Warriors Wiki talk:Characters

Minor characters
Since the topic was brought up again, I'd like to propose that we make a page for extremely minor characters. Here's an idea for a template, and here's an idea for a layout for the page. Opinions? 12:09 Thu Jul 30

That's not a bad idea at all. :) I like this, but what about if the character has more than one art? It's probably unlikely but what does everyone think? 20:37, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

If the character has more than one image, the character pixels gallery would work just fine. 08:03 Wed Aug 5

Is this for every single character that is mentioned in the books? 12:25, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

No, it's extremely minor characters that have some significance, or just extremely minor characters. Like some unnamed BloodClan warriors in the BloodClan battle. Some cats there appeared in more than one sentence, like the indentical gray toms recognised Barley as a former BloodClan cat. We could also look at the Dark Forest battle. I'd say unnamed characters that are mentioned in more than on sentence. 22:00, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

I've started a list of minor characters with the series. Just to say, but there is an error to the coding in the Charart template, since it goes after the main page name rather than the title. 08:05, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Err, it's way too short and doesn't list allegiances and book appereances. I think Berry's one is pretty good. 10:40, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

What??!!! I wasn't trying to take over Berry's version. That page is a page for potential minor characters and it just contains information about them. Not the actual page. Why the heck would I even try to take over Berry's page? It's rude, condescending and stupid .-. 11:26, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

???? It's just a list of unnamed characters by book and the info we have about them...? Rather than an actual template/page layout like Berry's...? Anyway, I'm not too sure we should make a page for all of them - I don't think the 'Orange WindClan warrior' who was part of a patrol or something gets a page - pages should be reserved for unnamed characters with somewhat of a significance (Dappletail's Kit, Lowbranch's Mother, etc.) Maybe for the most minor characters, we could have a page like 'minor unnamed characters' and categorize it by book, the info about the characters put in using Berry's template. Idk. 13:45, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

That...was the idea we started on. That's why I made the template. One big page for every extremely minor character too minor even for a page. That's why the page layout's there. That's what I image the page would end up looking like; lists of cats with info and the history. Also, I think Burnt's list is only there as that; a list. Not an attempt at replacing my template idea, so could we calm down a little? 13:49 Sat Aug 15

All right, my apologies. I think I missed something in the discussion, oops. 13:55, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I came across that way Brunt. It wasn't my intention. 00:55, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Anymore comments? 05:05, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

I'd just like to ask if everyone thinks the layout for the history sections looks okay. I could probably put everything into the template since most of the minor character's histories are short enough for it... 11:30 Sat Aug 29

There's a coding error for the charart template, it names the files after the page name rather than the character name. Is it possible to fix it? 11:38, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

I can assure you nothing like that happens in this template. I'm fixing up an example on my test wiki right now, so we'll all be able to see how it properly works then. 11:55 Sat Aug 29

Sorry, I read that wrong. Are you talking about the gallery template? We could probably create a separate template for this, or edit the one their is now to work for this page. 11:58 Sat Aug 29

Oh yeah, I was. Sorry for being unclear. 12:37, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah the charart box and gallery is automatic. I think there's a way but I'm not an expert on coding. 04:01, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

I took a look at the template and the code that puts in the name is just a #switch tag, so it'll be easy to put something in for this minor character page. 07:13 Tue Sep 8

Can you put back up an example? I'd like to have a look at the template and fix anything else needed to before we talk more on what cats to include. 08:40, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

Examples. 12:07 Sat Sep 12

Hmm, can you show a bit more example? I more or so want to see how the affiliations work, with past and present and all that. Also family too, how will we list family? Especially with really long family sections. 22:00, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Berry? Hello? 00:19, September 22, 2015 (UTC)

I'm getting to it now. I haven't really had the time and motivation to deal with this this week. Sorry. 05:56 Wed Sep 23

I don't know...I still disagree. They have their articles and I don't think they need anything else. 13:55, September 27, 2015 (UTC)

What are you talking about Icy? Allegiance only characters wouldn't go on this page if that's what you're thinking. This page would be for characters who are mentioned like, super briefly. Like "the black tom glared at Fireheart as he walked past" sort of characters. 15:45 Sun Sep 27

