Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations

This is where PCA members can be nominated for different spots on the project.

= Senior Warrior =

=Rules=
 * A user cannot nominate oneself.
 * The majority of the project must agree
 * Nomination must be up for at least two weeks.
 * User must accept the nomination.
 * A valid reason must be provided, whether voting for or against.

Successful Nominations

Unsuccessful Nominations

Requirements

 * User must have been a member for at least 4 months.
 * User must have at least six images of their own approved.
 * User must be able to give good, constructive criticism.

Mountainheart - Nomination Ends February 21st
Supporting:
 * 1) What is there to say about Mountainheart but... dang! I, however, being who I am, will waffle on for a bit.
 * Mountainheart is one of the most remarkable members of this project. The love and care she puts into her chararts shows every time she posts an image to this website, not just when she's posting to PCA. That's not to say she doesn't post to PCA frequently: in the mere four months she's been with us, she's gotten 37 images approved from scratch and one approved from tweaking. I mean, just look at it all! Look at the care and attention to detail she makes!
 * But that's not the only thing spurring this person to elect Mounty for senior warrior. No, Mountainheart is everywhere in the project, offering helpful critiques and participating in important discussions.
 * This is the person that made our new, amazing loner blanks. And I believe that this person truly deserves to be a senior warrior.
 * Mountainheart, I want you to be among those entrusted with the responsibilities of approving and declining images. I know you'd do well. 06:00, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Against:
 * 1) I wanna vote first. 8D She totally deserves senior warriorship. Mounty is very talented and a nice, patient person. I was completely amazed by how quickly she learned when we were critiquing her loner blanks and she was pleasant and willing throughout the whole thing. Her chararts are absolutely stunning and I want to nom all her tabbies. And she's plenty active. I see no barriers. ^^  Breeze  whisker  06:31, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Of course!!! Mountain's chararts will always be better than mine will ever be, she's got amazing tabbies, and I do believe she deserves senior membership. She's one amazing member of PCA (though I think she should try more chararts other than tabbies), and she has my support. As said above, ^^ getting 37 chararts done from scratch in just 4 months is amazing. She's active, though she could comment a bit more. But generaly, she's one freakin' amazing charartist. My wifband deserves this!  06:37, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Darn it Shell, you stole my nomination. DX But anyways, yes, yes, a million times yes! As I said, I was gonna nominate her myself. I've watched her from the beginning and it's amazing how much she's improved, and her chararts never fail to stun me each and every time. She's had the makings of a SM for a long time now, and I think she's been here long enough to be a good choice for one now. I often times forget that she's only a warrior, and now hopefully that will change. I dare anyone to say a bad word about her. Seriously, there's nothing you can say. She's an amazing user, an amazing artist, and to me especially, an amazing friend. I totally and completely support this. You deserve it Mounty. <3 07:33, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Yes!!!! Mounty completely and totally deserves it! She's got a whole dang lot of chararts approved, redos, originals, anything and I'm preparing to rob her charart gallery >=3 . I swear, if it weren't for this nomination, I would've gone on considering her to be one of the Senior Warriors and I have thought billions of warriors held the SW rank. She doesn't comment too frequently, but I see that as no barrier blocking her way to Senior Membership <3 *noms* 11:54, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Of course Mountainheart would make a lovely SM! I agree with everything said above. She's very talented, active, and gives good, helpful comments to others. She even made the new loner blanks for us, and they are beautiful. I see no reason why she shouldn't be able to become one. =) 14:57, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) What can I say? Mountain makes wonderful charart and would help with lead duties so well. She is mega kind and helpful, and I honestly think she could even become the leader of this project some day, given enough experience. I really have nothing to add to what's been said above. You go Mountain :D 19:54, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Pshaw, she deserves it. *huggles* You are amazing, you made the wonderful loner blanks. Why wouldn't i support you? :D 20:01, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Heck yes. Mountain has amazing chararts and is active. Mountain, you know you have my support. <3 20:11, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Yes yes yes!! Her chararts are more than lovely. =) I see nothing that can stop her from becoming one. Great job, Mounty! 20:20, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Awww yeah! M-Heart deserves this! All of the stuff has been said already, no sense in repeating it, but M-Heart you'll be a great addition to the project as a SW. 20:45 Fri Feb 3
 * 11) Mounty <333 I agree with the above. Congratulations girl! 21:39, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) So we're allowed to vote even though she hasn't been a member for 4 months? I vote yes because she has awesomely epic chararts, is very commited to the project, is seen in discussions and gives helpful critique. Everything has been said. <33333 09:08, Sun, Feb, 5, 2012
 * 1) I think we have enough, sorry. 19:39, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments:

