Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval=

Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Featherpaw (A) - For Approval
I did my best. Tigerbird-The-Great 01:03, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Can you darken/define the shading? And tone the earpink down some, it looks a little bright. You can just run the burn tool over it a few times, and that should do the trick. I like those eyes. 1:13 Fri Sep 5

Smear a bit of the fur into the ears 18:02, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded.Tigerbird-The-Great 01:19, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Smudge some more fur into the ears. Still looks a bit solid. 04:31, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Oh and define the light on all four paws^^ 19:45, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Maybe lighten she shading just a tick? The stripes are getting a little lost. Nice job! 9:00 PM, Sat Sep 6, 2014

This is beautiful! I feel so proud right now Define the light on the lower part of the tail, and possibly the shading on the tailtip? 11:39, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Still working? 15:48, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

I will update soon. Tigerbird-The-Great 23:47, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded. I cannot smudge any fur into the ears. I need opinions. Tigerbird-The-Great 00:51, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Add more stripes. 11:27, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded. Tigerbird-The-Great 21:07, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Is it possible to make the pattern look more natural? If you look at other tabby chararts or a real life tabby, that'd be a good reference. 08:52, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Tigerbird, referring to an earlier upload when you said you can't smudge the fur into the ears, you can if you raise the rate of the smudge tool(depending on what program you use) and it'll smudge for you. Shinx, we have had a debate in the past on the image Aspenfall when he was up for approval. We ended up deeming it natural and let it pass. I think if Tigerbird maybe had the markings curve more to the fur it'd look more natural, but the actual pattern I think could work unless someone says otherwise. I'm just remembering a past similarity. Lol. Keep it up, Tiger! 12:29, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Aspenfall and Featherpaw are two totally different pelt types, Darkfrost. Gray/white placement on those cats, to my knowledge, is not totally required to be placed realistically. Tabby stripes, however, are (sadly; I hate realism and I think it's stupid to force it on others), so they should be made a bit more natural. Also, please keep in mind that one user does not speak for the entire project (so using 'we' and things like that isn't necessary, since most of the members who were around at that time are long gone), and I agree with Shinx about the stripes.

Reuploaded. I'll work on the ear smudging. Tigerbird-The-Great 22:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I can't smudge the ear fur since I use Pixlr and the smudging turns out black when I try to use it. Tigerbird-The-Great 22:28, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Isn't this supposed to be called File:Featherpaw (WC).apprentice.png? 23:36 Thu Sep 18

No the file name is correct. It's normal to put an underscore instead of a space. 18:20, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Um, no it's not correct. What Hawky has linked is the correct file name, so please use it. We need File:Name.rank.png, otherwise it does not work in the least with the templates. Tiger, I've told you this before =P

I'm sorry, but I know there are several files with -name-_(SC).rank that I've seen, so I just assumed the (WC) was supposed to be like (SC) is. 02:07, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

When I try to put a space, it changes to an underscore. Tigerbird-The-Great 16:55, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

That's not what I was talking about. The underscore is fine. But, it needs to follow the exact naming guidelines that we have, and what Hawky has is the proper file name, changing it to an underscore is the exact same thing.

Oh my bad. I thought it was about the underscore but I see what you're talking about now. Carry on :3 20:50, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Toadstep (SC) - For Approval
-gross sobbing- My poor baby! Also, I will fix the waste in the next reupload. 19:06, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Smudge the fur into the ear a bit more and define the shading a bit 19:08, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Try blurring/smudgning the earpink a bit more. The white on the right paw is higher than on the left paw, and the chest white could do with a bit more blurring plus a bit of defining on the shading. Also, the file should be named Toadstep.star.png. Brick 20:02, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading on >>>> paw a bit, too. 20:09, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

The shoulder should be black, not white. Jayie Unwritten words~ 03:24, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Blur/smudge the shading a little? Everywhere except for the haunch and face. 17:43, 09/6/2014 Try making his eyes a bit more pale.

Define the overall shading while your at it.-- 18:52, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Can you blur the white on his chest? It looks a bit hard edged. Poor Toadstep. Tigerbird-The-Great 23:40, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded I'm not changing the design on his paws, because it matches his other chararts,and his design is based off of my real cat, so uneven socks on the paws is realistic. 17:40, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

There's some waste around the image.

