Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Approval Page

=Discussion= Take it to the discussion page

=Tweaked= Take it to the tweak page

=Images Pending Approval=

Please use this section to put images up for approval only.

Queen Blanks ~ For Approval
Righty-o. Here we go with the queen blanks. Comment away my friends. ^w^ 09:42 Tue May 28

I'm no expert on this but maybe square up the shape of this --> forepaw and define where the du-claw'd be. I can't really explain how, the but maybe slope the haunch a bit more, it looks kinda flat compared to the shoulders. Gorgeous work, Berry! 22:15, May 28, 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps ---> this leg could be curved a tad? 22:50 Tue May 28

Maybe you could make both sides of the longhair's tail fluffy? The straight line looks a bit odd. 01:18, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

Do you think you could define the top of the nearest shoulder a bit? Also you might disconnect the line on the same shoulder from the head. As is it looks a bit awkward. You also might define the joints a bit more on the other leg and even out the sizes of the ears. Though I doubt you'd need it, if you need a redline feel free to ask. 2:06 Thu May 30 2013

Maybe the tail can be curved a tad more --- no cat's tail is that straight when they walk. 23:22, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, Breezy I wouldn't say no to a redline. xD 06:18 Fri May 31

Re-uploaded meh I did some stuff on the shorthair - decided I'll work on the longhairs later. 12:45 Fri May 31

Maybe slant the toe line on her left front paw the other way, or make it straight up and down? And maybe make a small line over the base of her tail where it joins with her haunch on our left; just to show a little more depth. These are really stunning... 00:43, June 1, 2013 (UTC)

Enlarge the hind paw a bit more and maybe define the "ankle" of the leg that's just behind the lifted forepaw 01:24, June 1, 2013 (UTC)

How about these? Ignore the face, though. Yours is fine. Except for maybe the sizes of your ears, which should be more even. 15:48 Mon Jun 3 2013

Re-uploaded officially naming these blanks Hannibal because they look like they want to eat you. 08:17 Fri Jun 7

Umm... what happened to these? They look odd. different. 10:26, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps thin and even out the tail lineart a little. 10:33 Sat Jun 8

Re-uploaded. Sorrrel, I was given a redline by Breezy to fix up some anatomy issues. .-. Please do not call my blanks odd, and don't comment unless you're offering critique. 10:45 Sat Jun 8

I'm sorry, Berry. I was just surprised by how different they looked. 12:02, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Don't know if this'll make any sense, but can you make the curve around our front right paw more noticeable? 13:20, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

The hind thigh looks lumpy. Maybe smooth it out a bit more? The tail seems bigger than the body. Also, define the front right paw (the one that is not on the ground). 15:03, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

I'm very confused; when you go to the file for this is shows that it looks more like the original version; here it looks like the redline Breezey gave you. Is the wiki playing up? Just asking. 01:39, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Maybe shorten the whiskers by a few pixels, make the tail a bit thinner and maybe shrink her front paws and her right (her right) back paw a just a little. 16:28, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

The bottom of the tail on <--- this side looks like it has an extra line on it, the front part of the belly (or chest?) doesn't look like it connects to the belly smoothly, and the shape of the paws look...off? to me. I don't really know how to explain it, but something about the digits on the paws seem to be throwing me off. 00:49, June 11, 2013 (UTC)

Still working, Berry? 18:28, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Yes- sorry for the lack of re-uploads, I've not had access to a computer. The line on the tail, Ivy, is a bit of fur and I'll keep it unless someone else says otherwise. and the Hannibal eyes stay eheheheh 07:35 Fri Jun 14

Possibly smoothen the lineart on the back? (there's like a little place where it rises :P) 12:21, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

Brackenfur (W) (Alt. 3) ~ Declined
Was described as ginger (not dark ginger) in the Darkest Hour. Comments? 19:59, June 7, 2013 (UTC)

Define the shading on the tail a tad maybe? 10:33 Sat Jun 8

Define the depth in the shading overall. 13:18, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

The stripes are a bit blotchy. The shading looks flat, too. 14:58, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

He really shouldn't get an alt for this. It's simply a partial description of an alt that he already has. That doesn't get an image. If he was called something like pale ginger, then yes, but this is nothing but a partial. I'll wait for another SM's opinion, but I think this should be declined.

Are you sure? I think he's got an alt for being called ginger as a kit or something... If not, then it's fine. 16:27, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded 17:06, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Oops! Waste; fixing now. 17:06, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded 17:12, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

There's still some waste near his tail and front legs. Bb un   legs  17:17, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see how ginger is a partial of his description. I believe it's fine, as he also has alts for other images. Dark ginger is from a completely /different/ book, and arc, and shouldn't be treated as the same thing. I think it's justified and it should stay.

Reuploaded Since the waste was hard to see, I don't know if I've gotten rid of all it... 18:34, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

There's still some waste around his tail and I think above his back. 22:04 Sat Jun 8

Reuploaded 01:27, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

There's a bit more waste up his tail and ears. Sho ond erp  <font color="#CC99FF">Like nobody’s around~  01:33, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

I can't find it! Can you tell me exactly where; ear tips, tail tip? 01:36, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Mhm. Just above the ear tips and tail tip. <font color="#00CC66">Sho <font color="#66FF99">ond <font color="33FF99">erp  <font color="#CC99FF">Like nobody’s around~  01:45, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded if there's any more waste I swear to god... 01:50, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Lighten the earpink a tad please? 18:14, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and actually, there is a bit more waste, it's a bit farther out from the lineart, though. 18:15, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Reuploaded 19:31, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

It's not a partial of his description, it's a partial of his other warrior alt. And yes he got a ginger kit image, but that was a different rank. He already has a ginger warrior alt, just because the "dark" part was left out doesn't mean he should get another image for the same description.

Dark is just specifying what type of ginger. It would be like a grey cat, who is never called light grey, getting a alt for being dark. His ginger alt does the job just fine. <span style="">3:18 Tue Jun 11 2013

Alright, since nobody's commented on this in a few days, and all I was really waiting for was another senior warrior's opinion, I'm gonna go ahead and decline this. Feel free to open up a discussion on it if you really think it's needed.

But... can't it be CBA'd or can you ask first? People wait a while before commenting sometimes... and you have two other SW opinions. I'm not yelling here, but why are you making such a big deal of this? 06:20, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

It's a partial of another alt image - It's the same as any partial image, it doesn't meet the requirements. We can't CBA an image that doesn't meet the project's guidelines. <span style="">07:07 Fri Jun 14