Forum:Lead Requirements: Mentorship?

Here is the idea Shellheart propsed:

''I'd like to propose the rule that no senior warrior can become deputy (and by extension, leader) without having mentored at least one apprentice to warrior level. I feel this will ensure that our leaders will be consistently more in touch with the projects members, from the apprentices to the leads, and that they gain a bit of wisdom that comes with teaching someone (you know, the same reasons warriors can't be deputies in the books without being mentors first). Of course, this rule would not be retroactive, meaning it would not apply to the current deputy and leader, but it would apply to all future leaders and deputies.''

And the vote is wheather it should be made a requirement. The discussion on it is here. Place your votes please.

It Shouldn't Be Required

 * 1) Although a good idea in theory, there are multiple requirements to be a SW already that insure theyre ready, and the leader isnt stupid, the chosen deputy is someone who can handle the leadership, and more often than not already passed the SW nominations anyway. 21:34, December 1, 2011 (UTC)