Perhaps just make the eyes a tad bit more of a paler green to match his other images, and also either blur or smudge (Whatever they used on his other images) the white parts just a tad. -- 00:57, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded Okay! And since I use Sai and it has a really unreliable selection tool, I'm having a hard time removing waste without it removing lineart. Does anyone else use Sai and have a "true" way of selecting the binary region instead of it being feathered? I feel like a dumb and I'm sorry 16:02, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

If I were to make a reccomendation on removing waste on SAI, it would be select outside on the lineart layer on default settings, using working layer only settings, and going through each layer doing CTRL+X. That should work. Brick  20:48, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

The white looks over-smudged. 18:22, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

I promise I'll reupload sometime tonight, I had to work 6 days in a row  00:12, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Reuploaded  18:06, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

I like this. Let's go CBA.

I hate to interrupt, but there's waste around the image, most notably the ear, the tail and the back. 20:33 Sun Sep 21

Waste does not affect the overall quality of the image and can be killed at any time. Continuing CBA.

My apologies for another interruption, but could you define the chest shading, perhaps? It looks flat. 21:59, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Petalfur (Q) - CBA
Comments? 18:12, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Define the shading 19:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Personally I think it's fine. It's rather clear, and defining it any more will make it look too dark. 20:04, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading and thicken it a bit around the belly and define it on the face and on her lifted forleg. I think there's also some waste on her back 03:24, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the tail shading, and I agree with Shinx- I think it could use some definition.

Smudge the earpink into the fur or vice versa. and if you have no clue what vice versa means don't sweat it. It is Latin--I think--literally meaning other way around. It currently looks too neat for a long furred cat. Keep it up! 17:21, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Smudging the ear pink is not required on these blanks. I don't smudge them on mine, and I know a couple others that don't either. Plus, it already looks like Feather smudged it- it's just not extravagant.

Re-uploaded. 17:52, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

She's looking a teensy bit cross eyed. Well done! Tigerbird-The-Great 01:15, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Thicken the shading on the belly and add depth all around. Define the light on the lifted forepaw 04:42, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Define the leg shading. 08:02, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

'''Re-uploaded. '''I left the eyes as they are: they look fine to me.

the hind leg shading seems off with the rest, its implying the light source is coming from the back while the rest says otherwise. swap it around? 11:29, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Brighten the white on the chest, legs, and paws. This is nice!! 18:14, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

It looks fine, imho. Theres shading there; of course its not going to look pure white. The only thing i think could be lightened would be the chest, and maybe the right leg. Also, define the facial shading. 02:23, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

'''Re-uploaded. ''' 15:57, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

CBA? I love this. 22:05 Sat Sep 20

Crouchfoot (Ki) ~ For Approval
i hate kits 05:46 Fri Sep 12

define the shading on the head slightly? 11:48, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded I just redid the shading I wasn't very happy with it anyways 13:47 Fri Sep 19

Define the tail shading. I know it's there it is just really faint. 18:12, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

I tried; but it ended up looking really odd and threw off the colour of the tail a bit. I can try again but I'd rather not..... 10:37 Mon Sep 22

Olivenose (Star) ~ For Approval
what are torties? comments? — Sat Sep 13 00:26

I can't see the earpink or the tail shading. She is very lovely! Tigerbird-The-Great 01:11, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Blur/smudge the shading on the paw furthest from us a bit. This is /gorgeous/. .o. 01:23 Sat Sep 13

Give just some more earpink, just so it is visible, because it looks like her ears are very fluffy, covering them. -- 13:32, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

This pattern is very pretty, but it doesn't really match the other images all the way. You need to smudge everything out more like on theirs, especially the ginger on the shoulder. 16:00 Mon Sep 15 2014

Was she always this dark?--crow!!!! 12:16, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Her coat color matches her other images just fine. I suspect it's just shading that's making it look dark. 1:07 PM, Wed Sep 17, 2014

This <--- pupil is a bit cross-eyed. Move it to our right just a few pixels. 18:10, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Still Working? 22:04 Sat Sep 20

Well, if you are, define the light on the head. 20:16, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Lizardpaw (A) ~ CBA
I love playing with texture c: Shading is dark on purpose to be defined and it is smudged so no blurring here. 03:44, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Blur and shicken the shading on the back and define your light source 04:40, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Or if you won't blur it, smudge it a bit more. It also causes the texture to get lost in it, so perhaps tweak the coloring of the shading a bit?

