Warriors Wiki talk:Charart

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Discussion=

Redoing images...
Hey, I know we have a rule that anyone that redoes an image has to redo all the images for that cat, but shouldn't it also be a rule that the user has to do the rest of the cat's images before redoing another cat's image? I mean, it wouldn't apply to just tweaking another cat's image, but to redo one image and then go to redo another cat's image means that one user can just quickly make it so that they have "dibs" on multiple cats when another user could be doing them. Personally, I think that makes the project run a bit slower as the extra images for that cat could be done rather quickly but just sit there waiting for the user that decided to redo one image and just moved on to another cat. Does anyone agree? 04:14, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

To clarify: basically, you'd have to redo all of the images for one cat before redoing another cat's. You could go tweak another image in you wanted, as tweaks don't require you to do every image on a page. 04:16, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

I thought something similar. Yes, that makes sense and I like it. 04:24, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, cause someone could redo a lot of images, and have to redo all their ranks. 05:26, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

I always found this rule silly to begin with. I mean, if you have to redo one image on a page whose two images already look different, it's not out of your ability to copy the other artist's style. Now, I know that if you can't do it you can't do it, but when Iceheart told me about this rule (because I had never had any indication about it before) I was completely baffled. Do we really think that our artists aren't good enough that they can't copy a charart? 05:41, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

The rule is stupid, albight a bit useful. Personally, I don't want it around. Say if someone's going to re-do Cloudtail's images (Not going to happen, but just an example), I'll be the first to admit, I'll snag his kittypet image if possible. I adore it, and if I had the chance to work on it, I would. It seems certain people think that we're unable to mimic another style. >.>;; 05:44, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

I hate this rule too. I mean, what if we had it where the people who make new images for characters (say, a new kit or something) make all the images for that character from there on in? That would just be plain silly, and honestly, I don't see this as very much different than that. I mean, I would probably (along with a few other probably) redo the rest of the images for a character, but making it a rules just seems a bit unneeded. I think we should get rid of it, and it seems a few other people agree with me. :P Though, MAYBE we could make it so if the image isn't on the redo list, the person has to do the rest, but not if it is on the redo list? Cause then, it wouldn't really be completely necessary for the image to be redone, so the artist would have to take responsibility for making the rest of the images match? Though, like I said, personally I think we should just get rid of the rule altogether. ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕  ☆StarClan be with you★  06:58, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, you guys are right. The reason I thought of the little add on up there was because I think of the rule as flawed as well. Dunno what they were thinking, my first charart for the project was Shellheart's elder image, and I copied the deputy image just fine. I could do the same on the redos. 12:33, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

So, can we simply be shot of this rule and be allowed to redo images that need to be redone, regardless of who remade another image for the same cat? 02:52, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

If an image is redone completely, I say that the same artist should do all of the others (like I'm doing with Raggedstar). Sorry, but that's how I see it. 02:53, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

EDIT: Like, if they change the whole style completely, despite the other style being okay. Ie: the Crookedstar and Feathertail incidents... 02:54, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

I believe I said this before, but let's say in the next book a new warrior is introduced. Now, what if said warrior leaves the Clans and becomes a loner, or becomes a leader, and elder, or even a queen? Would we have the same person do both images? No. That's like me saying I did Spiderstar's leader, so therefore I must do his loner. And don't say that this is different, because it is no way different. Redoing is the exact same thing as starting from scratch. I am against this rule. 04:06, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ya we get it you dont like it no need to get aggresivly boldened. I kinda thought that they all had to be done in a row was self-explainitory >.> Yes they do need to be done in a row, i guess i didnt make that clear enough. People always say this rule is around because of consistency and thats all good and fine but not why i wanted it. I wanted it because people would redo one image out of 5 and then never do the others. Then there would be the one different one for months and months and it looked stupid. Thats why i pushed for this rule to be in place. I dont care who does them as long as theyre done within a reasonable time of each other. 23:40, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