Oh, so you mean cats that aren't named? Okay. That makes a lot more sense. 19:34, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

But uh, I should probably say - good luck. There are a lot of unnamed characters. Also, I'd like to help if you don't mind. 19:35, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

Examples updated. More examples, added some stuff to the template. Ignore that bottom part - joke with some friends. 12:25 Thu Oct 1

Now I'm really loving these! Do we want these templates multiple colours or try to match them to the wiki's colour somewhat? 22:36, October 1, 2015 (UTC)

The different colours of the headers, as stated on the page, is supposed to represent the cat's affiliation. We'd put a key somewhere, and probably order the cats by group and all that. I was lazy and wanted to show off the nice colours. 17:25 Fri Oct 2

Looking good, Bert!!! Does anyone have any suggestions/ideas for that template, or is it just about ready to go? 00:55, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

[pokes] hey guys anyone else got anything to say about this? i wanna make sure the template is as perfect as possible before we implement it 12:34 Mon Oct 12

Like the character template, can you add optional other sections on some examples? Like past affiliations and cause of death. Can we discuss what characters to add to this page? Just unnamed characters or very very minor characters, like Gorsefoot or something. 21:56, October 15, 2015 (UTC)

Hello? Berry? 00:19, October 25, 2015 (UTC)

Honestly I thought this was only ever going to have very, very minor characters. Say, allegiance-onlys and cats that are mentioned while someone's passing by or "a black cat streaked past" sort of thing... 03:04 Wed Oct 28

[nudges this] opinions, guys? 09:36 Wed Nov 4

Why would characters who are shown in the allegiances get featured on that page? Some of them hardly stay allegiance only for the entire series... It wouldn't make sense to put those characters on that page.. chances are, they'll show up later. It's good for characters who aren't named, sure, but ones that are and have their own description, affiliation, rank, ect, should probably have their own page.. especially with some of these newer cats, since we don't know if we'll see them again.

Character Descriptions
Alright, this is becoming too major and confusing to not discuss about. Many many pages with character descriptions are being removed. Like Sharpclaw (SC) and his sharp eyes, and Clear Sky and his icy eyes. Why? We already sorted out the synonym thing and suddenly we are removing everything that describes the eyes' colours. I do not understand at all.

I think we also need a new system for this stuff, as I keep getting put in the dark with this and it is just leading to much confusion. 01:48, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

Basically everything that's not a physical description, like soft paws, powerful claws, etc. You can't see those, you'd have to feel them. Physical descriptions are like something you see at first glance. 02:00, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

Whoever added the Clear Sky thing didn't even check the context. It said his eyes looked like chips of ice because they were narrowed. Context is everything, and whoever wants to add things needs to read before they do. Also, powerful claws, soft paws, ect... that stuff makes no sense to have in a description.

And I saw on Pips description, the dog, that he liked to run around and sometimes chase cats. That does not need to be in a description. 02:25, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

If anything, it's best to establish what's in a description, and what's not in one. You know, to make it easier for once? Perhaps explaining certain contexts and what they mean for desc. , maybe? 00:29, August 4, 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea to me, Beebs. A description should be what you see at first glace- ie; pelt color, eye color, gender (keep in mind these are cats and scents also give away a cat's gender), size, condition of fur (ragged, sleek, fluffy, ect), and things along those lines. Claw size for cats like Bramblestar and Tigerstar too, since it's a signifigant part of their character. You can't tell if a cat's claws are sharp, if their muscles are hard or soft, or anything like that just by looking.

