Forum:Tweaking Process Revision Vote

Project
This is a Project, a collaboration area and open group of editors dedicated to improving Warriors Wiki's coverage of a particular topic, or to organizing some internal Warriors Wiki process. For more information on projects, please see the community portal.

Forums: Index > Project Operations > Project Character Art > Tweaking Process Revision Vote

This is a vote to revise the current tweaking system. The new system would look something like this:

We would have two headings: "Nominations", and "Approved Projects". Under each heading would be two subheadings, labelled "Tweaks" and "Redos". If you wish to nominate an image, you link the image (like so - [[:File:image.png]]) underneath the appropriate subheading, and list the reason(s) you wish it to be redone/tweaked.

Some suitable grounds for nominating a tweak:

• If the shading and/or highlights are... blotchy, undefined (no light source), too dark, or too light
• If the earpink is... too ostentatious (ie doesn't fit with the pelt colour), too big, too small, not blurred enough, or undefinable

Note: please realize that you cannot propose a tweak just because of the earpink, although if there is another issue with the image, you can also list the earpink)

• If the markings are... too blurred (undefinable), too sharp (needs blurring), not easily definable from pelt colour (need darkening) etc.
• If a character is deviating slightly from their current (cited) description: ie shade change (from light to dark or dark to light), need scars etc.
• If an image needs a change of fur length (lineart-wise)

Suitable grounds for nominating a redo:

• If an image needs to match a significantly different (cited) description: ie Tigerstar's kids needing to match his pattern exactly, needs to match the character's other images, etc.
• If an image has so many things from the "suitable grounds for tweaking" list that it would be illogical to ask somebody to just tweak it.

Note: There are always special cases that can't be outlined in vague rules. These are just the basics.

Suitable grounds for a tweak that do not require votes include...

• Fixing blurred lineart
• Adding torn ears
• Adding tufted ears
• Changing eye colour
• Switching to a new blank
• Erasing waste

Note: Images that do not qualify for a vote can just be posted under the "Approved Tweaks" without any further ado. However, the image must have issues that are only on the not-requiring-a-vote list. Any images with issues that are on the not-requiring-a-vote list and issues that are on the suitable-grounds-for-tweaking/redos list must be nominated.

After an image is nominated, three senior members must come along and vote. They will do so by using the appropriate templates - {{voteyay}} or {{votenay}} - and a justification of their own. The number of SMs must be three to make sure there is more than one opinion and that there cannot be a tie.

After the nomination is voted on, there can be two results: passing or failing. If the vote passes, it is archived in a subpage somewhere and the image is put underneath the "Approved Projects" heading and the appropriate subheading. If the vote fails, it is archived in a subpage, but not added to the "Approved Projects".

Once an image is under the "Approved Projects" heading, it may be reserved on the project main page and crossed out with a <s> and a </s>.

An example of what it would look like is this:

Nominations

Tweaks

File:Fleck.loner.png I think the shading could be redone. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 I disagree. It's lovely as it is. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 Yeah it's fine as it is. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 Agreed. Ivy did a lovely job and it doesn't need to be fixed. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10

Redos

File:Owlwhisker.kit.png Needs to be redone to match other images. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 No discussion necessary. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 No brainer. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10 Yup. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10

Note: If you are suggesting that a character's entire charart set should be redone (for whatever reasons), you will post the character's page (linked like this: [[Character's Name#Character Pixels|Character's Name]]) and not all of their images individually.

Approved Projects

Tweaks

File:Wildheart7.png Shading needs to be blurred.

Redos

File:Wildheart7.png Pattern needs to be redone to match description and shading darkened.

---

For previous discussions on this matter, look here and here.

The vote is simple. Leave your signature and an optional comment under the appropriate heading.

The vote will end Feb. 16^th.

---

Revise the System

Place your vote here if you wish to revise the system according to the rules and guidelines listed above.

1. I've said all I need to say. This will make the tweaking process more diplomatic, efficient, and democratic. Hopefully everyone agrees. llwildheart™l02:13 Fri Feb 10
2. The less drama over images the better. I agree with everything Colleen's said. —Jayce() 02:13, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
3. After being caught in the fray of users arguing over tweaking images many times, I agree that this is needed to stem the flow of blood hate. Shelly _{For a limited time only} 02:15, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
4. Nothing to say. Perfect. oblivion^Audience? 03:07, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. I've been counting down the days till this finally went up for a vote. Supporting completely.

Paleh Send help 03:32, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

1. Okay. --Leafstrike-- 18:37, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
2. I agree. It will keep the tweak page controlled and less drama. i agree with the above. ~DJCandyFun~ ^{I do enjoy fun...8D}23:42, Fri, Feb, 10, 2012
3. I also agree, causes less trouble/drama. Sweetflower23:47 Fri Feb 10
4. Sure. I've seen some drama on what needs to be tweaked, and this'd help. ^^ User:Twilightheart200/Sig 23:48, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. This sounds like it would be effective. Brilliant Wildy ^^  ʝΣηяѲ¢к   The Aftermath Is Secondary  23:49, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
6. Agreeing with the comments stated above. ^^  Stoneclaw    08:49, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
7. Seems like a good idea to me! Ivyheart ^=P 15:42, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
8. Let's give it a go! ~Scarletwind^{"Time to go home Flap."} 02:29, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
9. Indeed. ^^ Atelda _{insert vague subtext here} 02:31, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Do Not Revise the System

Place your vote here if you do not wish to revise the system according to the rules and guidelines listed above.

Conclusion

The vote has passed with 14 votes for, and none against. The new system is here. llwildheart™l02:19 Thu Feb 16