Warriors Wiki talk:Characters

Adding Ages to Character Charts?
Hey everyone~ I'm here to do what I do: make suggestions.

I'm of the opinion that, for characters we have this information on anyway, we should include ages on charcats. (For dead cats, it'd be the age they died at.)

In example, on Firestar's chart it'd say that he is approximately 7 years of age.

We'd only do this for characters we know the ages of, without guessing at it, and doing this would allow us to provide even more information on characters than we already do. Not to mention, with out handy Events Timeline, it'd be a snap.

Comments? 00:15, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I love this idea Shelly! But of course, only some cats will get ages. You have my support. 00:37, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, only some cats: the major characters. I like this idea. 00:38, 25, 02, 2012

I like it! 8D Where would it be added though? Just on the Charcat? I think thatd be the best place. And can we just put unknown for the age, rather than leaving it off? Anons will probably eventually start to ask why there's no ages on some, but I think it'd be fine if it just said unknown. But anyways, great idea. ^^ 00:39, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

^^ Yeah. It'l bring up contributive edits for sure. 00:41, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I like this too! 8D I agree with Paleh for it to be on the charcat. @Rowan, this isn't about getting edits up, but for improving the articles. 00:44, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

-Shall be the pessimistic one- While this is a good idea, don't you think it'd be a bit odd to add in ages of only a few characters, meanwhile about maybe 65% - 75% of the characters would be missing this information? Only few characters would have this available information, thus I'm not convinced of making it a part of a characters article.

There's also the bit about years. Since all character articles use the terms used within the books, wouldn't it be odd to use a "human term"? An easy substitute is that would be using the term, "moon", however that'd also add a bit more precision to our estimates. And even with the timeline, I feel like we'd still be guessing at the age of a particular cat.

Anyways, my little outtake on this idea. Don't get me wrong, it's a great idea, but I don't think we should carry out given the pros and cons presented currently. 03:42, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I understand your concerns, and I'll carefully debunk them in order:

1: How many of our character articles ever have everything there may be to have on them? Some have post-death residence, some don't, all depending on whether or not we actually know where they ended up when they died. This is the same exact concept. Nothing different. Making it a part of the character articles will allow us to provide all of the information we have on characters, which is our job.

2: Sure, we can go with moons if you're concerned about terminology. But I think approx. years or even approx. seasons would work as well. Not everything we do on here has to follow Clan vernacular.

3: Our timeline has the information down as best as we know it, which is the best that the books provide, which is as accurate as it's going to get. We know that Firestar is 7, nearly 8. Dovewing and Ivypool are both 1, nearly 2. When Lionheart died, he was approximately 5.

I still think that this is a good idea, in short. 04:13, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Strange. I suggested this months ago and it got shot down :S  04:37, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

I refuse to be shot down. ಠ益ಠ 04:38, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

XD We all love Shelly's argument mode. But, this is a great idea. In my opinion, this could actually really improve the articles. And maybe, when they find out all these ages, people will stop tormenting Firestar's age xD 09:31, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, Shelly. Dat face. Both Shelly and Atelda have good points. If we decide to go through with this it would be a terrific addition to character pages. 01:31, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Shelly's points have proven that this is still in the running for going in the charcats. I agree still. 01:35, 03, 03, 2012

I agree with this idea. 14:56, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

So shall this go to a vote or can we just do it? 01:48, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

It's a simple matter to resolve, but shall the ages be in moons or year? Also, we have a citation (how to cite it will be a different matter if decided on)? Otherwise, we need only to add it to the template and add it to the characters. 01:57, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

I think moons, with years in parenthesis. Or seasons would work better, even... And yeah, citations are important. Adding it to the templates should be easy, too. 02:02, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

So, for citations, would we just cite the timeline or what? 15:33, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

I guess that we should cite the timeline... 15:49, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Well we could another version of the R template, and have it cite the book and page number of it saying how old a character is in comparison to another or something (basically, whatever we use to cite them on the timeline), then say "See Timeline for explanation" and link the timeline or something. I dun know, just a thought. 21:44, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay since it took me some time to try and not make a mistake, but 'Teldy got the age to work out on the charcat template. So, Moons are the time unit we'll put it in with years in parenthesis. If a cat is dead we just put (at death) after their age, plus a cite (Age: 28 seasons [cite] (at death [cite])). Soo yeah, sound good? 17:23, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

