Warriors Wiki talk:World

AaU Revival?
I am attempting the revival of the Adopt a User project; however, my idea has quite a few flaws, and I hope to somehow resolve them with the help of this Wiki. Please comment on this forum. 09:20, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Medicine ~ Silver Nomination
Well, I dont know if any of you guys heard, but Wildheart decided to leave the Wiki; I know, sad. So she asked me to nominate this page that we've both worked hard on; And I agree, I think its pretty worthy. So, Don't be shy, Tell Me what you think! -- 05:09, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hmmmm It looks GREAT, but I think it could use a few more refrences. I'll try and add as many as I can. :) ♥ Paleclaw  May StarClan be with you ♥ 08:59, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

It does look great, but, BlueOrca, you're not a member on this project, but if you want, I'll add you in :D And, its currently the Content Drive, so I'm not sure if you can nominate it until the next one is chosen. And, yes, it could use some more references, but it looks awesome so far! 22:29, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, Why not; Sure I'll join!

And, I dont really what you mean by "Content Drive" Mistystar, So Mind explaining to me? BUT you can just say that Wildheart nominated this instead of me, since shes the one who asked to me to so in the first place. -- 01:13, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

"Content Drive" is like a goal for the whole project. We want to get it looking great, and being informative. I asked Nightshine if we could change the Content Drive to Battles, though battles doesn't seem like it needs help anymore, right? XD. At el  da  04:24, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Well, lets wait for Nightshine's decision. 22:11, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, well, I guess its my decision now. Why don't we have Tunnelers as our next content drive? Its needs a lot of work. 17:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I fixed it up alittle.

Why don't you take a look at it and tell me whatya think about it. --

It still needs some work, but Medicine looks good. Could you add a few more references to Medicine, though? 18:29, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

There are tons of plants that still need sources. Also, at the bottom, you need a source for Yellowfang's quote about Foxglove and such. 22:37, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, you need a lot more citations. There's lots of Source? references that need to be fixed. 18:36, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Are you still working on this? 19:24, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Hm? Oh, sorry it's just that I'm going over my books to add the cites. Still I don't think I can do much, since Ive only read 6 books so far :\ --

I'll help. ❀ Atelda ❀ talk 04:16, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

So will I. 22:54, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I fixed about 5 source references, and I'm trying to do more. 16:34, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Woah! Thanks for all your help guyz 8D --

Ok, I fixed about 8 more references. This is taking a while! XD 18:03, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

I'll fix some too. :D 16:58, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

The ones that still need citations are beech, coltsfoot, comfrey, daisy, dandelion, feverfew, honey, lamb's ear, mallow, parsley, ragwort, ragweed, raspberry, rush, snakeroot, tansy, tormentil, water mint, willow bark, wintergreen, and foxglove seeds. So if anyone comes across these while reading, it would be great to add it in! 21:23, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

I fixed some more. Now the ones that need citations are beech, coltsfoot, comfrey, dandelion, feverfew, lamb's ear, ragwort, ragweed, raspberry, shakeroot, water mint, willow, and foxglove. Is anyone even working on this anymore? 23:18, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try. 15:52, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

I added about 9 more references. So, here's the list:


 * Beech


 * Coltsfoot


 * Dandelion


 * Feverfew


 * Ragweed


 * Snakeroot


 * Foxglove

Once you add in all the references for one section, just cross it out on the bulletpoint list so we don't have to re-write everything. 18:08, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Is anyone still working on this? Its almost ready, and it only needs references for 7 more sections. 17:57, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Be patient, it's only been three days! :P 22:15, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I fixed some source references, but I couldn't find them all. I did add in a lot more referneces for location though. If no one can find a reference for any of the ones that need it, those pieces of information will have to be removed. 19:02, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, those will have to be removed if no one can find anything. I'd rather not have to delete them though. 21:12, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Content Drive
Medicine, our current content drive, has been nominated for silver, so we should begin discussing our next one. Anyone, opinions? I suggest Tunnelers or Battles, but I'm open to other suggestions. 18:07, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

We should do battles because it's a stub and there's a lot of info about those in the books. 18:09, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Any other comments? 15:56, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

