Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Tweak Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaking=

Bramblestar (W) ~ tweaked
w/o further ado here's the tweak. oa is me and tweaked for colors. 00:17, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Could you brighten up the shading under the tail a tad, i can barely see the pale fur Storm  &#9835;  00:22, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Dawnpelt (Q) ~ Tweaked
OA is Darkforst. Tweaked for stripes. 01:25, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

The stripes fade into the shading... is that intentional?

Tansypaw (A) ~ Tweaked
OA is Silvereye. Tweaked for stripes. 01:25, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

Can you add the stripes on the front legs please? Also the stripes are showing through the shading as really bright. Did you use a multiply layer? If not please do so Storm  &#9835;  14:29, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

Reupload 22:05, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

Are there stripes on <-- front leg? I can't see anything at all on there.

Yes there are stripes on every leg. You can see it if you look closely. 22:46, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

I've looked closely, and I still can't see them. Can you please define them or add one or two more stripes? It seriously doesn't look like there's stripes at all on <-- leg.

Reupload I've defined them. 05:22, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Can you add darker ears to match the kit? The StarClan image is being nominated for it right now. 17:53, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Can you add at least one more small stripe on the other paw? Storm &#9835;  20:23, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Why was the coloring tweaked on this image? It matched before, and once you tweaked it, it no longer matched. There was no reason to alter the base coloring, so please change it back.

I think what happened was she also tweaked the shading as it does appear to be darker, although the base does look a liiiittle bit off. Did you put the whole charart under the multiply layer? Storm &#9835;  20:35, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Why would the whole charart be under the multiply layer..? That doesn't many any sense whatsoever. It's not even mandatory to use multiply as a stripe layer option (I know I don't)...and the stripes and shading shouldn't have altered the coloring of the entire image. When I've used it, it just changes the certain areas that are covered by said layer, not the entire thing.

Reupload I don't think an extra stripe is needed. Maybe the base colour looks different because of the shading? I've only lightened it so I can darken it over the tabby stripes. The only layer on multiply is the stripes, that's it. 22:02, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

I honestly think the shading was fine as it was Storm  &#9835;  22:04, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Oh and dont forget to add the darker ears because the kit has them, the tweaker says so Storm  &#9835;  22:05, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

It would help if I upload the edited the right version. Reupload. The shading was too dark and was not fine as it was. 22:07, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

What do you mean the shading was too dark? Im talking about the shading before you had tweaked it. Could you add the darker ears like i asked please? Storm &#9835;  22:11, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

I have to add shading, otherwise the stripes will be too flat. I already darkened the ears, before you even asked. Can you please calm down a little? I feel a little stalked since you I find you comment a lot on the images I'm working on. I mean, a lot. I ask that you slow down a little and let others notice and comment and let me make mistakes, otherwise I'll never learn. 22:25, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

Given that these aren't thick stripes that monopolize the entire image, (like the ones on Berrynose or even Dawnpelt) you actually don't need to add shading, and the shading that was there before you tweaked it was more than enough.