Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval= Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Poolcloud (Star) ~ For Approval
-- 20:35, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Define the earpink in the <--- ear and define the shading depth? 20:45, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Define eye depth too, a tad bit. 20:56, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Darken the shading a bit 20:56, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Reups -- 21:51, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

I can't tell the difference. 21:53, 5/06/2017

Define the light on the tail, define chest and tail shading. 21:58, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Reups --  22:06, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

I think the eyes look a little too bright, earpink doesn't seem to match the other images, there's waste around almost the whole image, and define shading depth there are also some unfilled pixels in the eyes that are supposed to be white

For the eyes and ears, I colorpicked them. But I'll check into it again. --  23:34, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Redone Great stupid me deleted the xcf and didn't even realize :C Here's your redo I really liked the first one. ;-; --  00:01, May 7, 2017 (UTC)

The ear pink is uh... leaking? remember to blur things with a smaller brush.

@fox, if you mean its not covering the whole ear, it is not a requirement to fill in the whole ear with earpink 01:23, 5/07/2017

Reups Actually, the earpink color was leaking past to the back of the ear so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --  01:52, May 7, 2017 (UTC)

I honestly can't tell what's shading and what's the pattern. Define the shading and then the shading depth as well? Also brighten the white a good amount, it's looking silver-gray 16:04, 5/07/2017

Reups --  16:31, May 7, 2017 (UTC)

I'm having trouble seeing the shading (besides the tail and <- paw)

Gray coloring looks a little off - it seems just a bit duller than the others. Also, I think the gray could be more smudged in appearance, like the others

There shouldn't be any gray on the forehead. It should only be on the ear and the muzzle. Also, the <--- rump gray patch is leaking near the lineart on the top 17:04, May 8, 2017 (UTC)

Define the color in the <-- eye. The pupil blocks it out. 01:00, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Reups --  03:43, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading. 12:13, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Theres waste by the butt 13:45, 5/09/2017

Is there a specific way to define shading. I've tried smudging but that doesn't seem to work..--  22:04, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

You can increase the opacity, or if you've already done that all the way duplicate the layer and adjust the opacity on that one

Dont forget your signature ya rando :P Also to define shading, you can also add more shading overall 23:50, 5/09/2017

Reups --  20:44, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

Define the pattern overall and make it sharper like the other images.

Reups --  02:30, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Define the ear pink in the <--- ear 02:35, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading more. I can tell it's there, but it's kind of all over the place 02:43, 5/11/2017

Is there chest shading? If not, add some. 02:46, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Reups --  03:17, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Define flank shading? Nice. :3 03:22, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Reups --  04:02, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

The placement of the gray doesn't match completely. Especially check the warrior image, as you can see the difference between the shades better there, and also how there's a more defined patch of gray on the face.

Define the shading more 01:29, 5/12/2017

Reups --  02:12, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Ok I think the gray should match the elder's image since it was lightened/tweaked before the others and if that's the case then this is too dark, also the gray looks softer than the other images, and it's still kinda hard to tell what's gray and what's shading on the chest and front legs

Well, I was just asked to match the warrior image so I'm not sure what to do when critiques contradict each other :/ --  16:05, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

The critiques, at least the recent one where I said to match the warrior image, don't contradict. I was talking about the gray placement, such as on the muzzle (which from what I can see, still hasn't been done). Snow is talking about the coloring, which is a separate issue, and also the coloring in other spots not previously mentioned.

There's a stray white pixel on the <--- paw. 21:08, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading more 21:31, 5/15/2017

The shading on --> side of the head looks a little dark, maybe lighten and smooth it a little? 13:15, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

I feel like defining isn't the right word for this, but expanding is. I've noticed that the artist repeatedly "defined" the shading on the same spots when they should've expand it instead. That's why the shading looks pretty dark and not visible in some areas. It should be expanded on the tail and stomach.

Reups --  21:04, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading 21:06, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

There's a few pixels of grey in the area behind the <- front leg. I think you could smooth that out a little or get rid of it. I can put a red circle on it if you'd like. Branchwing (talk) 01:05, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Define shading on the legs, chest, and belly area and lighten the shading everywhere else 04:16, 5/18/2017

I think it looks too dark compared to the other images, but forgive me if it's just my screen or something.

