Warriors Wiki talk:Charart

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Discussion=

Official Designs/Manga Designs alts.
Before we got the new queen alts, we had offical art alts/manga alts; which have since then been removed/and or not redone. So im proposing an idea to bring them back.

Yes, i know that character designs are up to the the artists, but what im saying is that we could have chararts with the official art in the character pixels aswell. Not as the main image; but atleast on their page. Mainly so they will have more variety, while still including the designs the Illustrator created, but still having our own designs as the main images.

Also, Some characters could use alts like Silverstream. (Shown as Blue-gray tabby; Blue-gray is quite a few shades away from Silver.) and possibly Leafstar. (Shown as cream colored cat with brown tabby patches.)

We already have made chararts for characters as they were shown in TUG and CotC; (Onestar; Brown and white/cream alt), etc. And we already make alts on how some characters are shown in the black and white pages in the manga. I dont see why we cant have alts for the manga cover art aswell, since it is official art. Unless our designs are almost identical to the offical art, i think we should atleast add "official designs" alts to the character pages as they were shown in the pictures in the guides/mangas.

This will probably get shot down, but this has been bugging me for awhile. 23:01, September 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * This is a good idea, but the only thing I'd be worried about is copyright issues, because we don't own the official images. Unless you mean doing alternates /exactly/ as they are depicted in the books. 11:22 PM, Tue Sep 30, 2014

Yes, this is what i mean. Using our blanks, and try to match the official designs as much as possible; not using the offical images themselves from the books, but simply matching those same patterns to the best of our ability.-- 23:27, September 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I like this. In fact, I was just about to post something about this for Leafstar (I just finished reading SD again), so I think this is a great idea. We'd just have to find all of the pictures, which could be hard, but, then again, it's not much different from finding sources from the books. 11:33 PM, Tue Sep 30, 2014

*nudges* Can we get some other comments on this please? 9:15 PM, Mon Oct 6, 2014

I think we did this for a while... quite a bit of time ago... But I think we could definitely do it again. Some people might not connect the official desc. and the manga ones, because they are so drastically different. And since we count the manga as canon, we should definitely use the desc. in those. It'd be a different matter if the content was not considered canon, I think. 22:18, 10/6/2014

Can we get some more opinions on this?-- 18:56, October 12, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's a reasonable idea. I dont know why they were ever discontinued; It still counts. Manga descriptions are used for manga-only cats (like Diesel), I don't see why they shouldnt be made into alts. 11:59, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

While I don't agree with Leafstar, because we do not know she is shown as brown and white and to say so is an assumption/plus it could be brown and cream for all we know- which is her confirmed description- we just show it differently, I would be okay with readding older images that were removed. Millie isn't shown in anywhere near the description she has, and we already have those alts done- they got removed for some odd reason.

I think this is a good idea, especially the official art part. For example Sol on the cover of outcast or wherever he appears, doesn't look like the charart he was made. --EosOfTheDawn (talk) 12:30, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

I think this is a great idea. There are a few books with alternate looking characters, especially Lionblaze. The Sight shows him as orange and Leafpool's Wish and The Forgotten Warrior looks more a dark golden-brown to me and his tabby stripes are not as visible. They also seem to like giving Hollyleaf short fur on The Sight and The Ultimate Guide than long fur on Hollyleaf's Story and Sunrise. --Stealthfire star (talk) 02:00, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

No, its been established time and time again that we do not make images based off of official art if they are not extremely different from their canon descriptions. Mainly because Wayne's style and pattern for the cats changes all the time. Millie's official description is completely different from her depiction in the manga, so yes I would agree that her alts should be readded to her page. Other alts based off of Cats of the Clans and The Ultimate Guide art are the same way - they have a completely different image than what they were shown in the book. For example, Boulder is a silver tabby, but in CotC he is blue, Heathertail is ginger, etc. I don't know why Silverstream's blue-grey alts were ever removed but they shouldn't have been as she's the same case as Boulder. But Lionblaze's depiction on FW is not two shades off of his description, and there's no reason to make a charart based off of a cover image if it's so similar to his given description. The same with Sol - he is described as a tortoiseshell tom, his chararts are tortoiseshell, and his cover image is tortoiseshell: he does not need an alt.

