Warriors Wiki talk:Characters/Membership Nominations

This is where Project Characters members can be nominated for different spots on the project: Senior Warriors or Elders.
 * When nominating someone, consider it carefully. For senior warriors, really think about how active and devoted to the project the user is. When nominating for an elder, make sure the user hasn't been on for several months before nominating them, you wouldn't want to accidentally nominate someone who's still here! Any members can post why they think a nominee deserves/doesn't deserve the spot, but only the Leader, Deputy, and Senior Warriors can officially "vote" on the outcome.

=Rules=
 * User cannot nominate oneself.
 * At least 2/3 of the project leads must agree.
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination, except for elder noms.

/Successful Nominations/

/Unsuccessful Nominations/

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) Oblivion is very active in the Project and contributes a ton to improve articles. She not only has 8 Silver nominations and 1 Gold, but she also always comments on other users' nominations and works extremely hard to create awesome quality articles. She's skilled with editing character articles, and often fixes mistakes less experienced users make. She's very loyal and devoted to the Project as well, and I think she deserves to be a senior warrior. -- 03:22, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I support a ton. She often nominates and helps out other user's nominations. 04:18, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Supporting. :) 10:29, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) I support as well, Oblivion would make a great senior warrior! River pelt Just go with the flow. 15:38, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Supporting as she often helps out and makes useful nominations. 21:59, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Supporting-- 01:34, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe Oblivion is ready. She has been a member for a long time and contributes to the Project a lot. Congrats Oblivion. 22:19, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm in favor. =) 01:25, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Comment From Nominated User
Three SW nominations, all on practically the same day. I feel really honored to be a part of those three, and thanks to Midnitesky for nominating me :) I look forward to serving this project loyally. Really small speech, but I like to keep it short and sweet ^_^ 22:16, November 20, 2010 (UTC)

Results
With six normal votes and two lead votes, all in favor, Oblivion will be granted Senior Warrior Status. Congratulations Oblivion. :) 23:11, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Frostheart works hard on this Wiki, she is dedicated and devoted. She is on every single day, and edits constantly. She is very devoted to PC. With 3 gold nominations (and mostly helping on Whitestorm, too, if that counts) and 7 silver, she seems to qualify for senior warrior position. Always commenting, leaving helpful comments, and always nominating, she is good senior warrior material. Scanning the PC page and archives, she has something that makes me see her as a wonderful senior warrior. 02:23, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Definitely. When I think of Frostheart's relationship with PC, I see something that burns deep inside her, as a blazing flame that cannot be quenched. She has true devotion and is extremely passionate towards this Project. I know she was declined by the leads before, but now she is truly ready. Frostheart's fervor and enthusiasm for Project Characters will serve her well in the future. In my opinion, to become a real senior warrior, you simply need three qualifying characteristics: Determination, hard work, and devotion-and there is no doubt at all that Frostheart has obtained all of these over time. -- 02:35, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I totally agree with the two posts above me. Whenever I'm on I always see an edit made by Frostheart. She works extremely hard to make this Wiki great and I respect her a lot because of that. Even though I haven't been in this Project long, I've seen many helpful comments from her and she has many great nominations. Frostheart deserves this and will be a great senior warrior if she gets nominated. :) 00:52, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. As I stated previously, what matters in a leadership position is dedication and activity in the project, free time, and editing skills. Things like seniority or number of nominations (which many times are barely the nominator's merit) have no importance. A SW position merely means that the user helps out in minor things in the project, and should not be treated as some ultimately important honour for which someone must spend half a year to "get ready". Kind regards, 16:21, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Against

 * 00:35, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 00:37, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Sorry, but I agree as well-- 00:49, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comment
I'd like to point out that a SW nomination is supposed to be a debate, not a yes/no poll. Votes should contain valid and elaborate arguments to be eligible. 16:21, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Helix. Your signature is not a reason/answer. 01:22, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but Moonflight and I have both explained many times to many of you on here why we believe Frostheart is not ready. She has not been a member long enough and we would like to see her stay active longer. I am sorry if I am sounding rude, but I know me and Moonflight are both sick of fighting the insults that, "We are basing our actions off of personal reasons." We both know what we are talking about, and our decision is final. 22:40, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Elder Nominations
Hello, we are no longer conductinhttp://warriors.wikia.com/index.php?title=Warriors_Wiki_talk:Characters/Membership_Nominations&action=editg elder nominations because there are seldom disagreements about them and they are becoming pointless. If you see someone you think should be moved to elders, you can just contact me or a deputy/senior warrior about it. 12:51, August 21, 2010 (UTC)