As an example, I've added the age to Firestar's template. Go check it out to see how it looks. 17:32, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

I don't agree with this. The two parenthesis next to each other looks messy. I was talking to Paleh and she said we should do it like "## moons (# years)[cite] at death[cite]" and get rid of the parenthesis around "at death". Personally, I think two cites is kind of unnecessary, but I kept getting shot down, so whatever. 21:16, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Yes to the first idea in my opinion. Though I believe that having a cite for their birth/the first mention of their age along with their death is best, as it completely proves their age from start to finish. 22:20, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I can live with that. Another thing: the age in years. I think we should just put it in words (five) and leave out the .5 or whatever. I was born in January 1996, and you don't see me running around saying I'm 16.3 years. Putting it in words looks a whole lot better. 22:27, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

No, I think that putting a solid number with a decimal is best, personally. Just because it's the most precise way to do it. These are articles, they don't have to be written like we're talking to someone. If they're 5.5 years, it'd be false to just say that they're five. Also please remember to put "Approx." before every age. Because that's all we can do, even if we saw the cat born. Unless we witnessed every day of their life, all we can do is approximate. And do not cite the events timeline as proof of age. We cannot cite ourselves, even if there are cites on that timeline. It's like saying "this is true because I say it's true." 22:31, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

...Okay, I can live with that too. But doing things like .25 years for a cat that's three moons old just doesn't work for me. I'd rather put 3 months in the parenthesis, or nothing. Putting .25 years is really redundant. I understand putting years for cats older than one year so you don't have to divide the number of moons by twelve, but for less than a year it shouldn't be put. I want more people than Shelly to comment on this since she enjoys shooting me down oh-so-much. 23:23, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

I know you don't want me to comment, but I'm doing it anyway.

It's putting months that's redundant. Moons and months mean the exact same thing. We should be consistent and put in .25 years instead of 3 months. 23:29, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to have to agree with Loonie on this one. Not everyone knows that a moon is equivalent to a month. 23:37, 22, 04, 2012 23:37, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

You know, I may be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure it's safe to assume that anyone that has read a single book in this series has picked up on that bit of vernacular. And it's not really hard to figure out that a moon = a month since our months are also based on lunar cycles. 00:56, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

Then there shouldn't be anything at all. I fail at explaining things... But putting, in decimals, how many years a cat is if it's less than one seems extremely redundant. 01:12, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

I agree that putting months would be silly, as we put those anyways in the moons, simply by a different name. However I also don't agree with putting a decimal of a year if it's less than a year. For cats that have died or weren't one year by the time the book ended, I think we should just get rid of those parenthesis all together. Only use them on cats older than 1 year. 12:35, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion
I figured making a new section rather than just commenting would get this a bit more attention.....

Anyways, due to the false cite problem that was recently discovered, I've been trying to think of a way to show that the page's cites have been verified. I was thinking maybe we could put a template of some sort at the top of the pages saying "This page's references are of questionable authenticity" and that only reliable members (maybe such as members of the project?) could remove it. That way we know that the pages are checked. Or maybe we could make a new template that has the cite in it, but also shows that it's questionable whether it's a real cite or not. I don't know, I just think we should have something so we have a way of knowing when the references have been checked (or haven't) on some pages. Those are just some of the ideas I came up with. Feel free to shoot them down. 22:15, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

I acctually like this, becuase it gives an option for people to do even if they don't own the book and question the accuracy and veracity of an article. 22:39, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Wow. You know it's a good idea if Kitsu supports it. xDDDD

I like it too. It would be a nice addition to the page, and we'd be able to narrow down those references that are false, most of them added in by Wikia Contributors. It's actually quite annoying, because most of the time, they look like good edits, when in fact they're not. Excellent idea, Paleh. 05:56, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

This sounds good, all though it would be a bit confusing- expecially for newer users, it sounds like it could work. As Kit said, it gives users the option to put the reference up, even if they're not 100% sure it's factual. Good find Paleh. 09:50, 28, 02, 2012

