Warriors Wiki talk:Charart

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Discussion=

A Suggestion
Okay, so i have a suggestion to help speed up the approval process. There's this website called Join.me that allows people to see and interact the host's screen. If we use this website to see another screen while making a charart, we could give them comment before they put the image for approval, and even show them how to do different things. I definitly think this would help speed up the aproval process, and it could also be good for mentors to teach/help their apprentices. ☾ ~Pouncey~ ☽ 23:15, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

That's not half bad of an idea, Fallow. Is the website free, and does it require any downloading? 23:17, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it's free, but you do have to download it. It's nothing major. ☾ ~Pouncey~ ☽ 23:20, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. I know I'd download it, since this is my computer, but I don't know if anyone else would. 01:23, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'm using it now, and I didn't have to download much. Just a simple .exe file that doesn't change anything. It's kinda like Team Viewer (as Splook, Rainwhisper and Icebrain would know about), with the exception it doesn't crap out after a few minutes. xD 01:25, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I don't know I think its best to leave out as much downloading and off-wiki websites as possible, some people are very... internet challenged XD. Just what I think. 01:32, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I just made Clovertai's queen with about 8 people watching, and it worked magically. They gave critiques while I was actually doing the image. I love it. 02:19, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I love it too. When I made Snake's loner image Fallow even helped me with the collar. You can share control with other users on so they can help you out. I use it <3 02:30, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

It's a very useful program, I use it when I work on other drawings. I can vouch for it. :3 02:37, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I like this idea. It wouldn't be compulsory, opinional right? It's a great site, thanks Fallow! 05:37, Mon, Feb, 20, 2012

DJ, if you don't want to use the site, you don't have to. No one can force you to do anything here. =P 05:59, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Is there a way to create a PCA... I want to say station? It confuses me alot :( 15:57, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Also how do others look at your screen? 16:01, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Hey guys, I'd totally use this, but I'm totally confused and have no idea what to do... xD Would someone help me out? 16:12, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, so basically, one person makes a "meeting" (that's what join.me calls it) and they give someone else their code, and whoever goes on it can see the host's screen. For pca purposes, someone who's making a charart and would like some opinions on it would give other members of pca their 9 digit code and they could come on and give critiques as they made the charart. We did that with Oblivion while she was making her charart, and I did it with Mooneh yesterday.

We could make a pca station, but that would require someone's email address, and only one user could do it at a time. I think it would just be easier to let each user make their own station then to share one as a project.

I'm not quite such how they see your screen xD You just go on join.me, type in their code, and their computer screen it there on your window. If we do make this part of pca, I think we would need some rules to protect the host's privacy (example: no going on Facebook while on join.me)

What I was thinking for the mentoring program, the apprentice would host a meeting on join.me, and give their mentor the code to help then with things.

Adding to that, the host can give a user who is in the meeting control of their screen. I think this could be helpful for mentors and apprentices, as the apprentice would give their mentor control to show them how to blur or smudge or something along those lines.

So that's a basic run through of what I was thinking and how join.me works xD ☾ ~Pouncey~  ☽  21:36, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I've used join.me before, and I will say, it's quite helpful. It's a great way if mentoring your PCA apprentice, or getting critique on a charart before posting. I'd use this for sure. ;) 00:49, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Fallow! :D 05:11, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

I don't know if this was said before, but where do you give your join code to others? The Wiki chat? 17:00, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

@Leafstrike, I'd say either the chat via private messages or email. Not right out in public where evryone can see it. 05:36, 27, 02, 2012

Tweak Rogue Blanks
Okay this has been brought up a few times but I think we need to fix the rogue blanks, we redid the apprentice blanks for their ears, well the rogue blank ears are huge, I'm not saying we need to completely redo them just tweak them. Also the tails are very short and unnatural, and some of the rogue blanks are different sizes. There are 66 rogues, and we've already put up all the loners so we could start on these. Comments? 16:33, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

The ears may have to be tweaked but I think they are ok. I think the main issue with the rogues is the whiskers. I don't really notice the size differences. 16:46, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you guys both. The rogue blanks have always bugged me >.< 17:08, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, and I think the legs would be less stick-like, too. At least they don't look like dogs, though, so I don't think a total overhaul would be necessary. 17:14, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Finally! Those have always been my least favorite blanks. xD I personally would be fine with a redo. 17:46, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Nuu for that love of Stripes XD I think they would be to fix than to redo. 17:48, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

I think a redo would be good. Since I already have Tangle reserved, can I just keep him as reserved until the blanks are fixed/redone? 19:03, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

It depends on if we go through with this, Silver.

