Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Nominations/Declined 5

Red (SD) (Ro) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Red.rogue.png The shading on these could be defined quite a bit, and it looks like the shading is engulfing the legs. I'd like this if it passes.-- 16:31, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope. Ev's style is very unique and I don't think it should be touched.
 * agreeing with Snowman. 18:07, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think the shading necessarily has to be defined as I can see it fine. However, it ought to have additional highlights to explain where the direction of light is coming from. 18:21, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I honestly think it's fine as-is. 18:53 Sun Oct 12
 * 18:55, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9:47 PM, Sun Oct 12, 2014

Snow Hare (E) ~ Tweak Nomination
Elder Shading is very blocky, could use a good blur. Also could be defined. I'll take it if the OA doesn't want it. 7:32 PM, Mon Oct 13, 2014
 * The harder-edged shading is intentional, and it's fine. There are actually people who use that kind of shading. I believe it's similar to soft-cell shading.
 * I actually like how it is. 20:37 Mon Oct 13

Not voting on this one, since I kinda agree with both Rocket and Hawky. 21:00, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * looks alright to me. 22:20, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the shading looks fine. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 18:36, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

10:00, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Briarlight ~ Tweak Nomination
W, A, Alt A, Ki She has a cite for having dark paws. If the OA's don't want them and if it passes, I'd like this whole set, please. 15:13 Sun Oct 26
 * You wouldn't mind sharing the alt apprentice would you? 3:19 PM, Sun Oct 26, 2014
 * That's a partial description, Hawky. She's already dark brown =P 15:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Partial description; but even so, I'd like the warrior and normal apprentice since I still have the files for them.

Partial descriptiooons~! 16:34, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * -- 18:01, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:32, 10/28/2014
 * Archived. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 01:15, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

Fernpelt ~ Tweak Nomitation
File:Fernpelt.star.png and File:Fernpelt.apprentice.png Flat Shading. If the OA doesn't want either of these, I'll take the set. 8:08 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014
 * No. But I'm pretty sure Scarlet wants these if they pass since she adores Fernpelt's images.
 * 20:19, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we're getting too overboard in terms of what looks flat and what's not. Honestly, I think these are fine. 20:36 Mon Oct 27
 * Hawk, I nominate images because I have a hard time seeing things like shading. Everyone's eyes are different, and mine have sucked as of late. I don't see how we're going overboard with these things, but if you guys just want to vote no, go ahead. (And I'm not saying that in a pissy way, people will vote how they want to vote and if no one else sees a problem with this then that's fine with me.) 8:41 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014

mine 21:04, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * -- 23:59, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

00:38, 10/28/2014
 * Archived. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 05:12, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

Rain That Rattles on Stones ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Rain.elder.png Flat shading. I'll take it if the OA doesn't want it. 8:08 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014
 * This is so neat how it is please do not touch it.
 * 20:18, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's fine. 20:37 Mon Oct 27
 * -- 23:59, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:39, 10/28/2014
 * Archived. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 05:13, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

Bramblestar ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Bramblestar.leader.png Flat shading. I'll take this if the OA doesn't want it  Okay that's enough for today    8:08 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014
 * This is not flat. This is more defined than Swiftstar and you voted no. I literally only tweaked this a couple months ago and it's fine. Regardless, it's my image so I will be taking it.
 * It's fine. 20:18, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I like this shading. 20:37 Mon Oct 27
 * Okay then, Cloudy, you don't need to get so upset at me for nominating this, I was having a hard time seeing the shading and I acted accordingly. As for Swiftstar, I was voting no for the color not the shading (tbh I didn't even see the shading). <span style="">8:41 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014
 * As I said, it is not flat (to me and obviously a few others), and overly defined shading on this can and does throw the colors off quite badly. We had this issue with the kit too because the shading threw off the colors.
 * I know you said it was not flat. I understand that others do not find it flat. I found it flat, and I nominated it. I wasn't going to freaky over define it (or ask anyone else to), because I am //legitimately// having a near impossible time seeing it. <span style="">9:02 PM, Mon Oct 27, 2014
 * It looks fine as it is.-- 23:59, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * how is this even seen as flat. <span style="">00:41, 10/28/2014
 * Archived. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 05:14, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