Reups --  20:34, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

There's some hard-edged shading on the arm, see here http://vvcap.com/5NI5dU5r7SI 21:07, 5/19/2017

Nettlepad (W) – For Approval
– 11:28, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

I can't see the image. Try reuploading?

Reupload – 11:34, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Is there shading leaking on the back lineart or is that intentional? Please dont shoot me Rainbowmistake (talk) 11:58, May 9, 2017 (UTC)chat

Lighten or smooth out the shading, the dapples seem to melt into the shading. 12:06, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

define some of the speckles? 15:00, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Reupload – 12:11, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading 13:32, 5/10/2017

Reupload – 14:41, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

Theres still shading leaking on the back and smooth the shading more 18:15, 5/10/2017

Define shading depth a bit

Reupload – 07:20, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Define the earpink and the shading on the paws. 19:45, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Define the patterning that's under the shading

Define the shading depth more please 01:32, 5/12/2017

Reupload – 07:18, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Maybe recede the shading a little bit by the shoulder/lower chest area? 23:19, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Define earpink, and maybe define shading depth a bit more?

Please, explain to me more precisely. HOW concretely I define shading detph? – 14:23, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

I think a little on the legs will do tbh

What is mean "do tbh"? – 11:47, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

tbh = to be honest. basically im saying that you should just define the depth on the legs

Smooth the shading more on the base of the tail and everywhere else but the legs 21:32, 5/15/2017

Reupload Excuse me forcing you to endure me – 16:46, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading more 00:56, 5/17/2017

Define the speckles just a tad in the shading? 03:18, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

What means tad? – 10:02, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

tad means a little bit.

Do I have to do something with legs? – 07:59, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

All you have to do is smooth the shading more over the whole image, and define the speckles a little bit in the shading <span style="">13:55, 5/18/2017

Spider Paw (W) - For Approval
I didn't add the extra toe because on the Early Settler, it's on the side that's not showing, but I can add it. 01:48, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded Smoothed out shading. 01:53, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Nice! Smooth the shading just a tad more and define the light a little. 01:57, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Can you try to add it in? Just a little bump on his other foot would be ok <span style="">01:59, 5/12/2017

I was just about to comment to smooth the shading, but Snek already said that I feel like the light could be defined on the back paw <span style="">02:02, 5/12/2017

Well broken little did you know I also said to define the light already 02:19, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded Wow. :p 02:27, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Gonna be of the unpopular opinion here, but I really don't think you'd need to show that extra toe at all. This blank doesn't show that side of the cat, and the lineart looks a little awkward and forced with how it is. The paw would have to be kinda twisted in order for it to show that toe anyways given how this blank is shown.

Reuploaded 02:33, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading on the ear on <--- side? Congratulations on 2 approved images :) <span style="">02:44, 5/12/2017

Reuploaded Thank you, Broken! :) 02:58, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading on the top of the head and the ear that is farthest away from us? 04:09 12 May 2017

Shading's leaking on the belly.

On the back leg closest to us, it looks like there's a spot of shading that should be smoothed. 14:19, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 22:33, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

I think the overall shading could be smoothed a little, but also particularly on the ears. In addition, I think the shading's leaking a bit on the haunch. 23:04, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 00:25, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

I think the shading's still leaking on the belly and on the front leg closest to us. 04:08, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

For lack of better words, the shading near to the lineart looks really... pixely, moreso on the back and tail-tip, but in a few other spots too. Not sure if it's like blurred lineart or just something odd?