Since we have mxed opinions on tweaking vs redoing the blanks, why not hold another vote? This time people can either submit blanks to tweak or to redo, and of course we'd have a choice where people can opt to not change the blanks at all. Sound good? 19:31, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. 19:33, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good, if we redid them I vote for the same pose. 20:25, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, but I don't think they should be redone. I am highly against it, actually. Just a few minor things. 00:01, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

We could still have a vote. If people don't want them to be redone, they won't be redone. 00:13, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I think we should have two, one if we should leave them, tweak them or redo them. And a second (if we vote to tweak/redo them) with the choices of blanks. 00:54, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Well yeah, I think we should vote.. 00:59, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, shall we post a page for members to post their blanks for the consideration of PCA? We'll devide it into two sections, one for tweaks, one for redos, and we'll have the current blank on top for those that don't want it to change at all. And we can give members a week or two to post their blanks before the vote starts. I'd be willing to host it on a subpage from my userpage. 01:01, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Do you want to? Also we could open it March 10th and leave it up for 2 weeks. 01:09, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

As soon as another senior member agrees, I'll do it. I think closing submissions on March 10th is a bit too much, though. A week should be enough to throw together a rough lineart. 01:13, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good! 01:17, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I decided to start a forum instead. :3 01:29, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Reserving Tweaks
Just a reminder to everyone that you should wait until the tweak nomination is archived before reserving an image. Even if - and this is directed at leads - you're the third vote, you shouldn't vote and then archive immediately. I think we should have a rule that the lead who was the third vote must wait until another lead comes and archives it before reserving. In addition, do we have some sort of rule on "I nominated it, I get the image"? If so, we definitely should. If someone nominates an image for a tweak, it isn't fair that someone else comes along and reserves it after it's archived. 03:11, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. It's kinda like CBAing and image, you shouldn't CBA your one right away. It's rude when someone reserves the image, when it wasn't approved to be tweaked/redone. Someone may even disagree with the nomination. Again, like CBAing, if your image isn't approved yet, then you can't reserve another image. 03:16, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Right. Also, about the "user who nominates is the user who tweaks" rule, perhaps. With limitation of course, like user x can't nominated 7 tweaks and have claim to all of them. Maybe 1 out of every 3 tweaks a user makes, they have claim to? 03:18, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Now, how would that work with a user who wants to re-do an entire set? Like what I did with Littlecloud. I adore him, and his images have always bugged me. Plus, I really need the practice with tabbies....but...I know we did have for a while there that if you changed the style, you'd have to do the other images as well. 03:22, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Eh heh heh heh whoops Sorry *headdesk* Guess I'm sorta new to this x.x I guess that would be ok. How about when the person puts there redo up, they mention the hex codes, opacity, etc. in case someone wants to redo that characters other images maybe. I think that would go with Scarlet's idea, I don't really know. 05:07, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

I honestly think that once it gets three votes we should be allowed to reserve it. Like I nominated Heavystep Friday and it was just now archived today? That's too long. Now, I see that there should be a small window for additional voting, but after 12-24 hours I think it's done being nominated. Breeze whisker  05:12, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

I agree about the whole "You nominated it, you get it" thing, but I think the user should still have a choice. Like, say I nominated Tigerheart's kit image to be redone, but didn't actually want to do it, you could just say you don't wanna do it, and that anyone can take it. Also, they should only be able to claim 2 images, regardless of how many they have nominated at the time, as that's all they can reserve. They should still be able to nominate as many as they want though. Otherwise it will just slow things down. And personally, I don't see why we should have to wait till the nomination is archived. If it gets three votes, I think we should be allowed to post it. Like Breeze said, some nominations sit a while before being archived (even though they shouldn't... *cough*) and it doesn't seem right to make a user wait that long because the SMs are taking a long time to get around to doing that. 17:04, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Paleclaw, for example (not being mean here just saying) someone took Stoneteller (NP) and I kind of wanted to do him. And I think if you nominated it you should get it (if you want it) because since we are in different timezones some of us aren't on the time they are archived so it is only fair that they nominators get the image they nominated, if they don't want it they can put it in the comments. 22:43, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Paleh too. If you nominated it, it's only fair that you get to do it, unless you don't want to. And we should be able to post it even though it's not archived, if it's got 3 votes, they've obviously decided that it's going to be approved or declined already. I think it should be 12-24 hours until it's archived though, but's that's my opinion. 06:45, 23, 02, 2012