Moon, did you vote against her just because you didn't become a warrior? It's not her fault, you know. 20:01, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Rainface, we can't just go on assuming things. I know your trying to be nice to Mountainheart, but we shouldn't go on accusing people of things. ^^ 20:20, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Uh, guys? I have to break up the party, but Mountain's only been a member since October 21st. That's three months, not four. I think this should be archived then re-opened on the 21st. 20:47, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oblivion is right, we can't bend the rules for just a single user. But...Rainface, as Misty said, we can't assume things as easy as that without any proof. Moonleaf has every right to state her vote or opinion. As for you, Moonleaf, if your nomination passed, we would have the same amount of SMs if Mountain passed, and you didn't say that there was enough SMs on your nomination. Think before you say something, anyways, there are no acceptions if Moutain hasn't been in PCA long enough. Sorry but true. 21:31, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oblivion's right, sorry M-Heart. :/ 21:54 Fri Feb 3

It's alright, if Oblivion didn't say that, I would have said something myself. It isn't fair that I get nominated before 4 months. But I'm still forever grateful to Shelly for nominating me 8DDD Thank you all so much <333 22:54, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

That's odd. I swore that I saw in her activity log that she'd joined on October 4. Sorry. 23:10, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

I wouldv'e voted supporting, but, I guess not... 00:20, Sat, Feb, 4, 2012

Sorry, my bad, guys. However, simple solution: hold this vote until the 21st when she hits four months. It'd be an inordinately long vote, but the rules of procedure say that the vote must be at least two weeks, not that two weeks in the maximum. Can I just change the end date and leave this? 20:43, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Got Paleh's permission. The vote stays until she's at four months. 00:26, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

I think it should go 2 weeks after she's four months. Waiting till the day she turns 4 months would be like not having an official vote for her in my opinion, since the first few weeks should have counted. I think it should stay till march 6th. 00:31, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

How about if at least half of the project votes by then, it just passes on the spot? 00:35, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Mmmm that sounds fair enough. If half the project's voted by then, there won't be much votes in the two weeks after that, so alright. 08:59, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Mistypebble - Nomination Ends February 17th
Supporting Against
 * 1) Honestly, one or two more SM's (IMO) won't hurt the project. Mistypeble has been in the project for over 4 months, she's been a warrior since what, August? She has 13 (or more) original chararts approved, 6 tweakes and 5 redo's. Mistypebble is a great user on PCA and in general. She gives good critisim, and is very helpful to new users. She'd make a great SM in this project and she deserves it. 22:06 Fri Feb 3
 * 2) I agree with you Sweet! Misty is a great charartist, has perfec critique and is respectful. I hope this passes ^^ 22:21, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Sweet. You. Stole. My. Nomination. xD Of course, Misty's up for the job! She make amazing chararts, helpful critiques, and is plenty active! She's also go the fine makings of and SM, and I trust her with dealing with problems, CBAing, and approving. =D Eh...I wanted to nominate her, oh well, at least I managed to nominate her to Warrior before anyone else. You go girl! 22:28, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Why not? I see no reason to vote against her. Agreeing with the above. 22:43, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm agreeing with what everyone said above ^^ Misty's amazing and would make an amazing SM ^^ 22:56, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) I support Misty! She is dedicated. She's made bootiful chararts. She made my first personal charart. I chose her to make it because she makes those wonderful chararts. I agree with the above. 00:20, Sat, Feb, 4, 2012
 * 7) Of course! I'd be very proud of her if she became a senior warrior ^^ 02:15, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) I've known Misty for a while now and I'd also be proud of her if she became a SM. She gives good critique, is active, and makes lovely chararts. =) 00:42, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I still think we have enough. 16:30, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

I hope this passes Mistypebble, ya deserve it! 22:06 Fri Feb 3

Thank you so much, guys! :) Especially you, Sweet. Thank you for nominating me! I honestly did not expect this. I hope that I can help improve PCA in all ways possible if this passes. (even it doesn't, I still will try ;))  23:54, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Your welcome Misty! You deserve it! 00:07 Sat Feb 4