It was bolded so it would stand out, please don't be rude to me. As for someone never redoing the image, it would go smoother if we had different people doing a redo; it would be faster. Say the character has four images. Well, one person could do two, and someone else could do the other two, and then all four could be up at the same time. Then this "never doing the others" wouldn't happen. 19:57, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Let me get this straight. Let's say that I go and redo Willowbreeze's warrior just because her old charart was hard to work with. So long as the pattern doesn't change considerably (say going from the pattern now to triangle tabby) and compared with the others, still looks like it belongs to the same cat, I don't have to redo the others. But if a charart is completely redone with a new pattern, then yes, all of them would have to be redone because it was the artist's choice to redo it and make it into a new pattern. Does that sound right? - Scarletwind  ✧ L i s a n n a ✧ 03:00, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Voting Now Open!
Voting for the first part of the charart contest is now open! Go here to submit your votes! 01:15, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Apprentice Test Chararts
Hey, I've been noticing that a couple of apprentices have uploaded new files for test chararts that their mentors have asked for, such as this and this. I'm afraid this might cause some clutter in the images and it may get us in trouble for causing multiple uploads by users. I think this could be solved by apprentices simply uploading the images over their personals or e-mailing the images to their mentors. Any other solutions? 15:31, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

I think we should just stick with those two. Personally, I think the emailing is good, that's what I'm doing now, but for people who don't have email, yeah they could just upload it over their personal image. I don't see any need for anything else, but that's just me. ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕  ☆StarClan be with you★  16:52, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

That sounds good, Paleclaw. Any objections? - Scarletwind  ✧ L i s a n n a ✧ 03:04, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

No. In fact, I think email would be better, that way a mentor could take the time to critique it, and write step by step things, and they could talk back and forth without clogging the recent activity feed / wasting space by uploading images. 06:13, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Alts
I've got a few questions on alts.

First off, would Lionblaze get an alt (after the apprentice blanks are finished of course) for his CotC picture? He looks more speckled than a tabby, however he DOES have very clear strips on his head (tabby M) and the tip of his tail. Normally I wouldn't ask this, but since Silverstream seems to be getting an alt for only having one stripe, I figured I'd ask.

Second of all, if a ginger cat that's DESCRIBED as a tabby is shown as a solid cat in the manga (in black and white, not on the cover) would they get an alt? I know all ginger cats have stripes, but if the cat is specifically described as a tabby, then shown as a solid in black and white, meaning you can't tell for sure if it's ginger or not, I would think they would. Like for example, Sharpclaw is a ginger TABBY, but is shown as a solid cat in the manga, whearas Billystorm is just a ginger cat (never described in book as a tabby) and he's shown as a solid cat. I think Billystorm wouldn't get one, because in the Erin's eyes, Billystorm very well could be ginger, but Sharpclaw is described as a tabby, but shown solid, so shouldn't he get an alt? Same with Jaggedtooth.

Also, just one last question, why was Ashfur tweaked to look like his CotC picture, but all the others got alts for them? Sorry for the long post. XD ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕   ☆StarClan be with you★  10:44, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

I think if a ginger tabby cat is shown as a solid, then it should get an alt. I don't know why Ashfur got tweaked to look like the CotC picture, and I'm not sure about Lionblaze. 08:00, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Lionblaze, I'm not sure about. Speckled tabby is different, so I'm leaning towards yes, but I want a couple more opinions. Ashfur, I got no idea why he looks like that, but he does look nice. As for ginger cats, I'm gonna say, no alts. - Scarletwind  ✧ L i s a n n a ✧ 03:07, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Blackstar
In the allegiances of The Forgotten Warrior, Blackstar is listed with one jet-black paw, instead of four. Does that warrant an alt? Or do we tweak all of his images? I wish the Erins would stay consistent... 21:35, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure. Since it's only a paw, it's not a huge change. Like Spottedleaf being described with a white tail tip instead of a black one. I don't think this'd require an alt. but I wanna hear from some others before I confirm. - Scarletwind  ✧ L i s a n n a ✧ 21:47, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

I think it should get an alt. I mean it is different from his reagular imade even though it is only a little change. But it should still be counted as an alt. because it is different and that is what an alt is for. 22:38, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Nope, I think its too little of a difference. It might make it in the Trivia section, but I dont think an alt isnt really needed. Im pretty sure hes been mentioned with all four black paws before(I think) - 22:41, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Why in StarClan's name would we give him a new alt, just for that? It's too minor, and it's not like it changes the entire pelt colour. If anything, a statement in the trivia section should suffice, since he's been mentioned with multiple black paws a lot more, I think. 22:44, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cloudy, he was mentioned with one black paw, not multiple. 00:50, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

I've read him mentioned with more than one. Regardless, I see no need for an alt. 00:53, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Which wasn't really what I was asking anyway. It was about whether he needed to be tweaked or an alt. You guys make it seem like I'm desperate for an alt D: 00:56, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

I dont think he needs either. 01:49, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Iceheart on this one. It's like changing eye color or gender. 06:07, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Rejoin
Hi can I rejoin as an apprentice Wild  fire Hazelx Thorn!  18:51, November 24, 2011 (UTC)