Warriors Wiki

Welcome to the Warriors Wiki! Want to edit and see less ads? Consider creating an account! Registered users will be able to edit pages, will only see ads on the main page, and more.

READ MORE

Warriors Wiki
Advertisement
Warriors Wiki
Project
This is a Project, a collaboration area and open group of editors dedicated to improving Warriors Wiki's coverage of a particular topic, or to organizing some internal Warriors Wiki process.
For more information on projects, please see the community portal.
Forums: Index > Project Operations > Project Characters > Foster Family Trees




This vote is based on this discussion.

Since the community is divided on whether to make foster relations a part of trees, their own trees or not, a vote has been opened to find a community consensus.

As in normal PC votes, anyone, PC member or no, can vote on this topic.

This forum will on Foster Family trees. Please place only one vote. The voting will end in one week, on October 10.

1.Foster Relations as Part of Existing Trees[]

2.Foster Relations in their own Trees[]

  1. In all hindsight, trees are too big to fit these foster relations now and we should just add a new tree in instead. Plus, some foster relations already have characters genetically related, (i.e.Gray Wing + Thunderstar) and I don't think I can make that fit in an existing tree well. I still think we need to have these anyway as honestly, it's incredibly important to some characters and even the story (Gray Wing + Thunderstar again, and even Brokenstar + Lizardtail) so I think it needs to be represented.Stealthf🔥re ❤Warriors Forever!❤ 00:49, October 3, 2017 (UTC)
  2. I agree^^. Some family trees are very, very crowded, and adding in the fosters would be pushing it over the edge. But, they are still very important to a lot of characters, and deserve to be somewhere in a tree, so they should get their own. madie the wicked witch of the west
  3. Agreeing with both of you. Foster relationships actually have some importance in the books, eg, Thunderstar and Gray Wing, Lizardstripe and Brokenstar, and Lilyheart and Twigpaw. However, placing all that on one tree would be a, too crowded, and b, a lot of work. ♥ Star red and black <01:00, 10/03/2017>
  4. Agreeing with what has been said above. A majority of the family trees are crowded, and most foster families have significant importance to the series. Vec I am Iron Man! 👾 01:26, October 3, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Too tired to write my own cohesive thought but agreeing with above. spooky is that... a furry cat?!? 01:29, 10/03/2017
  6. Same, Spooky. :P But yes I agree with above and I think they should have their own. :) ⓌⓘⓝⓣⓔⓡICouldn'tSayIt To Myself 02:21, October 5, 2017 (UTC)
  7. Appledash the light of honor 18:29, October 8, 2017 (UTC)
  8. Jayce(18:40, 10/08/2017)
  9. JayI hope they remember you....ϟ 18:41, 10/08/2017
  10. I agree! C o s m o s n e s s 🐾User talk:Cosmokitten 19:42, October 8, 2017 (UTC)

3.Neither[]

Results[]

With 10 votes on foster relations in their own trees, 0 votes for foster relations as part of existing trees and 0 votes for neither, we will implement foster family trees seperate to genetic trees.Stealthf🔥re ❤Warriors Forever!❤ 05:10, October 10, 2017 (UTC)

Advertisement