I also agree it should be Battles. There's a lot of refrences to be added plus information, as Squirrelflame said. 10:22, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, whereas for Tunnelers, there's not that many references in the books and more people could participate in Battles. 21:44, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Mmm...maybe battles but it's been expanded a profuse number of times and it wouldn't take all that much to make it a bronze. But it could use some citations and some of the information could be expanded/ added. However, tunnelers would be a great challenge to overcome because it's not known very well. At first I thought that it was a useless page but with more info, it could be of great use. Both articles would be good for a content drive but I think battles would be quite a short content drive. I'd be in favor of tunnelers, but battles would work also.  ❀ Atelda ❀ talk 22:12, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

I agree, but since Battles would be a short content drive, shouldn't we get that over with first? Then, since it's said to be short, we could start on Tunnelers in a few weeks. 23:11, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Good idea! As soon as Medicine is graded silver, we can do Battles. 17:51, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

It's going to take a while, though. It needs a LOT more references. 21:25, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

It does. But then, a lot of articles need references. :P 18:43, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Mentor ~ Silver Nomination
I'm adding in a LOT of references right now, but other than that, I think it's ready for silver! 21:38, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

There! References added. Comments? 23:36, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Great job! Add the mentors listed for A Heart of a Warrior section''. 10:13, June 21, 2011 (UTC)''

Wow, I can't believe I forgot to do that. I'll do it right now! 16:15, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Can you add more citations to the Process section? It has a few, but could use a few more. 18:46, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

I added in the mentors. And btw, every sentence except for one has a reference in the Process, so I don't think I can add anymore! :P 02:44, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Lol! It looks awesome Squirrelflame! 10:29, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Is it just me, or are there no references starting from the Dawn section? 12:42, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

No, its not just you :P Add in the references, and otherwise, it looks great! 17:14, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I added in the references. Took a while, though. :P Anything else? 15:07, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Looks astounding. I don't see anything else. 02:24, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Changed a few refs to notes. Looking great now. 19:54, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Oh thanks! Any other comments? 21:44, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

This will be CBVed after more votes are over... 16:25, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, since this is relatively late compared to other nominations above, it might take a while. 18:02, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

CBV? 17:44, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Vote is up! 17:26, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Leadership Ceremony ~ Silver Nomination
It looks good to me, but I think it needs a bit more information. Any suggestions, or does it looks good the way it is? 13:35, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

All I see that needs to be done is see if you can find the specific Erin Hunter chat that corresponds to Reference 6. 14:16, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Can you also find a few references for the last three paragraphs of Process? 17:06, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Got it! 10:21, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe one ref for the first paragraph of Process and one ref for the second to last paragraph of Process? 15:09, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, but I might need a little bit of help. I am still a bit busy. Can anyone help if possible? :3 10:22, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, I'll help! 16:25, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

There, done! Better, Rainey? 16:29, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much Squirrelflame! It looks much better now. Anything else? 03:07, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, I think it looks great! 18:19, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, and it's all thanks to you Squirreflame! Thanks so much! =D 07:53, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! 20:45, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

So....anything else? 09:24, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Nope, I don't think so. CBV? 21:14, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Vote is up! 16:45, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Medicine Cat Ceremony ~ Silver Nomination
Since everyone seems to be nominating the ceremonies, I did this one. :P I expanded it a bit, and added lots of citations. Comments? 18:04, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Can you add citations for the words medicine cat use to give their apprentice their full name? If not, it looks great! 10:32, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, same. One reference for the actual words of the ceremony. But other than that, looks great! 15:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, but the words are from the same reference as the sentence after that, so I don't think I should. 00:34, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Well, get it from a different reference then. I'll add it in. 16:33, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

There. I think the whole article looks a lot better! 16:34, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Anything else? 18:19, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Nope. Looks splendid! 17:51, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

CBV? 21:20, July 5, 2011 (UTC)V

Vote is up! 17:19, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Wolf - Silver Nomination
I edited the article significantly to fit the guidelines. I added a description section, and expanded everything. I added several citations from external sources. 16:49, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Can you add a refernece for the intro and a few more for Relations to Cats? 22:51, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Add a few more references. Great work! 00:32, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Done. 23:40, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

