Forum:Vote of No Confidence - Kitsufox

Hello, users of Warriors Wiki. I’m here today to put a Vote of No Confidence against the admin, Kitsufox. Though she's done some wonderful work in the past while reviving the wiki, some of her behavior has been highly questionable and inappropriate. I'm going to look over those cases and question; Is that the right behavior for a bureaucrat?

First, her activity level is unacceptable for a bureaucrat. She has these long gaps of inactivity and then she returns for a little bit before disappearing again. An admin should be on often, not 24/7, but often enough to catch vandals and other calls of duty instead of leaving it to a solo admin. She has also neglected giving various users their earned rights despite being on this Wiki since they had passed their nominations, for up to a month in come cases, despite being warned several times by other users. Her inactivity on the wiki is not good, because it affects her mainspace edits, and her inactivity on projects is large. She has had roughly the same number of edits for a year now, and her editcount is fairly poor for an admin. The percentage is not good for any user, never mind an admin, and she shouldn’t get away with it because she is one. I understand that being an admin has her edit talk pages and userpages more often than others, but this? It's simply unsatisfactory for an administrator. She only contributes to project pages when she feels as though it is necessary to persuade others in another's favor, which leads me into my next point: favoritism

She also shows favoritism towards other users, taking their opinions instead of others (even if others were correct). Due to her behavior, it is presumed that she belittles others because ‘’she’’ believes they are wrong, even though she may be wrong herself.

Moving on, she has a record for personal attacks. Though she is an adult, that does not give her the right to insult certain users, calling them inappropriate names, such as dicks or calling their actions ”douchebaggery”. As an admin, she should be fair and just instead of insulting them. She also takes sides, instead of acting neutral in debates and kindly stopping it, as seen here.

Furthermore, Kitsufox has past cases of abuse of her rights in these kind of cases, using her rights to end a conflict in her favor, while not listening to another person’s point of view. In an edit war, after openly taking a side in the war she used her rights to end it in her favor, not even getting the opinions of the others around her who are equal to her.

In conclusion, I believe that Kitsufox should be rid of her admin and bureaucrat rights. With the proof shown; her inactivity, favoritism, record for personal attacks, and abuse of rights shows that she has not succeeded in being an administrator without going against the rules she enforces, and  has even gone against the rules listed  here.

I understand that others' opinions may oppose my own, but this it mine. So if anyone else disagrees, please state your opinion here. We need input and opinions. 01:01, June 27, 2012 (UTC)