Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Nominations/Declined 2

Hattie (KP) ~ Redo Nomination
File:Hattie.kittypet.png Dazzle agreed with me, and said this looks like a modified y-yabby with hints of triangle tabby. If this passes, I would like to do it. Comments? 12:09, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * I swear I said yes last time, and I still say yes. Skt Spoilers...  13:26, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not giving my reason because last time I voted no. 14:12, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * No.
 * It's fine the way it is  17:10, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Mousefang ~ Redo Nomination
File:Mousefang.warrior.png File:Mousefang.kit.png Shouldn't her stripes etc match her other images? -- 08:14, June 18, 2012 (UTC) I'm pretty sure they will~ 08:15, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Also, if this passes I would like to do the kit :3 -- 08:18, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Skye is doing them...These were already nominated... Pad foot Mischief Managed 08:42, June 18, 2012 (UTC) They were already nominated and approved, and yes, cloudy already has dips on them, 09:50, June 18, 2012 (UTC) Oh, I'm sorry, I checked through the archives and I must have missed it. -- 17:45, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Coal (W) - Tweak Nomination
File:Coal.warrior.png - Very minimal and blotchy shading. I'd say, just redo the shading rather than trying to blur it. 01:31, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * I already nominated this one. e.e

Dapplenose (W) - Tweak Nomination
File:Dapplenose.warrior.png - Darken the dapples to match other images, though, I'd love to see the whole set get redone 01:31, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * nevermind, didn't see it was already nominated.  01:38, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Furzepelt (W) - Tweak Nomination
File:Furzepelt.warrior.png - Smudge patches to match apprentice and darken the shading. 01:31, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Apprentice was already nominated to match the warrior  01:36, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Boulder - Tweak Nomination
File:Boulder.warrior.png, File:Boulder.rogue.png - Warrior, darken and add some more stripes. Rogue, lighten to match loner and elder. I suppose they could be redone. 01:31, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Only voting no for the warrior. They're facing opposite directions, so the warrior is fine. However, I think the rogue needs to be redone, as the stripes do not match //any// of Boulder's images.
 * Same as above. Renominate the rogue or just remove the warrior from here? I'd like the rogue if that's alright. 09:53, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I think the rogue could be redone.... neither the colors nor the stripes match, and could also use more shading. There wouldn't really be much kept from the old image to warrant a tweak... 09:54, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. 21:39 Mon Jun 18

Twist - Redo Nomination
File:Twist.rogue.png I think she could be made more Tortoiseshell looking, the markings look almost like they are supposed to be mud to me, And she is described to have White streaks like lightning on her face, It doesn't really look like that in my opinion, I would like to do this if it passes. -- 20:47, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * She is a tortie. Just a dark tortie, based on my own cat. I color-picked from a picture of her. I would vote, but I'd be horribly biased against this one. 01:04, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope.
 * A tweak for those white stripes at the most. Skt Spoilers...  01:11, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * I still have the layers, too. The stripes would be simple to tweak. 01:20, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * No need for redo. It looks fine. If others agree something should be changed though, leggo does have the layers and it does not need to be redone. Simple tweak. 01:22, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm sorry, I'm just trying to help. -- 02:33, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Lizardstripe (Q) ~ Tweak nomination
File:Lizardstripe.queen.png Needs narrow eyes. 14:16, June 22, 2012 (UTC) I don't think we tweak for narrowed eyes. 17:26, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I mean, we've tweaked eyes before... (Owlstar) So why not her?  02:35, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Look at the context in which narrowed eyes was used.
 * Eh, plus character descriptions are for PC. 03:00, 23, 06, 2012

Brightheart (Alt. W) ~ Redo Nomination
File:Brightheart.warrior.alt.png It says she has patches, and I really don't think those are patches... Sweetpaw had the same type of style, and she was redone. I'm not the only one who agrees with this. If it passes, I'd like this.


 * 02:14, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * We've done it before. No harm done. 03:44, 17, 06, 2012
 * I think they look like tortoiseshell patches. It's really more of the way the artist smudged them than anything. That's where the similarities between the chararts end. Breeze  whisker  03:46, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * ^^ 05:30, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry I've always kinda liked this one :c 04:43 Sat Jun 23

Mudclaw (D) ~ Redo Nomination
File:Mudclaw (WC).deputy.png Needs to match warrior. 15:21, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * This was done not that long ago, I think it's fine -.- It could maybe be tweaked but doesn't need a redo. 18:49 Sat Jun 23
 * I see little to no difference between the two. Breeze  whisker  21:32, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Needs to be tweaked. It doesn't quite match. But there's no need to redo. 00:00, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Tangle - Redo Nomination
File:Tangle.rogue.png I think the stripes are too dark, and a bit too blurred  08:50, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think they look fine.. 13:54, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if the image had those things, it isn't grounds for a redo in the first place.  14:40, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope.

