Warriors Wiki talk:Characters/Archive 13

Cinderpelt/Cinderheart
I tried to get this done on her talk page but no one goes there and I think it might be debatable so here's the thing. In Twilight Cinderpelt died and all and Cinderheart is born. Cinderheart is the reincarnation of Cinderpelt and she shares many buried memories with the old Thunderclan med cat. I think on CinderPELTS page we should include parts from the PoT and tFA when CinderPELT shows through CinderhEART. And example is in tFA when Jayfeather returns from fignhting Breezepelt and Cinderheart immediatly starts making herb mixtures. I din't think CinderPELT's page needs ALL of CinderHEARTS life details, just the parts where she shines through. Thank you. Also, the reason I used CAPs lock on their names were so that no one gets confused or anything. Once again thanks.-- Artimas Hunter Welcome to Bramblepath's Den 00:16, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think this is really necessary, I don't think we even need the Sunrise mention. Cinderpelt's articles are meant for when she appeared alive or dead in the books, not when it's implied that Cinderheart was Cinderpelt. I think that should stay only on Cinderheart's page, since it was Cinderheart who appeared in the books, not Cinderpelt. → Sky feather  00:10, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

True enough. It kinda confusing though like, is hse really Cinderpelt now or Cinderheart? :D -- Artimas Hunter Welcome to Bramblepath's Den 00:44, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Cinderpelt is Cinderpelt. Cinderheart is Cinderheart. They are two different cats with the same soul. ♥Mouse♥ ♥Heart♥  00:19, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

I really pity Cinderpelt though. "I'll neer be a warrior now." Sob. :O -- Artimas Hunter Welcome to Bramblepath's Den 01:50, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hrm. This is a bit of a confusing issue, isn't it? I had thought that it was already one of those unspoken decisions that mentions of Cinderheart acting like Cinderpelt would be mentioned on her page, so I didn't question it... however, Sky brings up a good point. And also, they're only "hints" at Cinderheart acting like Cinderpelt, we can't really say that it's not just Cinderheart's own... nature... since she does have Cinderpelt's soul. I'm kinda fine either way on wether we write the mentions or not, so if you guys think we shouldn't, that seems reasonable. ♫ insaneular ♫ Down at Fraggle Rock! 20:35, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Whatever you guys decide is cool with me. I just thought it was a weird topic and might need debate.-- Artimas Hunter Welcome to Bramblepath's Den 00:58, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, any objections before we just stick to what Sky said, no mentions on Cinderpelt's page at all? (since that seems to be the more agreed on way) ♫ insaneular ♫ Down at Fraggle Rock! 12:07, February 20, 2010 (UTC)