Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaking=

Dewnose (W) - Tweaked
OA was myself, redid the shading. Much better ^^ Although I will be darkening the shading on the paws and tailtip in next upload. 21:44 Mon Mar 28

Reuploaded Darkened the tailtip/paw shading. 01:36 Tue Mar 29

Not sure if it's my phone (could very well be), but the shading on the main body and tail loom extremely dark... I'd wait for a second opinion, though, because my eyes aren't the best right now.

No, they look fine. 11:33, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

the body shading is really dark, and the shoulder, leg, and neck shading need blurring or whatever. 11:55, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

I will lighten it a little bit but I would really rather not try to smooth it. If you were to look at the file and try smoothing it you would have a bit of a hard time due to how many times I went over it. I am just curious, but why does it seem like some people are able to get away with incredibly rough textured shading but others aren't? This is just how I shade these things. It will loose the effect I wanted for it if I keep trying to smooth it every upload. 12:05 Tue Mar 29

As I said before, smooth shading isn't a requirement of the project... but I think the constant asking does stem from the older PCA standards we had. In the end, I think smooth or "rough" shading should be left to whichever artist is working on the image. I wouldn't object to you keeping it how it is, but in the end, it's your choice.

Reuploaded Lightened it, but no smoothing. It isn't even the most textured shading I've gotten approved (Honey Pelt's alt). Sorry I didn't get this earlier, I was at work all day and had a slightly longer closing due to having to work the baler tonight. 02:05 Wed Mar 30

well I'm sorry but I still think those parts are too sharp. I know its style but people have been told to smoothen out very sharp shading tonnes of times. 04:46, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

Reuploaded This is as smooth as I can get it without being told to define the shading. Especially considering that some parts of where I went over the shading were what I nominated it for, since you could not even see the shading in parts of the legs. Not trying to be argumentative here, but I can hardly tell the shape of it on my screen now. 13:09 Thu Mar 31

You're not being argumentative, Sun, please don't worry about that. You're bringing up actual points in a calm manner, and it's nothing that you would be looked down upon for. The disruptive and arguments that we don't like are the ones that actually bring drama. You're perfectly fine in this and there isn't anything that would imply otherwise.

Whiskernose (E) ~ Tweaked
OA was Amber, tweaked to lighten.  15:48 Wed Mar 30 

Could you define/darken the shading a bit?

reps may I remove the shading on the chest? Since the light's coming from that direction I dont see why there'd be shading there, but since it's on the original image I thought I'd ask first   16:58 Wed Mar 30 

Go for it, I say. It contradicts the light source.

reups thanks  20:48 Thu Mar 31 

Leafstar (Lo) ~ Tweaked
18:29, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

Leafstar (Ki) ~ Tweaked
18:29, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

Poppydawn (Alt. E) ~ Tweaked
OA is Ivy, tweaked for bushy tail  20:57 Thu Mar 31 

Leafstar (KP) - Tweaked
- OA was me. Added more mottles 03:41, April 1, 2016 (UTC)