Reuploaded 17:53, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Could you smooth the shading on the back leg closest to us, near the paw? I feel like the shading there ends abruptly. And, could you make the shading less pixely, as Spooky stated? Branchwing (talk) 18:01, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 18:08, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Looking good! Smooth the shading on the farthest ear 18:17, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded Thank you! 18:26, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Define shading? And smooth shading on both ears, top of head, tail, and two paws further from us

Reuploaded 02:09, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Could you smooth the shading a little bit? Branchwing (talk) 02:41, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 03:00, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

It looks like you smoothed shading in only some places. Please smooth all of it, define shading depth, and there's some smudged/blurred lineart at the tip of tail and by the neck

Reuploaded 03:43, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Give some shape to the flank shading, it looks like a straight line 03:46, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 04:05, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading on all of the paws and the ear farthest from us. Branchwing (talk) 12:21, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded 15:54, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth out the back shading just a small bit? This is cool^ <span style="">20:32, 5/14/2017

Reuploaded Thank you! 21:01, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Idk if it's just me, but the earpink and the shading are making it look like there's a stray gray pixel in the earpink. And define the shading more on the tail and add more shading to the back paw closest to us on the paw itself, as it looks like it fades away. ANd it looks like also that the shading is leaking on the legs. Smooth the shading more as well, and recede the shading a tiny bit on the top of the head, as if the light's coming from the < and up area, there wouldn't be that much shadow there <span style="">21:40, 5/15/2017

Reuploaded 21:55, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth out the shading just a tiny bit on the top of the head and on the paws furthest away from us. It looks a bit sharp. 16:41, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

I think the shading on the front paw farthest from us is leaking too far onto the toes, where it should be in all light <span style="">00:58, 5/17/2017

Reuploaded 01:41, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

The lineart looks blurred, or something weird/pixely is happening wherever the shading touches the lineart on this. Can you try and fix it? Also, smooth the shading on the top of the head, the back leg furthest from us, and the < ear

Reuploaded 22:29, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

The shading blotchiness/lineart pixeliness is still there on the tail-tip, > ear, belly, legs, and lower back.

Reuploaded If it's still there, can you please circle it? 22:36, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Spotted Fur (W) - For Approval
Failed at matching my own pattern again 19:25, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth out the tail shading? Unless that's part of the pattern :P This is very beautiful Sziri! Your images never fail to amaze me :) <span style="">19:42, 5/14/2017

Re-ups Ohh,thank you 20:41, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading on the front paw farthest from us? I really like this one Rainbowmistake (talk) 20:43, May 14, 2017 (UTC)chat

Maybe smooth the shading on both the front paws actually^ <span style="">20:50, 5/14/2017

Re-ups Thanks! 08:38, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

CBA? <span style="">00:58, 5/17/2017

sorry to break this, but the spots and stripes seem far too dark compared to the other images. 16:06, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Re-ups 19:10, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth shading on the back legs <span style="">04:18, 5/18/2017

Re-ups 17:34, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Pine Needle (W) - For Approval
I really like his name ^^ 08:09 15 May 2017

Define the light a little more on the back paw farthest from us, the tail, and smooth the earpink a little more? nice job! <span style="">21:44, 5/15/2017

Reuploaded Did my best, 04:32 16 May 2017

Smooth the shading on the back legs? Do you use Photoahop, or am I just a really unexperienced GIMP user? xD <span style="">19:18, 5/16/2017

Reuploaded, I use GIMP but I've been using it for a while now I guess ^^; 20:38 17 May 2017

CBA? <span style="">04:19, 5/18/2017

Hate to break CBA, cause this is nice, but smooth out the tail shading? Seems kinda hard-edged to me. <span style="">05:26, 5/19/2017

Moonflower (Alt. W) ~ For Approval
All colors came from Bluestar's queen image, which I still have the files for. Comments? 22:53, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Define shading on both the back paws? 22:55, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading a little on the neck/upper back area? 22:58, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded. 23:04, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Think shading's leaking on both front paws.

It's also leaking away from lineart on the back > of --> paw, near the rump area

Define the shading a little bit. Branchwing (talk) 00:36, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading depth also. <span style="">04:39, 5/17/2017

Still working?<font color="#0F52BA" face="Segoe">Stealth <font color="#FF0000" face="Segoe">f🔥re <font color="#0067A5" face="Teen">❤Warriors Forever!❤  10:26, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Snowbird (A) - For Approval
Wow, I tried a dark green/blue shading tint and I actually don't mind it? Yay! 23:29, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

Nice. Smooth out the shading a little on the face and chest, and maybe lighten the overall shading a tick or two. 23:49, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

Reup 00:20, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Define the eye depth a little bit, and also define the chest light.

