Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations

This is where PCA members can be nominated for different spots on the project.

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * At least 3/5 of the project leads must agree.
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations

Unsuccessful Nominations

Requirements

 * User must have been a member for at least 4 months.
 * User must have at least six images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

=Senior Warrior Nominations=

Mossy - Ends April 22nd - Project Lead Votes - 3, 2/3 Supporting
Support
 * 1) I believe Mossy should be a senior warrior because she is able to deliver good, constructive criticism on how to fix charart, will gladly help out if asked or will ask to help, and gives great charart. Me and Frostheart both believe she is ready, and another reason I would like to give is that she is a very good friend, and as I just commented, she is a great help. True, she has an attitude, but does that stop her? No, I didn't think so. If she can't become a senior warrior for her personality, then why am I standing here, right now, CBAing images? 19:16, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I truely think she deserves this status. Yes, I am only an apprentice voting here, But I am one of Mossy's good friends and I have seen her work. She makes amazing chararts and very good criticism. I think she has earned this status and deserves every bit of it. 19:25, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Of course. Saying she does not have enough experience is simply ridiculous. I became a lead when I was here for a mere eight months. Mossy has been here for a year. I don't see what her un-qualifications are. 19:26, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, I'm supporting. Her chararts are great. And if some people have a problem with her attitude, no offense, Ice (you know. ;3) shouldn't be a senior warrior then. Mossy has a logical mind, comments a lot, and she deserves this status. 19:57, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Mossy definitely deserves this. She gives great constructive criticism and her chararts are beautiful. She is very good on giving her opinion, which is helpful in project discussions. 20:08, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Mossy absolutely deserves to become a senior warrior. She has a year of experience, and she gives helpful criticism. Also, her charact is very amazing! I'm glad to be supporting her and I hope she gets that rank soon. : Holly  ♥   22:39, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Supporting. Mossy's Chararts are awesome and when she has something to say about a charart, she says it. I belive her comments are reliable and helpful and she is fit to become a sr.warrior and i hope she passes. :) Fea  ther  23:28, April 8, 2011 (UTC)Feathermoon
 * 4) Mossy is a brilliant user who deserves this fully. Her chararts are beautiful, and her opinions are valuable to discussions and votes. She was my mentor once; I know very well how helpful she is. I support Mrs. Mosse completely :) 06:07, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Mossy is an awesome user. She is fair in judgement, and makes lovely chararts. She deserves this privilege completely. She is also active, which is an important factor.  Mistfire Spring rainfalls  16:00, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Mossy is an amazing user, and is very reliable, too. She also makes some amazing chararts, is active, gives great critisism, and is not afraid to speak her opinion. She deserves this 100%. 17:51, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) I agree; PCA currently only has 3 senior warriors, and could use more. Mossy is an amazing artist and deserves this :D 21:52, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) I think she should be a senior warrior. Although she has an attitude, she's very fair. Her chararts are amazing, and I'd vote for her any day. -- Cloud skye  13:21, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) I'm all for her! The project needs her. =) ❁   YatzSliversword   Ah, spring...  ❁ 21:11, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Against
 * 1) Gosh, you guys are making me feel bad. I just can't support. Mossy is a great artist, active, and gives good advice. However, some of her comments concern me a little. A good senior warrior should be open to listening to all sides. Obviously, being opinionated isn't a bad thing! I sure am, as was Malinois (a former senior warrior). However, she seems to stir up arguments, and I simply don't see that as a good thing. Mossy, I have nothing against you and I'm sure you are a great person, but I'm going to go with a no.  Darkhallows... Mew? 12:17, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm sorry Mossy, but I have to agree with Darkhallows on this one. You are a great person. 20:20, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm sorry, Mossy. You're definitely active enough, and you make wonderful chararts, but I think you need a change in attitude. Yes, you've got attitude, and that's not a bad thing, but it's a little more than that. If you could try a little harder to be open-minded and diplomatic, I believe you would be ready to be a senior warrior. However, as it is, your hackles come up a little too easily, and other users don't react well to that. This starts heated debates that often get unnecessarily personal. I feel kind of guilty saying this, but it's the truth. I cannot support. --   Wildheart  In mourning for Duckling, my phone. 00:02, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) I'm sorry Mossy, I have to agree with Darkhallows. You are a wonderful user and give wonderful advice to chararts that are up for approval, but sometimes your advice does comes a bit blunt. Scarlet wind Step into the Light 00:05, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm sorry as well Mossy, but after just having a long two hour discussion on leadership and writing a paper I don't think you're ready just quite yet. This has nothing to do with our conversation on the eye thing just to clear any mishap.-- ♩ Shimmerpool ♪ Never B ♭ ♫ Sometimes B ♯ ♬ But Always B ♮ 01:59, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) I agree with them as well. You're an awesome user, you make beautiful chararts, and give great advice, but you do tend to start some arguments, even if you don't intend to. I don't mean to offend you, Mossy, but you could use diplomacy more often in discussions, which is the reason I'm against this. And you are a little blunt sometimes. If you could try to be more open-minded, I would support this nomination. 01:53, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) I'm sorry too, Mossy. I think you could be a great senior warrior, only if you get a change in attitude. Yeah, I'm not afraid to point it out. I feel guilty saying this, but you should wait a little bit until you mature, not trying to offend you. You do tend to cause arguements or argue back. But you are a great person, I can say that. MINTSTARR   You can stand under my Umbrella!  18:43, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