Re-uploaded. Lightened the shading a smidge, and smudged the back shading more. I also defined the texture under the shading some more so it'd be more visible, and I unshaded and shaded some things to make the light source more obvious. 13:46, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

It's probably just my phone screen but the shading is throwing off the colour a bit (making the image look a strange colour where it is). Maybe try tinting it? Dark red and dark blue with the layer on multply usually work well. however if it /is/ just me feel free to let me know/ignore this comment. 14:43 Sat Sep 13

I think it looks fine. But I'll look at it closely when I do another upload and check it out but to me it works with the color well. 14:59, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

What source are you using? I'm comparing it to the sources for multiple apprentice images, and I can't seem to find what source you're using. Enlighten me, if you don't mind? pun intended I think there'd be more shading on the haunch, and the back shading wouldn't be so thick.

Lol. Um I visioned this light source like the apprentice is on top of a hill watching the sunset. So it'd be almost straight at him but downwards a bit if ya get me. So I might need a bit more shading on the haunch and the tail so let me add those and then you tell me what ya think. 23:22, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Hope that makes a bit more sense. I'm not too good at shading apprentices. x.x 03:00, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Define and darken the shading a bit. I know it's there, but I'm having a rough time seeing where exactly it's placed.

Re-uploaded. Not going to touch the shading anymore, I don't want it to look weird or overworked. 12:34, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

There are ways to play with shading without making it "look weird". What are your settings, colors, ect? Also, what color is your base and texture? He's kinda looking a bit orange...or that could be my eyes. Idk about that last part- may want to get a second opinion.

It doesn't look orange to me. Looks light brown. My base color is #8b5531 and the texture color is #c17545 which turns him light brown. And my shading is a standard black. And you know what? "Look weird" was stupid wording on my end I really just meant to say overworked, so I'm striking "weird" out. 20:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I gotta agree with Skye here - he's looking orange. Try putting the texture layer on multiply, and then lighten it a bit 20:45, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Did what you suggested, Beebs. Thanks it looks so much better now. So much more light brown-y than before this. =D 23:16, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

May I have some comments? c: 20:45, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

You can have a CBA instead. <span style="">22:03 Sat Sep 20

Whitetail (WC) (E) ~ CBA
Sooper happeh with how this came out, minus the earpink. Any help on that would be greatly appreicated. <span style="">4:34 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Make the shading more defined, I think it blurs out into the white a bit too much, it's looking a little gray. Jayie Unwritten words~ 16:46, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

reup <span style="">8:01 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Define the tail shading. Nice job! Tigerbird-The-Great 21:03, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

#thanx <span style="">9:16 PM, Sat Sep 13, 2014

Define the depth of the shading some more. This is nice Rocket!! :) 21:28, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

I think the shading depth looks fine. Define the light on the tail? 14:28, September 14, 2014 (UTC)



Expand the light on the tail- I'd think there would be at least some there, that way it doesn't look all gray.

ship it never thought that onexwhite would be a couple so here have some tail white someone please kill tail shading forever thanx   <span style="">6:50 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

Blur the light on the tail. 19:36, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

blurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr <span style="">7:55 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

(I'msorry) Define the light on the front paws? 20:08, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

sooper (it'sokay) <span style="">12:20 AM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

What's up with this shading? o.o Did you forget to blur or smudge or accidentally erase something?

That's just my layers going haywire. I'll try to fix it. <span style="">3:05 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

fixed it so it's 10000000% more sooper B) <span style="">9:50 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

Rocket, changes are not showing for me. Mind giving a site to a photo viewer? 02:33, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

'''is it sooper yet? B) <span style="">10:16 PM, Wed Sep 17, 2014

Haha almost. It still looks a little like the shading is a straight line on the shoulder and chest. Give it a little blur over and I think this will be sooper =D 01:20, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

MOAR SOOPER <span style="">5:27 PM, Thu Sep 18, 2014

Blur the shoulder shading a bit more, looks a little solid still. Make it epically sooper!!! =] 18:08, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

much sooper someone take my keyboard away   <span style="">8:15 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

There's waste all around the image. <span style="">22:02 Sat Sep 20

I don't see where there's waste but I'll check in the morning. <span style="">12:10 AM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

I don't see any waste, either. o_o However, define the belly shading a TIIIIIIIIIINY bit? 13:06, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

There's no waste, and also the light source I use does not have any shading on the belly. <span style="">2:27 PM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

Yes, there is waste. I print-screened this and pasted it onto paint. Then, I paint bucket filled the outside with black. Whatever is pale blue means that there's waste there, seen as paint doesn't care whether or not the colors are similar. The colors aren't the same, it doesn't fill that area. <span style="">17:05 Sun Sep 21

reup <span style="">5:19 PM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

CBA? Well done, dear.