Sorreltail (star) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Sorreltail.star.png (I have no clue how to just do the file link and not the whole image so if someone could fix that, thanks) -she needs a little tweaking with the shading; I don't see it very well, and I believe it could be defined more and darkened. If this passes, I'd like to do this one. Edit: darken had been a typo I just meant define^^ 17:27, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * If you darken the shading too much on this, it's gonna look really gray on the white, and I think it would start to distort the coloring Hawky has.
 * define yes darken no. <span style="">5:56 PM, Tue Oct 28, 2014
 * Even if darken was an apparent typo, my vote is still no due to me honestly believing the image is fine as it is. Changing the type of tweak you want to do will not sway my vote.
 * I'm not trying to sway your vote, I'm just correcting an error I hadn't noticed when I posted this. 19:53, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm with Jayce on this one. <span style="">19:54, 10/28/2014
 * 20:11, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope. -- 20:57, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * 21:04, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

Owlfur - Tweak Nomination
File:Owlfur.warrior.png Shading looks a bit flat, if the OA doesn't mind, I'd like to take this if it passes. Jayie Unwritten words~ 02:42, October 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * not that flat tbh <span style="">03:08, 10/30/2014
 * I think it looks fine. 04:03, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nah.
 * ^ <span style="">20:52 Thu Oct 30
 * 00:32, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">3:29 PM, Fri Oct 31, 2014

Mossheart (SC) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Mossheart_(SC).mc.png the shading needs defining and it's a bit flat. I'd like to take this if this passes, and if the OA doesn't mind. 19:57, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I honestly think it's fine. <span style="">20:28 Wed Oct 29
 * <span style="">20:57, 10/29/2014
 * <span style="">9:48 PM, Wed Oct 29, 2014
 * 23:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Jayie Unwritten words~ 00:47, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks fine as it is, tbh.-- 15:50, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

Pinefur - Tweak Nomination
File:Pinefur.warrior.png Shading could use some defining. I'd like this if it passes, if the OA doesnt mind.-- 22:33, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * In general, maybe the tail, but I can see it just fine and it's not enough to warrant a tweak, imho.
 * I like this and I think its fine. <span style="">0:27 Fri Oct 31
 * 00:34, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * 01:02, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">3:29 PM, Fri Oct 31, 2014
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

Mossheart (SC) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Mossheart_(SC).mc.png the shading needs defining and it's a bit flat. I'd like to take this if this passes, and if the OA doesn't mind. 19:57, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I honestly think it's fine. <span style="">20:28 Wed Oct 29
 * <span style="">20:57, 10/29/2014
 * <span style="">9:48 PM, Wed Oct 29, 2014
 * 23:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Jayie Unwritten words~ 00:47, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks fine as it is, tbh.-- 15:50, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

Pinefur - Tweak Nomination
File:Pinefur.warrior.png Shading could use some defining. I'd like this if it passes, if the OA doesnt mind.-- 22:33, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * In general, maybe the tail, but I can see it just fine and it's not enough to warrant a tweak, imho.
 * I like this and I think its fine. <span style="">0:27 Fri Oct 31
 * 00:34, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * 01:02, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">3:29 PM, Fri Oct 31, 2014
 * 16:05, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

Blossomkit (SC) (Star) ~ Redo Nomination
file:Blossomkit_(SC).star.png well at first I thought it would only be a tweak but i now realize it'll have to be a redo. Basically shes not the same color of white as the kit. And with that, id have to change the shading color so the blue tinted shading wouldn't make the white look so off. So yeah this would be a redo. If OA doesn't mind, And if it passes, I'd like this. 14:42, November 1, 2014 (UTC)


