Warriors Wiki talk:Characters/Archive 18

Next Content Drive

 * So, we haven't had a formal content drive in a little while- I put up the TFA characters one quite a while ago, and by now most characters have their history filled in. (It didn't have a lot of emphasis on it anyway...) So I think it's time we picked our next Content Drive. Personally, I'd like to do Cinderpelt- Since we just were forced to demote her from Gold, it'd be nice to be able to work her back up to the standard again. Do people like Cinderpelt, have other ideas, etc.?

I like the idea of Cinderpelt. Was planning on getting her up to scratch anyway as I felt sorry after her demotion. =) ∑✐+ᖱ =  ᶊ⍶ᵰᗫᎽ  22:31, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Cinderpelt should be next. But what will happen after that? If everybody is working on her, she going to get back up pretty quickly. How about the main characters of the Original series? (e.g., Sandstorm, Firestar, Dustpelt, Cinderpelt, but not Bluestar or Graystripe, I should think) Maplefern May StarClan light your pathHow's the Prey running? 15:00, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well, that's worth considering, but I think we could spend one or two weeks working on individual articles and get them pretty much Gold-ready, and just switch whenever they're done. I don't think we'll make as much progress on any of them if there are multiple ones. (Which is why the last one knda failed XD) I realize now that the point of the Content drive is to focus everything on one article. It's a good idea though, to do some other OS characters after her, since a lot of them could easily be pushed up to Gold level with a bit of work (of course some need to be featured, but yeah...) Sorry for my incoherent ramblings, I was sick today and I'm still shaking it off. insan TA STE  THE  RAIN BOW  eu lar  22:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

I got snowed in today. :) What about characters from TFA? ♥Mouse♥  ♥Heart♥   18:02, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Washington got 20"!!!!!!!! sorry OT there. TFA characters were the last drive. I agree we need a single character. ∑✐+ᖱ =  ᶊ⍶ᵰᗫᎽ  21:27, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Sandy, what character needs the most work on their article. Whichever does, I think that should be our content drive. ღ♥Fire-Heart♥ღ  22:49, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

So, if there are no objections, Cindepelt will be our next one, and once she's done we can move onto some of the others Maple suggested. insan TA STE  THE  RAIN BOW  eu lar  23:01, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yah. After I posted my above comment, I looked up and I was like, I'm an idiot. Sandy- 20 inches? We got six! :( ♥Mouse♥  ♥Heart♥   23:52, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Alright. I will post her now, and compile a list of concerns on her talk page to be worked on. Let the content driving begin! insan TA <font color="#FFCC33">STE  <font color="#00CC33">THE  <font color="#0033CC">RAIN <font color="#6633FF">BOW  <font color="#660099">eu lar  23:08, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Put up the concerns on her talk page, if you see any more, feel free to add them. I can probably cite her family completely later tonight, though. <font color="#CC0000">insan <font color="#FF6600">TA <font color="#FFCC33">STE  <font color="#00CC33">THE  <font color="#0033CC">RAIN <font color="#6633FF">BOW  <font color="#660099">eu lar  23:18, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Her family's done. Maplefern May StarClan light your pathHow's the Prey running? 00:37, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Is she being worked on at all still? <font color="#8e322e">→ <font color="#96aeb6">Sky <font color="#96aeb6">feather  19:45, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Gar, I kept putting her off, sorry! I'm doing a run-over of her history now. But I don't have my books, so it's more of a general touch-up than adding content. insaneular   Talk  20:02, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

All right, I cleaned up her history a fair bit (It was horribly messy!) but I still think she needs a bit more history added for TNP, with more individual appearances listed rather than generalization. The only book of TNP she's okay for is Starlight, since I have read that a bunch of times and could remember when she appeared. Also, if anyone sees mistakes I made about what she did, feel free to correct them; I was working completely from memory. insaneular   Talk  21:12, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Nice job Insane, I was looking at my home and it was like

Cinderpelt- Insane

about 500 times. :) I can work on her some.-- Artimas Hunter Welcome to Bramblepath's Den 21:15, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Anyone see other major concerns for her, or should we look into a new content drive? insaneular   Talk  21:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think perhaps we can look for a new one now. She looks at least good enough for silver. ✐Sa  NdY  16:34, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Um......?
Well seeing as PCA had closed, and people have to start to join other projects. I think that PC will become like it. Evryone is going to join! Is there any point in making new members join as apprentices? I know I'm kinda new but yeah, what do you think? There is going to be a rush of people. Fawnstorm The Dark Forest are rising...  10:07, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Well, we've had several new members, but not a huge rush. And the reason PCA has apprentices is to accomodate for people learning to make chararts, then when they are good, graduating to warrior; you don't really need to 'learn' how to edit pages, so I'm not sure an apprentice rank is necessary as of yet. But it is a bit tempting to add, just to sort out the new members a bit. I'm not sure, what is everyone elses' opinion on this? insaneular   Talk  11:22, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

True, but we have a lot of warriors now. Maybe (and this is a big maybe-please tell me if I'm stepping out of line ;D) Porject Characters could take on a new resonsiblity? I don't know what but yeah-just a thought! Making the new members apprentices would teach them about gradings (see how I messed up on Cherrykit) and what to say in their edits. Fawnstorm The Dark Forest are rising...  11:28, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'm not going to get mad at you for making a suggestion. I actually think we shouldn't make apprentices here now, as we're starting to work at reviving the Adopt-a-user project, which will help a lot of people learn how things work. So it might be a bit redundant to have apprentices here. insaneular   Talk  16:08, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't think we need apprentices here. If someone makes a mistake, we can simply point that out. :)

As for Adopt-A-User, I liked that project. I think it would be good to have that back. ^_^ <span style="font-family:Century Gothic; color:blue; background:gray; border:0px dashed; -moz-border-raiuds: 1em; color:Blue;">Ruinpaw I was trapped like a mouse in TwolegPlace... 16:20, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

We have Adopt-A-User. That is enough. Møųş ëţą  łő  ŉ!!  19:53, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

If you guys want to help Adopt a user get back on track, you can participate in the discussion about it here.  i nsaneular  The original Hazelnut spread 13:48, April 3, 2010 (UTC)