THIS TOPIC HAS CONCLUDED & ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN - PLEASE SEE BELOW
- ARTICLE: Role Play:Goldenstar (DELETED)
- START DATE: 30 June 2008
- REASON FOR CONSIDERATION: Page lists no site on which character is active. Article has fewer than ten sentences, and uses strikethroughs and red text, which generally does not appear on actual articles.
- PROCESSED BY Eu(Talk!–Contribs) 18:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
| Cast your vote with the Deletion Discussion Voting Scheme Select the code from the list below that best describes your feelings on the nominated article. You have a single vote, but are free to enter comments and questions as you feel necessary. Voting will be open from 30 June 2008 until 07 July 2008. | ||
|---|---|---|
| PICTURE | VOTE CODE | DESCRIPTION |
|
{{voteyay}} ~~~~ | You feel this article should be deleted from the Warriors Wiki. |
|
{{votenay}} ~~~~ | You do not feel this article should be deleted from the Warriors Wiki. |
|
{{question}} ~~~~ TEXT | You are posing a question on the topic. (This may be done in addition to voting, both before & after) (Please enter that question in place of the word 'TEXT') |
|
{{votemerge}} ~~~~ [[NAME]] | You support the merging of this article with another, or moving it to a new location. (Please specify that new location or article by replacing the word 'NAME' in the Wikilinks with the appropriate title.) |
|
{{comment}} ~~~~ TEXT | You are making a comment on the topic. (This may be done in addition to voting, both before & after) (Please enter that question in place of the word 'TEXT') |
|
{{dontvote}} ~~~~ | You are choosing to abstain from voting on this deletion. |
--Eu(Talk!–Contribs) 18:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
TC14 21:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC) --After looking at this page, I agree with Eu. Deletion is suggested by me.
Yeah,it's like the other article. --JayfeatherTalk 22:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Kitsufox Fox's Den 13:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC) No reason to keep a page that have an image without copyright information and no data on the character. The only potential concern I've got is that it's a brand new article, and the user just may not have finished it yet. IF the creator desires, I think a week long continuance would be completely appropriate.
Result[]
With four yay votes, and no opposition, the article has been deleted from the wiki.--Eu(Talk!–Contribs) 12:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)