This does sound like a good idea to me. I agree completely. 21:24 February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful idea, Paleh, I agree with this. 02:40, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I like it. It would work well, looking at the all the links in the articles, and it would provide something for us who are looking for something to do on that spare weekend. I'd say also having a category for it, to point out all articles that would need work. I'll fiddle around with a box later, if more people agree, when I'm less tired and it's not 10:30. xD 03:27, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Although, we could make a page, with all the articles that haven't been looked over. 00:34 Thu Mar 1

Woah Kit actually supported one of my ideas. o.o Thanks guys. And Sweet, that'd work to a certain extent, but what stops more false cites being added? If we made a page it'd have to be constantly updated everytime a cite is added, unless the person who sees it first has the book to check. 15:31, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

If we could get a list of people who are participating in the "cite" thing, maybe we could assign people to articles, and have them check the cites maybe, every 2 weeks? There are a lot of character articles, but if a lot of people participate, I think it'd work. 13:20 Sat Mar 3

I agree with Sweet ^^ Maybe we could add a category of users participating and a category for the pages that need citation checks...or whatever we're calling them =P 12:57, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

I feel that a template would be fine, but a category or list of people participating would be unnecessary I feel. 15:33, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful idea! I feel this would really help out in making sure pages are 100% factual. 21:59, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Ken and Jean - Separate Them?
This article is the only character article that has planned status. I want to see if I can change that. :)

Before I start digging in, I want to see if anyone would like to separate them. I personally believe that we should. I know that they're not major characters, but we've made article for cats without names, so I see no reason why each character shouldn't have their own pages. What do you guys think? Leave your thoughts down below and I'll weigh both sides and possibly create a vote accordingly. :) 15:51, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, but didn't we make articles for Sol's Father and Leafstar's Mother simply because they had relevance to their individual plots? With Ken and Jean, the two are only relevant to the plot together, in my opinion. There'd be a lot less to write about them seperately than together, at least in Jean's case. 15:57, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

I always wondered why they weren't separate. I think they should be, because they are different characters. Their individual roles should still be acknowledged, no matter how small. Look at the allegiances-only cats. They have articles of their own, even though we'll probably never see them do anything important in the books, because they're still characters. 17:49, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

I agree, they are seperate characters, and should be treated as such. 21:57, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

I think they should be separate characters as well. We do the same for other minor characters, instead of grouping them together. Mistkit and Nightkit, for example, as well as Leafstar's Mother and Sol's Father. Just because they're human characters doesn't really mean much of anything...and since the page is only "started" status, we wouldn't have to worry about changing any of the gradings.

Runningnose ~ Silver Nomination
I added in Night Whispers...I don't see that much more to add but anywho comments? 21:13, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Expand the section on Forest of Secrets. 01:17, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Expand The Darkest Hour if you can :3 01:18, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Still working on this, Cinder? 19:42, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry I am still working. Sorry for the delay. 02:47, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Done. I added I think one sentence or so to the Darkest Hour, and expanded Forest of Secrets a bit. It was kind of hard since he shows up only once. 23:04, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Are there any other quotes you could add that possibly show his personality a little better? I know he appears in Cats of the Clans, so is there anything quote worthy in there?

Okay I'll check. I have a lot of other books too so if he has any good quote there too I'll add them in. 14:13, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Done. I added one quote from Cats of the Clans. I looked in some other books but didn't really think any quotes seem fit to be put up on his page. 19:37, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

CBV? 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Senior warriors and citing ranks
Wow I completely forgot to bring this up. xD Anyways, so I was discussing with Teldy about this a bit, and she said to bring up an actual discussion about it. I was editing a bit the other day and noticed a couple of characters who were in the senior warrior category, though I have no memory of them ever being mentioned. As it's a category, I can't add a cite tag to it, and even if I could, nobody could cite it to prove they are one. So I was thinking perhaps we could list them in the charcats like any other rank, and cite where it specifically says they're a senior warrior. But then we also couldn't cite those and not the other ranks, as it'd be inconsistent. So maybe we should just cite all ranks in the charcat? It'd be helpful with more than just the senior warriors too, for instance, characters like Pad, who's in the manga only which I know a lot of people have never read, is listed as a Loner, Kittypet, and Kit. However he's only a kit, and he was only in one book. So how do we know it's real unless you can read the book yourself? Am I rambling?