Would this count?
Would Skywatcher get an apprentice pixil? Pricklenose is listed as his mentor and he was taught SkyClan ways. I honestly think that should count for something, as he was taught how to hunt and ect. I will understand if you guys disagree but I thought I'd ask before it getting posted and then potentially declined. 22:53, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

I think he should. We've got apprentice chararts for cats that have been said like that before, so I agree. 23:12, 24, 02, 2012

Yes, I believe he would qualify for one. ^^  00:21, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I see no reason why not. Take Millie as an example. She's listed as Graystripe's unofficial apprentice. That doesn't stop her from being and apprentice, even if she wasn't quite aware of it. 03:48, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Using this proposed logic: Sharpclaw, Millie, etc. would get an apprentice pixel, basically, any cat who was taught basic "life skills" would qualify, though I think it should represent the Clan rank (unless the queen rank qualifications come into play). 16:58, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. He shouldn't get one because he wasn't part of a Clan. Apprentice, unlike kit or queen, is a rank, and only members of a Clan would get the apprentice charart. 17:25, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. We've pushed it far enough with the kits and the queens. Apprentice, warrior, leader etc are all Clan ranks only. If you went by the logic, Barley and Ravenpaw would get warrior chararts for what happened in the comics when they helped ThunderClan, despite the fact that they were still loners at the time. I say no, definitely no. Skywatcher was not part of any Clan, he was just being taught how to survive by his mother's friend. 20:20, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Everything's already been stated above.^^ 09:49, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Then by that logic, he should have no mentor listed :/  20:15, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

She was still his mentor, in a sense. But, since SkyClan wasn't really around....you could hardly call him an apprentice. 20:17, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm... well, what is a mentor and what is an apprentice is different. If we were to have mentor blanks, all those with unofficial apprentices would probally get one, but yes, if we're going by logic, Scourge and Willie would get a leader blank, Bone a deputy, and all that. 09:22, 28, 02, 2012

Repeat of the Past
Since we're redoing or tweaking the Rogue blanks, I don't think that we should do anymore work with the rogues until the blanks are finalized. Those Rogue chararts that are being worked on and reserved before this moment may stay, but like the apprentice blanks, I feel that the others that need work should just be left until the blanks are ready, otherwise it'd just be a wasted effort. Thoughts? 02:33, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. 02:37, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

There's no opposition from me. Wasted effort is useless. xD 05:48, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

I agree 100%. 09:24, 28, 02, 2012

SW Nominations
'kay guys, I'm here with another suggestion. As you all know, Twi's currently got a SW nomination up, and it ends March 8th. I'm in no way, shape or form trying to deny future leads of their spots, but, I'd like to propose the SW nominations be closed after Twi's nomination ends. I mean, we have fifteen, possibly sixteen senior warriors, and an excellent leader and deputy that lead us well. Do we really need anymore then we already have? I'm not saying that no one else is worthy of a lead spot, but, that we have more then enough right now to keep the project running and stable.

So, comments? I propose closing the SW nominations until...hmm...maybe April? May, perhaps, depending on what happens with the current leads we have. 05:28, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

April's only like a month away. I'm thinking June maybe because by the summer people might have more time to work. I don't know. 05:39 Tue Feb 28 05:39, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

June would be good too. With most of the members here still in high school (middle school for some of the younger ones), it's a lot harder for them to get on, due to school work and all the fun stuff you can group together with being a teenager. 05:49, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

June sounds good. I do agree we have plenty senior warriors, even though it's a bit unfair to those who really deserve it. 05:59, 28, 02, 2012

I agree. I also think that we should improve upon the grounds that we nominate our SWs for. Though I cannot deny that any of our SWs haven't earned their spot, I think that the SW rank is starting to been seen as an "inner PCA circle" which seems all high and mighty. I read somewhere that a SW rank is given to a user who needs to head a certain aspect of a project like Cloudy and the Mentoring Program.

Though this might sound kinda dumb, but, in the future, I think we should put a limit on the number of SW's so when a SW steps down or leaves the project, their spot can be filled by an appropriate runner-up. And right now, SW rank just feels like a step up from a warrior rank by saying "oh, you did really well at X, Y, or Z". I dunno, this idea's just been bothering me for a bit lately. Thoughts? 22:09, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

I think that's a great idea! Kinda like how there's only a certain amount of admin and rollbacker spots and such, so things don't get too out of hand. It think that'd be great! 8D 23:50, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah! I think that's a good idea. What do you think the limit would be around? Just curious, though it might be too early to ask. :3 03:49, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I like the idea too. I think the limit could be 18 sm's. 07:32, 29, 02, 2012

18? DJ, I think we're good with the ones we have now. I don't think we need more. *if I'm understanding you correctly...* 07:33, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Dont-vote section in Membership nominations?
Okay, I suggest that on the different Memberships Nominations, we add a Don't Vote section to the current sections, Supporting, Against and Comments. Like how we have a dontvote template for votes, we could have another section here. As most of you have seen in Twi's nomination, a few people decided to not vote. Instead of clogging up the Comments section, and not making members suspicious about becoming inactive/not being truly dedicated for not voting, I mean, some members just don't want to vote on MN's, and some can't choose. Feel free to shoot this idea down, I understand, but this is my idea. 09:45, 28, 02, 2012

Seems unnecessary. If you don't want to vote you needent put anything in the nomination and can simply ignore it. 13:00, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Okay. ^^ Just curious. 07:45, 29, 02, 2012

Acorntail?
Although he doesn't have a specific color, in the image that he is shown in he is a tabby. Wouldn't that warrant a charart? Weylon Distinctly Unique. 14:19, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Does it specifically give indication that it is Acorntail? Like, him doing some significant event that happens in the story? 16:19, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

That is not Acorntail. I removed that for that very reason. We have no proof, and if anything, we have more proof it's not him. His chararts were removed cause of that. He's not getting an image. 17:59, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Wait, then why does Featherstar get a charart? We don't know that that's her in the image either. Weylon Distinctly Unique. 20:13, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

I was told that the story the picture is shown is has nothing even to do with Acorntail. 20:26, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Featherstar's description was mentioned, not shown Elo..... what are you talking about? And it's doesn't Loonie. 22:25, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

The cite for her description says 'shown in the image on page 68'. Weylon Distinctly Unique. 01:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Oh dear.... my bad. XD You're right, the cite's wrong. The image will have to be removed unless a proper description can be found. Why on earth was that cite put? 0.o I mean with Acorntail, it made sense, but there's not white and gray cat even in that picture.... 0.o 02:49, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

The cat appears to be a patched cat; I guess the description was just assumed xD  Weylon  Distinctly Unique. 03:41, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Well, we all know that we can't make a charart unless it's description is cited, and book covers and pictures in the field guides aren't really a reliable source to go to. Both of all their images should be removed. 07:56, 29, 02, 2012

Joining PCA
Excuse me if this isn't the place to post this (I haven't been here for a while XP), but I have now turned 13, and would like to rejoin PCA. Sunny frost  21:53, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Great ^^ I'll add you in right now. Please look over the guidelines before you get started. And check out the mentor program and the apprentice tutorials if you would like extra help. Welcome to PCA! 00:01 Wed Feb 29 00:01, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Thank's Mountainheart! Also a question...are kits allowed to vote on the Rogue Blank Artist debate? Or are they considered too new? Sunny frost  00:26, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Kits are allowed. 00:28, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you :) Sunny  frost  00:54, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Join
So, I've been kinda inactive on this wiki and I only get on chat usually--so I thought I would try to be more active and actually contribute. =P Art isn't really my forte, but I'd like to try. So, on that note, can I join? '''

ϚίĿʋεʀϝƪσώȅƦ ♥  Live <font color="purple" style="background:none;"> like <font color="blue" style="background:none;"> there's no <font color="purple" style="background:none;"> tomorrow! <font color="red" style="background:none;">♥  00:23, February 29, 2012 (UTC)'''

