=webhp&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjhud_E-JDLAhXGMSYKHWpPD0cQ_AUIBigB (blood warning, don't click if you're scared by that) 17:39, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

Your Edit
Hello. I have seen the edits you keep making to the trivia on Brightheart's page saying that because dogs have blunt claws in comparison to cats means they are unable to scratch and leave marks. And you keep posting non-scientific references for it. I personally study and work with animals and have had both dogs and cats throughout my entire life. Believe me when I tell you that not only is a game site not a credible source for that kind of information, but you are in fact attempting to spread false information. I have more marks from dogs scratching me than I do cats, and a dog certainly can leave a pretty decent sized mark that will bleed. I know I am not an admin and you will most likely just tell me I am being mean or that I am wrong, but unless you can find credible sources with scientific proof of this, it will keep being reverted. 17:43 Wed Feb 24

Um, ever hear of autocorrect on phones that sometimes changes what you type to something similar but not intended? And there you go, I changed it if it was that huge of an issue that you decided to edit my message. I am not trying to be rude/mean/a bully/etc., but that was very nit-picky, and honestly not a huge issue in the bigger picture, as it did not take away from the meaning of the post. So allow me to apologize for being blunt before you tell me this was meant to target you, as it wasn't. 18:21 Wed Feb 24

Re:
I understand, as I am sometimes as well. It's just a part of the rules that you cannot edit someone else's message. Sorry. 18:13, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

It still doesn't matter, unfortunately. The apostrophe will have to stay, because it is not your message to edit. 18:16, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

Re:
Yes I can understand that, but still, tell me if that honestly made the message as a whole incomprehensable. I am typically a grammar nazi, but even for me that was extremely nit-picky, and I still take the possibility of changes due to autocorrect or typing quickly into account. And being completely honest, your grammar isn't perfect either, so this makes it seem even more so. That did not warrant editing my message. That is all I have to say on this. 18:40 Wed Feb 24

Block
An admin and I have discussed this agian, and we have come to agreements that you have continued to be disruptive despite several warnings, including you blaming your autism, changing things without any proper cites and arguing with others when they point it out, arguing in general, putting inappropriate stuff on your userpage, and more. This time due to violating the rules again and being given more than enough warnings you will be blocked once more. This time your block will be extended to two weeks. The last block I told you to come back when you've read the rules. I don't think you did that then, so I want you to try it again now. Regards, 00:21, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

(Note: if somehow there's something wrong with this note, instead of reverting this edit, tell me what is wrong and i will change it. Be specific because guess what? With autism you have to be specific or i won't get it. This ban was totally unfair, and the extended bit was even more unfair. it was unfair because it was extended for something that happened on TWITTER, not the WIKI. Bans are for stopping people doing things on websites, so they can't edit it. i wasn't doing anything wrong on the wiki. You said i was "harassing" you on Twitter about the wiki, and i asked what you meant by harassing, you didn't tell me so i replied when you did. Then you ban me. i don't get it. Why didn't you tell me what i was doing wrong BEFORE you banned me to give me a chance to stop? Also, you could just not reply. That simple. Also, threatening people on a website that you'll ban/do something to them on a different website is a form of BULLYING. it's like saying "do a YouTube video about something or i'll ban you on this website". So i didn't get a chance to stop "harassing", and it was on Twitter. Now, you think the quote on my page is bad? Well, on another user's page, there's a note made by the admin that banned me, all crossed out, about christianity, with swearing and rudeness, and it's not deleted. i don't know what went wrong there. Also, the quote isn't that bad at all. in Bramblestar's Storm, ivypool says this: rip their eyelids and claw out their eyes. So what's wrong with the quote? Another thing is "proper sites". There are sites to Wikipedia, and it is very innacurate and claims things without sites at all sometimes. Anyone can edit it. Wikias are pretty much all a small Wikipedia, so they can be a source, and any random website can. Because Wikipedia can. Arguing and blaming autism. Well, that's because autism makes me repeat points and not give in, blaming autism is ok. All i'm doing is saying "i can't help it, i'm high on the autistic spectrum". if you have a problem with autism, you shouldn't be here. There's probably other reasons that i was unfairly banned, but these are all i know. There is one thing i have to say. i do not respect the admin who banned me as an admin that much. But there are a few things i like about her/him: she/he is not afraid to say she/he likes Disney and MLP. They're meant for children, and i like it when people are like "i can like whatever i want, i don't have to be a sheep". Also, she/he doesn't feel sorry for people and when people beg she/he is just like "No. Get over it." and she/he does not succumb to guiltiness or begging. On the other hand, i wish she/he could be as kind as someone like Snowdapple or Falcon_49. i still think the admin doesn't like me. But listen. You don't know me, you don't know my life, you don't know what you've put me through. Also, don't say "oh i know autism" or "autistic people don't do that" because you don't know, because if you or anyone else is autistic, remember, no 2 autistic people act the same. We're all different.)

Look, I know I probably shouldn't jump in on this, but that was really offensive to me. If you have a problem with an admin, then take it to their talk page. I know what people with autism are like, my best friend is autistic! So I will explain this precisely, we have a policy here, about citations. We only take information from Wikipedia if Wikipedia cited it to somewhere else like National Geographic or a educational website. Or even a book! Our admin is doing what is best for us, and if you saw that one message about Christianity, she did apologize. I honestly doubt you were blocked about an incident on Twitter, but everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt so I won't push further. The quote was just a little inappropriate only because users under 13 may not be on the wiki, but they can sure view it. Don't wanna give people nightmares, they suck.

Re:
Advertising is forbidden here, and by our rules, you linking your own work on dA does count as advertising. No, you cannot recreate the blog, as it does violate the rules.

You already have one personal image, so if you upload that art, then the image you currently have on your page will be deleted. And it was a form of advertisement, so please don't argue with me about it.

Your Image
Hello. I have deleted your personal image on your userpage as it is extremely offensive to people who actually have autism. I have recevied numerous complaints that people are offended by your image, and I myself am as well. If you continue to create things that reach the same level as your image, then you will be blocked for good. Regards, 14:52, April 22, 2016 (UTC)

I've actually had enough of you using your autism to justify your activity. It's offensive to other people who have autism because ''you're using it as an excuse. ''I'm not going to let you change it unless you do something to get rid of it. Instead of asking what you did wrong, you become angry and snappy. What you have does not give you a free pass to be rude and disrespectful to everyone who disagrees with you. I am not letting you have that image on your page to justify what your wrongdoings are. Regards, 16:15, April 22, 2016 (UTC)

No, it's not an explanation at all. It's an excuse, and I've already told you what's wrong with your image. Right now I actually think you're trolling. Please stop using that "it's an explanation" because frankly you're proving to me it isn't. 16:29, April 22, 2016 (UTC)