We should add this this little bit to the guidelines; just to clarify that descriptions are purely physical and can be seen at first glance, unless it's a major part of their character or what they were named for, and to remind users to check the context before editing. 07:16 Sun Aug 9

Actually just to add you can see if a cat's claws are sharp. just adding that in. 00:24, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

It's sorta the same with soft fur too. A cat's fur can look soft. 21:59, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Really? I don't know. My cat has pretty long, shiny fur that looks soft but when I do touch it it's really coarse and not that soft. 02:27, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

that's why I said can look soft. 04:01, September 8, 2015 (UTC)

Comments? 23:20, September 18, 2015 (UTC)

I still disagree with "soft fur" being "physical"... 01:37, September 24, 2015 (UTC)

its literally a tangible thing you can touch and see, (most of the time) its physical. 10:14, September 24, 2015 (UTC)

There's two types of soft: One you can feel and one you can see. I have no idea what we are going to do about that though. 00:40, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

I looked at Path of Stars, Thunder narrates about Violet's soft ears, when he was at a distance. I think that's conclusive enough to say that soft should stay up. 06:19, October 14, 2015 (UTC)

Comments? 00:24, October 24, 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. Now that you put that up, I did read a few more books and noticed that cats see "soft" from a distance. And I took a look at some of my own "soft" things and technically I can see if they're soft or not. So yeah. 21:00, October 25, 2015 (UTC)

The majority agree that soft is a physical description. Anymore comments? 01:22, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Character Template
Alright, so we all know the ongoing issue with the character template, right? It's not showing up right for some, but correct for others. Basically, it's full of outdated and expired coding, complicated statements that are probably unnecessary, and tbh could probably be formatted better due to us constantly deciding to add/remove fields- some sections could use some expansion in their width or height as well. Tribe names are infamous for this- the entire name doesn't properly show up if it's too long, and don't even get me started on having to put "Teller of the Pointed Stones" (with or without 'Stoneteller' at the end of it). I would like to propose a revamp or even a restyle on the character template to make it a bit more functional and easier to fit all of the information. I had a basic thing here and then there was other examples here and in the general history of the page, but I couldn't get some of the sections to show up properly... but yeah, I'd really like to eventually redo and/or tweak this template so it actually works for everyone.

I'd prefer to keep the blue colour, but these still look great! Can you put more on one of the examples as I'd like to see what a full template looks like if you don't mind. ^^ I think you just add age, cause of death, deputy/leader/medicine cat positions and book appearances. Maybe do a Firestar example? He has the biggest template. 21:23, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

Honestly that template does need an update. It's extremely hard to create the thing on different pages because I end up having to jump back and forth between articles to work out the long field names and how everything should be put in, etc.. Plus, as you've pointed out Jayce, the size of different parts just don't work for some pages. Family and education parts sometimes screw up and put different names on different lines and stuff.

I really like the colour scheme on the second one, but I think instead of having rounded boxes we should stick with the rectangle/square thing (or maybe try playing around with the padding; rounded edges have never really worked for me). I agree with an example, but probably not Firestar, because that is a very big Charcat. Perhaps you could try Cloudtail or even Gray Wing, since we've had trouble with his family section before? <span style="">05:08 Sat Sep 19

Thanks for the input, you two! I'll get to fixing that around Tuesday, since that's the next time I have off work! If there's any other suggestions, go ahead and put them here. Also, maybe we could incorporate Burntclaw's idea about translated names into this as well? Because how the template is now, that would be really hard to do.

That's not a bad idea, actually. I wouldn't be against having a translated names section in the Charcat template; it would save having to add a whole new section to articles that are already really long. Perhaps you could have it as a dropdown or something? <span style="">09:40 Mon Sep 21

If you're suggesting putting translated names into the template, I disagree. I think that'd cause a lot of hassle, and warriors is translated into a lot of languages ... Also, there's a page just for that. There's no need for it to be on the template. However revamping the template sounds like a great idea. 17:56, September 22, 2015 (UTC)

Opinions? 00:09, October 2, 2015 (UTC)

It wouldn't be too much of a hassle, imo. It's not too hard to find names in different languages now that all the alternate language Warriors Wikis are popping up. We've also got a few of English-as-second-language editors that could give us a hand. It'd also be easier than crawling through the whole translated names list for one character's name.

Jayce, have you added anything to your examples recently? I can tell a bit's changed but I can't find all the changes. totally not because im too lazy to compared the history <span style="">17:33 Fri Oct 2

Comments? 05:18, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

Hello? Jayce? 06:03, October 22, 2015 (UTC)

I've been busy as hell and haven't had the time to properly sit down and focus on this. I'll let you know when I've made the proposed tweaks.