Anyways, so what do you guys think? Should we add the Senior Warrior rank to the charcat, and/or cite ranks? 08:54, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

I think it might be hard to cite where a character is mentioned as a SW, but it wouldn't be impossible to find. I'm not against the idea. 15:44, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

I also think it'd be a good idea to cite the other ranks (like kit, elder, etc.). 15:50, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it would be hard to find the cites, but in a way, that's kinda the point. So few SWs are mentioned in the series, and yet there's so many in the category. If it's hard to cite, a lot may be taken out due to lack of cite, which is the point. 00:45, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

That's true. I agree with this idea. 13:11, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

I agree, Paleh. I don't remember some of the cats in that category being called SWs... 01:15, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I agree we should cite the ranks. However, I don't know about adding the SW. In fact, I might put up an AfD for that category just because it will always remain incomplete. We basically know all of the SWs in ThunderClan since that's where the point of view is coming from. But we have not the faintest clue who's SW in the other Clans. I mean, yes, there's the ones who are older cats than some of the newer ones, but we still don't know for sure if they are SWs. Then there are the middle group where they've been alive a couple of books, yet they're not as old as others, and we really don't know. 01:20, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Hmmmm true, it won't ever be complete, but then most categories won't ever be "complete". We probably won't know every Windclan cat for instance, or every Tribe of Endless Hunting cat. But you're right, the only ones we really know are ThunderClan. I'm not sure it's really needed. I'd support and AfD, but not necessarily cause it won't ever be "complete". 21:42, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

This sounds like a good idea. I have an idea for citing a character being described as a senior warrior. If one cat is newly mentioned as one, cats that are of similar age can have that used as their citation as well. That would make sense, since I'd think age pretty much qualifies a cat for a senior warrior rank. Oh, and yeah, I'm trying to be helpful to other projects now, so hi! :)  21:55, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Ohai Ivy! 8D But it's not always about age. Usually, but not always, so it'd be assuming if we cited a cat as a senior warrior cause a cat a similar age is one. For instance, Thistleclaw and Tigerclaw established themselves as senior warriors fairly young, before Bluestar even, who was older than them. 23:42, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Alive templates
Paleh asked me the question of, "why do we have just alive templates and not status templates?" This meaning that why do we change the status of every character to deceased on every page when we can merely edit the "alive template" (possibly a name change should occur to these templates if this goes through). If we have all the templates on all the pages, it wouldn't take more than one edit to change the status of a character from alive to deceased. Paleclaw and I could not come up with a valid reason for why the templates are only for characters who are alive.

There is the case where a character has one appearance and then we hear nothing from them again so we put, "Status Unknown". However, is this truly a valid reason to spend 100+ edits on just editing the status when a simple solution would be changing the alive templates to incorporate deceased characters too?

So as a propsal, I think for the next arc, Dawn of the Clans, we should make the alive templates just status templates. We can do that with the current arcs that were released if we decide on that as well. 01:22, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Well you already posted all I had to say on it really, however I do suggest that we go back and change all the old alive templates too, as statuses on them can change through the erin hunter chats, facebook, blogs, etc. and therefore it'd be easiest to just have them all on the templates. 01:27, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

This seems like a good idea...I agree with it. 8D 22:21, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea to me. Some users only edit just to change that, and honestly, I thin it's sort of uncontributive. Also, on some articles, since they're never touched, they don't get changed half the time.

Makes sense. 15:37, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

I think it would make much more sense to actually do it with one template, instead of making hundreds of Status template subpages. Do correct me if I'm wrong, since I hadn't followed the original discussion about the Alive templates properly so I may have misunderstood something, but say has  on it. So does. And probably (I haven't checked the template before posting this, so I might be a little wrong) has "Deceased, Confirmed StarClan member" I would say it would make better sense to use a switch on, like this:

Then for Bluestar we'd have to type, which would output "Deceased, Confirmed StarClan member" and so on, for all the characters.