 * Not sure about this one, I think the white on the star may just be like that because of highlights, but the shading on the kit is a little odd and it's making the unshaded parts look a bit gray. Hmm. <span style="">6:19 PM, Sat Nov 1, 2014
 * Tint is not required to match. Also, this image is fine, and if anything, the actual kit needs to be tweaked to be lighter, because that's bordering on gray. This is a wonderful image and does not need to be redone.
 * I think the kit could use definition of highlights as it looks grey, like Jayce said (they ec'd me oops) This is fine, though. <span style="">18:22, 11/1/2014
 * Agreeing with the above. 18:23, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * May I put the kit up in the tweaks or shoudl I wait until this is archived? <span style="">6:23 PM, Sat Nov 1, 2014
 * agreeing with the above. But if this passes, since I'm the OA, I want this, Frosty. 19:31, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">0:18 Sun Nov 2
 * btw Rocket, I never use highlights. It was colour picked from the lightest part of the kit, and the shading tint probably makes it appear brighter, not to mention that the kit is a little grey, like people have mentioned. 01:51, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Daisy (KP) ~ Tweak Nomination
file:Daisy.kittypet.png shading is flat. If OA doesn't want it, I'd like this. 19:49, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * wow I can barely even see the shading. <span style="">20:05, 11/1/2014
 * bruh how did no one catch this? <span style="">8:08 PM, Sat Nov 1, 2014
 * Sorry, but I can see it just fine. Make it much darker and it'll probably end up distorting the coloring.
 * Agreeing with Skye. 20:12, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * hey now that I have my glasses on I can see it. <span style="">22:33, 11/1/2014
 * 22:42, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">0:17 Sun Nov 2
 * 01:56, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Briarlight (W) ~ Tweak Nomination
file:Briarlight.warrior.png shading is flat and could use some more depth. I'd like this if it passes, since the OA isn't around anymore. Whoops it is Shinx lol sorry. If Shinx wants it that is cool (sorry it said it was someone else at first) 01:28, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you even check the file history? The OA is me. All Shinx did was change the eye color. Regardless, this isn't flat and actually, trying to shade this with the lineart isn't easy. If it passes, though, I do want it.
 * <span style="">01:33, 11/4/2014
 * <span style="">1:53 Tue Nov 4
 * I honestly have no idea how to do that, as I don't have any time to explore that. The first I saw was some user from a while ago, then I saw Shinx. Sorry I had no clue. 02:07, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

lol im not an OA Jayce is 10:44, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 21:14, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * -- 21:30, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

Chirp (Lo) - Tweak Nomination
File:Chirp.loner.png shading is flat and could be defined in some areas. I'd like this if it passes. <span style="">20:46, 11/4/2014
 * 20:57, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see it just fine.
 * Agreeing with Skye. 21:14, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ <span style="">21:25 Tue Nov 4
 * It could have some more depth, aswell.-- 21:29, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see it. 22:20, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Jayie Unwritten words~ 17:39, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Archived. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 17:40, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

Featherwhisker (MC, Mca, Star) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Featherwhisker.mc.png, File:Featherwhisker.mca.png , File:Featherwhisker.star.png Needs a plumy tail. (Similar to Feathertail's, since she was described with the same thing). As the OA, i'd like the StarClanner.-- 22:47, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think he'd get this because it's not a major feature and he isn't named for it. I got turned for nominating Swiftstar, who has a long tail and Cinderheart, who has a bushy tail. <span style="">22:51 Tue Nov 4
 * he was named for his whiskers not tail. also plumy is a common thing so no <span style="">22:58, 11/4/2014
 * I don't know. I think he would have a tail like Feathertail. it doesn't really matter what their name is e.g. Tornear doesn't have a torn ear. So yeah I think he could, especially since it's in his description. 04:30, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * He was named for his whiskers, not his tail. It's not a defining feature and irrelevant to his name. Also we have no cite for Tornear being named after a torn ear as we have absolutely no evidence he even has one to begin with.
 * Jayie Unwritten words~ 17:35, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

