Forum:Chatroom Policy:VoNCs

Currently, the Chatroom Policy for Votes of No Confidences dictates that: "Any user may, at any time, post a Forum Discussion titled 'Vote of no Confidence: Chatmod NAME' and in that post explain why they feel that a chatmod should lose said status. If the forum posts yields more positive than negative votes with less than 25 counted votes, it will be presented to the sysops and chatmods active under this policy and they will then vote. If the blog post yields more positive than negative votes with 25 or more counted votes, the results of the vote itself will be put into action by a Bureaucrat immediately. Votes in a vote of no confidence will be struck under the same criteria as those in a vote to elect a new Chatmod."

I, personally, feel that 25 votes is a bit much. I would say that if there is a non-unanimous discussion and once it seems that discussion has ended (no comments within 10 days with at least 10 opinions per say), it rolls over to a vote and there has to be 20 votes for a decision to be made. Let there be a unanimous discussion, the amount of votes needed to dictate a decision would be dropped to 15 votes. Also, to point out, not even Eulalia's vote on his bureaucrat rights had 15 votes. Opinions? 21:56, April 21, 2012 (UTC)