Regards,

why do we change the status of every character to deceased on every page when we can merely edit the "alive template" <<< I would like to ask the same question.

The "Alive" templates are used to eliminate the need of editing ANY character page when a character's status changes. An Alive/character template may contain ANY of the following:
 * Living as of (an older book)
 * Deceased, [StarClan / DF / Unknown residence]
 * Status Unknown
 * Status Unknown

This was the original idea behind the template... if you are still changing hundreds of character pages, then they have no use...

Kind regards, 17:33, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm good point lightning. It'd be easier that way. *nods* I support. 04:01, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

The coding gods have saved us from pointless editing. xD

It's a lot easier that way, from what I'm gathering with the above coding. I'll go along with this as well.

Stoatpaw ~ Silver Nomination
Woo~ Stoatpaw. I detailed the first paragraph a bit more, and I don't think that there are any good quotes for him. 22:42, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

I added a quote. 19:22, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Is it possible for you to detail The Last Hope more? And maybe get just a few more quotes? I know he is a minor character, but how about when he alerts ThunderClan that ShadowClan needs help for one? 23:54, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

I detailed that section, but I'm not going to add that quote since...Well, it doesn't describe him in any sort of way, really. 00:38, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Could you detail the main quote any? Also, which quote? I haven't gotten a chance to sit down and read TLH, so if you could possibly list it...something is better than nothing.

It's a quote where Stoatpaw says that ShadowClan needs help. Honestly, I'd rather not add it since it means that ShadowClan is weak against the DF. I'd list quotes that show strengths, not weaknesses. 23:25, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

CBV? 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Quince - Silver Nomination
I like Quince. She mothered a tyrant. Comments for improvement? 05:53, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Quick update: added a few quotes. I think the third one that I added would work better as her main quote. What do you guys think? 06:07, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

I like the third one. It certainly does the article a lot more justice than the one that's currently on there. If you ask me, the main quote now serves as more of a Jake quote than a Quince. Go ahead and change it, I'd say.

Taken care of. 17:05, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

CBV? 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Pad - Silver Nomination
Well...the main problem with this article was the quotes. One had an incorrect page number, and the main quote didn't match up with what was in the book. Both issues have been fixed. The history looks pretty good. Suggestions? 16:10, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Is there another quote that could be added? 02:54, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

I checked; there isn't, sorry. Pad doesn't say much. The only thing I could find is Husker introducing them, but I'm unwilling to add that because the only thing it reveals is Pad's name. 20:44, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've read Warriors Refuge..but is there anything else that can be detailed, like when Millie teaches the kits how to speak dog? If there's only one sentence, that's fine.

Expanded to the max. 15:40, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

CBV? 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Kestrelflight ~ Silver Nomination
...how has he //not// been nominated? I'm working on a fix-up of the history, and I'll be adding quotes soon.

Quotes added, and history expanded to the best of what I can do right now. Comments?

Look's excellent! Could you just expand the last paragraph of The Last Hope? 15:21, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Expanded. I don't know if he appears anywhere else, since I just skimmed the book. I haven't gotten a change to actually read the whole thing.

Could you detail Outcast, please? 17:50, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, no, I can't. That's all he's shown. I did, however, mange to play around with the wording to make it seem a little better... I kid you not, that's all he does in Outcast. xD

CBV? 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Cloudy Sun ~ Silver Nomination
My first. 8D Anyway, added more in Long Shadows and expanded Sign of the Moon. I could add some narrator quotes, but the two that are up now are all she says. Pretty minor character in SotM, so not much... Comments? 21:24, 04 15, 2012

There's nothing else you can add for Sign of the Moon to make it flow a little better? That first sentence seems a little...iffy. Perhaps describe what was going on at the time? Long Shadows is excellent.