19:16, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

Half Moon (SP) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Half Moon.softpaw.png Shading could be defined in some places. If Ivy doesnt mind, i'd like this. -- 21:51, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see it just fine. Overly defined/darkened shading on these blanks doesn't go over well.
 * <span style="">22:53, 11/11/2014
 * <span style="">23:04 Tue Nov 11
 * 23:08, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * 23:19, November 11, 2014 (UTC)

Rowanberry  ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Rowanberry.warrior.png File:Rowanberry.kit.png The shading looks flat on the warrior and the kit image too. Plus, on the kit the colors don't seem to match the other chararts. The warrior OA is not active anymore so I'd like it if no one else does ^^ 00:19, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * for the kit. the warrior is fine and Duck is active so I'm sure he'd like it. <span style="">00:28, 11/14/2014
 * Honestly, both are fine.
 * ^ <span style="">1:08 Fri Nov 14
 * however i would likethe kit 01:19, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * no 02:51, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * 03:12, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Russetfur (W, D) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Russetfur.deputy.png and File:Russetfur.warrior.gif The stripes could be defined just a little bit more (as in, make a bit more visible) since they look a bit sharper on her other images.-- 06:31, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Russetfur.warrior.gif isn't even being used. Do you mean File:Russetfur.warrior.png? Regardless, I think both images are fine.
 * Oh yes, i meant to link the second one lmao. My bad xD. 06:39, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">21:40 Tue Nov 11
 * nah <span style="">22:54, 11/11/2014
 * it's fine 16:51, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * they look fine tbh 23:41, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

Mistystar - Tweak Nomination
File:Mistystar.leader.png, etc. So, I've wondered this for awhile, but why aren't these long-haired? Both of her parent's chararts are longhaired, her brother's is, her kit's are and she's a RiverClan cat. They honestly should be longhaired, because she was never said to have shorthair. 01:35, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * shes never said to be longhair either, and shes also of thunderclan descent. 01:37, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * She, Stonefur, and Mosskit were born in ThunderClan, and therefore are exempt from the pelt length ruling. As her pelt length is never specified, it was decided to keep her short-haired. It was still artist's choice since she is half-ThunderClan.
 * Honestly, just because she's of ThunderClan descent doesn't mean she has to be shorthair. However, I won't vote because it could go either way. <span style="">1:41 Sat Nov 15
 * Actually, it does have something to do with it. Because the pelt length thing, to my knowledge, is for those who are born in RiverClan, or are of full-RiverClan blood, or something along those lines. If she's never said to be long-haired, then I don't think she should get it. Also, I forgot to mention, but if this passes, I want the leader image. ^^
 * But based on her Clan background, and family I think she should get it. We have nothing that says she's shorthaired, either. 01:50, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * Mosskit has a shorthaired blank, and Stonefur's pelt length is not specified. Nor is Oakheart's. The only one that specifically says "long fur" is Bluestar. Oakheart got the long fur because that's just how his images were, and Stonefur was artist's choice. I'm currently looking for the discussion we had on this, since I remember it was somewhere on here... Mistystar was one of the cats brought up. Remember, "thick fur" does not mean "long fur". You can have thicker hair and it not be very long- my own hair used to be like that before I grew it out.
 * <span style="">04:21, 11/15/2014
 * -- 17:49, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * 22:35, November 15, 2014 (UTC)

Storm (Ro) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Storm (Ro).rogue.png File:Storm (Ro).queen.png File:Storm (Ro).star.png She's a silver tabby, so im guessing she'd need black stripes.-- 17:30, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * The queen and StarClanner are mine, so I'd like to take those. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 18:45, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * aww but she looks pretty with these stripes I'll have the rogue if Raelic doesn't mind 18:50, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * silver gray tabby =/= silver tabby 19:56, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * it's a shade of gray and unless it specifically says "silver tabby", it should not be tweaked.
 * Yeah silver-grey implies that she's grey with a silver "sheen" or whatever, not a silver tabby. Believe me, I would have loved to give her heavy black stripes when I was making her rogue. <span style="">20:02 Sat Nov 15 2014
 * Agreeing with above. <span style="">20:07 Sat Nov 15
 * <span style="">20:08 Sat Nov 15