As for fur length, that's so minor and can easily be explained by seasons or even the cat's mood and doesn't deserve an entire alt dedicated to it. Half the time the authors themselves can't even keep track of the length of the cats fur in their narration.

As for manga alts, I believe since most of the time they are simplified versions of their canon description, they should not receive and entire image unless they are very different, such as Lionblaze appearing as a solid cat instead of a tabby. Basically, if they have a completely different pattern than in the books or they're a black cat or something and turn up white, things of that nature, that's when they should get a charart based off of the manga and should be entirely in greyscale. Otherwise the depictions of the cats in the mangas are based off of what the artist knows the description to be, hence why Millie is a rose colored tabby instead of silver - all he knew was that she was a tabby and went from there.

Now if you want to argue that we should include a gallery of scans of images from the books, that should probably go to another project, such as Characters, World, or even Reality, though I believe we don't do that do to copyright and a desire to keep copyrighted images on the wiki to just book covers for the most part. 15:08 Fri Oct 31 2014

I think with Hollyleaf she has short but thick fur, again though that could be explained with seasons. I think having the covers/official art on the pages is both a good and a bad idea, because of major description changes, but we also have to be careful if we show the official art because of copyright. I think in cases like Leafstar, her cover design and our design for her are very different from one another and she should have an alt for that. (only for the leader and anything earlier because she hasn't been described as a queen in anything but the manga (right?) 3:44 PM, Sun Nov 2, 2014

Oh no; that's not what im suggesting. Im not talking about adding the pages of pictures from the books; im simply saying we can try and match the designs given to the cats with our own blank, given they aren't close resembling our own designs. =) Showing the actual cover art and official art pictures would be copyright; so using our blanks instead and trying to match those designs seems like a much better way to avoid this.-- 17:07, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

I think you're missing what's been said about Leafstar. She's still shown as brown and cream, which is what her description is. She shouldn't get an alt for that- just because our chararts are different than what her comic description is (they're not manga, do not call them that, please), doesn't mean she gets an alt for artist's interpretation. Now, if she was shown as brown and white in those comics, that's another story. But, she was shown as brown and cream.

I understand that she is still shown as brown and cream, and I'm talking about the cover on SD, not comic/manga (which they have been referred to as manga so I see no reason to change that) which the pattern is much different. And besides, I was merely using her as an example, Snow. 5:48 PM, Sun Nov 2, 2014

We have no citation to her being on the cover of SkyClan's Destiny. No matter how obvious, we cannot assume. Again, she looks (They're not manga. Manga is of Japanese origin and reads from right to left. These are comics, as they read from left to right.)

No, I don't think we should require the manga and charart designs to match. If you want to make their images match then go ahead but otherwise no. It goes against our realistic design standards for characters and would waste countless amazing images. It simply wouldn't be worth it. 19:22 Sun Nov 2 2014

I don't think anyone said anything about making them match as the normal image, I'm almost positive that Breeze is saying that for some of the images that we have cover cites for we should have an alternate of that image (in whatever blank it should be, like leader or queen), whereas redoing the images we have right now would be dumb because they are amazing peices of art and deserve to be recognized. Should we just have a vote on this or something instead of (what seems like to me)  arguing? 8:31 PM, Sun Nov 2, 2014

Why? What's the point? The cover images are usually just simple headshots of the characters and you can see few markings besides whats on their face and chest. There's not nearly enough to make an alt out of. It'd be one thing if Lionblaze showed up as a black cat on a cover, but for just a shade's difference there's no point. That's even the standard for normal images with descriptions in the books. And what would we vote on? Like, you do realize that working on a wiki is mostly arguing your point, right? Also, if you're going say something don't cover it up with small text. 16:59 Thu Nov 6 2014

Thats true, but wheres the harm in making alts for the design's from books like CotC and TUG, and the manga's? (Given they aren't close resembling our own designs) They show the cats full image (or atleast most of them do) Cats like Sol and Millie, and some others have design's completely different than ours. I'm not saying we should replace our own designs, all im proposing is that we make alts to go into their character pixels with their original book given designs. Our design's will still be the main image, but the official patterned copies using our blanks will simply just be an alt. That way, we are still recognizing how the illustrator designed them, and also adding more variety.-- 22:55, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