Tweaks
Okay guys, just a quick note about reserving tweaks. I was looking on the tweak nominations page, and I saw that one image I wanted to do needed to be redone and was not struck off the list. (For those of you who don't know - you should - when an image is struck off the list it means it is reserved.) So I went and reserved it. Then, upon closer look at the reservations chart, I realized someone else had reserved it, and had forgotten to strike it off the list. This is irksome and causes unnecessary conflict edits. I suppose it's partly my own fault for not checking the reservations table (you know, Ctrl + F) but the whole point of striking images off the list is to avoid having to check the reservations table. While I was checking the reservations table, I also noticed that one image had been reserved by three separate people. This is one of the reasons you should (unlike silly old me) Ctrl + F the mainpage to see that the image you want hasn't already been reserved.

Tl; dr: Strike stuff off the tweak noms page when you reserve it, and search the reservations page before you reserve an image. Thanks for reading, guys. <span style="">03:01 Wed Feb 29

I thought we struck out the stuff that was already for approval? It makes sense, because you can change a reservation at any time without withdrawing it. One person forgets to unstrike the tweak, and we get an image that never gets done because everyone assumes it's reserved. 04:55, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Well, as Loonie said, it is easy to forgot to strike and unstrike tweaks. I know I go through the tweak nominations page at times, and strike chararts that are already being tweaked/redone. But yes, we need to make sure we only reserve chararts that aren't already reserved. <span style="">08:00, 29, 02, 2012

This Needs To Stop
I've been talking with a few other leads in PCA, and we've all come to the same conclusion: PCA has really lost its 'touch', so to say. A few of us (including me) have even been considering leaving the project.

My first reason for leaving PCA could really sum up the whole thing: it's not enjoyable anymore. We've been getting too picky. Tabby styles were the artist's choice, and realism wasn't really thought of. I hate hearing this one topic brought up constantly, but it needs to be addressed: Warriors isn't realistic. Back when I first joined (that makes me sound old) not everyone who could make pretty artwork was made a SW. I don't have anything against any of our current leads, and I believe they're doing an amazing job, but, look. Back then, we have about five SWs at the most. It used to be a rank only given to the most respected members of the project, who had been here for a while and were trusted by almost everyone. Now, we have sixteen. Honestly, I doubt we need sixteen SWs to manage the people in this project.

Second, the eternal tweak week has been bugging me. Seeing my images redone a month or two after it was approved make me feel bad.

^^I'd type more at the moment, but my parents are nagging me to get off. Anyoen who wants to can continue. 04:50, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I was against the "realism" thing at first (but only really for things we assumed, like Birdsong) but with the tabby styles it's completely understandable. Some of those tabbies were... let's face it, bad. I really do think they need to be redone. As for the senior warriors, this project did used to be a lot smaller. But now with the new users - and the full-time tweak week, which requires more leads - more senior warriors are in fact necessary. 04:53, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

As for the senior warriors, every senior warrior goes through a vote. If you had a problem with the idea of expanding the rank, you had every chance to stop it by voting against them. 04:56, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

As a few who were on chat know, I'm one of the ones who agrees completely with this, and has been considering leaving because of it. Something has to change. Enough of the SWs agree that it shows this is just not working. The main thing that I want to happen is for us to get rid of the tweak page. It was good for a while, but it's getting out of hand now. I think we should go back to tweak week, if nothing else just have it more often. And not be so picky about chararts being perfectly realistic. Tabbies like what Speckletail and Bumblestripe used to be are one thing, but what's getting redone now it's very unrealistic, and most are recently approved. There's no reason to redo perfectly good images and I've had enough of it. I had more to say, but honestly, I forgot what it was. So I'll post whenever I remember, but this is my take on all of this for now. (enough with the edit conflicts) 04:57, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I...totally agree with Leggy. We've become picky...Art. Are there mistakes in art? No. Could art be bad? No. Everyone is an artist in someway, but only different ways. Everybody has a different point of veiw--meaning that something to someone is bad, and that thing to someone else is good. Blurring shading, earpink, tabby style...ect. We're too picky about that, because for what I know, this is a project for providing character articles with art, and art cannot be improper, because it's something that we imagine, create, and feel, not judge and dislike.