Nettlesplash, Sandypaw, etc
so i'm here to bring up another topic, (yay) which is why exactly do nettlesplash and other such skyclan cats have kittypet images for? i'm aware they were taking food from a twoleg, but......they were still feral the entire time. they werent ever in a house (that i know of), never held for a time (graystripe, leafstar) and never renounced their loyalty to skyclan like...ever. its entirely possible for a cat to get twoleg food while still being feral; you can feed a stray cat for a time, but that doesnt make it a housecat immediately. that takes time and the skyclan cats were doing it for a reason i think? or they were just greedy. whichever, but basically im proposing we remove the kittypet affiliations, (and by extension the chararts, but thats not for here.) 15:08, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

No, they weren't taking it for a reason. They were willingly taking kittypet food instead of hunting for it themselves. They weren't staring, sick, or suffering. There wasn't a lack of prey, either. They were being sneaky and tbh due to their actions, were acting like kittypets by taking the food willingly without another motive behind it.

Yes, but they didn't live with Twolegs, and I think that's what is defined as a kittypet. The definition of kittypet is:

"A kittypet is the Clan cats' word for housecats, that Twolegs keep and care for."

The twolegs didnn't keep those guys. They just went for food, and they didn't live with htem. 18:19, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

But they also went more than once. If they'd gone once, then I would agree, but the fact that they went back, hid it from their Clanmates, and had plans to go back again had they not been caught by Leafstar and the others kinda makes me think they'd have just kept on doing it. Willingly taking food multiple times should count for something.

nah, theyre just ebing greedy. and sure they went back multiple times, but did we ever see any intention that they would have become kittypets, no. like ive said feeding stray cats doesnt make them housecats. 18:30, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

Tbh I never understood why their images were there, and I agree with Skt - being greedy for pet food =/= kittypet 21:56, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

I'm on the fence with this one. They kinda became kittypets but kinda didn't... 00:17, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

Tbh they weren't kitty pets they just took food so 04:27, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

You guys also need to remember that some of these choices were made long before you even joined. The only ones around now who were around back then are people like me, Icy, Splook, David, and Roo. We had a discussion or something along those lines, so it's not like it was randomly added. Clan standard for a kittypet is not the same as PCA and PC's standard. Context implied they were acting as kittypets, by taking food willingly from a Twoleg and going back multiple times.

if they get it because they were 'acting' like kittypts ( i still dont agree) then why doesnt every cat whos ever pretended to be a rank theyre not get that image? it wouldnt matter their intent then, because if a different clan cat saw them then theyd think they were a kittypet or whatever. but moving on, they didnt leave the clan. thats my point. they didnt leave, they were still loyal, they werent kittypets. its just them being greedy, and it happens? it doesnt make them a sudden kittypet. calling them one is false, they ever even went in a house, werent even taken. SHRUG 10:51, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

you also might as well add hollowflight and whoever else it was to have kittypet images as well then, since they got kittypet food in MO. :/ 10:56, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

Gotta agree with Trolly here. 16:56, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

ehhh I'm indifferent about this one. If they strictly came to the Twolegs for food only, then is that really being a kittypet, or just a mooch? If they just went for food, and food alone, that doesn't spell kittypet to me. That sounds more like "ehh I don't wanna hunt my own food so I'm gonna eat some kittypet food". On the other hand, I see where Cloudy is coming from. PC and PCA's standards are different from personal opinions and/or book description. If the project standard for a kittypet is "a cat who strayed from the loyalty of their birth Clan into a relationship with a Twoleg feeder or caretaker", then they were technically a kittypet. <span style="">22:39 Thu Oct 8

If that's the definition of a kittypet, then Nettlesplash and etc fits. 20:42, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Anymore comments? 00:52, October 28, 2015 (UTC)

No, the "kittypet" definition is what was listed before: cats who are kept and cared for by Twolegs. True, Nettlesplash and the others were cared for, but they weren't kept. They are still not kittypets. 01:13, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Mentioned Characters
I might have suggested this before or something. Anyway, the minor characters category is a bit overwhelmingly long since there is a lot of characters. I think it'll be a good idea to make a category for characters that are only mentioned, like Oatspeckle or Dappletail's Kit. Allegiances only characters, I guess because they are only well, mentioned on the allegiances. 05:31, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