Done. 09:09, 04 18, 2012

Oscar ~ Silver Nomination
I added a Main Quote and two other ones. Comments? 13:13, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

Firestar's Quest could probably be expanded some more. 16:52, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

I feel the last two paragraphs of Firestar's Quest could be reworded some  19:21, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Detail the second paragraph, also. Perhaps explain what he was doing when he is seen at that time, and so. 02:59, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

All set. 15:03, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Gorsepaw - Silver Nomination
All this needed was quotes. It was in decent shape otherwise. Suggestions? 02:42, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

The main quote is bold. I know that it isn't supposed to be like that, but possibly it's supposed to be like that. I know that anybody could change it, but I'm not sure if it's supposed to be like that in this case. :P 02:52, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Derp, It was changed. xP 02:53, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, then. So...the main quote is fine? o3o 20:39, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Yup. xD It's fine. 00:54, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Willowclaw ~ Silver Nomination
Erm...Yeah, not much to add on. ;.; Suggestions and comments? 03:02, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

All I can say is get rid of the Fading Echoes section. Jeez, boring character. XD 05:33, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Yup, done. Lol, she is a boring character...xP 15:12, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Minnowkit (CP) ~ Silver Nomination
Welp, a minor dead character ftw. I reworded a bit, but I doubt there's any quotes I could add, except for the one where Crookedstar's naming them; tell me if I should.~ So, comments? 10:05, 04 19, 2012

I would suggest adding that quote, but not as the main quote. :P Also, in the first part of the first paragraph of Crookedstar's Promise, I suggest giving a bit more detail about their birth and so, such as in what time of the year they were born, ect. Also, in the last sentence of Crookedstar's Promise, could you add a bit more detail on Silverkit of her whereabouts, and what happened after Minnowkit's death? Of course, just a bit detail, we don't part of the article to be based pretty much on Silverkit.

You don't have to add this in if it's much...But in my view, it would be something I would like to know of if I was using the article as references or so. :P 15:19, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Re-worded a bit again, added the part where he named them in more detail, and added the quote at the bottom. Nothing else is really mentioned about Minnowkit, but Crookedstar is just seen grieving over all of them...about a page or two later. 09:45, 04 20, 2012

Dovestar (RC) ~ Silver Nomination
Not much that can be added, since Dovestar only appears once.

Any quotes from Leafpool about her? 21:02, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Not that have to do with Dovestar...there's one or two about the law itself, but not Dovestar.

Frogleap ~ Silver Nomination
I'm so nervous, this is my first nomination. I reworded most of it but I don't see much else, Comments? Ducksplash    Talk!  PC  Edits   00:34, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Try and expand the last few sentences in CP. They just seem kinda...short, compared to the rest of the article. Take this one for example:
 * Frogleap is with Echomist, Owlfur, Lakeshine, Reedshine, and Skyheart listening to Timberfur's orders..

Could you try and elaborate on the orders given, and possibly what happened?

OK, made it about as long as it could be without copying it from the book Ducksplash    Talk!  PC  Edits

Could you either elaborate on the quote descriptions? Which battle was supposed to be his first, who they were going to shred, and who their new denmates were, etc. 18:52, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks and Done. Ducksplash   <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red"> Talk!  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:blue">PC  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:maroon">Edits  20:59, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Could you in any way expand each paragraph as much as possible? The paragraphs seem quite short...Also...Hmm, it's hard to describe, but could you somehow add more detail (or excitement, I would say) to the overall history? Other than that, this looks good! 23:32, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'll work on that, Thaks! Ducksplash   <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red"> Talk!  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:blue">PC  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:maroon">Edits  12:23, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

I tried but he's not mentioned very much in the book, and whe he is he's usually just mentioned for a sentence or two

Woody ~ Silver Nomination
Because... Woody. :3 I think the article's good. It covers his history completely and he has plenty of quotes. I don't see anything that isn't cited. Comments? 00:40, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Sparrowfeather (RC) ~ Silver Nomination
I added bronze status onto the page, but I don't see much more for such a minor character. Comments? Ducksplash   <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red"> Talk!  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:blue">PC  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:maroon">Edits  12:23, April 26, 2012 (UTC)02:59, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Mmm, you're right, it looks pretty complete. But I remember in Crookedstar's leader ceremony, he mentioned how he automatically knew as lot of the StarClan cat's names, "as if he'd known them all his life". If that applies to Sparrowfeather, could you add it into the history? Oh, and if you see any quotes, add them, please. 13:28, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

