Warriors Wiki:Community Portal/Reporting Center/User Issues

[COMPLETED] Wikia Contributor ~ Personal Attacks on Blogs

 * This and this. I've left him a message on her/his talk about watching what you say, but I figured with personal attacks, they should go straight to the reporting center. -- Echo Harkness   "I was just saying hello!"

20:22, April 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * Handled. 22:19, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETED] Wikia Contributor ~ Personal Attacks
As seen here, here, here, and here. Just some kid that got offended when I marked some blogs for deletion. I've tried to ignore them and they've been warned by another staff member already but they don't let up. I'd also like that slanderous comment removed from my blog, please. 21:52, April 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * IP has been blocked and the comment has been deleted. 22:19, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETED] Wikia Contributor ~ Personal Attacks
Apparently the same as the anon above. Has now moved to insulting anyone and everyone that interacts with her. 16:49, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Handled. 20:53, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETED] Bramblewind ~ COPPA violation
http://warriors.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:CreamTheKittypet#Smudge.27s_Image She stated here she's only 12. Sorry Bramble :/ 03:06, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Done. 21:03, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETED] Wikia Contributor ~ Personal Attacks
This anon attacked Echo and Skye in this message on Echo's talk:. This anon has been clearing pages of all content as well for a while, too, with plenty warnings. The attacks are a result of the warnings, it looks like. e.e  23:06 Tuesday April 23 2013

They did it to me too - look on the bottom of my talk page. 21:56, April 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Completed. 22:05, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETE] Darkfrost14 - Intent to vandalize
Thanks to a couple users, who will remain unnamed, I have come across this, which is intent to vandalize the wiki, should we try and remove WWiki's lineart from their wiki. As seen here, they have tons of WWiki's lineart, and when asked to remove them, they refused. The threat to vandalize if we try and remove the images is what I'm trying to prevent.


 * Cloudskye is working on this, and we don't punish people locally for actions on another wiki. So this is closed. 14:44, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETE] Enderfireline ~ Dupe Account
User said they had a second account here. The dupe is TheOneMiner 12:02 Fri May 10
 * Taken care of. 12:44, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETE] Shawn Tiger - Personal Attack
Need I say more? Due to my personal standpoint with this, I refuse to comment on said matter, so I'm leaving it to the other staff.


