Warriors Wiki:Chatroom/RfCM

Chat moderators enforce the chatroom policy and ensure that the chat runs as it was intended. These people are carefully selected for their posts.

Eligibility Requirements
To request Chat Moderatorship please check that you meet the requirements.


 * Membership of the Wiki for at least 6 months.
 * No warnings for chatroom policy violations in the previous three months.

Process to File a Nomination
If you meet the above requirements and desire chatmod status you may post post the following forum on the talk page of this policy:

=== Nomination for USERNAME ===
 * Date: DD MONTH YEAR

TEXT


 * Replace USERNAME with your Username.
 * Enter the day as requested.
 * In place of TEXT, prove a short essay explaining why you feel you should be granted moderator status.

Following the posting of the original nomination, the following will happen:
 * 1) An existing sysop or chat mod currently working under this policy (is on the list above and has been on said list for at least a month) endorses the user and posts a blog asking for people to cast simple "yay" and "nay" votes with statements of why the vote is being cast in that diction. (Votes without comments will be struck, votes from users without edits or with edit counts unacceptable according to the NOT Policy will be struck, Votes from accounts not active on the wiki within the last month will be struck.)
 * 2) The blog is closed and votes are tallied. If the community votes in favor, the individual is then subject to a vote in the talk page comment by the sysops and chatmods who did not run the blog
 * 3) If the second vote is also in favor they will receive chatmod status. If the second vote is not in favor the nomination will have failed.


 * Please note that any violations to chatroom policy resulting in a written warning during a nomination will void that nomination immediately.
 * Existing policy involved Sysops and Chatmods may close nominations when chats are currently being properly moderated with existing staff. They may also opt to limit the number of Chatmods promoted from voted in applications. This may result in individuals who pass the vote but are not made chatmods due to limited numbers of positions. These passed applications mean, should that user choose to reapply at a later date and they have received no written warnings in the interim period, that they may skip the public blog-vote and go strait to in-policy voting.

Chatmod Vote of No Confidence
Any user may, at any time, post a blog titled "Vote of no Confidence: Chatmod NAME" and in that blog explain why they feel that a chatmod should loose said status. If the blog posts yields more positive than negative votes with less than 25 counted votes, it will be presented to the sysops and chatmods active under this policy and they will then vote. If the blog post yields more positive than negative votes with 25 or more counted votes, the results of the vote itself will be put into action by a Bureaucrat immediately. Votes in a vote of no confidence will be struck under the same criteria as those in a vote to elect a new Chatmod,