There's no more guotes, but I added in the part about his name, Thanks! Ducksplash   <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red"> Talk!  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:blue">PC  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:maroon">Edits  12:19, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Snowy Silver Nomination
Um, I would like to nominate Snowy for silver. I did random page, and what do you know, Snowy came up. :3 I am trying my best to edit her to make her legible for silver. 00:17, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

OK, but you don't need to nominate a character for bronze, you only nominate them for silver and gold. 00:47, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Oops! Sorry, I'm really nominating Snowy for Silver. :3  21:19, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Expand Firestar's Quest if you can. 21:21, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

It's OK, and can you add maybe one or two more quotes... Ducksplash   <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:red"> Talk!  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:blue">PC  <sup style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;color:maroon">Edits  21:43, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Kay, added a quote and added a sentence to Firestar's Quest. :3 00:42, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Swallowtail (RC) ~ Silver Nomination
Comments? She's pretty minor, but I liked her in Starlight. xD

Looks Good! But is there maybe one more quote?

Done. I manged to find two more, but that's it. She doesn't speak much, if at all.

I would remove the part about Swallowtail possibly being in love with Rainwhisker. If there's a hint, though, leave it in, but mention what the hint was in the article. 16:20, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Done. The only time I could find Swallowtail in Starlight was during that event..

Food for thought
Yo guys, me again :P When I was working on an Erin Hunter chat for PR, Vicky said something about the allegiances not having a full list of cats. Why I bring this up is that on character articles, if they haven't been mentioned in the allegiances, they're almost automatically assumed dead. Also, take Darkfoot for an example. He never appeared in the allegiances and only apperanced once while in WindClan, I think, and yet no mention of him has him listed as dead. To me, that sounds like speculation. I think instead of assuming they are dead, why don't we assume they have an unknown status if there has been no mention of them? And if I'm missing something and this is already be done, be kind about informing me of my mistake XD  02:49, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, I agree with you Ivy. Do you have a cite of when Vicky mentioned this? 21:24, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with that as well. It's annoying to see all of the theories running around saying a character is dead or something along those lines just because they're not seen in a book. Perhaps the editor forgot to add them in or something... it doesn't automatically mean they've died. Unless it's said in the books, I don't think it should be placed on the article that they've died.

I Agree^ 21:44, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

I'm agreeing with everyone above me. 22:29, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

I totally agree. This would explain why some characters aren't listed in the allegiances yet appear in the book. 13:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Wildfire ~ Join Request
I need to contribute to the wiki more than just PCA. So I'd like to join PC. 00:17, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Please read the guidelines and refer to the FAQ if needed. 21:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Status Templates
While going through and fixing some of the status templates, an idea came to me. Why don't we just have one template for living, deceased and status unknown characters? Instead of having so many status templates for each character, just three or four titled Template:Living, Template:Deceased/StarClan. Template:Deceased/Dark-Forest, Template:Deceased/Unknown. <span style="background-image:-moz-radial-gradient(center,#00FBFF,#FF00FF); -moz-border-radius: 12px 4px; -webkit-border-radius: 12px 4px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 5px;"> Berry Gradients, gradients... 03:49, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

We kinda already have a discussion going on about the status templates above, but basically the reason we don't do that, is cause when the status of a character's changed, say, they're verified in starClan, then it'd take a million edits to change that. With a template for each character, it only takes one. 04:04, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Whitewater ~ Silver Nomination
I couldn't find any quotes for her, and she doesn't appear a lot. Kind of a boring character. Thoughts? 14:11, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Foxy ~ Silver Nomination
I added a main quote and redid a couple of things, but didn't see much else, Comments?21:40, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Piketooth ~ Silver Nomination
I redid a couple things, added a bit of history. Very minor character... Comments? 22:20, April 29, 2012 (UTC)Moonshine

Could you add maybe a couple more quotes?

Can you try and detail the history a little more?

Gar I was gonna nominate him. :3 Can you combine some of the paragraphs? There seems to be more than necessary. 22:39, April 29, 2012 (UTC)