Warriors Wiki talk:Reality

To-Do list
Hi all! Currently we have four more year pages to finish, two "chats" (Erin Hunter Answers Your Questions), illustrators, and the facebook pages.

We currently have three illustrators that still need silver status but the issue is there is little information on them from what I can find. What's on those three pages for the authors/illustrators currently is just about as much as possible we can find, or at least what I can find. I don't really want to give them silver status as they are now. So how do we want to move forward? We can merge the three illustrator pages into one, though the problem with that is we'd have to merge all illustrator articles of which some of them are quite good. We can also delete them since there is little information about them.

I'd also like to move onto how we're going to organize the role-play phenomenon. As of now, we have several pages of role-play websites scattered about so what should we do about those? I'm inclined to say that we should coalesce them into one page like we have with the Fanshrines and Fansites.

If I missed any major topics, please bring them up and I encourage everyone to answer all questions in a complete manner. Thanks, 22:59, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

I think you're right about this. I think that maybe the illustrator pages could be merged. For some of the persons articles, I have tried searching more information on them countless times, however, I have never found anything much.

As of the roleplay pages however, I'm not exactly sure, but merging could be useful. Currently ideas are lacking in my head, but indeed I'll comment if I come up with anything. (BTW, sorry about my inactivity lately in PR, due to all the computer stuff going on, but I'll become more active now that everything's fixed)

I'm in between on leaving the illustrator pages as they are and on merging them, because like 'Teldy said, some are wonderful and at great legnth, while others are stubs. I think we should merge the roleplay pages, as it would make everything more organized, but would adding those into PR mean that once the page or pages are finished would we be able to nominate them or not? x3 02:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Facebook template
Alright since the discussion was finally archived, I believe we're agreed that we should have facebook pages for the authors. Now the chat template could work for this, but it'd be much more organized and easier to use, and would also allow us to list more information, if we had a template of it's own for the facebook pages. Such template would need to include a section for the main question, a section for relating comments from others (such as in the case of Whitestorm being Cinder's father), and answer section, a link section, a date section, and questionably, an outcome section. The chat template only has about half of these and therefore can't include all the information we need, and tends to look messy. Furthermore, I don't believe we need the author section of the template, as only the author who owns the facebook page would be answering. I propose that the facebook pages get their own template. Perhaps tweaked from the chat one, perhaps not. Maybe even with some fancy coding, we could possibly make it look similar to facebook posts. That'd be kinda nice. What do you guys think? 01:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and about the relating comments part, only comments that are needed to either explain, or clarify the answer should be put there I think. Not just anything that someone posts relating to the question. Like if Vicky says "so and so is right", we'd need to post the comment she's referring to. Or with Whtiestorm's case, someone stated they wondered who Kate thought, or wanted Cinder's father to be. therefore clarifying her answer from being plain "definitely", to possibly "definitely want" or "I definitely think".Things like those examples should be included, but not all comments on that happen to be on the same topic, in my opinion. 01:32, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Might need an option for putting it so we can list the posts that vicky makes, like, not in reply to other people, just the things she posts on her own. 02:11, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Great ideas Paleh, and I do think that we should have a seperate facebook template. 21:37, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

I like these ideas too. I think we could tweak the template so it'll be different and suit the pages more. I'd like to see if we could get some fancy coding to make it look like facebook posts too. Sounds neat! 23:00, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

As I've mentioned before, I'm up for having facebook pages, after all, it would be related to the authors, who are related to Warriors. The chat template might work, but I'm more in favor of having a seperate template ('cause I'd believe it would be much more organized). Making it look all fancy like facebook posts would be pretty cool imo, and I think that it would also be a good idea. x) I also agree with the basic layout of a hypothetical template for the facebook pages (the sections for links, answers, ect.).

Kay with the help of Lightning and Helix, I believe the code's ready now. You can check it out here. What do you guys think? 00:02, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

It looks great Paleh! =D 22:58, December 5, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. =) 17:34, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Join Request
May I join this project, please? 06:26, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Of course, please read the guidelines. =) 17:34, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Question about FA
OK, so I was wondering this awhile ago, but why does PR not have a FA section on the front page? Every other content project does, and I think it might boost activity a bit, what with the discussion and voting and sometimes nominating that goes with it. 18:14, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Page for Kate's Blog
So, I said this awhile ago, back when we were discussing Facebook pages, but the discussion was archived, due to like no comments in awhile. But anyway, I think that we should have a page for Kate's blog, it has answered countless questions and it would be useful to have a page to keep all of it organized. We have one for Vicky's facebook, and I just think it would be nice, so yeah... x3 00:01, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

(casually pokes head in) This is a good idea. If we've got one for Vicky's facebook, we should have one for Kate's blog. Kate is a little more active on her blog than her facebook anyways, I believe.

I agree- Kate's blog has been used by us more frequently than her facebook....even if that's not true, (I gotta check x.x), we still use her blog frequently- if Vicky gets a FB page, why not give Kate's blog a page? We use them both. 15:45, January 3, 2013 (UTC)