Stormcloud (W) ~ CBA
Ewwww 23:44, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Add depth to the shading, it looks flat. <span style="">20:32 Mon Sep 15

Re-ups I already had added depth, so I defined it and added another layer of highlights.

Have the shading curve more to the body shape. And lighten the tail shading a bit it's so dark I can't really see the patten. Very nice! 22:12, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

also smudge/blur the shading, whichever it is. 11:27, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups I didn't like how the shading looked after I fixed it, so I redid it and I think it looks a bit better? (Also, smudge, Skt. ^_^) 15:14, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

CBA? 00:22, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to interrupt, but smooth out the closest foreleg and the tail shading. 00:24, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups CBA interrupted in two minutes? A new record! 11:48, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Smooth out the back shading a little bit too. There's no need to get upset when someone interrupts your CBA, Shinx. It's kinda rude. <span style="">5:18 PM, Sun Sep 21, 2014

I wasn't getting upset? I was gonna interrupt it myself anyway, the tail shading was too dark. I was amused. 17:40, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Let's re-CBA. Also, two minutes is a record lmao.

Interrupting my own CBA because I have yet to re-upload for Rocket's statement 19:35, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Nah, it's fine honestly. That's why I CBA'd it to begin with- I just totally forgot to say that.

Oh, alright. 19:38, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Ancient Tribe Blanks ~ For Approval


(ill crop all of the extra space on the next upload.) Comments? 03:56, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Why do those look slightly different from these? o.o The blanks should be pixel-like, how the ones in your PI are. Also, if you just want to put one long-haired and one short-haired up, that's fine, that way we don't have four extra images. You can just add eyelashes/remove them, depending on which set you have first. The only difference between male and female ones here are the eyelashes.

Because, I tweaked them a bit. I can easily make them pixelated: I just didn't have enough time right this second. I thought I'd just go ahead and post them now, so I can fix anatomy errors while I'm fixing other issues. ^^` -- 04:19, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Elongate the body, and perhaps make the ears a bit thinner. Jayie Unwritten words~ 04:28, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Well, like the other blanks, they do have to be pixelated. I wasn't sure that you were aware of that or not, so I figured that informing you would be a good idea. If you could please do that, I would appreciate it. I won't comment much aside from small issues- anatomy is not my strong point.

Maybe flatten the rump a bit. 06:35, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Add a bit more fluff to the longhaired tails? I told you you'd win! 07:59, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

For the longhaired blanks add more fluffiness all around. <span style="">3:05 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

Would you like a redline? <span style="">15:52 Mon Sep 15 2014

Also, in generally I'd recommend flipping them so they don't get confused with the elder blanks. <span style="">15:53 Mon Sep 15 2014

Try smoothing rounding out the line about the shoulder, and maybe make the line for the chest reach all the way down? Sorry if I'm being unclear, I'm crap at wording things >< 16:36, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

The forepaw that goes on top of the other one goes up awkwardly, so maybe try to show that it's connected to the leg? Sorry I am really terrible at explaining stuff like this. <span style="">20:31 Mon Sep 15

Re-uploaded. Better? ^^' I dont have a tablet, so drawing these with a mouse is difficult. ^^' But, i tried to add all of the above. Im aware that i have to fix the eye on the shorthaired blank, and the ear on the longfurred blank. Im aware of some issues, but i didnt have enough time to fix them on this upload. ^^'-- 02:23, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

They still have to be pixelated, and Breezey's suggestion for flipping them so they don't get confused with the elders is a really good idea. ^^

Make it so this > front paw doesn't look so short and almost rectangle-like. Make it more curved like < this one. These are really good. ^.^ 03:08, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Uhm so I forgot to reflip them around but the image is the same. Here are some redlines. <span style="">3:17 Tue Sep 16 2014

Elongate the body more, lower/flatten the rump a bit especially on the longhair, make the tail way fuller, and flatten the forehead a bit. Jayie Unwritten words~ 03:18, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Breezy told me the redlines could be used as a reference, or just lined directly over. The redline helped greatly; thank you, Raelic. Better?-- 04:27, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

This looks really good. :) The only thing I can think of is make the tail even fluffier. Look how full this tail is compared to the rest of the cat: http://thornews.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/norsk-skogkatt1.jpg I can do redlines for the tail if you want. Jayie  Unwritten words~ 04:29, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Also, make the shorthair tail a bit thinner. Jayie Unwritten words~ 04:34, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

It wouldn't hurt to add a bit more fluff to the longhairs all over, methinks. 08:48, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

The lines could be a little bit thinner. i'm still so glad these won because that pose if beautiful imho   Brick   14:45, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

It could probably only be thinner in certain places. I think, comparing it to some of the other blanks we have, they're around the same thickness.