I still think you're missing what we're saying. Sol is still a tortoiseshell, and a lot of the images in CotC and TUG are already showing a character's description. Just because it doesn't show what we have, doesn't mean it's not the same thing. It's just how Wayne decides to paint the characters. He doesn't know how we design them (to my knowledge), and he's given basic descriptions, so he just works with what he has. It doesn't make them anymore official than our designs. We go with what we know, and Wayne goes with what he knows. Millie's design in The Lost Warrior (the entire trilogy) is because the artist (I think anyways) only knew she was a tabby, nothing more, nothing less.

Alright. It was just an idea =). Sol used to have an alt for his design on Long Shadow's and TUG, but its since been removed? Same with Silverstream and Millie. Maybe we could just re-add the images that were made back then back to the character pages?-- 23:10, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good, but if we do that we'll have to make alts for the other cats, or it wouldn't really make sense.--EosOfTheDawn (talk) 13:35, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

Alright, what I'm seeing with making chararts in general is given people a good view of a cat's looks because there are a lot of cats without pictures, and the Erin's get it mixed up sometimes. The Charart is supposed to be the picture of the cat. Sol for example, if you want something to do with Long Shadows picture or Ultimate Guide picture, than redo his pictures to make him look just like it, because they are supposed to be the picture of him. The two shades off idea is good, because blue-gray tabby is way off light silver-gray and black tabby (I like being specific) I certainly wouldn't recognise it as Silverstream if the books didn't point it out.

We are literally painting a picture of a cat for everyone, the correct one and closest we can as described in the books and since the graphic novels are part of the warriors series, we could use some of the pictures for inspiration for our pictures as honestly, I like Bramblestar's tabby pattern in the graphic novel than as the charart (sorry to the artist who made the pattern! I still like it!) Especially with the SkyClan and the Strangers series, picture Leafstar, what does she look like? Either way, it's most likely Brown and cream tabby, but which way? Simple brown and cream like the chararts, or cream with tabby patches like the graphic novels? I think we need to capture what's most memorable about a cat's looks in the graphic novels and put them as charart.

Official alts are too confusing to me but graphic novel alts for mistaken description, that's the same as the books mistakenly calling them a different colour. We also look to the books for cats' descriptions, so why not look to the graphic novels for descriptions too? As long as it matches the description, we can draw it up on a blank and people can easily recognize it.

That's my opinion in a not-so-organized essay that I suddenly typed up. Agree or disagree, this is what I think of this. --Stealthfire star (talk) 02:19, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

The chararts aren't canon descriptions, though. Those chararts are how the artist sees them- Sol is a prime example. We are not required to match the images given in Cats of the Clans, Code of the Clans, The Ultimate Guide, Battles of the Clans, or any other book cover/picture of a cat. These include the graphic novels. Sol's charart is what he's called- a tortoiseshell tom. Bramblestar is a dark brown tabby (his leader is my image and I'm slightly offended since I had a pattern to match), Leafstar is brown and cream, ect. It's kinda silly and honestly pointless to change chararts based on matching their "canon" descriptions- which the graphic novels aren't even that. They're grayscaled and we do not know what colors they are. Plus, those patterns are more often than not over simplified and really not the best idea to match. Unless they are a drastic change from their written description, then we don't do anything with it. I quite like Leafstar's pattern in the SkyClan graphic novels myself, but that doesn't mean I think we should redo her chararts. That's pretty counterproductive and a waste of a perfectly acceptable set.

Those pictures are not "the picture of a cat". Wayne is given a basic description, and that's how he chooses to paint them. The other artists involved help too- making their own patterns based on the lists they're given. We are not bound by those basic lists, not when we have detailed written ones we can use. tldr; I really don't think we should change the chararts we already have for the overly-basic descriptions we have in the graphic novels- the designs aren't official in the least.