Define the light on the ears a little bit. Branchwing (talk) 00:59, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded. 04:23, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Applefrost(Ki) ~ For Approval
I am aware of my trash attempt to texture, and the shading being too dark maybe. Comments for Applefrost? Also, the picture might look blurry?? Idk, it shows as blurry in the editor. <span style="">02:21, 5/17/2017

Is there white in the eye? Because I'm not seeing any at all. Also, it doesn't look blurry to me.

I can see the white. 02:28, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded! Defined it. There was texture and a bit of shading covering it. <span style="">02:38, 5/17/2017

Re-uploaded! Surprised nobody mentioned the shading depth yet o.o <span style="">04:30, 5/17/2017

Add a bit of light to the back paw darnit i wanted this 05:03, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded! <span style="">05:24, 5/17/2017

The base looks green-tinted on the two screens I've looked at it on, idk, perhaps shift it a smudge?

I totally get the frustration of not being able to do images you want to do but can people stop guilt tripping each other over images they didn't get to do? I know it's not really against the rules or anything, but not everyone needs to hear it. Sorry if I came off as rude, but it's been happening a lot on the approval page. As for the image, the brown could be fixed with a reddish tint, or you could color pick from Appledusk (as they were said to look alike? Idk)

Also can you lighten the shading?

Texture looks great, but on the upper left in our view, the texture looks out of place.

Re-uploaded! Thank goodness my block was lifted..you have no clue how good it feels to be back. Sorry about all that. Also, Star, could you please specifiy what you mean by 'out of place' next time? I added some more texture there by just a bit, but I didn't exactly know what you wanted me to do so yeah x.x <span style="">07:25, 5/18/2017

Oh forgot to add^ I did colorpick from Appledusk, it might just be the texture that's throwing off the colors. <span style="">07:28, 5/18/2017

Actually, Appledusk's coloring is a bit on the green side, so I really don't think you're gonna be able to change it much without having to alter Appledusk as well. ...which I think might actually be because of the shading. not totally sure on that one.

Oh, I'm sorry Broken. What I meant by out of place is that it kind of looks like stripes or something like that, and kind of hard-edged. It's kind of hard for me to explain, I'll try to provide something for you to understand. (I suck at explaining this)

So like, is there anything you want me to change?? You're only telling me about how the texture looks weird, so I'm not sure if I should change the texture or not. <span style="">22:39, 5/18/2017

I think they're trying to say the texture needs to be smoothed a little?? That's what it sounds like to me? 22:42, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded! So ugly tho :P <span style="">23:25, 5/18/2017

The ear pink looks just a little bit neon 23:27, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Every color on this Charart is colorpicked off Appledusk. I just colorpicked his nose and made it the earpink. I don't see why I'd have to change it, but if others agree, I'll change it. <span style="">23:48, 5/18/2017

Nah, if you colorpicked, it's likely fine. Smooth the shading on the back paw? And maybe a little bit on the tail 00:52, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded! <span style="">02:20, 5/19/2017

Seedpelt (MV) (Star) ~ CBA
I always had my eye on this guy ever since I first joined. Together at last... 02:27, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

I believe that their is white on the tail. This is really beautiful! Much better than mine. ErmineGlow (talk) 02:41, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Define or expand the tail shading? Pretty^ <span style="">02:47, 5/17/2017

Define eye depth? And < ear pink if you can, if not that's alright. 02:48, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

I know I'm going to be told to stop, but the eye depth is very visible for me. <span style="">02:55, 5/17/2017

It's ok, I also agree that the eye depth is visible.

Reups <3 Ermine, there is white on the tail. What did you mean by that? 03:33, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

i guess you could expand it a little, as on the warrior it nearly takes up one third of the tail.

Reups 17:18, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

smooth shading on the chest a little <span style="">04:21, 5/18/2017

Reups 04:30, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

CBA?

Duskpaw (HJ) (Ki) ~ For Approval


Define shadinf depth a little tiny bit 20:44, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded

Add the paler underside, and add/define the paler parts around the eyes. Would you like the file? 01:59, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded

Moss Tail (W) - CBA
I went for something simple, idk. 21:04, May 17, 2017 (UTC)

CBA?