Yep, agreed. Should we also make a supporting characters category? I can see some cats who would go on that - Cloud Spots, Dappled Pelt, Brindleface, Bright Stream, Frostfur, Goldenflower, Lightning Tail, etc... 01:12, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Don't we already have a supporting characters category? 02:18, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Yes we do. You can check what we have here. It also shows we have 840 minor characters... 02:48, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

"Mentioned Characters" would be a good category, but at the same time... We have way too many minor characters, and some of these are probably a bit more than minor, but not quite supporting and in no way major or main.

My bad. Then some of the minor characters should be moved to supporting characters. 18:40, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Do that then. I have no problems with those characters. 21:23, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Thunder
Bringing up Thunder again, does he need a status as rogue? He never was a rogue - his entire life was spent as an early settler. 01:14, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Well he wasn't born as an Early Settler, he was born in the Twolegplace. That could be it, but that could more or so count as a rogue than anything else. 02:48, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Is he ever stated to be a rogue, though? Unless he's stated to be one, then I don't think he should be given that title. <span style="">11:05 Sat Oct 31

He was a kit when he was born in the twolegplace, he never grew up there. And no, while I was working on all of the DOTC summaries I never saw him once listed as a rogue. 14:26, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

i think its in sotc. and what about when he was with neither the moor cats nor clear skys cats? does that count or not. 18:38, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

When he was traveling to hsi new camp? No, he'd still be apart of thunder's camp. 18:39, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

how so though? his camp didn't exist then. 18:42, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

The camp wasn't settled, but the group was. It was too short in my opinion anyway. I think Thunder gets a rank for being born and living the first few days in the Twolegplace. His mother did leave Clear Sky's Camp and became either a rogue/loner again. 21:25, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

The cite isn't even from Dawn of the Clans, guys. It's from Secrets of the Clans. If we have a cite for it, no matter how wrong it's been proven, it kinda has to stay on the article... just like the incorrect mentors that we had with that book and Yellowfang's Secret.

It could go in the trivia. 01:45, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Secrets of the Clans doesn't directly say they are rogues. I'll quote: "These were not warrior cats. They lived in small groups, not yet Clans." That matches the description of the Early Settlers. That cite should be removed. I still think he was a rogue when he was a kit, but that would only affect the past allegiance, that's it. 02:27, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

quote from the blazing star: ''"I was born in the Twolegplace! My mother was a rogue, and I would've been one too, if Gray Wing hadn't taken me in." -Thunder, chapter 22. So basically he says he COULD'VE been one, but he wasn't. 01:26, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

I think he means he could've of grown up as a rogue. I mean, was he an Early Settler when he was born? His mother wasn't, she purposely left to have her kits. So really, he was a rogue, just for a few days. 03:09, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

No...he was a /kit/, not an early settler or a rogue. He said he would've been a rogue if Gray Wing hadn't taken him in. 03:42, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Littlekit (YS) ~ Silver Nomination
props to worked on it before; all i really added myself was the age thing...if they person/people who worked on it before want to, we could make this a joint nomination. comments? <span style="">11:07 Sat Oct 31

Any quotes? Even a narrator quote will do. 21:32, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

done and <span style="">09:35 Wed Nov 4

CBV? 05:06, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Pink Eyes ~ Silver Nomination
Finding quotes is kinda hard for me since I use PDFs, so if anyone wants more they're gonna need to help me find page numbers. Comments? <span style="">12:10 Sat Oct 31

More quotes please. Just put in the chapter, I'll find the page number. 21:40, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

done <span style="">09:35 Wed Nov 4

Moth Flight's Vision needs filled out.

Owl Eyes ~ Silver Nomination
Boy he is certainly not a minor character. Comments? 01:07, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

CBV? 00:34, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

Again, this needs to have Moth Flight's Vision filled out. You can't just CBV an article without making sure it's complete. Having a missing section is not complete.

