Warriors Wiki talk:Books

Trivia
Forgive me if I make no sense because I'm. On my phone. I was stalking the wiki and I recalled that on a few book articles. We have a section for trivia, some of them list all the issues in the book, some of them list none, some of them list a little. I believe we should decide for the layout. Should we include. All trivia? None? The important ones? 02:36, September 15, 2016 (UTC)

I noticed that before too and was actually going to bring it up but forgot :P I think that errors shouldn't be listed in the trivia, because in some books (like MFV) there are just so many of them that none of the other trivia would be noticeable in all of it. I don't think that mistakes are that important anyways, but we could link that book's section in Mistakes in the Warriors Series in the trivia and say that the mistakes in said book are listed there. I think that's what you are talking about? 00:08 Fri Sep 16

I agree. But, there should be some trivia, imo. Just the stuff about the book itself, like what the working title was and other major things like that.

Anymore comments on this? 03:30, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

I could understand if it's a major mistake, such as the issue with Graystripe and his kits in Bramblestar's Storm, since I think that warranted a reprint, but minor mistakes, such as description, gender, eye color errors, ect, shouldn't be mentioned in the trivia, but on the Mistakes page as well as a given character's article. Working titles, plot changes, and other tidbits about the books themselves are appropriate, while the Mistakes page is beneficial for the rest of said mistakes....

Although now that I think of it, that page is getting extremely long. Would there be a way to possibly shorten that with the use of subpages or something along those lines?

Good idea. Any ideas for it? 01:15, October 2, 2016 (UTC)

I'd be good with separating it per arc, since having a page for each book might be a bit tedious. But yeah we should totally to that^

Poke

I don't think anyone else is going to comment... but it does seem like Icy seems to be for separating it by arc, so I think we could go ahead and do that? I know she's avoiding the wiki until she's finished Hawkwing's Journey... But one person should do it, so we don't all jump on each other and edit conflict.

Let's go ahead and implement this. 00:18, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

Super Edition 10
So, on Kate's Blog, on HJ Spoiler Page, Kate confirms it is a DovewingXTigerheart based book. (Which I don't see the need for a whole se on this ship imo). Scroll through the comment pages, I don't think the confirmation is on the current page.

So. Should we proceed to make a Super Edition 10 page as we know what it will be about?

-- 23:10, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

Okay, never mind I just saw the page existed already =P-- 23:11, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

I don't see the confirmation on the trivia you just added? It's not on that comment page, and we shouldn't have to dig for the cite. Direct comment linking does not work on Kate's blog, so you'll have to screenshot and double ref.

I looked and couldn't find the exact cite you're talking about. It seems more like Kate being vague and fans jumping to conclusions again.

Sorry, wrong link! Here we go -- 23:17, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

That was a random edit conflict...anyway, she did say "I am told at the moment that the next SE is DovexTiger." 23:19, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I added it in the trivia. --  23:20, November 9, 2016 (UTC)

Then you need to find the exact cite that says that. You can't just link it and expect us to go digging around for the citation in the other pages. Burden of proof falls on you, not us.

December FA
Well, we could do TAS or maybe CJ to go with a somewhat SkyClan theme since HJ was recently released.

Maybe Thunder and Shadow. 22:37, November 10, 2016 (UTC)

That should be nominated for silver first before we put it as FA. If that gets nominated for silver and passes, then yes, we can do that. 00:17, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

... scratch that. I'm an idiot. I mean it should pass first. 00:17, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

I agree with Icy ^^ 15:40 Sat Nov 12

CBV? 22:46 Tue Nov 15

By the way, there's a reason this isn't up yet - I'm just waiting until it passes in general and then I'll put up the FA thing. Does that sound good with everyone? 22:26, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Join?
Hi, I was wondering if I I could join this project? Maplepaw (talk)  19:01, November 21, 2016 (UTC)