Forum:New Project

I believe this has been discussed before, but nothing came of it. I'm re-opening it. We have articles that don't fall into any project. These are articles about authors, years, chats, etc. I think a project including these articles would prosper very well. We do need a name, and a leader before we put it into action. What do you guys think? 01:09, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Definetly. I totally agree on this. It would be like any other project, am I correct? Having its own featured article, silver/gold nominations, articles to work on, concerns...?--

I'm pretty sure it would. Anyway, I was thinking of this as well. 01:20, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm thinking it could be called Project: Life? (Terrible with names and stuff!) 01:22, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe, Project Reality? 01:24, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Project Reality Life? 01:25, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I totally agree! And I like Project Reality for the name. Echoblaze♥ 01:26, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Ooh! I think this idea! Project Reality sounds like an amazing name, since they are part of reality, in a sense. I'd join this project in a heartbeat. Lawliet Meow 01:29, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Project Reality is a great name! 01:31, July 4, 2011 (UTC) I honestly agree! I love that name and think we should use it :) So does everyone agree on making the project? -- 01:33, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I agree to making this project. 01:38, July 4, 2011 (UTC) Icestorm: This has been up for about 10 minutes. XD But, its future looks bright. :) Who do you guys want for a leader? 01:40, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Lol! xD I have no preference really, all I want is somebody who is experienced and is fair and friendly :) -- 01:42, July 4, 2011 (UTC) Well, that could be anyone. :) I want this user to be active, too. I don't want this project to go cold fast. :) 01:43, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Me neither. Someone who's active, fair, experienced...and...awesome. (Lol everyone here is awesome so that must be hard xD) -- 01:45, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

An active user, Like Moonflight said we wouldn't want a new project to get cold so fast. I totally agree to this project, it's a wonderful idea and I'd join anytime ;) So basically, a user who actually would contribute to this project and help it grow ;) 01:49, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Do any names come to mind? 01:50, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, Moonflight. What about Splashpelt? Or maybe even YOU. Lawliet Meow 01:54, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Or maybe Mistystar139? 01:55, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Either Mistystar of moonflight; both options are great. :) 01:55, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

All of them are great, but perhaps a person who hasn't led a project yet? -- 02:00, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Icestorm, that's why I said Splashpelt. If we're going with ones who haven't lead a project, that would mean Rainlegs, Moonflight, Mistystar, Rainwhisper, Darkhallows, Iceheart and myself are out of the question (I'm going by the leads of all four projects, as of today). Lawliet Meow 02:03, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with all of those names, But I didn't expect mine to be there o.o Anyways, Yeah I feel a user who would benefit from the leadership of this project would be a good choice. 02:15, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. -- 02:16, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

This project sounds like a great idea. I support it. :P 02:22, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe Cherryfur123... 02:26, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * She just returned from a really long hiatus. Sorry, but she should stick around a bit longer before she's offered a lead position. 02:28, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps Splashpelt or Atelda. 02:30, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Just a note: Make sure the leader actually knows a bit about the articles that will be in it. 02:31, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

So should we narrow it down? Someone who hasn't led a project before, and is open to new ideas and able to let the project grow? Ideas on this? 02:35, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * And knows about the topics. Don't forget that. :3 02:37, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * xD Yes, I agree Splashy. Someone who is open to new ideas, doesn't stay the same, able to contribute to the project and watch it blossom at the side of the Wiki. -- 02:39, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol, I like the word you used there. "Blossom." So we have a user with the understanding of the pages and articles, a user that is able to grow, a user that is open for the project to grow, and a fairly active user. I believe these are pretty good qualifications.  02:43, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol, I like the word you used there. "Blossom." So we have a user with the understanding of the pages and articles, a user that is able to grow, a user that is open for the project to grow, and a fairly active user. I believe these are pretty good qualifications.  02:43, July 4, 2011 (UTC)