I disagree about redoing all the chararts to match the books; that would just be pointless. I was proposing an idea to either bring back the old alts that were made for that (Silverstream, Millie, Sol, and a few others) or just add a new category to the charart images labeled "Official Design Alt", or something of the like. Not all cats would need it; only the ones shown in COTC, BOTC, TUG, etc. (Given they don't look exactly like our current designs) Even if we don't add another category; i'd just like to see the old images back on their pages as alts. I honestly saw no point in them being removed, tbh.-- 06:28, December 13, 2014 (UTC)

Sol wouldn't come back, though. He is still a tortoiseshell cat, so that's totally out of the question. I understand Silverstream and Millie, and I'm all for those two, but Sol is already depicted as a tortoiseshell cat in his chararts. Just because the designs don't match doesn't mean they're not the same kind of pattern. A tortoiseshell is a tortoiseshell, simple as that.

Well let me just slide in here for a second. What Im understanding is that Breeze thinks there should be alts as the manga shows the cat. Personally I don't think we should do that. First of all, you cannot see the whole cat in the mangas most of the time. Secondly they're in black in white. So we can't confirm an official color for the alt because of that, and no we can't just assume it's their desc color. Thirdly we'd need a citing. We can't just say "it was in the manga" because I've seen that some of the books don't include the mangas. Nobody would understand what the alt is doing there. It's different when they say "he was accidentally mentioned as black" so then we make an alt.

But also I'm sure the Erin's hired people to draw those, and who knows they might now have known the description of each cat. It's different with Diesel though of course.

So yeah not sure if I made any sense at all, I'm low on sleep and food. But yeah I disagree that we should make alts for those cats. Sorry Breeze it was a nice idea. 18:43, December 16, 2014 (UTC)

That point has already been debated about, Dark. What im saying now is that we should atleast add the old alts that were made (and removed) before the new queen blanks were approved. (Atleast Millie's and Silverstream's, anyway.) I see your points, though.-- 00:51, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

Bluestar's official art design alt is still on her page--EosOfTheDawn (talk) 02:19, December 30, 2014 (UTC)

Alright, let me get this straight. Breeze is saying that we should make alternate character arts for cats that have drastically different descriptions/depictions on book covers or official guides. AKA cats that are different colors, are missing a tabby pattern, etc. If this is correct, then I'm all for this. This is supposed to be a fully comprehensive encyclopedia that covers every aspect of the Warriors series, correct? Then I don't think the character art should be left out of that "every aspect" thing. Unless, of course, the official depiction isn't very different from the current canon description that we have. Alts shouldn't be made if we don't have a cite for that cat being depicted. I'm sorry if I'm wrong with any of this, this discussion is just so very confusing >-< 04:28, December 31, 2014 (UTC) Has this gone into action yet? 04:24, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

No, it hasnt. We're still discussing whether we are going to do anything about it. 08:08, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

StarClan kit subcategory
I was thinking we could have a sub category of StarClan kits in the StarClan cat section. It is more or so related to the charart part of the character pages but I think it could be easier for people searching for the characters with a StarClan kit charart (especially for those at Project Charart) I'll don't mind if this is rejected though. XD I just thought this could be useful. --Stealthfire star (talk) 01:02, December 9, 2014 (UTC)

If PCA wants to put this on the kit images, they can do it, but a starclan kit isn't an actual "official" rank, so they wouldn't be getting this category. 02:28, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

I'd be up for adding that to the images themselves, honestly. It would keep better track of the images since while they are StarClan cats, they are also using the StarClan kit lineart. Shall we move this discussion to PCA, in that case?

Yep, you can go ahead and move this to PCA. 02:39, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

(above section was from PC)

Okay, it's been moved, and I like her idea of adding the categories. It seems to be a bit easier, and we can only get more organized, imho.

Agreeing with Jayce. ^^' Im up for adding it; I see no reason to disagree. 16:17, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

So any other comments? 04:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Golden-brown and Ginger
Kate just posted something about how the Erins consider their colors for the cats. She says that when they're describing a cat as golden-brown, they see it as a sort of syrupy color, while ginger cats are more orange. I figure that's pretty much the standard we already follow, I just wanted to bring this up in case this could be made a more solid standard for chararts.

