Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Nominations/Approved 22

Jumper ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Jumper.loner.png I feel like the shading depth could be defined just a little bit. I know I'm being nitpicky, but it's my opinion :x If the OA doesn't step forward, I'd like it. And the kit and loner need a black chest and stomach! (I'd like the kit if OA doesn't want it, sorry I love tweaking) 00:11, 5/04/2017
 * The OA is inactive, but regardless, if you nominate someone's image, you should still leave them a talk page message. Most of the time they don't/can't even see the nominations. Also I'm staying out of this one, because while I do feel like it does need some depth definition, I can see the shading, soo... 00:28, 5/04/2017
 * I can see the shading, but barely.
 * Broken, you need to lay off claiming so many images. Even if the OA is "inactive". Let others do things too. =\
 * the shading kinda throws off the white, especially on the tail and legs
 * we need to add the kit to this. The rogue is the first in this set, according to the timestamps. Both the kit and the loner need a fully black underbelly, and a black chest, as per the rogue. None of them match one another, despite the rogue being uploaded first, and our rulings state that first uploads are first in the set, unless otherwise agreed upon (such as the case of Sparrowpelt of SkyClan).
 * Oh alright^^ I always thought something was off with those images. I don't think I'll take 'em(k tbh I want the kit) I'll add it. 02:38, 5/04/2017
 * Broken, did I not just tell you to lay off? Let someone else tweak these; you've claimed more than enough of your fair share lately.
 * Would it be alright if I asked to tweak this ones (loner and kit)? It's been a while since I've done one and I'd like to start pulling my weight around here. Also would the white need to be made less gray or nah? 03:31 Thu May 4 2017
 * Go for it, Diablo. It's been ages since you've tweaked and I don't have any objections to fixing up the white either.
 * Probs should've done this in my initial post but oh well. I'm agreeing with what has already been said basically. 03:57 Thu May 4 2017
 * 20:52, May 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * 20:52, May 4, 2017 (UTC)