Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Nominations

Before editing this page, make sure you are clear on the guidelines for editing it.

TWEAK/REDO NOMINATIONS ARE CURRENTLY: OPEN/ CLOSED, BARRING THE NOMINATIONS ALREADY POSTED (see the list below for images to tweak or redo)

=Nominations= If you wish to nominate an image, you link the image (like so - ) underneath the appropriate subheading, and list the reason(s) you wish it to be redone/tweaked. Project members with the ranking of warrior or above can vote, and only five votes are necessary for the vote to pass or fail.

Jingo - Tweak Nomination
File:Jingo.kittypet.png and loner. The stripes fade into the shading, and assuming that Teldy does have the files, this can be tweaked. 00:16, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I honestly think these would be better off redone, 'teldy isn't on often and I don't think she gives image files out, if memory serves. I think it would be 10 times easier to just redo them. 04:12, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am agreeing with Duck, but if this passes I'd like the set please. 22:11 Fri Jun 6
 * I honestly think they're fine and they can be tweaked instead of being redone.. =/
 * 22:24, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 19:34, 06/14/2014
 * Can we get moving with this nomination, please? If no one will comment within three days, I'm going to archive with the majority winning.
 * 19:31, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:58, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I never actually voted, so here. 3:37 Fri Jun 20

Oakheart (Alt W) - Redo Nomination
-&gt; Sourceless shading (don't tell me there's a source, since it's my old style), and it's also blotchy and icky, and he looks kinda shiny-ish and light brown. I sorta want to go back to the color used here, and I no longer have the file for this since I lost it when my original Compaq decided to take a crash. I'd like to redo this since I know I'm able to do much better and I can't just switch things around due to lack of an xcf.
 * 17:43 Sat Jun 14
 * Just because you can do better doesn't mean it has to be redone. It looks fine. 18:13, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you even read the rest of the reasons I want to redo it??? .-.
 * it's your image 19:33, 06/14/2014
 * Yes, I read the reasons. 19:55, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * you do not need the .xcf to do everything, besides that I don't think it needs to be redone, I've seen that lightsource on tons of images and it's fine. We can't keep redoing images because they're ours and we can do better for tiny reasons. 21:03, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * your image, dear 21:09, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Duck, there is no light source. When I did that image, I didn't know what I was doing. Please don't tell me something I created has a source when I know for a fact it does not. I have every right to nominate something I feel is not up to standards.
 * I never said you didn't have a right to nominate it? I just know that I don't think this needs redone. 04:22, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * You all ready redid it more than once, saying that you can do better, and there simply isn't a need for another redo. It seems fine. As Icy said, being able to do better isn't a reason for a redo: trying new things out, and practicing is what personal images are for.
 * That is not the only reason I asked to redo this image, and it appears to be the only thing some of these comments are saying. That is not the only reason I have nominated this image (it's sourceless shading, the color does not sit with me, he looks shiny, he's more brown than tawny, ect) and I'm getting tired of being told off for putting that down. >.> If I moved it to a tweak, would that suffice? Because that shading is sourceless and it bothers me to hell and back. =/

=Approved Tweaks= Once an image is under this heading, it may be reserved on the project main page and crossed out with a and a. The image may only be removed from this list when it is approved and archived.

All project leaders are to keep track of the number of images on this list, including those that are crossed out. Should the number rise above 50, nominations will close and remain closed until the number of images on the list is down to 40.

Tweaks

 * File:Bess.kittypet.png - needs some more white
 * File:Bess.rogue.png - needs some more white
 * File:Blossomkit (SC).star.png - flat shading (Reserved to Sorrel until June 24)
 * File:Harrykit.kit.png - pale parts need to look pale (Reserved to Jayce until June 24)
 * File:Hussar.kittypet.png - flat/sourceless shading (Reserved to Jayce until June 24)
 * File:Jayfeather.apprentice.png - shading issues
 * File:Newtspeck.warrior.png - Pattern tweak
 * File:Poppyfrost.kit.png - define dapples (Reserved to Duck until June 24)
 * File:Rowanberry.kit.png - Patches are over-blurred.
 * File:Sandgorse.warrior.png - redo patchy fur (Reserved to Berry until June 24)
 * File:Sandgorse.star.png - redo patchy fur (Reserved to Berry until June 24)
 * File:Sunfish.apprentice.png - flat shading
 * File:Sunfish.kit.png - flat shading
 * File:Speckle.loner.png - needs more flecks, and they fade into her shading
 * File:Tom (Cat).kittypet.png - needs nicked ear (Reserved to Jayce until June 24)
 * File:Voleclaw.apprentice.png - flat shading (Reserved to Duck until June 24)
 * File:Voleclaw.kit.png - flat shading (Reserved to Duck until June 24)
 * File:Voleclaw.warrior.png - flat shading (Reserved to Duck until June 24)

Redos

 * File:Darkstripe.warrior.png - multiple issues
 * File:Honeyfern.apprentice.png - multiple issues
 * File:Ivytail (SC).kit.png - Pattern change
 * File:Rainfur.rogue.png - multiple issues
 * File:Specklepaw.apprentice.png - multiple issues
 * File:Sol.kittypet.png - multiple issues
 * File:Tigerheart.apprentice.alt.png - multiple issues
 * File:Clear Sky.kit.png - multiple issues (Reserved to Hawky until June 21)