Here's the cite: http://erinhunter.katecary.co.uk/christmas-blogclan-tavern/comment-page-7/#comment-188027 Jayie  Unwritten words~ 22:48, December 19, 2014 (UTC)


 * Prods discussion*. ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 11:07, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Rosetail's tail
I was bored and looking over chararts of various cats and I came upon Rosetail's page. In her description it says she has a 'pinkish-orangeish tail' yet in all of her chararts, her tail is the same, normal brown color. Does her charart set need a tweak for her tail or am I just seeing things and it actually is rosey? (I though I'd ask this here instead of her talk :P) 21:53, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

You probably should have taken this to the tweak nominations page. 16:12, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Im pretty sure her tail is rose colored, but its just not all that noticable. I may be wrong, though. 05:27, December 25, 2014 (UTC)

Actually her entire pelt is rosey-colored since that's the only color we have a cite for. There was a false cite for ginger that was there for a long time and no one caught it/bothered to check. =/ We're working with what we have. Also, it would only go to the tweak nominations page if she wanted to propose a tweak. She was asking a question about the color, not saying it needed to be tweaked- this section is in the right spot.

rejoin
Guess who. Again. 12:30, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Welcome back. I trust you already know the guidelines, if you were here before ^_^ 14:42, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Waitwait, what rank were you when you left?? 14:43, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Dazzy was a warrior, and a very experienced one at that. =P

Tweak Nomination
I just want to put up a tweak nomination but the art/character I want to nominate is already there, and I want to nominate something different from that nomination. Can I still make the tweak nomination or do I have to wait until that tweak nomination is down? --Stealthfire star (talk) 09:39, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

Just suggest it in the comments and votes. 11:00, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

Alright, thanks! --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:27, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

any answers??
Hey! I just wanted to ask, how do you become an apprentice? thx x Flameclaw1 (talk) 13:24, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

A senior warrior will promote you when they think you're ready. You have to put up an image for approval ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 13:34, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

To add on to that, it has to be at least 50% done. 04:17, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Tallpoppy - Star
Why isn't Tallpoppy's StarClan image being used? Because she is shown to be in need of a StarClan image eventhough she has one. Could someone explain that to me?

Thank you. — ｷﾉ尺尺乇ﾚ í'm nσt rαndσm, чσu just cαn't thínk αs fαst αs mє   23:07, December 27, 2014 (UTC)

It was never approved to my knowledge, so that's why it's not being used.

Ah! I see thanks for that. But what I don't understand is why it's not in the declined archives. — ｷﾉ尺尺乇ﾚ í'm nσt rαndσm, чσu just cαn't thínk αs fαst αs mє   14:20, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Nevermind - I found it withdrawn in the archives! — ｷﾉ尺尺乇ﾚ í'm nσt rαndσm, чσu just cαn't thínk αs fαst αs mє   22:21, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

StarClan Shrewclaw
File:Shrewclaw.star.png I've done a tweak nomination for the eyes, but was told it doesn't need nomination and can just be changed with permission.

so, can I just change the eyes and add a little depth? It looks a little flat. Also, I'm not sure if I should leave it at the tweak nomination page or ask here, but Shrewclaw's star and apprentice images have a gray nose, can brown cats have that? Also noting his kit image has a pink nose, but I understand that as kits usually have pink noses. --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:26, December 27, 2014 (UTC)

I guess, but don't touch the pupil or overall colour. Just adding some darker yellows near the top (where the depth is in the image) should do the trick. Not all kits are born with pink noses, I believe - I could just tweak the nose to match the others in a heartbeat (since it's my image). If it's alright, I'll change it to grey later tonight. 21:57, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

Reupload Like that? I saved the original file to my computer if we need to change it back. --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:04, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

I don't see any difference in the eye color at all.

Also, I fixed the kit's nose; and, Stealthfire, can you upload the changes on ezimba or something, so we can see?

[] is the best I can do. If this isn't enough, we might have to redo the eyes altogether. --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:34, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

All I see is a green box with orange words saying 'www.ezimba' etc. And no, we don't need to redo the eyes - putting depth into them is easy. If you want, I could tweak them instead. 23:41, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah you do it. My computer is acting up on me. --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:49, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

It's done; I didn't want to do it too much, otherwise I'd make the eye colour look more different. 02:20, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

WindClan Tunnelers
I don't know if this has been considered before but the WindClan Tunnelers in Tallstar's Revenge have been described a lot with dirty or muddy pelts, I was wondering if adding the 'mud' to their chararts, like with Tribe cats, is an idea that can be explored. Stealthfire star (talk) 00:31, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

Unless its a thing they purposely do like the Tribe does I don't think we should. 4:54 Mon Dec 29 2014

Nah, they're just messy from the tunnels and it's not done for their protection and things like the Tribe. Unnecessary tweaking is not a good thing- we already have enough of that.