Mud Paws (W) - For Approval
Yes, I'm aware most of the shading should be smoothed out, I just wanted to get this up before I went to school 11:37, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Maybe lighten the shading just a smidge as well? I like this^^ Rainbowmistake (talk) 12:13, May 18, 2017 (UTC)chat

Idk, in this light source, I don't think that patch of shading in front of the shoulder by the chest would be there <span style="">13:52, 5/18/2017

I've had shoulder shading there on my images. I personally think that is a matter of personal preference if it is placed there or not. Realistically there would be some shading there due to musculature and skeletal placement. <span style="">19:40 Thu May 18

reups @Winter, it's on the apprentice tutorials, so I mean?? It's probably fine anyways 20:33, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

There isn't one source for every image Snowdapple :/ I don't want to come off as rude, but if it was added as a source in the Apprentice Tutorials, why does Snek have to remove that patch of shading? There's multiple sources.. <span style="">21:12, 5/18/2017

And smooth the shading on the shoulder and haunch. Looks kinda blotchy^ <span style="">21:14, 5/18/2017

Shading could be smoothed.

reups why did I even do this I hate shading on warriors Broken, it's fine, I know you weren't trying to be rude but both I and Sunjaw already gave a reason as to why it's fine. Thanks for the help, but it was pretty much dealt with. 21:24, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Wha? Oh shoot I wasn't looking when I said the above comment. Sorry for repeating comments. :P But anways could you define texture on the head?

reups I did your comment, then I decided to define the texture everywhere to better match the other images, and even worked in some texture highlights and sort of did something with the shading?? Idk man but tell me if it looks off now. 22:37, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Shouldn't there be shading on top of the head with the light source? 22:38, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

reups 22:53, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Can you maybe try to round it out more so tht the light is on the front of the leg? Because the shading is kinda leaking onto where the light should be (adding onto previous comment. Also the new alien movie was really spooky ...) <span style="">04:17, 5/19/2017

reups I believe i got where you meant?? 04:22, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

There's some shading on the tail that looks blotchy compared to the rest, see here http://vvcap.com/mEwAiZVwqJE. All in all, it's very nice^ <span style="">05:35, 5/19/2017

reups it was actually texture 20:29, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Birchbark (Ro) ~ For Approval
w 18:41, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading depth on the line that runs across the top of the back, and the one on the main body (not near the shoulder, more on flank/near the haunch) 20:34, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

reuploaded i tried. light brown is a dodgy colour to work with 23:32, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Do you think you could smooth the shading on the toe on back paw closest to us? In the rear end below the tail, is that tiny pixel supposed to be transparent, and not filled in? Cosmokitten (talk) 13:14, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Pinenose (Ro) ~ For Evaluation
First time doing this, so hopefully I got everything right :D Pinenose is one of my favorities warriors!! The shading is supposed to be lessed blurred and more sharper kind of? Comments? Cosmokitten (talk) 20:40, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Don't align your images, it messes up the structure of the page. I removed them, but next time you can remove them by going into source mode and removing the word 'left' or 'right' in the image name. 20:46, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Define the ear pink. 20:47, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if you have added highlights or not, but she looks gray, not black. &#123;&#123;SUBST:Nosubst&#124;User:ErmineGlow/Sig&#125;&#125; (talk) 21:05, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Is this how I upload? Did you guys notice changes in ear pink and stuff? Also, Ermineglow I did use highlights, so I lowered them down. :) Cosmokitten (talk) 21:11, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

if you're uploading with the same file name and overwriting the previous one? yes, that's hwo you upload. 21:14, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Is it showing now? Idk if it did before, but I see what you mean David, thank you! Cosmokitten (talk) 21:17, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

The file name needs to be Pinenose.rogue.png 21:24, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. It should be Pinenose.rogue.png now. c: Cosmokitten (talk) 21:28, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

It actually says 'rouge' :P 21:29, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

If I may ask, where do you see just the 'rogue' part? Cosmokitten (talk) 21:35, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

