Warriors Wiki talk:Charart

=For Approval= Take it to the approval page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Discussion=

May I please be re-added
May I please be re-add I lost my computer and just got it.Thunderjay 22:14, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

Cast Your Vote
A vote is currently being held to determine whether or not the queen rule shall be changed or actually enforced. Go here to vote. 23:57, September 24, 2011 (UTC)

Tweaking
Okay so i suggested before that we not redo images that need not be redone, and everyone had a little fit cause everyone wants to claim a charart as their own completly. Not happy about it, but i let it drop. But this is becoming a serious issue. I get that im not ging to get everyone to stop uneeded redoing, but I want this rule put in place. No image is to be tweak/redone at all unless the image had been on the tweaking nomination page for at least a week. That gives the leads a chance to remove it if they disagree. I dont like the while loop hole thing going on now. 05:42, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, the only images I claim as my own are the ones that needed to be redone as a different pelt style, or if I was told by another lead (Rainwhisper and Frostheart both, actually), that I could keep them. I think that's fair, because they'd go through a whole critiquing process anyways. One week is sufficient enough time for a lead to decided whether or not an image should stay. I know I go though and remove images I think are fine. Some are added on there for pointless things. So what if the shading is only a smidge too dark? No one's perfect. (I re-did Mudfur because his image needed to match his description. There was no pale belly, the highlights were way too bright and the light brown wasn't a light brown.) 05:49, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea to me. Should we start dating it when we add an image? I think it would make it easier. ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕  ☆StarClan be with you★  08:54, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea, can we add Runningwind to the tweaking list? His stripes look red almost, his pelt color is fine, his stripes just look red. Maple♥ pool  Mischief brewing 15:03, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. There's been quite a few chararts re-done completely that only needed a torn ear or something similar, and that creates unnecesarry work for the entire wikia and the person doing the tweak. And, as an artist, I think that could be hurtful to the OA, to see their image completely replaced suddenly without need. 15:04, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. I only redid Ashfur because someone had put him on there twice for two different things. So what if they want to claim the character "as their own", that's bull crap. And no, Runningwond looks fine to me (it's one of my favorite images on here) 15:16, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

I agree on Runningwind. I would like to have it so that if its on the tweaking list, it gets tweaked. The only reason it can be redone is that if its on the list, or whiile its up for approval the general comunity thinks it needs to bve redone. 16:27, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

I agree on all this, unless it's on for "shading needs to be blurred" yet it will make no difference because it's blotchy. If it's on for torn ear adding stripes, I don't think it needs to be redone. ☾Mint☽ Cheers! I'll drink to that. 20:08, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Except in the worst possible case where the image needs to be redone (who remembers the shading on the old Redstar image?), and even then, the user should ask the leads if they can do it. Some images are on the tweaking list, when they should be on the re-do list. Not all users can work with certain images. I know I need layers in order to get anything done. xD 20:11, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

At least try tweaking it. If its so impossible to work with, it will look bad, and the general community will tell you to redo it. See how the rule solves its own problems? 20:12, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion for Nominating
I saw on the nominatios page that Shellheart was once again nominated to be a warrior. I find this silly because twice this month it happened. I think if someone has a tie, they have a month wait, then they are nominated again. 15:22, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

It's not silly. We nominate users because we feel they deserve something for their hard work. Shellheart is one of those users. You don't have to vote if you don't want to, y'know. 15:25, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

A person can be nominated multiple times when we feel they are ready. She needed a little more time with the project and she has, plus she has a deep understanding of the rules and can take charge. Heck I'll be surprised if she doesn't become a SW soon. It is not silly or unfair. I was nominated twice. 15:30, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, ummm, thanks Silvereye. I was myself surprised to be nominated twice in the span of a month, and the biggest difference now is I've actually proven myself to Iceheart and the rest of the project. I'm proud of my accomplishment here. If you don't feel I should be a warrior, all you need to do is cast your vote (which you already have). 15:35, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I dont see what's the problem is. If you dont think Shelly deserves to be a warrior, then cast your vote under the 'against' title. That's all. We nominated her again because now we think shes ready now cause she has proven herself. I dont why your think of this as "silly", as clearly now everyone think shes ready now, as opposed to the first time -- 17:05, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Longhaired apprentice blanks
I know if they change, it will result in many being redone, but i think the longhaired apprentice blanks have a stumpy-like-tail. and they just seem weird that way. 15:40, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

They kind of do, but we have too many long-haired apprentices to just re-do the tail. Personally, both the long-haired apprentice and warrior's tails are weird (they need fur lines at the end), but it'd be a lot to change. 15:41, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Frankly I don't like any of the apprentice blanks, as the tails and front legs are awkwardly thin and long (no offense to whoever made them!). But to redo every apprentice on the site... it would be quite a feat. Maybe it can be something we can do when there are no new chararts to do, like after the end of the Fourth Apprentice series and before the start of Dawn of Clans. For now, though, there are more important things to focus on. 15:46, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Hello i would like to be on the PCA again i will bw more active or at least as active as i can be.Acornfur 16:00, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

That's true, Shellheart. That would definitely give us something to do. The apprentice blank's tails have bothered me for as long as I've been on this wiki. 16:39, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Yes but thats an unbelievable amount of work. I agree that they look off, (Personall i like the loner blank even less) but its not worth the work. 16:49, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Shellheart, we should try and redo them (and MAYBE, just maybe, the rogues too) between the series. I always thought the apprentice blacks could use some tweaking, but that WOULD take a lot of work. We're probably not gonna really have anything to do between the series though, so we should take the spare time to accomplish big tasks that would be too hard normally. ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕  ☆StarClan be with you★  21:39, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

May I join?
May I join the PCA? Laynabug 22:40, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

Of course! I'll add you in now. Please look at our guidelines for any questions. Welcome to PCA! =) 22:50, September 26, 2011 (UTC)