The neck kinda resembles a dragon neck. Can you bring the neck line behind the head a few pixels closer to the nose side of the head? Like move that line over >>>> this way more. <span style="">20:35 Tue Sep 16

Can you elongate the body just a tick more? <span style="">8:44 PM, Tue Sep 16, 2014

Re-uploaded. I'd rather not elongate it anymore, it looks fine to me. Moved the neck line, fluffified the longfurred more, and made the short fur tail thinner. Better?-- 21:51, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

The arm on <<< this side looks awkward. Move the chest line <<<< more so that the chest appears larger. <span style="">23:57 Tue Sep 16

Make the longhair tail fluffier with a tiny bit more of a point to it (look at the Queen and Elder blanks to see what I mean) and the shorthair tail should be even skinnier. Jayie Unwritten words~ 00:11, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I think it might be fluffy enough, it just need a bit more of a tapering off at the end. It's the shorthair that needs to be much skinnier. Jayie Unwritten words~ 00:59, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Lengthen the visible back leg? It looks a bit short to me.--EosOfTheDawn (talk) 18:10, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I think for the back leg if you erase a bit of the line separating the leg from the foot it may help. Do you want me to give you a redline? <span style="">7:11 PM, Thu Sep 18, 2014

redline as per request. I think if you move the tail out away from the foot a bit more, and elongate the foot and erase a bit of that line it'll help. <span style="">11:19 PM, Thu Sep 18, 2014

I think the shorthair tail should be thinner than that, personally. Jayie Unwritten words~ 00:40, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

I'd thicken the ruff on the longhair's neck 03:26, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

I will reupload soon. =) Probably sometime this weekend.-- 02:30, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Dawn River (Q) ~ For Approval
This shall bring the list of queens to be redone to just Swoop. Well, provided I can get it approved without ragequitting because ''this goshdarned pattern is impossible. '' 12:29, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

It looks good! Lighten the shading just a smidge everywhere but the face. Jayie Unwritten words~ 12:55, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups Thanks! 13:03, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Darken the black a bit to match her sharpclaw. <span style="">15:57 Mon Sep 15 2014

Re-ups Fun fact, whilst making this I accidentally used the shorthair blank and had to start over. 16:30, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Based on the Sharpclaw image, her ginger fur could stand to be darkened a bit. Jayie Unwritten words~ 18:58, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups 08:54, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

The ginger could be darkened just a tiny bit more. also, smudge her markings just a little bit more.-- 21:56, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups [Insert witty comment here] 18:05, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

There are bits of brown waste around the image, mainly on --> this side. Brick  18:53, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

There are actually bits of waste all around the image. ^^ 18:05, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups how did i miss that 21:12, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

The ginger seems too dark and orange. Maybe run the dodge tool over the layer once and it'll fix that. <span style="">14:28 Sat Sep 20

Re-ups 16:40, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Brighten the ginger more it still looks dark. 17:03, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Any more and people will ask me to darken it again 17:38, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

smudge the shading more, especially on the tail. 00:20, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups 11:16, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Webfoot (Star) ~ For Approval
I'll just wait for it and give a gold star to the person who says it. <span style="">23:49 Tue Sep 16

define his face shading a little. 11:23, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. *gives gold star to Skt* <span style="">21:29 Thu Sep 18

Define the chest shading a bit. This is amazing Hawky!! *.* 14:08, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thanks! :D <span style="">14:26 Sat Sep 20

Whiskernose (E) - For Approval
Somebody fix my alignment I don't know how :( So, I'm a little worried about this one. Thoughts? EosOfTheDawn (talk) 18:07, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

What'cha worried about? He's looking amazing. Darken and define the shading a bit, though. ^^

Re-uploaded Thanks! EosOfTheDawn (talk) 17:22, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Darken the shading some more, but not too much. Just try to define the depth of it. Cloudy is right, this is looking very nice!! 23:22, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Ashfur (TC) (Alt W) - CBA
He's cited pale gray, and he's said to have a dark pelt in Eclipse. I checked before I reserved, and he's not in any shadow at all- it's daylight. He's in undergrowth, but the dark pelt thing is mentioned before there's any indication of there being undergrowth.