Sharpclaw (SC) (Alt W) & (Ki) ~ Tweak Nomination
file:Sharpclaw_(SC).warrior.alt.png file:Sharpclaw_(SC).kit.png Honestly the alt has some waste next to the chest so I could do that in a jiffy. I think the kits color needs to be darkened to match with the rest of his images, because it seems awfully paler and lighter than his other images. His stripes could be sharpened too on that particular image(completely optional). I'd like both of the OA's don't mind. 08:51, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * There's no waste on the alt warrior, and even then, you don't need to nominate for waste- just get rid of it. As for the kit, I think that's fine too. I believe when Atelda made this, she was given the colors by Misty, so they should match. They just look different because the blanks are a lot smaller and shading on these is usually pretty thick.
 * as per Snowman. It's fine. 19:55, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Naw, (wo)man. 20:14, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ <span style="">21:48 Mon Nov 17
 * 03:12, November 20, 2014 (UTC)

Willowbreeze ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Willowbreeze.star.png, File:Willowbreeze.queen.png , File:Willowbreeze.warrior.png , File:Willowbreeze.kit.png and File:Willowbreeze.apprentice.png She's described as pale silver-gray; she could be lightened a bit, and also needs black stripes. If Scarlet doesnt mind, i'd like the kit if this passes.-- 19:05, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think "silver-gray" is different than silver??? <span style="">19:20 Sat Nov 15
 * silver-gray is a shade of gray, I think. Unless it specifically says "silver tabby", I don't think they should be tweaked.
 * <span style="">20:20 Sat Nov 15 2014
 * 03:12, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Plus, these images are puuuuurddy 10:03, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 09:16, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Flowerstar (Star) ~ Tweak Nomination
file:Flowerstar.star.png The stripes need more defining, as I can not even see them. And I think a bit of earpink is missing in the <--- left ear(completely optional on the earpink). I'd like this, since I don't think Berry is active in PCA anymore, sadly. 09:35, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope. I can see them just fine, and Berry is easily reachable. =P
 * 15:57, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nah.-- 23:24, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * The earpink is fine and just a tad for the stripes, and I think the other images have a more reddish tint to the patches. 18:28, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I would just like to point out that tint is not required to match.
 * Shading tint may not be the the patches do need to match and I think these are a bit less red than the patches on her other images. 22:14, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks okay to me. 22:33, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:18, November 28, 2014 (UTC)

Mallowfur (Star) ~ Tweak Nomination
file:Mallowfur.star.png Her white patches look more like a creamy gray on the chest, and a dark gray under the shading, so they need whitened up. I'd like this, and the OA, Mounty, isn't active anymore. 00:24, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks fine; i can clearly tell its white. Theres shading on some of the white parts; of course it won't look pure white. The muzzle/paws clearly depict that it's white, and not gray. 01:06, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * We've approved some tweaks for a lot less. 18:26, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * honestly, I can perfectly tell it's white. 20:14, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreeing with the above. 22:34, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:17, November 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * 00:17, November 28, 2014 (UTC)

Firestar (Ki) - Tweak Nomination
File:Firestar.kit.png Like Beebs said, all kittypet kits need a collar. I'd like this if it passes. 01:39, December 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">2:35 Mon Dec 1
 * 21:12, December 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * he was only ever tweaked to remove it, can't we just revert it? 03:01, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * -- 03:25, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * Just revert the file 03:42, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * Revert. <span style="">13:50 Tue Dec 2 2014
 * Agreeing with the two above. Brick   The Bite of '87  15:36, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ <span style="">23:29, 12/2/2014
 * Hawky is blind and doesn't pay attention. Changing vote. <span style="">23:58 Tue Dec 2

Patch (KP) (K) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Patch (KP).kit.png Like all kittpet kits, he needs a collar. Since the OA is no longer active, i'd like this, please.-- 03:32, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * If I'm not mistaken he was actually seen without a collar soo 20:47, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ <span style="">21:34 Tue Dec 2
 * <span style="">23:31, 12/2/2014
 * 21:34, December 8, 2014 (UTC)

