Warriors Wiki talk:Reality

Online Phenomenon Infobox
I've been thinking...Since Online Phenomenon pages are PR pages, how about we create an infobox for sites? So far, For role-play site articles, we can make an infobox that reveals this information:

There will be game information in the infobox.


 * Name of website:
 * Picture of Website logo:
 * Website link:
 * Website abbreviation:
 * Type of role-play website (modified canon for an example):
 * Website Staff:
 * Date founded:

This is for role-play websites though, I'll think of ideas for others, and I'll work on the infobox, if I need to make an example. Thoughts, comments, and ideas? 18:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

It's a good idea. Have it somewhat like the Clan articles, or even character articles. We'd need to get into contact with the founders of the fanfiction websites, though that's not much of a problem. 20:47, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

I agree too. I'm not all that good with online fan stuff and everything, but I think this will work. 01:54, Sun, Feb, 12, 2012

Here is the model. The first infobox. 04:41, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

That looks good, but I'm not sure what to add.

Maybe add under important dates close date if appliable. 05:25, 27, 02, 2012

Anything to add I think would be on the dictation of those who are founders of the website. We can start on the coding and then find all the founders who've made applications for online phenomenon and start editing. To forewarn, these will not have nominations. 00:13, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Yet another infobox
Again, another idea for an infobox. This is for the official sites page. Look at the second infobox here. So, my idea is this:


 * That a infobox could be placed in each section of a website on the official sites page.

Thoughts, comments, and ideas? -- 04:41, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

This makes sense to me, but shouldn't there be like a category for what type of website it is?

Sounds good, I'll add that into the model to see how it would look like. 18:23, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

That looks good.Just curious, why is this necessary? Is it for orginization? Just not quite clear on that.

Yes, organization. If we can spruce up the reality pages more, then we are able to nominate them. 18:38, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Okay thanks.

I agree this is good. 05:35, Mon, Feb, 13, 2012

It's a bit more than sprucing up pages to nominate. Its so we have a clear understanding of how certain Reality pages should be laid out. As for the template, I'm a bit wary on the charcat box style. It seems overwhelming when there are 4+ of those templates on just one page. Take note that each official site can not stand as it's own article due to the small possibilities of information we can put on those articles. 23:52, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm...I thought that an infobox would be much. I rethought it, and since the official sites page is more like the prey page, we can have a template like the prey one. 17:39, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

I agree to have something like the prey template. 00:32, 25, 02, 2012

I agree with DJ.

Er...Here's my idea. Comments? Thoughts? Ideas? -- 21:31, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Great job Stoney! We'll need to organise the coding though. 06:07, 26, 02, 2012

It is simple, but right now, it's coded from scratch, which is not how we're going to use it. I added parameters, which is simple, so users can just fill in the info, not code it out. This is the complete set of coding that will be added on to the template page. Once it's on the template page, when we add the template, it'll be simple 'cause it uses parameters. Sorry if I didn't explain, well, but that's what I mean. 06:04, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Also, the image we could put can be the logo of the website. 21:56, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

I like the idea of that Stoney. 01:00, 03, 03, 2012

Same here. 01:04, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

The only question I raise is do we need an image? Otherwise, it'd be wonderful if we can start putting this idea into action. 00:13, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

We don't need one...but I just thought that we could possibly have the image as the logo of the website, so others get familiar with it. 00:17, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I'd say that we should start making this template. :3 01:37, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

I think so. 08:16, 19, 04, 2012

Yup, I made it! Take a look guys, I wanna know if it's good. =3. 21:40, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

That's good Stoney! I think we should make it into an offical template. 01:50, 21, 04, 2012

Facebook Pages
I was thinking, why don't we have pages for Vicky and Kate (and soon Cherith's) facebook pages? We could list the questions that are answered on there, just like we do for the chats. I asked Teldy about it, and she said to propose it, so what do you guys think? Should we make pages for them? 02:16, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea. Though, the only problem is that the information we obtain from their facebook pages may not be valid, such as, we got information from Kate (I think?) that Seedkit and Lilykit were torties, later revealed to be false. But, it's not much of a problem because if something is invalid, it can be confirmed later in the books. I think that it should be one page, with each sections for each authors' facebook page. I see that we could probably use templates like the chat template for the questions answered. 02:21, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Well really the stuff in the chats can and has been wrong too, so I'm not sure that's much of a problem. Like them saying Mapleshade was tortie. But yeah, I that sounds good about the section thing, and using templates like the chats. 04:04, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

I don't know whether we can fit it on one page. I mean, I was sort of thinking about having one page for each of the facebooks and then just sections to break down the information either in dates or like we have with the chats. Vicky is quite active as an author on her facebook and to coalesce all that information would mean quite a long page plus Kate's facebook, -shrug- either way works. 02:47, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

That would probably work. 00:12, 29, 04, 2012

Victoria Holmes ~ Silver Nomination
Looks Good to me! I edited one piece that didn't look right but I don't see anything else. Comments? 04:48, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Just being a bit nit-picky here, but could you if possible add more references to the bio? 09:54, 08, 05, 2012

Done 15:27, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Expand that last paragraph of her bio-give it more detail, perhaps elaborate the whole bio some more? 00:03, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Done, if it still isn't long enough just tell me. 00:41, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

If you can add more, I'd like it if you did add more, just because she's sort of the head author as she writes the plotline. Also, I'd add her facebook, blog, and her official website.

