Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Accepted 235

Crouchfoot (Alt. W) - Approved
And Crouchfoot makes three. 16:25, June 8, 2019 (UTC)

I hate to be that person but only 60 images are allowed on the approval page until the CBAs are archived.  Ellie  life is an illusion 16:33, June 8, 2019 (UTC)

Withdrawing for the same reasons as Berrynose's and Darktail's kit images. 16:55, June 8, 2019 (UTC) The page is currently at 60, so I believe this is allowed now? If so, un-withdrawing. 18:48, June 8, 2019 (UTC)

Yeah I think it's fine. I'm having a hard time distinguishing the base from the lineart. Is there any way you can lighten the base? 20:38, June 8, 2019 (UTC)

Reuploaded. I'm just bad at colorpicking today it seems. 23:55, June 8, 2019 (UTC)

Maybe lighten a little more. I still can't see anything rip

Reuploaded. 22:47, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

CBA?

Approved. 15:07, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

Oddfoot (K) - Approved
warrior isn't in use so new pattern kids

didnt we agree that unless you're the oa, you have to match the pattern in the set, even if its not in use? (which was the entire outcome of the shade pelt drama) 12:53, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

Max is the OA, they said earlier that they are the OA especially since the warrior isn't in use. So this is fine imo.  Ellie  life is an illusion 13:19, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

but hes not the OA of the warrior, is he? 15:11, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

Checked, and the OA of the warrior is Paleclaw. 15:24, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

I think the difference here is it isn't 'not-in-use' in the way that's 'we removed all the kits and warriors to re-add them to pages' but rather the 'not-in-use' in that Oddfoot's warrior is an invalid cite with an image that was just kept of courtesy. It's not going to be redone into the set like Shade Pelt's needed to be, and this is a single by count. And since it's an OA single, I personally think they can do whatever.

The warrior isn't in use due to an invalid cite, meaning Max is free to do whatever they want with the pattern. There was no proof that Oddfoot was a warrior, which is why the cite was removed.

Isn't his name proof in itself though? As we all know only warriors/meds get unique suffixes so it wouldn't make sense for him not to be a warrior. He should at least get an unknown residence blank (could they be used for instances like this? Maybe a new blank should be made for situations like this) since he most likely was not a kit. But besides that, can you make the base color a tad more brown? It looks gray to me, while the stripes look (very dark) brown. - JArtz11  Oblivious to EVERYTHING!  20:12, June 9, 2019 (UTC)

The name is only proof he was at least an adult cat, but we don't know if he was a warrior.. it's likely that he was, given that Nightmask was the deputy at the time, but there's still nothing outright calling him a warrior. Regardless, that discussion is for PC and this should only focus on the art, not whether or not a cite is valid.

reuploaded

CBA?

Approved. 15:07, June 11, 2019 (UTC)