Blur/smudge the shading, it kinda looks solid and you can't see the texture through it. This looks pretty, Cloudy! 22:14, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. I just redid the texture and tweaked the shading since it was kinda sloppy. I like this a lot more.

define the shading on his front leg. 11:22, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded.

Very pretty; CBA? 19:22, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Earpink? 19:00, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Sunstrike (Star) ~ CBA
As much as I tried, I couldn't bring much justice to her and her awesome name. Comments? 19:38, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Smudge the patches in the direction of her fur a bit more to match her other images. She looks great! 19:40, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's fine on the face and tail; I'm assuming you're talking aobut the main body, right? 19:43, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I meant along the back. I should've been more specific x3 19:51, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

re-up 20:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I can't see the earpink in ---> this ear. This is very pretty, Beebs! 22:17, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

White is looking a little gray. Nice job, Beelby! <span style="">10:27 PM, Wed Sep 17, 2014

Then what do you want me to do about it, Dark? It has shading - of course it'll appear a bit gray. re-up for Rocket's comment 23:30, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

re-up thank skt 23:34, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Define the tail shading a bit. This is lovely 10:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

re-up 20:43, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Can you smudge the white a little bit more? Like, on her belly and such? This is really stunning. *.*

re-up 19:29, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

This is lovely, so CBA? <span style="">20:30 Sun Sep 21

Amberpaw (Ki) ~ For Approval
she's a sweetie 15:53, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Define the shading more. shes so pretty!!! *.* 21:29, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Reups obrigado 17:29, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Is it possible to define the earpink a bit without straying too far from the apprentice's colors? 13:10, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Reups stuck it in-between the two layers of shading (I use two for shading definition) 16:07, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Hazeltail (Star) - For Approval
Now she's confirmed to be in StarClan so heres Hazeltail's Starclanner again :3 20:03, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Maybe thicken the tail just a touch? Very pretty I loved her :/ 20:05, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups Thank you:) Thickened the tail but i think its a bit too fluffy now :p 15:57, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading a bit, it's starting to look blotchy. And I think the tail is fine but you may want a second opinion lol. 17:00, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

It dosen't look at all blotchy to me, but I just think the tail shading needs a bit of definition and the shading nearer the start of the tail should be blurred just a tiny bit. 13:29, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups Better? 19:51, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

There's bits of waste all around the tail. And I think the tail shading could be extended more. 12:16, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Re-ups 16:20, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Seedpaw (Ki) ~ For Approval
Tried matching the StarClanner.

Would you like the .psd for the colors, or are you good without it? Either way, she matches quite well, I'd say.

Define the neck shading, and smudge the earpink a tad. Also define the <--- leg's shading. And yeah I think it matches pretty well. 16:55, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Dewpaw (A) - For Approval
- Brighty's son! c: 20:54, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

White's looking a bit gray on the belly. <span style="">10:54 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

Re-uploaded 00:25, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Whiten the white some more and smudge the white into the gray more. I reccomend doing a size one with a rate of 65-70 and going nuts cx  16:57, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's fine, honestly. <span style="">17:09 Sat Sep 20

Yeah but the smudging has to match the kit doesn't it? I dunno ask Cloudy. 20:40, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Dark, im pretty sure Hawky knows what shes talking about. The white looks fine, imho. Perhaps just define the light on the paws, and lighten the chest and underbelly a bit? Otherwise, this is great. ^^'-- 00:47, September 21, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think the white is fine and from the light source I have, there shouldn't be very much light on the paws 02:47, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading a tad? 13:08, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded 18:30, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Slightpaw (A) ~ For Approval
its ravenpaw v.2 00:47, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Could you possibly lighten the white a bit? It looks grey. 13:08, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Can you define the markings a bit? They're a bit hard to see, especially on the face. ~ Splashheart27 (talk) 22:52, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

The only markings that he has are on his chest, which has already said it needs to be lightened a bit more.

re-uploaded. I only made the white a bit more hite since its mostly in shadow, and if you're talking about the texture, it's only supposed to be slightly visible. 00:05, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Define the texture under the shading. It seems to get lost. Oh and define the light on the front paw farthest from us. This is amazin as always skt~ I love how the white is like a cottonball!! :D 12:11, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

I can see the texture just fine- it's not easy to do that on black cats and still have it 300% visible. I do agree about the paw, though...and maybe define the lighter areas on the other three too, if that's part of your source?