I think it looks great! 03:06, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Splendid. 03:23, June 30, 2011 (UTC)T

This will be CBVed after more votes close. 15:51, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

CBV? 21:23, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Join
May i join Project World! 19:09, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, sure! A lead will add you in soon. 21:45, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Of course! I'll add you in. See the Guidelines for any questions. Welcome to the project! 16:06, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Join?
Can I join? Echoblaze♥ 01:28, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Sure! I'll add you in now. See the Guidelines for any questions. Welcome to Project World! 15:55, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Personality Traits
In my opinion, this is an unnecessary article, but lets get more opinions. The vote closed a long time ago, but it was forgotten, so I closed it today. However, there is currently no conclusion, as it only had 3 votes supporting, and 3 votes against. See the vote here. I think it should be deleted, since characters have their quotes to show personality. Comments? 17:55, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Like I said on the forum, it would cause many arguments, and their personality traits would be better off on their articles. 17:58, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

I think it's unnecessary, too. Their traits are in their articles, and it would take too much unneeded work to add in every character. Quotes show a trait much better than picking out a few individual traits to write in. And there could be a couple of traits that cause arguments between users. After all, everyone can see different traits in a character. 18:18, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

So will it be deleted? 23:53, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I think we'll have another vote. 21:22, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

leaving
i'm leaving this wiki:(. Can someone take my name out of this project? Spottedstar42 The WWi ki van dals Mu st fall!!!  22:58, June 29, 2011 (UTC)\

Okay, I'll remove you, but you'll be missed. Bye! 16:13, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

leaving
i'm leaving this wiki:(. Can someone take my name out of this project? Spottedstar42 The WWi ki van dals Mu st fall!!!  22:59, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

WHHHAAA--?!?! You're seriously leaving?! Wow, alot of people are leaving these days.... Oh well, Bye Spottedstar! Im pretty sure you were a great help! --

Good luck in the real world! May StarClan light your path! 23:23, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Good Bye! :( 13:28, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Clan Terminology ~ Silver Nomination
It's not exactly ready for silver yet, I'm just reserving it. But I'll be adding in a lot more references. 17:22, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, add in more references. :P 17:30, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, added in references for everything! Anything else? 02:08, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Looks great! If you have Crookedstar's Promise can you check that to see if there are any more phrases? 06:27, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

I don't have CP right now, but I did add more phrases. Anything else? 18:03, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Apprentice Ceremony ~ Silver Nomination
I added a lot of references, and expanded it. Comments? 17:38, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe a reference for the part where it says that the mentor touches noses with the apprentice. 20:39, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Done! Anything else? 21:33, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re-Join?
Yeah, title pretty much says it all. -- 23:15, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Welcome Back Icy! Mistystar will add you back in soon. 08:12, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sure! I'll add you in now. Thanks for coming back to Project World! 21:26, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

New Project
Please comment on this: Forum:New Project. 01:15, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Softpaws
Are the softpaws (Ancients' apprentices) a part of Project World? If they're not, they could be, since they're just like apprentices. Echoblaze♥ 05:16, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, ther's no actual page for Softpaws. There is for the Ancients, but not for the Softpaws. I'm not sure if it would be a good idea to have a whole page for them since so little is known about them, but if others agreed, then I would too! 23:52, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I think we should have an article about Softpaws. We have one about Sharpclaws and such. It could explain what makes them different from sharpclaws. Also, if we do create a Softpaw page then I'm certain that it would be part of Project World! 03:27, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it definitely would be part of PW. However, it would be an extremely short page, so I think we should just leave it on the Ancients page, like the Tribe ranks. 15:33, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Joining?
may I please join? 20:51, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Sure! I'll add you in now. See the Guidelines for any questions you might have. Welcome to Project World! 21:28, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

thanks! 18:16, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

August '11 Feature Article
Since all the other projects have started their FAs, I see no reason why we shouldn't. So, what do you all think should be our next FA? Since we've been nominating a lot of ceremonies, I think we could use one as a FA, but I'm open to suggestions! 19:10, July 6, 2011 (UTC)