Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations

This is where PCA members can be nominated for different spots on the project.

= Senior Warrior =

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * The majority of the project must agree
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations - 1 2

Unsuccessful Nominations - 1

=Requirements=
 * User must have been a member for at least 4 months.
 * User must have at least six images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

Appledash - Nomination Ends Sept. 27th
Supporting:
 * 1) Okay, I understand icy has left in the past, but when she returned, she was always given her sw status back. I've had to nominate her in years past when she was without them, and i said the same thing as i'm saying now: icy deserves them. she has been working in this project for six years now. i'm pretty sure she knows how to comment, make art, and do all the senior warrior tasks there are to do. with PCA being the busiest and most popular project, what's wrong with adding her to the team? i was a sw among like, ten others, and it was fine. we got the job done. she will be nothing short of constructive, active, and willing to serve as a sw once more. 22:57, September 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) As per Splook. Those who assume Icy will retaliate obviously don't know her at all. And if hers are unfriendly, then you should have seen old PCA. Her comment are blunt, not unfriendly. There's nothing wrong with being blunt.
 * 3) Splook and Skye have said it already. There's no doubt in my mind that Icy will do wonderful as a senior warrior, as she has proven in the past. 00:04, September 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Totally for this, without a doubt in the world. Icy totally deserves this. Plus, we didn't have "too many SWs" during the last nomination that went through. Why is now any different, hmm? 01:09 Mon Sep 14

Against:
 * 1) I'm sorry Icy, but I'm going to have to say no. I know you're going to retaliate against me for this but here goes: I do not think Icy has what it takes to become a senior warrior. I know she is a wonderful charartist, but some of her comments on images takes it a little bit too far and overall slightly immature. Some of her comments are very helpful yes, but the majority of them are a little unfriendly. Plus, there are too many SW's as of the moment to add more. 23:40, September 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) As much as I'd like to support, we have too many SWs at the moment. We already have 6. That is more than enough of what we need. She's definitely more than ready (she has been PCAs leader once, mind you). In the near future, my vote would change once there aren't do many leads. 00:09, September 14, 2015 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Yeah I have to agree with Burnt. ;; we have too many senior warriors at the time. 00:39, September 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) While icy can be a bit blunt and maybe just a tad offending (regardless if it's intentional), I believe she should be ableable to get her position back. Now, I'm not voting yes or no, though I'm fine with either outcome. I do agree with winter, but she has shown herself worthy of the position many times over. 05:08, September 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) I'd say there are enough SWs at the moment, and two users have been voted against for that /before/ both of them promoted, so it's kind of... yea. That being said I might leave the entire wiki just anytime so I don't know. Nettlesky (talk)

Comments
Thank you, Splook. I accept this nomination and hope it goes through. If not, that is alright as well. :) 23:38, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Winterflurry, while you may vote against her, please assume good faith when doing so, or I will nullify your vote. Icy would not retaliate- that would be childish, and she knows better.

Actually, there were neutral votes against a nomination for having too many SWs last time. 04:04, September 14, 2015 (UTC)