Charart Contests?
Well, i had been looking through some old threads, and saw that the wikia has had a couple charart contests in its lifetime. So, im proposing an idea to have another one. Here are my reasonings;

It would be alot of fun for every member of the project, and be a small, creative break from things.

It could draw newer members here, possibly.

It could also let users get to know eachother a bit.

While i was reading through them, i saw you had to create either a description for a character that had none; or everyone had to do the same cat. Now, i believe this could be a really fun event/vote that includes every member of the project. Like before, each rank could be split into different catagories.

Agree/disagree. =) 20:29, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

No. It promotes unnecessary uploads and people don't listen when you tell them to use their personal image file for the entries. This has happened before, and as "fun" as it is, the wiki's main focus isn't the charart project- it's the other projects and the mainspace. If you're suggesting it because you're bored, then there are plenty of mainspace articles that could use some work.

I haven't been around to see an event happen, so I don't know if it can happen or not, but I think it sounds like a good idea. Maybe have a strike system, might be hard to keep track, maybe create a page for it, but it could work. --Stealthfire star (talk) 21:43, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

...I didnt even say i posted this because i was bored? I'd appreciate it if you wouldnt automatically asume my reasonings to posting this. And it would be for this  project; more like a bit of a break for the members here. Also; that could easily be fixed; Whoever didnt post it as their personal image would be automatically declined. I was simply suggesting an idea =/. 21:47, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

I said "if you were bored". That doesn't mean I accused you of it, it means that could have been one of the possibilities for it being brought forward- that's been the basis of a suggestion in the past. I'm allowed to state that and I don't appreciate being told off. My answer is still no. The first one was suggested, and then other ones after that were only suggested to relive boredom because people refuse to edit the mainspace.

Just a suggestion.. I think it'll get shot down Maybe we can use links instead of personal images? Please don't shoot me   04:15, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Tbh, it wouldn't even be considered as a break. Making chararts is already supposed to be fun and a break from PCA would be to not make chararts. Plus, why have a contest when you can always redo your personal image? 18:08 Fri Jan 9

Please Help!
I love the warriors series, and I want to make character pixels, but I don't have gimp of pixlr. I tried making it on microsoft excel, but I don't exactly know how. Can someone help me please? MP15102005 (talk) 04:17, December 31, 2014 (UTC) MP15102005

try to remember signing with four ~. There are many other programs, such as PAINT.NET, or even paint, Sumopaint, photoshop, and others. GIMP and Pixlr are just popular ones. I don't have pixlr and I hardly use GIMP, and I think I'm doing fine. --Stealthfire star (talk) 04:19, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much! MP15102005 (talk) 04:35, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Um... I read through the basic tutorials, but they all start with a basic lineart. How do I get that lineart? Thanks MP15102005 (talk) 04:41, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

The front page, just scroll down until you find them. --Stealthfire star (talk) 04:48, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to keep bothering you, but which front page again? I can't find it on the Main Page MP15102005 (talk) 04:51, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

And how do I get it on the program? MP15102005 (talk) 04:55, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Usually copy and paste. You probably will have to adjust the borders, but there is different ways of doing that, depending on which program you use. With some programs, you even have to Save as the lineart you want, then open it in the program. --Stealthfire star (talk) 04:59, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Pinely - Join Request
May I join this project? Thanks! (And Happy New Year!) ^^

And I have one question: If I want to make charart, do I have to ask here? Or do I have to ask someone in particular? Thanks.

