Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Nominations

TWEAK AND REDO NOMINATIONS ARE CURRENTLY:
 *  OPEN - Nominations can be posted. 
 * CLOSED - Nominations cannot be posted, barring the ones already on this page.

Before editing this page, make sure you are clear on the guidelines for editing it.

=Nominations= If you wish to nominate an image, you link the image (like so - ) underneath the appropriate subheading, and list the reason(s) you wish it to be redone/tweaked. Project members with the ranking of warrior or above can vote, and only five votes are necessary for the vote to pass or fail.

Storm Pelt (All) - Tweak Nomination
File:Storm Pelt.kit.png File:Storm Pelt.warrior.png File:Storm Pelt.es.png

I think these need to be tweaked because all three images display different mottling styles. The kit's spots are wavy, the warrior's spots are large, dark, and distorted, and the early settler's spots are smaller and lighter. Also, the early settler has some texture and the other images do not. None of the styles are bad or wrong, but none of the images match at all, which made it confusing for me to do his hunter image. We should choose one style and tweak the rest of the images to match that style. Thoughts?  HA WK FI RE98  03:00, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
 * the first image is the kit, I believe. Everything should match that, there's no choosing.
 * they look fine. ​​
 * Gonna also say the same thing I said on the approval page. No image is 100% required to be symmetrical, so of course the warrior, ES, and kit won't 100% match each other. They match well enough for the set, and this is definitely getting picky. The ES does not have texture, and that's Misty's shading style, by the way. Their basic styles do match, but given how we don't see each sides of the kit, who's to say that they don't match the kit? Certainly not us, since that's not a side we see on that blank. ​​
 * I think they match fine, personally. The kit blank does make it hard to see te side Malina457 (talk) 11:56, September 27, 2018 (UTC)Malina
 * As reasons stated above. As long as it's close enough. 15:17, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
 * 14:40, October 3, 2018 (UTC)

Poppydawn (Ki) - Redo Nomination
File:Poppydawn.kit.png The stripes don't match the style of the other images, and I feel like I can do better with the tail \: I am the most recent OA, so I'd like this if it passes. 13:58 Thu Oct 11

=Approved Tweaks= Once an image is under this heading, it may be reserved on the project main page and crossed out with a and a. The image may only be removed from this list when it is approved and archived.

All project leads are to keep track of the number of images on this list, including those that are crossed out. Should the number rise above 50, nominations will close and remain closed until the number of images on the list is down to 40.

When placing images onto this list, please also add if a user has reserved said image. Reservations will last for one week after the nomination is archived and placed into the correct archive, unless there are other matters that interfere with a user not being able to complete said images by the time their reservation expires (such as a comment that would usually require an additional nomination, like adding stripes or changing a pattern completely).

A tweaked image on this list can be redone with permission from a project lead. If a project lead wishes to redo an image on this list (such as a solid that is not part of a set), they must contact another lead for permission. If it is an overhaul of a set, another nomination must be posted into the correct section, and the voting process will begin again.

Tweaks
None

Redos
None