We cannot be perfect, no matter how hard we try, we're humans, and that's how we will always be.

Abstracts...They are art, and something with no clear picture, but it's still art--a peice of imagination of one, not a math test to be judged by another.

Also...If it makes PCA more enjoyable, I would happily give away my position, PCA's goal is to provide art, and these ranks are more...kinda, "extra."

I tried explaining it as good as possible, and I hope everyone understands my main message to PCA. 05:01, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

You know what, you guys? If you find PCA to be unenjoyable in some way, make the proposals, just like I always have when I've thought of something that might help this project. Go through the process, get votes, and get it done. No use sitting and talking it to death. Just go do it. 05:10, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I definitely agree that PCA should... change (if that's the right word). And I couldn't agree more with Shelly, that the project can't change itself. Starting now I'm going to try to put in my real opinion in more to what I really think, if that makes any sense. And agreeing with Stoney also, if it would make our PCA members more happy I'd gladly give away my position. Being able to put up art is good enough for me. 05:17, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I think PCA could do with some change as well. I think that the "realism" applies to some images (like the ones where the stripes don't even look like stripes), and such, but we need to tone that down, in my opinion. But about the "eternal tweak week" thing, I don't think it's that big of a problem. True, some of the images are fine, but some of the really old ones need fixed up. (e.g. blurred lineart, really messy shading/highlights, that sort of thing). That's all I have to say. Sorry if I'm babbling. 14:22, February 29, 2012 (UTC) Shadewing

Mapleshade
Eh...dunno if it'll count, but d'you reckon that this woukd count for a tweak to add a mane like Lionheart's or something? "She faced him, her thick pelt like a mane around her neck." CP, page 117. Opinions? c: <font face="Arial" size="1" color="Violet" >Sky Promises, promises 05:02, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm.. I'm not sure either. I think she might get one, but since it has "like a mane", than it might not. 05:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I think it just meant she had thick fur in general, which she already is since she's in the longhair blank. I dunno, maybe not 05:21, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Well, for Lionheart, it specifically says that he has thick fur around his neck like a lion's mane. If it doesn't say, it could be that her fur is just ruffled. Like a mane is pretty vague. 05:28 Wed Feb 29

If it does happen, I'd advise not going for a full blown thing like Lionheart has. Maybe just a bit of a ruff around her neck, or you can even add shadow lines to make it look like the for their if puffing out. I'm thinking it'd mostly look like Lionblaze's ruff on the cover of The Forgotten Warrior. 15:02, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Important Notice
Hey guys. Just putting up here the same thing I put on PC's talk page, since it applies here as well at least in terms of descriptions. In fact, I'll just quote myself since I'm lazy.

"I was just going through some articles and I checked Dustpelt's page, seeing that there was a missing citation. I decided, on a whim, to go through and check the other citations to make sure they matched up with the books.

Only one out of six was factual. The rest were fabricated.

This got me paranoid about the citations on the descriptions of every other character page. ... I know it's a big thing to do, but I think the project needs to start the process of going through all of the character pages and checking to validate citations. I'm sorry, it's a big task, but it needs to be done. Withthe whole of the project working on it, it shouldn't be too hard."

Since I posted this, even more characters were found to have false cites in their descriptions. This effects our project since we revolve around these descriptions. From here on, I'd like to ask that my fellow senior warriors and everyone else that is able to do so check the citations of the characters they go to do chararts for.

We recently found that Kate Cary comes to this site herself when she forgets a point in a characters history or appearance. We need to provide the most factual pages we can because, frankly, her saying that Dovewing's eyes were gold was probably our fault. (don't go into that argument here, it's over)

My point is that PCA should be helping out with this as well since it'll mean that less chararts will need to be redone over time when we find that descriptions have been falsified. Just check the cites before you make the charart, if you can. If not, ask a friend to do so at least.

And that's my two cents. Not a proposal or a suggestion, just a request really. 06:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. We could maybe have some sort of patrolling system for this...? Anyway's I'd be willing to help out with checking cites. 06:29, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with this as well. 14:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC) Shadewing

Yeah, I also agree. I'll look over when I can. 15:05, February 29, 2012 (UTC)