Thistlepaw (P3) (K) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Thistlepaw (P3).kit.png Shading could be defined quite a bit. The light source could be defined, aswell; since the body shading is telling me its coming from the <---, while the tail and facial shading is telling me its coming from the --->. The leg shading could be defined, aswell. ^^'. 01:19, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is mine, even though I honestly think it's fine and some of the members are getting picky. =/
 * <span style="">22:27 Wed Dec 17
 * 03:39, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * 11:46, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 01:16, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Fox (Ro)- Tweak Nomination
File:Fox (Ro).star.png The color doesn't match the other images. 18:28, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. I colorpicked from the rogue, so it most definately should. If it doesn't look that way, blame the shading. Alhough I may be biased. IF it passes, I'd like this, though. 19:12, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine. It's just the way shinx used the highlights but it still matches the others 20:43, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ <span style="">21:44 Fri Dec 19
 * Nah, it just appears that way because of a different blank and different shading methods.
 * Nope. -- 05:21, December 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks fine ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 06:46, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Fawnstep (MC, Star) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Fawnstep.mc.png and File:Fawnstep.star.png I think the base color is too dark to be light brown. ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 06:26, December 22, 2014 (UTC)


 * Looks fine as it is. 06:30, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * no holy shit 06:41, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's the shading. The base itself is actually fairly light on both images.
 * I can see the shading is as light as it can be. Maybe have the tabby stripes lightened? --Stealthfire star (talk) 06:55, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks fine to me. 11:21, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Shading could be lightened up a tad, but the base color is fine. ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 12:10, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Emberkit (Ki) ~ Redo Nomination
File:Emberkit (CJ).kit.png Not quite sure if this should be tweaked or redone but, the stripes on Ember's flank are very thick compared to the others and the fore-head stripes seem pretty sloppy. I'd like this if it passes :3 22:02, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but this was the first image in the set, therefore the other images need to match it, not the other way around. It's not "nominate whatever image 'looks the worst' in the set". You match what you're given, and that's that. He doesn't have another image that should match as we have no proof when he died, therefore we have no StarClan image for him. Any versions you saw were unapproved and don't count. Regardless, this image is fine and does not need to be redone at all.
 * As the OA, I'm giving my 2 cents. My image came first, therefore the other images match mine. As Skye said, this isn't nominate the "worst one" (which is really rude by the way) furthermore, I made that image back when PCA was literally redoing every image that was not 100% realistic. It's not realistic to have perfectly symmetrical stripes, so I made them sloppy on purpose. Furthermore, even if my image needed changing, it'd be a tweak, not a redo. But as it stands, the kit came first so the other images (if needed) need to be tweaked to match mine. Sorry, sport, but I think this one is kinda unnecessary. 22:22, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry Vixen, but agreeing with the above. But this is the only image in the set?? There's nothing for it to match or be "Worse" than what   22:32, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * My only problem is the neck shading and maybe the head shading could be defined a tad, other than that this is a great image! --Stealthfire star (talk) 22:41, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * When I said 'compared to the others' I was pointing out the other stripes on the only image. And I didn't mean to be rude??? Sorry if I came off that way??? I didn't think saying sloppy was rude... And I know cat stripes aren't perfect sorry... And I didn't mean nor do I think yours is the worst jeeze.......   22:39, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * <span style="">4:22 Thu Dec 25
 * Sorry.-- 05:14, December 25, 2014 (UTC)

Heathertail (W) (alt W) ~ Tweak Nomination
File:Heathertail.warrior.png the shading is dark, and could be lightened. Also, the File:Heathertail.warrior.alt.png shading looks really light, apart from the tail. Maybe darken that too. --Stealthfire star (talk) 02:16, December 27, 2014 (UTC) Looks fine. ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 04:09, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Heathertail.warrior.png Is fine, but File:Heathertail.warrior.alt.png's shading needs to be defined
 * agreeing with Burntclaw. 12:31, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 13:59, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 23:04, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 05:49, December 31, 2014 (UTC)