Pine Needle ~ Silver Nomination
Cute. I'll be doing his sister next. Comments? 01:07, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

CBV? 00:34, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but the Moth Flight's Vision section needs to be finished. He does in fact appear.

Many thanks to Burntclaw for getting that for me! :) Re-CBV? 06:22, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

December FA
Start of new month again. Again, always something from the list. No books coming out in December so... suggestions? 01:07, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Rosepetal looks good to me...Bramblestar's Storm could use a bit of detailing or expansion, but the rest is pretty good. <span style="">01:59 Sun Nov 1

Blizzardwing or Snowbush? Snowbush needs his TLH section completed, but I could do that ... something wintery themed, maybe? 02:03, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

I personally am not a big fan of weather themes since it's different depending on where you are. Anyways, yes I think Rosepetal is good other than Bramblestar's Storm, Blizzardwing could use more quotes and Snowbush needs The Last Hope finished and if possible more quotes. Other than that, these articles are good. 02:34, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Snowbush has enough quotes, Stealth. Not every article needs a million quotes. I would actually like to see Snowbush as an FA for December. Other than The Last Hope, the entire article is pretty good.

That's why I said perhaps. He has enough quotes I agree but I thought he'd look better with some more. Doesn't matter anyway. I'd like to fix a few minor things with Snowbush's page, (cites and links and that). If you want to work on the Last Hope Apple than this page will be very ready. I can work on The Last Hope if you want Apple instead. 02:57, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

I did his TLH section. I'm not sure if he appears more after that - I used a PDF for this, so...if you want to check that over, it'd be great. 13:53, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

I finished it off and updated/fixed other minor things. 00:57, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

Anymore comments before the vote? 04:36, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

Drizzle ~ Silver Nomination
So cute. Comments? 03:40, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

Fill out the section for Moth Flight's Vision, please. She does appear, even though it's not all that much.

I do not have the book and I nominated this before the book came out, so I think it's a little unfair to ask me to fill it in. I'll fill it in when I can, but I have to do it now I'll have to withdraw for now. 20:31, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

CBV? 04:36, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

Okay, but you can't just CBV it. That's not right at all. I'm sorry, but if a section is not complete when it's up for nomination, that means it is not permitted to be ranked up to silver. You'll need to either wait until someone finishes the section for you, or somehow get a copy of the book and do it yourself.

I finished it. 06:17, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

both this and pine needles section needs context as to whats actually happening, less laters, and less one liners. 06:25, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

Major Characters
So I was thinking we could have some sort of discussion on how the major characters are classified, or /who/ they are per say. For example, I don't exactly agree with Turtle Tail and Jagged Peak being main characters in the DOTC arc, along with Sol, Rock, and Ashfur being main ones in the third series. I also don't really agree with Tigerstar, Firestar, or Hawkfrost in OTS, but I think we should have a discussion and come to a conclusion on /who/ the main characters are, and have an actual definition. Thoughts? 22:24, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

From what I can tell currently, main characters are whoever has had their own narration of a book. I'm fine with just listing characters the highest of importance they've reached in a book. 22:59, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. 23:04, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

tbh i think this category should be gotten rid of. People have different opinions on who is major and who isn't for example, i could think Star flower had a big impact on the plot, but someone else might disagree. Main characters and mentioned characters are fine since it isn't an opinion whether they had a pOV b4 or not. 01:23, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Names Again
Hey I'm back. So in Mothflight's Vision, the names don't combine. For example, Lightning Tail doesn't become Lightningtail and Cloud Spots doesn't become Cloudspots. Can we change these articles now? I mean, sure, you could wait for a novella to explain this, but you should probably get confirmation we'll have one, or that their names /will/ change. hinthint i'm asking for one of you to ask kate hinthint But yes. Should we change the names or not? 23:00, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

Can I get some comment on this? 01:12, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Gooseberry ~ Silver Nomination
She literally doesn't do anything. Also, I couldn't find a quote for her. Comments? 07:53, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

CBV? 05:06, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Gray Wing - Silver Nomination
Finally my baby is done! This took forever. Comments? 04:19, November 6, 2015 (UTC)