 * If that's an attack, then I'd recommend you ban the Wikia Contributor a few answers below that just called a bunch of parents idiots for not wanting their children to read a book on gay cats. That person expressed an opinion. Did they say it nicely? No, but that doesn't mean they aren't entitled to it and don't have the right to speak their mind. It might offend people here on the wiki and may seem like an "attack" to them, but then another person could be offended by the opposite and the comment by the Wikia Contributor is an "attack." Isn't the wiki supposed to be impartial and unbiased in political matters such as these? 03:37, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I already admitted earlier that perhaps my phrasing was wrong when I did the report. I do think the user should be talked to, but perhaps not banned or anything of the like. It's not political, but more of a personal matter. If need be, all I'm asking is for someone to ask the user in question to possibly watch their language when saying their opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. I was just a little offended with the person's comment, especially when they said it's "wrong". I do apologize for filing it as a personal attack, and I've come to realize that perhaps that wasn't the best phrase I could have used when making the report.
 * Sorry, but if you have a problem with what that user said, it's your business to go speak with them and ask them to watch their words. It is not the business of the rest of the wiki to discipline them, especially because they haven't actually violated any rules. And I wouldn't know if you said anything earlier because I was not online. 03:45, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Due to the fact that Warriors Wiki bans for hate speech, he acctually /did/ break a rule. And it's not just a Warriors Wiki rule, but a Wikia TOS violation. From User Conduct: "Post or transmit any content that is obscene, pornographic, abusive, offensive, profane, or otherwise violates any law or right of any third party, or content that contains homophobia, ethnic slurs, religious intolerance, or encourages criminal conduct;". With a more experienced user, I would Perma-ban without question, but this is a bonafied newbie.
 * I've decided to issue a serious warning from the user (and so much as another sniff of a problem on this front and they'll be gone without further question) and delete the hate speech from the blog.
 * 01:07, May 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * While it was hate speech and can be considered offensive, it can also be argued that the reaction to it is religiously intolerant, which is also against the Terms of Use for Wikia. The fact that this user used the example of Adam and Eve to explain why homosexuality is wrong, and then the reaction being deleting it as well as warning the user is religious intolerance. Although I believe that it's a good topic to discuss, the blog is open to discussion, and because it's on the pro side, it's bound to have users who disagree. I hesitate to suggest it's deletion, but since it can and does incentive users to post content that contains offensive language and homophobia, perhaps a warning can be implemented on the blog. 04:14, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Removing a statement calling an entier group of people "F-ed Up" is not "religious intolerance". Religious intertolerance would be removing a statement of "I'm christian, and as a christan I belive that homosexuality is wrong.". Just because it contains religious content does not make it untouchable. Vitriol is still virtriol. Not one person in the comments (and I went through the delete log and double checked) took offense to Shawn Tiger's religion. They took offense to the words used, up to and including saying it's fine to disagree but not acceptable to call the group F-ed up. As close as anyone came was asking that he "please not bring religion into it" (which if it was a diffrent conversation, I'd have informed the person that since the POV is rooted in religious, it's an important way to understand where ST is coming from). Tolerating his religion does not mean we have to tolerate his hate speech. This isn't america, where you have the right to freedom of speech and the right to protest. This is a wiki, where civil discource is expected. He can't act like the Westboro Baptist Church here.
 * I do think your throught about a warning at the top of the blog, reminding people that all discource on this sensitive topic should be kept civil, and that stating your personal opinions in a way that attacks another or a group will be understood as such is a good addition to the actions taken, and will be implimented.
 * 12:06, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

[CLOSED] Splashmist3271 ~ Stealing Images
This user has stolen images from the wiki, and then refused to delete them after being warned. http://a-warriors-heart.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:2134 http://defender-cats.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:2104#2 http://a-warriors-heart.wikia.com/wiki/Special:NewFiles http://defender-cats.wikia.com/wiki/Special:NewFiles Sho ond  erp  Like nobody’s around~  22:56, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * On PCA's page, underneath the template section, it states "Contributions licensed as CC-BY-SA." This is the Creative Commons license in which, as stated by Community Central, "To grow the commons of free knowledge and free culture, all users editing or otherwise contributing to wikis that use the CC BY-SA license agree to grant broad permissions to the general public to re-distribute and re-use their contributions freely for any purpose, including commercial use, in accordance with the CC BY-SA license." This also goes for all art submitted on the wiki as Wikia automatically uses the Creative Commons license. While attribution must be given, we have no specified manner of doing so. Therefore, there cannot be anything done unless it is specified with a template of a different license.


 * Also, I cannot do anything outside of this wiki. Nor do I choose to ban them on this wiki over issues on another wiki. The attempted diplomacy is appreciated, but there really is nothing to do unless the images are under a different license. 01:35, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Short version: We can ask people to please not use them off our wiki, but we don't have much we can do beyond that. 12:41, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

[COMPLETE] Hollyclaw27 ~ COPPA Violation
Screenshot is here, user states they are 9. Sorry Holly :/. Bb un   legs  21:35, May 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Dealt with. 01:12, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

.Echo ~ Personal Attack among Other Minorities
Screenshots here- http://www.iaza.com/work/130610C/iaza16347838032900.png & http://www.iaza.com/work/130610C/iaza16347834644100.png Chat rules broken: Caps without permission, cursing with vulgar language- even though she was fully aware of she was doing. Oh, and basically a personal attack. --  S      t      a      r      r      y 00:41, June 10, 2013 (UTC)