I'd just like to point out that Mossy doesn't try to start arguements, she just of course agrees with her own opinion. I would guess that anyone would want to agree with their own opinion and support it. Since other people agree with their own opinions, if I make a suggestion and other people comment with something I don't agree with, it wouldn't be my fault if I said more of my opinion. 17:45, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Try to or not, she does. Look, I have nothing against her, I just don't think she should be a senior warrior. -shrug- Darkhallows... Mew? 20:10, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Darkhallows (if that is you up there): Your reasoning is completely justified. I understand. She will have to work on not creating unneeded arguments, regardless of if she gets the position or not. 18:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay that last comment kind of just made this go from reasonable to insulting. XD I don't create unneeded arguments. When have I? I understand that I argue about things but when is it unneeded? If I argue about something, I have a reason to. I always thought the problem people had with me is that I don't beat around the bush and I actually suggest new things. Not many people ever suggest something, and if they do, they usually go about it in a really nice way. Which I don't. XD 18:14, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I forgot I was on my mom's computer. I didn't mean for it to come across as insualting. I never said you were unreasonable, just a little blunt. I'm sorry if you took it wrong, and of how I worded it. Darkhallows... Mew? 20:10, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahh, okay. Well it's true, I am blunt. xD 21:23, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't think she should be judged by if she has an attitude or likes to speak what she thinks is right. Because everyone is different and nobody has the power to change someone if they like how they are. I think that Mossy being a Sr.Warrior would give her the respect she needs. Fea  ther  02:38, April 11, 2011 (UTC)Feathermoon

I wouldn't say the problem is if she has an attitude or not. That's not a bad thing, nor is being different. The problem is the way she deals with arguments, in my opinion. She needs to restrain herself a little bit more and use diplomacy where right now she maybe is using sharp words. --  Wildheart  In mourning for Duckling, my phone. 03:34, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Feathermoon, I don't think just by giving someone the title is the best way of just getting respect. A person has to obtain respect by their actions, or rather in this case words rather as we all can't see each other xD A leader has to be looked up to by others and also mindful of others, being able to listen to other's reason for a simple problem. Being open-minded is a quality, but yet it has to be a skill. Flexibility is the key I guess is what I'm saying :/ but still, tacking on a name for respect, however, is a no-no.-- ♩ Shimmerpool ♪ Never B ♭ ♫ Sometimes B ♯ ♬ But Always B ♮ 01:59, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Wait... under the laws we have now, Mossy actually can't become a SW! We have an even number of leads! wildheart    spr ing rai n ♫   06:10, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Couldn't we delay the nomination? 09:18, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Okay I suppose, but I was just thinking that what if it's a tie? Then what? We don't have any way of fixing that... wildheart    spr ing rai n ♫   05:25, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, why not as someone outside the project? Like a lead from another project, or perhaps an admin? If you can reach Bramble, have her post her opinion (since she lead the project before) if possible. Or you can do another vote just for the warriors and senior warriors, and see what happens. -- Cloud skye  17:19, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't have to figure it out now. We'll cross that bridge if we get to it. As it stands now, support is winning, so we have no reason for concern now. Bramble would refuse; she's left the wiki. Just an FYI. 17:22, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I realize she's left the wiki; I talked to her right before she left. And as you stated, the supporting side is winning, so I guess we don't have to worry about it now. -- Cloud skye  17:29, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * First of all, Moonflight is changing the rules. Secondly, it can indeed happen. It did with Iceheart and Nightshine (her first vote, that failed). 19:52, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh and I should say, speaking of what you mentioned about ties Wildheart, if there's a tie, the vote fails. 20:11, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

ORLY? Haha I'm silly I never knew that =P  wildheart     spr ing rai n ♫   00:57, April 16, 2011 (UTC)