Done about as moch as I can right now, but I'll still look for more to use in it. 05:52, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Also, I couldn't find her blog or official website. 20:41, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Fill in the source tag that's somewhere in the trivia. 04:10, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Done. ☛Duc kspl  ash☚  04:42, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I added a few more details in her biography, but like I said up there^ it's about as much I can find. -- ☛Duc kspl  ash☚  05:20, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Nicely done! CBV? 05:22, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but I've noticed that there are a lot of citations via Wikipedia. While Wikipedia is fine and such as a door to getting real citations, Wikipedia is like citing ourselves. 20:59, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'm changing them all right now. -- ☛Duc kspl  ash☚  21:11, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- ☛Duc kspl  ash☚  21:22, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

I looked at the link that provided her birth date and it never said she was born in 1975. It just said July 17. Unless I missed something.-- 00:22, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Wayne McLoughlin - Silver Nomination
OK, I added cites, but it looks really good. Comments? 00:43, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

The biography still needs more references. There should be a reference every sentence or two, I would say. 01:40, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Finished. 02:05, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Official site should be added. 03:27, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Finished. 05:33, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

CBV? 17:00, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Vote is up! 22:44, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Erin Hunter Answers Your Questions Chat Template?
On Erin Hunter Answers Your Questions Fall 2010 and Erin Hunter Answers Your Questions Summer 2011 do we need a chat template, or just a template? They are basically chats, excpt on forums. Comments, Thoughts? 15:41, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Just use the chat template, if that's what you're asking. 01:21, 12, 05, 2012

I looked through the arhcives, and unless I haven't missed anything, we have not discussed about these forums, I wouldn't suggest adding the templates right now. 01:28, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

It'd make sense to use the chat templates as the forums are just like another chat. 17:00, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

.Bossman-Join Request
May I please join? I feel like I could learn a lot from this project both related to Warriors or just helpful things. 23:55, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Please read the guidelines, and welcome to the project. 17:00, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Erin Hunter Chat 5 - Silver Nomination
Resuming my work from April, how does it look? 22:29, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

The New Erin
Hey all. I was just curious, and I figured that this is a topic that can be decided early rather than being decided the moment this thing happens, but will we be including an article about the new Erin that'll be writing Survivors? It may have nothing to do with Warriors, but it'll be an Erin Hunter member no less.

The name of the Erin hasn't been announced yet, but there's a floating rumor that it'll be Gillian Phillip.

Thoughts? Should we include an article about the author when his/her name is announced, or should we leave it out since they aren't writing Warriors? 23:01, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Personally, I think that, at the very least, we can include info on him/her on the Erin Hunter page. 23:03, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, Kate Cary herself announced that Gillian //is// the new Erin. Check her facebook page. Here's your proof.

Ah, good. So we can decide this sooner than later. Shall we make a page for her, or just make a section on the Erin Hunter page for her? 23:06, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

I would think an entirely new page. Yes, she's not a Warriors Erin, but, she's still an Erin nevertheless. We do that with the illustrators/writers/ect of the graphic novels, instead of just bunching them together. (I've actually read one or two of her books before...she's not half bad. =3)

Well, yeah, but those illustrators are still writing Warriors books no less. :\ I'm still up in the air about it. 23:10, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, very true. Perhaps for now place the information on the Erin Hunter page, and if we decide to make a page for her, we already have some basic information about her to add. Something's better than nothing, I say. Although she's technically an Erin, I see your point.

Alright, I wrote her into the Erin Hunter page. I figure it's the least we can do. She's an Erin now and deserves mention as such. 23:32, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but is Cloudskye and Shelly's opinion a community consensus? No, so why have we already added it to the Erin Hunter page? While I agree with adding her to the Erin Hunter page as she's now part of the pseudonym, but we haven't decided anything except hear the opinion of one user. Meanwhile, I don't believe she should necessarily have a page since she's not writing any of the Warriors books especially since this wiki is about Warriors series. All articles we have is pertaining to the series and those who have a part in it. My two cents on this. 00:06, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Atelda is correct, I believe. We need the support/opinion of the whole project; not even the project only, but the wiki. I would think that a section on the Erin Hunter article is good (As she is an Erin), and that it could stay. However, an objection of the idea could occur. Also, I don't believe that we'll need to make an article for this new Erin, however, if she's even slightly involved with the Warriors series (such as an idea for a name or so), maybe an article could be made for her (however, if she is involved only so little and only once, that could just be stated in her section on the Erin Hunter article). As for now, I'm pretty sure that she won't need an article. But of course, things are bound to change. 00:17, June 4, 2012 (UTC)