Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations

This is where PCA members can be nominated for different spots on the project.

= Senior Warrior =

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * The majority of the project must agree
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations

Unsuccessful Nominations

Requirements

 * User must have been a member for at least 4 months.
 * User must have at least six images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

Ducksplash ~ SW Nomination, Ends September 15
Supporting Against
 * 1) Duck has been a member of this wiki since December 4th 2011, and joined PCA on August 2012. He is a role model for many younger members of PCA, is dedicated, and his chararts are incredible. He has 21 stunning chararts approved, and one on the way, and he has tweaked countless chararts. His constructive criticism is positive, and is able to help other PCA members to fulfill the charart process. He is talented in many levels, and he takes part in many discussions. He has much experience dealing with the project and he is mature. I'm sure the project members would be happy to see him among the senior ranks of the project. 17:45, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) I think I have to support. Yes, he is not that active all the time..But he has proved himself over and over again. He delivers amazing chararts, and always helps people out with tips and ideas. To tell you all the truth, when I first joined, he helped me out, telling me what would be best to do, I wondered "Why isn't he a senior warrior yet? It feels like he's one to me!" I always looked at him as a lead, and not until now did I find out he wasn't. So, I believe he should be a lead, no matter how many we have. And seriously, if we have too many, demote a few that are not active. But Duck, I think he deserves to be a senior warrior, all the way. c: 12:47, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) I've been rethinking about my vote below, and I've chosen to cross it out. Considering how phenomenal Duck is, as a user, artist, and editor, there is no doubt that he will do great as a SM, its not fair to deny him that because of my reasoning below, and some SMs aren't always active or sometimes on vacation, Duck will be a good help.
 * 4) I agree with the above. You can't say no just because there's a lot of leads. Duck is very talented in his work, and it wouldn't be fair to not let him become a SW because there's already a few. He's good at giving criteria, and his skills are exceptional. He deserves this all the way. 17:40, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) I don't know Duck very personally, but I do know that he would be a great senior warrior. He fills all of the requirements, and, in my opinion, deserves this position. And if the only thing that gets in the way of him becoming a SW is the project itself, then I don't see what the problem is here. Getting a new lead, an active one, especially, would actually do the project a favor. We need more people who are willing to help get this project back on it's feet - and pushing qualified members away isn't going to do anything.  20:09, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Honestly, I'd love to see Duck as a senior warrior; he's extremely talented, mature, and very helpful towards others without a doubt. However, the only thing that prevents me from saying yes is the fact that PCA has a lot of leads, even more then enough. Also, I think everyone has noticed that PCA isn't that active or buzzing as its usual state, (even the wiki itself...) so I feel as if another SM is really needed. Duck is an exceptional user, and he's proved it many times throughout his time on the wiki, but I think once the project is more active, another user could be welcomed as a SM.
 * 2) I'm so torn...but I agree with Stoney.  Duck is a phenomenal artist and he is so active and dedicated, but I think his talents will be better used when the project is a bit more active.  But I have no objection if the vote does pass.   02:34, September 4, 2013 (UTC) Shadewing
 * 3) I think that Duck could be a good SW, but not right now. I think we need to sort out the ones we've got first. Maybe in a time when PCA is more active we could reconsider. But I don't think that Duck or the project is ready right now. 17:11 Mon Sep 9 2013
 * 4) I'm agreeing with Breezey on this. We really do need to get the ones we have sorted out before we even think of promoting anyone else. Also, having a lot of leads is a perfectly acceptable reason to say no. Why would we promote more than we'd need? Like, if all of our leads were active and doing their jobs, we wouldn't need anyone else. While I do think he'd be a good lead, now isn't the time, since there are so many other things that need to be taken care of first and this includes shifting the focus from PCA.
 * 5) Agreeing. Duck is a good leader in projects, and is a fantastic artist, but we do have a lot of senior warriors. More than what is needed currently. The project should liven up and actually call for more leads before any are taken in. Sorry Duck, I know you'll be a SW some day. 18:42 Sat Sep 14
 * 6) Sorry, but no. I think Duck is an outstanding user but we really don't need any more senior warriors at the time. Maybe when the project grows. But now, I don't think Duck's that ready and I don't think the project is ready, either. 19:58, September 14, 2013 (UTC)

Bbun - SW Nomination, Ends 22 November 2013
Supporting:
 * 1) You know, I was against this user being a senior warriors many months ago, but I have seen a drastic improvement in both Beebs' charart skills and her maturity. She's very involved and very talented, and I think it would be nothing but beneficial for her to be a senior warrior of PCA. She has plenty of chararts completed and knows tweaking and redoing as well as any of us. She's also displayed how responsible she is in her diligent updating of the Charart/List - without having to have been asked. She has much to provide for PCA and becoming a senior warrior would only help the project further. Several SWs have stepped down or left the wiki, so I see no barriers for her become one. 5:52 Fri Nov 8 2013
 * 2) As per Breezey. It's time we stop being so elitist, and maybe we can start by giving other a chance to show what they're made of. She deserves it.
 * 3) If I were to voice my thoughts, I'd only be repeating what has been said. Good luck Beebs! 05:59 Fri Nov 8
 * 4) Beebs deserved this a long time ago. 17:34, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Naturally, of course Beebs deserves this! 17:36, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Against:

Comments: