Warriors Wiki talk:Characters

Switching the Switch to tabs
This is a pretty minor little discussion, but would anyone have any objections to switching the switch template to a tabber feature. Reason being is their are still profuse glitches with the switch coding, and tabbers achieve the same purpose with little, if any at all, glitches. Switch coding is featured on Mapleshade, Brackenfur, Thornclaw in the charcat, and when you click from alt to alt, you get a double title of the image. So what do you guys say? 03:49, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

I think it would be a good idea, since the current ones are a bit glitchy. 18:17, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with switching 100% it would be so much easier and it annoys me when that glitch pops up. lol 20:29, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

I've noticed this. I agree, it's a great idea. 00:00, August 23, 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea to me. I hope it'll fix the glitches. x.x I see it used on other wikis all the time and it appears to work just fine.

This seems like a reasonable idea, after all, nobody wants glitches and annoying problems. x.x

Author's Word vs. Repetition of description
Skye brought up an interesting topic about one of Vicky's comments on the facebook page, so the following is our skype conversation about it:
 * [8/21/2013 9:31:44 PM] Skye: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10151978998222454&id=29566467453&comment_id=27652803&offset=0&total_comments=12
 * Vicky says that Tawnypelt should be tawny/pale ginger throughout the entire series.
 * [8/21/2013 9:31:50 PM] Skye: What do we do in this case?
 * [8/21/2013 9:31:56 PM] Skye: Since the tortie thing appears to be a mistake
 * [8/21/2013 9:35:19 PM] Atelda: Author's word vs. repetition of description, mmm, well with Vicky's word, she's the plot designer per say so she has probably the general idea of warriors more than the others, thus a better understanding of Tawnypelt throughout the entirety of the series, yet in the repetition of the series, more readers would probably agree with the image we have now since not everyone's on Vicky's facebook, plus the repetition is published with all the authors relatively agreeing in the multiple books.
 * [8/21/2013 9:36:16 PM] Atelda: I would go with Vicky's word because if we contradict it, then we'd set the image that we know more about the warriors series than the actual author and that wouldn't be a good reception for the wiki.

So, agree, disagree, other variables/points, and overall comments? 01:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

I'd said we'd go with Vicky's description;after all, didn't Mapleshade have a similar case when she got described as ginger-and-white a lot, but was originally said to be tortie? o3o 01:41, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

Never thought I'd say this, but, why not the switch template with the torties as the alt and the pale ginger/tawny as the main image? That way we'd be doing both what the book says and what Vicky has said. x3 01:44, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

Switch template sounds good to me, although I think the tortie should be the alt. 1:50 Sat Aug 24 2013

Using the switch template or tabber if it is decided is an awesome idea, in my opinion, which I support fully. owo I guess the tortie could be the alt.

More of to the point, in the future, which word do we go with? Think of the larger picture here rather than just this one situation. Should we go with Vicky's word or the book's? 23:26, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

I think we should go with the books. This wiki is based off the books, after all, and, while uncommon, it isn't unheard of for Vicky to give us the wrong information in regards to the events in books. It makes more sense to go with what has been written out in the book and got through the editors than what a single person wrote on a Facebook or blog comment. 23:39 Thu Sep 26 2013

I'd say go with the books, too, like Whiskey said, the wiki is based off of the books. 18:36, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Flykit ~ Silver Nomination
Comments? 18:33, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

There are a few grammatical errors that fuzz up the understanding of what Flykit is doing. Nice job. 17:26, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

Fixed, anything else? o3o 17:38, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

CBV? 04:20, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

Vote's up! 17:45, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

Meadowslip ~ Silver Nomination
Comments? 22:52, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

In paragraph seven (pretty sure it's that one), it says that she had three kits- Pidgeonkit, Hopkit, and Sorrelpaw? It doesn't make sense, as it's as if she gave brith to an apprentice. Can you change that please, if I'm not mistaken. sorry if I was confusing.

Derp, a minor slip up. Fixed, anything else? 16:47, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

Mole (Cat) ~ Silver Nomination
Comments? 16:41, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

In the 3rd quote, anything is misspelled as anyt5hing. 16:45 Mon Oct 14

Fixed, anything else? 16:46, October 14, 2013 (UTC)