Rosepetal (Ki,A) ~ Tweak nomination
File:Rosepetal.kit.png and File:Rosepetal.apprentice.png These are brown...her warrior is dark cream, description is dark cream. Anyone can have these. Unless no-one wants the apprentice, cause in that case, I want it owo 13:40, June 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * We decided earlier that we would just tweak the warrior back to the darker color, since these are dark cream. I was going to do it since I have the .psd file, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. Breeze  whisker  21:18, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Rainstorm - Redo Nomination
File:Rainstorm.warrior.png I think he looks more spotted than mottled, (Not trying to offend) and I think his shading could be possibly blurred and toned down just a bit? I would like this if it passes. 02:52, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * I suppose it could be tweaked, but it's better off as a redo. Meh. 09:34, 27, 06, 2012
 * Personally I think it's fine the way it is. I've seen mottled cats on here with similar patterns. And the shading's fine. 23:57, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks fine to me. 00:02, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

00:32, June 28, 2012 (UTC) But I believe Dapplenose was redone for the same reason? (Sorry if I'm wrong) -- 19:25, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ravensong has a point there, in my opinion. Dapplenose's warrior image looks slightly similar to this one. I think this should be redone.  21:08, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think Raven's right about Dapplenose...I can't remember off the top of my head as to why her images were redone...but I think this one may need to have something done to it, maybe to fix up the shading, perhaps. But, the color itself is fine.
 * Raven has a point; but as Paleh said, mottled cats can look similar to this. And honestly, if the style were to change, it could be tweaked. Changing a flecked and/or dappled pattern to a mottled would not need a redo. Also, the shading looks fine to me. 21:29, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * I actually agree on it being tweaked. 03:26, 30, 06, 2012

Shadow (Le) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Shadow.leader.png Highlights could be towned down and shading could befined since it's kinda hard to see the light source. I'd like this one if it passes. 08:21 Sat Jun 30
 * Sorry Mounty, but I think it's fine... 08:10, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah. She seems fine to me.
 * I don't think so... meh. 09:48, 01, 07, 2012

Thornclaw (Alt. W) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Thornclaw.warrior.alt.png Doesn't he need to be gray and can I have it.? 16:44, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, he doesn't have to. And even if he did, I'd do it, since I still have the file, and it would take a matter of seconds.
 * Wait, why not? Isn't that the reason Clovertail's alt. queen had to be changed. 18:15, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * No. Plus, Brightheart's alt is in color, despite it being a manga alt.
 * Cloudy's right. It doesn't have to have an alt for that. But if it's absolutely necessary, just give it to Cloudy. It'd save the time and trouble of making another charart and reuploading it over again. Cloudy could fix it in no time, like she said. 18:38, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, but then why was Clover's tweaked? Just wondering. And if this passed Cloudy could have it. 19:32, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Because Clovertail was shown as a tabby, whereas Thornclaw was a solid cat, even though his description states he's a tabby.
 * Oh, I get it now, it's because her color wasn't specified and she was shown gray, right? Thanks Cloudy. (Can I just withdraw this?) 21:11, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Mistkit (SC) - Tweak Nomination
File:Mistkit (SC).kit.png - Just looks a touch blue too me 22:39, July 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Mmm... I dunno, but I think it's fine. I've seen gray cats who look a tad blue - but would not be classified as blue-gray. It looks fine to me. 23:07, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's fine.
 * ^ 03:48, 04, 07, 2012

Snowfur (Q) - TweaK Nomination
File:Snowfur.queen.png - ^^See above 22:51, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's fine.

She's got plenty of shading. 23:26, July 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * o.e 04:10, 04, 07, 2012

Berrynose (Alt. A) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Berrynose.apprentice.alt.png If he's gray and white like his brother, sister and father, the patches could be solid and not smudged. I'd like this.  15:25, July 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't think it matters unless in the book it says he looked just like his brother, father, or sister. 18:22, July 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Just because Mousewhisker's and Hazeltail's chararts are not smudged, does not mean that Berrynose's alt should not be smudged? 00:20, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Smudges are the artist's choice. The patches can be smudged or solid. 00:27, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 01:26, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Daisyheart (D) ~ Redo Nomination
File:Daisyheart.deputy.png It looks like the shading is covering the entire image. I would like this is it passes. 15:57, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine. 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * ^^ 02:16, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe tweaked to define shading but other than that, it's fine. 08:54 Sun Jul 8