♠Pinely ~Anything Is Possible  04:17, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Nah, you just reserve it on the table on the main page. I'll add you in (I was preoccupied earlier and now I'm a bit more attentive), so welcome to the project! Here's a link to the the guidelines, so be sure to read them. =)

Alright, thank you. <: ♠Pinely ~Anything Is Possible  07:46, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Re-join
May I rejoin? I was removed when I was a kit because I wasn't active. I promise to be more active now. Sonic78 (talk) 20:37, January 2, 2015 (UTC)

Alt for Ravenpaw?
On his trivia, it lists the graphic novel mistakes, and I'm wondering if it counts as an alt, even the one where it shows him with no white at all. If it counts, can I please have it? instead of someone quickly jumping at it before I have a chance to process it all. Thanks! --Stealthfire star (talk) 00:17, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

Seems too minor to be an alt. If it were all white markings, with the areas around his eyes/etc., okay, but the grey's a bit too close to black. And it is first come, first serve. 00:54, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

Breezepelt
Breezepelt is shown as a rogue, but his rogue image has been taken down. Should it be there or the rogue thing be taken down? --Stealthfire star (talk) 21:37, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Likely just a mistake, I'll add it back. 21:45, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

I'd removed it because it was a common mistake that it was for Kate's thing saying that she liked the idea of he and Nightcloud being on the run. He gets the alt for him fighting on the side of the Dark Forest in The Last Hope, and I forgot to put it back on the article.

Lionblaze new cite
I've just cited him to also have a ripped ear. I think it doesn't need a vote as the guideline lists torn ears as an example of ones that don't need a vote, does it need a vote or can we work on his ears right away? --Stealthfire star (talk) 23:50, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Ripped and nicked are basically the same thing in this case. The cite is unneeded and his images already have the ripped ear. 00:26, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Alt for Firestar?
On the Japanese cover for Into The Wild, which can be shown, Firestar is depicted as a brown tabby. Would that warrant an alt? ~ Burntclaw  Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 08:04, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

One, I see no proof that it's Firestar on the front of that cover, and two, we don't do alternates for those covers since they're not the English-language ones we use.

Oh, okay. Sorry, I didn't know that. <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting;font-size:12px; color:Red; text-shadow:Orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">~ Burntclaw <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;"> Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 08:20, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Just a question Don't shoot me plz Why don't we go with the other language editions? They are a part of the Warriors series too, just in a different language. <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting;font-size:12px; color:Red; text-shadow:Orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">~ Burntclaw <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;"> Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 08:24, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but it would lead to countless unnecessary chararts, imho. Plus, we don't have any cites at all for who's on what cover. We don't even have a cite for Squirrelflight being on the English cover of Dawn.

Oh okay, thanks! <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting;font-size:12px; color:Red; text-shadow:Orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">~ Burntclaw <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;"> Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 08:32, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

??
I'm just asking (hope this doesn't sound random), is golden too close to golden-brown to warrant an alt? ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 10:36, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

golden is considered a partial to my knowledge. 10:38, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Anyone forget I'm a Charart member?
Hey, Stream here. It seems I have been removed due to low activity, but I wish to be added back in. I would like to come back :D Hope you don't mind. I'm an apprentice, but I understand if I'm back to a kit. 19:45, January 9, 2015 (UTC)

Joinnnn :3
Could I join? (Bramble mewed this ;3) -- 19:24, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Pale orange vs pale ginger
This is a bit random, but is pale orange too close to pale ginger? <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting;font-size:12px; color:Red; text-shadow:Orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">~ Burntclaw <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;"> Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 12:00, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Alt for Sorreltail?
On Dawn, Page 44, it quoted, ''A yowl startled her, and she saw white and ginger fur flashing through the undergrowth. A heartbeat later, Sorreltail and Brackenfur burst out of the bushes in front of them.'' I want your guy's opinions on this one, I'm not sure if this warrants. <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting;font-size:12px; color:Red; text-shadow:Orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">~ Burntclaw <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;"> Yolo <span style="font-family: Lucida Handwriting; font-size:11px;color:Red; text-shadow:orange 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">♫ ♪ 12:23, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't think it counts since we can't tell if one is being called white, one ginger, or if they're both being called ginger and white. Someone else might think differently, though.

I'm gonna say no because ginger and white fur in this case can still refer to them seperately, and they are (mostly) white and ginger. She could have seen them one after the other if you get what I'm trying to say. 12:50, January 12, 2015 (UTC)