Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations

This is where PCA members can be nominated for different spots on the project.

= Senior Warrior =

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * The majority of the project must agree
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations

Unsuccessful Nominations

Requirements

 * User must have been a member for at least 4 months.
 * User must have at least six images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

=Nominations=

Shellheart - Nomination Ends November 30th, 2011
Supporting Against Comments
 * 1) Honestly, I still forget that Shelly isn't a senior warrior sometimes. She has the air of a very responsible person, and she's always there for the project. She is always concerned for the welfare of the project, and not herself, and she makes beautiful charart. Don't give me any crap about us having too many senior warriors; I know perfectly well how many senior warriors this project has, and we can afford to have one more. Not every SW will be on at all times of the day, and no SW can attempt to be omnipotent or omniscient. I, for one, know absolutely that Shelly will make a wonderful senior warrior, and I don't see why anybody could vote against this. <3 01:12 Thu Nov 17
 * 2) I must say yes! I agree! Maple♥  pool  Mischief brewing 01:19, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) She's not a senior warrior? Nah, I kid. I agree. Who cares if there's too many leads? The more the merrier! 01:21, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) One more ain't going to hurt, and Shelly deserves it. Anyone says otherrwise, I will troll them.Sky-Stupidly  Spring...✿ 01:21, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Completely! So active and very active! Beatiful chararts! I agree with this 100%! 01:22, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) I completely agree! We may have a lot of leads, but Shellheart deserves it! Her chararts are amazing! I love her work, and she gives her heart out to this project! We'd be lucky to have her as SW! 01:23 Thu Nov 17
 * 7) Why not? The number of leads means nothing. It would be an honor to have Shelly as a lead. 01:25, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Hell yea! Who cares if we have just one more lead? You deserve this, Shellz - 01:27, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) I agree  01:32, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Oh my gosh. This is so creepy. I had a dream about this, and it came true... O_O. Anyway, yes! Yes yes yes! 03:46, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) I'm still surprised she isn't one already. 03:51, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Of course! Shellheart's dedicated and is hard working for the project. We need a senior warrior like her! 06:53, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) OMG. She's not a senior warrior yet? She's dedicated and hard-working, and her chararts are...too awesome for words. Who in the right mind wouldn't want her to be?! =)--  D  a  z  z  l  e  w  i  n  g  A  star  with  a  purpose   10:31, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) I agree with everything said above. Shelly is an AMAZING charart maker, and she deserves to be a SW. -- 10:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) I was slightly on the fence about this considering Shelly hasn't been a warrior that long, but that's not reason enough for me to vote against. Regardless of whether she's been a warrior for long, she totally deserves this, and would be a great help to the project. Everything else's already been said. I support. :) ♔ⓅⓐⓁⓔⒸⓛⒶⓦ♕  ☆StarClan be with you★  17:47, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) Yes! I know apprentice votes don't count that much, but I feel the need to say it. Because I was shocked when I actually found out she wasn't a Sr.Warrior yet. She deserves this position more than she knows! :D . 04:30, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) I agree with everything said above. Shelly really deserves this, and I did think that she was a Senior Warrior until I saw this. ;) 21:48, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) I thought she was already a lead... She gives great comments, awesome chararts, and deserves this entirely. Of course I agree with this! M is    t y pe bb le   ♪Goo d day♪ just go with |undefined the flow   15:17, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) I agree even though Shelly has only been my mentor for a few days I already know how awesome she is. Also I always thought she was senior warrior though....
 * 20) Shellheart, you have amazing talent, all your chararts are just pure epicness, and you have the welfare of the project in mind. I'd be great to see you as a lead in PCA. :) 21:31, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) Shelly, your chararts are outstanding, your advice is great, you're mature, kind, and courteous.  You deserve this 100%.   22:46, November 21, 2011 (UTC) Shadewing
 * 22) I dunno if I'm allowed to comment yet. Shelly derserves this. There isn't a word in the dictionary to describe her not being a SW. She comments regulary, and makes fantastic chararts. Actually, she should've been a SW warrior before! 13:20, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) I agree, Shellyheart definately has the requirements of being a senior warrior, but I honestly we have enough at the moment. - 01:17, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks so much. Hey, if anyone thinks that the project has enough leads, I'm fine with it. I'm honored just to be considered. 01:16, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Guardian, your vote against Shelly...it doesn't follow the guidelines, if you ask me. It says that a valid reason must be provided when either voting for or against a user. That doesn't mean any sense, what you said. You agree, but you don't at the same time? Having enough leads is not a reason to deny someone senior warrior status. 06:57, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Shelly, you deserve this, and a lot of other people agree! 22:08 Fri Nov 18

I just wanted to say that I'm really proud of you, Shelly. I'd love to see you as a senior warrior. <3 19:10, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

= Warrior  =

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * The majority of the project's warriors must agree
 * Nomination must be up for at least a week.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations

Unsuccessful Nominations

Requirements
=Warrior Nominations=
 * They must have been a member for at least two months
 * They must have had 1-3 images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

Shadewing - Nomination Ends Dec. 5th, 2011
For


 * 1) First off, I'm not 100% sure an apprentice is aloud to niminate another apprentice, but I had support on the nomination, so I figured i'd give it a try. Now, I don't know Shadewing very well, but her comments are very helpful, and her one charart is lovely. She's plenty active, or so I think, and I wouldn't know, but I'm almost certain she's been here for more than two months. I do realize variation hasn't been showed, but if her future chararts are as good as her first one and her current personal image, I wouldn't worry. She fills in all of the requirements and more, for me, that is, and I believe she really deserves this status! :D By the way, this is a really long post. ;) :) . 04:26, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, she only has one image approved, but, she's also worked on others. Who cares that they were taken over by other users? What matters is her dedication to the project, and number of chararts approved shouldn't mean a dang thing. She's extremely active compared to some of the other apprentices, and more then enough times gives amazing comments. Her first version of Sedgecreek's kit was beautiful, and only got declined because it'd taken over a month. Who cares how long it takes for a charart to get approved? What matters is the effort that goes in making an image, and the dedication to the project. 18:01, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) What they said ^^ 21:13 Tue Nov 29

Against

Comments

Oh, my gosh. Thank you so much, Thistle! No matter what you guys decide, I'll do my best, and I'm ready to dedicate myself to this project. 21:11, November 29, 2011 (UTC) Shadewing