Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaking=

Waspwhisker (KP) -Redone
The texture was a pain, and it was hard to make it as gawjus as the warrior charart, and I think I failed. xDD Not sure if changes are showing. 22:19, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Define the shading on the white?

Re-uploaded  22:06, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Can you blur the shading on his front leg and haunch? Maybe lighten it on the paws since the white is beginning to look gray. 23:02, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Re-Uploaded  01:13, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

There's a tad of waste under the front paw and to --> side of the head. Nice Work Thistle. c: 07:52 Thu Apr 18

The highlights are a bit bright, tone them down some? 00:22, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded It wasn't waste, it was bits of lineart that turned gray somehow o.O 22:37, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Blur the shading on his front leg a tad. 23:17, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 23:30, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

He's got odd shiny spots everywhere...fix that? c: 06:58 Tue Apr 23

White looks somewhat gray...unless that's just how you shaded?

What do you mean shiny spots? @Berry o.o 20:32, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

oh, and @Skye, I had the white a bit brighter before but they were too bright I think so I toned them down a tad, but if you want them brighter I can do that again. 16:26, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Er, sorry, but it's been two weeks - which is the limit for a redo, I believe. Since you asked specific questions and didn't get a response, I think you could get a few more days, though. 05:31, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Breezey. A few more days wouldn't hurt anyone, and this has been sitting for quite a while without anyone taking it, so it needs to be fixed.

Lighten the shading a little our left side of the face? 03:08, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Like Berry said, make it less shiny, it looks a bit shiny now because of the highlights/shading darkness. This is beautiful, btw. 12:00, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Whitewing (Q) - Tweaked
Tweaked to lighten white. Last OA was me. 23:38 Mon Apr 29

Define or darken the shading? 01:21, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded. 23:54 Fri May 3

Lighten it a tad, or make the shading less spread out? It's making her kinda look gray. Bb un   legs  23:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

The shading itself is fine. I think perhaps adding some highlights might do the trick.

No, I agree I think it should be thinned out. She's looking really really gray right now, and it looks like it's the fact that the shading's so thick.

Ryewhisker (W) ~ Tweaked
I seriously couldn't do anything with those stripes, so I redid them, but keeping the same basic pattern. Also redid the shading and pretty much everything else so yeah I apologize.

This was supposed to be a shading tweak. If you want to redo the stripes, then you should have nominated the image for that before going ahead and doing it. 02:55, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

One, it's my image, two, I could not redo the shading with how the stripes were. As the OA, I should have that right. The stripes were black, and with the shading, I couldn't do anything that wouldn't make it look green. I tried every possible method of doing so, and nothing worked.

One, even OAs nominate their images - and plenty of OAs have gotten turned down from tweaking or redoing them. I don't see what makes you an exception. And two, if you had nominated it again people probably would have said you could but even then what's the point of the tweak nomination page if you can go ahead and do whatever you want just because it's your image. We decline redone images when they are supposed to be tweaks and it sets a bad example when one of our leads decides they don't need to ask. OA or not. 03:03, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

I know OAs renominate their own images; I've done it myself, and I'm not stupid. I just find it a waste of time since a good 99% of the time, the tweak page is neglected and it already passed for a tweak (I have seen many users do things other than what a tweak was nominated for), there's no point. I also followed the same stripe pattern that I used before. It is impossible to tweak this without looking green. It's a black pattern on a brown coat. Impossible to do with tinted shading, and looks horridly green with black. I'll nominate it, so as long as it doesn't just sit there, like the rest of the tweak page has as of late.

You're still supposed to nominate it before you redo it because that's the purpose of the tweak page. Just because it's been rather inactive doesn't mean that when you do something as major as completely redrawing the stripe pattern or changing the color of the image it doesn't need to be voted on like anything else. We might as well throw the whole page it out the window because some people can't just wait a week for their image to be voted on. 03:21, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

I honestly don't know why you guys are throwing so much stuff on each other of an image that was tweaked more than it was supposed to. It seriously doesn't affect you guys in any way and it was one time so I don't see the need for an entire fuss about it. 05:15, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Okay so since the nomination actually passed and stuff, can I have comments? I'm not too confident about the stripe pattern, though...is it actually natural or anything like that?

Nutmeg (KP) (KP) - Tweaked
OA was Leaf-Storm, and she needed to be more brown in color and have a shading tweak. With the way that I tweaked the color, I may have to work on the eyes some more, because they don't look as defined as they did before .-. I'll get it tomorrow, I'm sleepy  05:51, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

The top of the head seems oddly gray.

Nutmeg (KP) (Q) - Tweaked
I believe that Shelly was the OA of this, and she needed to be brown because she was bordering on ginger. This one was surprisingly harder to tweak. 06:02, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Could you possibly dull the ear pink, if possible? It seems like bubble gum. If not, that's cool with me.