Warriors Wiki talk:Characters/Archive 2

Categories For Ranks
Currently, we already know we want to have categories for each book's characters (it's a great sorting tool if you're looking for a specific character in a book, rather than having to use the allegiances pages).

But, do we wish to do RANK categories? Someone created a Medicine Cat Category that I've adapted to become a proper MC's page... Do we wish to do this with ALL the ranks?

It would probobly be best to apply the highest rank a character posses ONLY, in the chronologically latest book (the one that would dictate which name the character's official page bears), and Cate-link the redirect pages for things like Firepaw to apprentices and the like.

My current ideal is that paw, kit, ect pages would only be given to those characters who we've known during a book by such a name be created (to keep clutter down). The main reason for pages like that is so that people can look up "Firepaw" and still get the correct page.

Kitsufox 13:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussions, Comments, Support & Dissent (CLOSED)
Add your comments of the non-vote type for the topic here! As votes close in a few days, we'll not be accepting anymore comments.

One week left for discussions and comments before I open the voting on this topic. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 00:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Category Voting (Closed)
Starting 28 October 2007
 * YAY Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 13:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC) It'll be a lot of work, but most of the category tagging can get done as pages go into voting for Silver or are working towards Bronze.
 * YAY Eulalia459678 ( Salamandastron ) 14:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

FINAL CALL FOR VOTES! This vote will be closing on the 10th of November, 2007, so get your votes in or forever hold your peace.

Results
With 2 votes of Yay, and 0 votes of Nay, the proposal is passed. Categories for rank categories will be implemented for all ranks. Final details will be hashed out via a policy discussion, but I've got some solid plans in mind that will be highly workable and lead to good organization. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 00:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Technicality Vs Fact - Deputy in Technically vs Deputy in Fact
Originally brought up on the ThunderClan Talk Page was the fact that Graystripe, while formally the deputy by Clan Law, did not acctually make appearances in most of the New Prophecy. Brambleclaw was, in fact, the "acting Deputy". There are three possible ways to address this in the listings on Clan pages, and on Character Pages.


 * 1) Use the "technical" aspects, Graystripe was deputy in name, and thus should be listed as such
 * 2) Go with "fact" aspects, Brambleclaw was deputy in action, but not name, and deserves to be listed
 * 3) Go with both. list Graystripe as Deputy, with Brambleclaw as his "Proxy" (or some other suitable word)

This vote is very important, as it basically sets the standard for how we deal with such issues in the future, should they pop up again.

Voting (Closed)
Cast your vote using the number of the option you support, as listed above, signing with ~. Comments should go AFTER your signature, please.


 * 1 Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 14:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Leave detailed truths to detailed sections of the pages such as history.

THE CLOSE DATE FOR THIS VOTE WILL BE THE 10TH OF NOVEMBER. ''I have no issues with approving this measure with only one yay vote, as the yay vote in at this time is for the obvious choice, one that (being based in the 'fact' approach) needs no open consensus to become the method as 2 and 3 do. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 14:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Results
With one vote cast in favor of technicality, the technical approach will be the one employed. Should someone wish to reopen this discussion at a later date, they may on the condition that they are a contributing member of the project. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 00:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Warrior
May I be a warrior? Like Dreamflight or Spiritlight or Rainsong? I'll train hard I PROMISE!(RayneOfShatteredSkies 04:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC))

Joining this project
I'm currently working on yellowfang's history and would like to join this project group--Shippofox 12:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, you're added to the project, but you must keep working hard for two weeks (until 16 April 2008), or you will be removed from the project. But remember, just because you're not officially a member of Project:Characters, you can still do what you're doing, so keep up the good work! :) Eu ( Talk! Contribs ) 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you, and I will work hard on this project, thats a promise =)--Shippofox 12:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I would like to join the project. So can i? Mousefire


 * Yes, since I suggested that you join, you're accepted. Addding you to the template now. Good luck :) Eu ( Talk! Contribs ) 12:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Can I join too, I'll work hard but I can't come everyday tough.Bluefur123 01:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, you can join. You don't have to be on every single day, but just keep a steady stream of edits coming until two weeks is up (29 April 2008), and you're "safe" :) I'm adding you to the template now. Eu ( Talk! Contribs ) 18:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to join in this, I have enough free time to try and do some of this stuff. Darkpaw
 * Yes, since I asked you, you're in. If you can make a nice stream of edits until 2 weeks (10 May 2008) is up, you're safe :) Eu ( Talk! Contribs ) 12:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to join, I have lots of free time, and I'm a pretty good editor. --Rainpaw 17:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I asked, so yes. Just try to keep a steady stream of edits going for two weeks, (30 May 2008).  Eu ( Talk! Contribs ) 18:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Can I join
Can I join the project?--Redflare 22:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll add you strait up, since you've been actively working on pages from the project. Remember that the project focuses on Quality and completeness. Not Quantity! Kitsufox Fox's Den 02:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to get on as much as possible if i join
GB here. If i joined the project, there would be a lot of times i couldn't participate, but i will try my best to do as much as i can! GB 15:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to suck up and pretend that editors who are actively editing and participating in work on character pages are EVER declined for memberships in projects.  Kitsufox Fox's Den 16:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * So am i allowed to be a member of the project? GB 19:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, you've already been added to the template.-- &Sigma;ul&atilde;l&iacute;&atilde; ( T – C – G ) 19:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Request to Join
Can I join this project? Fire Wolf  787  20:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep. I'll add you strait away.  Kitsufox Fox's Den 21:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Can I Join?
Can I join the project?--JayfeatherTalk 23:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Adding you in just a moment. Welcome to the Project.  Kitsufox Fox's Den 23:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Can I Please Join?
Hey, it's Jakko123. I was just wondering if I could please join? I took a look at it and it looks like a really good idea. I really like what you stand for.--Jakko123 22:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You've been added.  Kitsufox Fox's Den 02:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

can i join
can i join-- Bumble Nursery 15:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Done :)--< &Sigma;ul&atilde;l&iacute;&atilde; (Salamandastron )> 21:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)