? You misspelled rogue in the file name as 'rouge'. I'm not quite sure what you mean 21:37, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

OH omg, thank you. French for red, must have missed that! Thanks sm, great eyes! Lol. Cosmokitten (talk) 21:38, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Either your upload isn't showing up for me, but isn't this Skt's image? It shows his version of the image and not yours for me :P I probably sound really dumb <span style="">21:45, 5/18/2017

^^ I believe this is caused because you didn't select to replace the existing image. When reuploading, you need to replace the image with your own 21:46, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Hm.. it won't let me go to the visual page because it says it has complex coding? But I understand where you're coming from! I didn't mean too. --Cosmokitten (talk) 21:50, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth the shading. <span style="">21:57, 5/18/2017

Re-uploaded. Does it show changes? I had to do it in the source editing, not visual because of complex coding. --Cosmokitten (talk) 22:07, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Just a tip, you can also reupload at File:Pinenose.rogue.png by clicking replace. I believe this is the way you're actually supposed to do it, and it makes it so you don't have to remove and readd the image 500 times 22:28, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Very nice! Smooth out the shading a little bit? Branchwing (talk) 23:16, May 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded! I did do the replace thing this time Danny, and thanks! I hope it changed? I smoothed out the shading a bit, I just want it a little sharp for my preference, but if you want me smooth it out more, no problem. I messed with the face shading too. Is it too dark? And thanks Branchwing! --Cosmokitten (talk) 00:21, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re-ups Messed with muzzle/face shading again. --Cosmokitten (talk) 00:24, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

This is looking nice, maybe define the light source on the legs? 00:48, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Should I define some more? Cosmokitten (talk) 00:58, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Skunkpaw (A) ~ For Approval
Fail.

Very pretty! Maybe define the shading a bit, and there is a little white speck on ---> shoulder blade from the white on the chest. And maybe smudge the ear pink a little more? Keep up the good work! Cosmokitten (talk) 00:44, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Brighten the white <span style="">00:44, 5/19/2017

If I'm correct, the white on the <-- paw should cover all of it. 00:46, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Shouldn't there be white on the stomach as per the StarClan image? <span style="">01:24, 5/19/2017

re-up Thanks Cosmo!

Oh dang I forgot about the earpink. I'll get to it later

Maybe blur the white or smooth it out on the stomach and chest. Looks too sharp compared to the StarClan <span style="">04:19, 5/19/2017

Daisytoe (A) ~ For Approval
Disneytoe's my last image before I become a warrior! Go go go! --

Good job Neon! Maybe define the eye depth, unless there is some already. Cosmokitten (talk) 10:18, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re-ups Decided that even though there was depth that it needed some definition. Fixed. --

Define the shading a bit? I like this, good job! Rainbowmistake (talk) 11:55, May 19, 2017 (UTC)chat

Smooth/smudge the shading on the top of the hindleg closest to us and the base of the tail. 13:26, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Define the shading depth quite a bit, it looks flat. 19:35, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

I feel like all the shading could be smoothed out tbh <span style="">19:48, 5/19/2017

I believe the mickey mouse head on the chest is facing the wrong way. On the warrior and kit image, the head is facing sideways. This has it facing right side up. The patch on the back should be further up the back near the shoulders and the ears on the mickey head on the haunch need to be smaller. There should also be a tiny patch of gray on the furthest back paw. And I feel like all of the gray could be a tiny bit softer. 20:07, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Leafshade (W) - For Approval
All colors from her other images, I just gave the shading a red tint. 16:28, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Smooth out the shading on the tail a tad? Beautiful image! ^^ 19:59, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Thank you! I fixed up the shading on the rest of the body too. 20:08, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Thorn (W) - For Approval
Cute scruffy girl(?) <span style="">19:23 Fri May 19

Isn't there supposed to be some ragged fur on the tail? Unless it wouldn't be visible from this angle, there appears to be some ragged fur on the tail on the es and loner (I think) <span style="">19:27, 5/19/2017

ragged fur doesn't have to match between images. 19:32, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

This needs notched ears 20:10, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Reuploaded Wow that's a major pull a blank on my end... <span style="">21:15 Fri May 19