Warriors Wiki

Welcome to the Warriors Wiki! Want to edit and see less ads? Consider creating an account! Registered users will be able to edit pages, will only see ads on the main page, and more.

READ MORE

Warriors Wiki
Warriors Wiki
Line 38: Line 38:
 
:{{votenay}} Sorry, but I don't agree with this nomination at all, especially the part about defining the shading depth. The image does not look at all flat, which I think should be the standard for judging whether an image has enough depth. White cats do not need to have super dark, defined shading, and you would pretty much have to add darker shading in order to define the depth on this image. I also don't think the light source is really that inconsistent either. I can tell where the light is supposed to be coming from, and the source that's used is actually fairly similar to the source that's used on the apprentice tutorials and on Fish Leap's image (1 of the other 4 softpaw images). {{User:Ivybreeze/Sig}} 23:34, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
 
:{{votenay}} Sorry, but I don't agree with this nomination at all, especially the part about defining the shading depth. The image does not look at all flat, which I think should be the standard for judging whether an image has enough depth. White cats do not need to have super dark, defined shading, and you would pretty much have to add darker shading in order to define the depth on this image. I also don't think the light source is really that inconsistent either. I can tell where the light is supposed to be coming from, and the source that's used is actually fairly similar to the source that's used on the apprentice tutorials and on Fish Leap's image (1 of the other 4 softpaw images). {{User:Ivybreeze/Sig}} 23:34, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
 
:{{comment}} The source is fine. As per the guidelines, the rules are that it must show a 3D object, which it does. I will not be changing the source, as Fish Leap does have a very similar one as well. This hyperobsession with sources needs to stop, perfectly fine images are being tweaked over this picky stuff. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|01:38, 5/15/2020}}​
 
:{{comment}} The source is fine. As per the guidelines, the rules are that it must show a 3D object, which it does. I will not be changing the source, as Fish Leap does have a very similar one as well. This hyperobsession with sources needs to stop, perfectly fine images are being tweaked over this picky stuff. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|01:38, 5/15/2020}}​
  +
:{{voteyay}} source is fine, this anatomy is extremely wack anyways so there's not really a technically correct light source to begin with LOL. but, it is flat - definitely, for that imo.{{User:Spookywilloww/Sig2|02:12, 5/18/2020}}
   
 
===[[Whitewing]] (app) - Tweak Nomination===
 
===[[Whitewing]] (app) - Tweak Nomination===

Revision as of 02:12, 18 May 2020

Project Charart
This is a project discussion page, where a group of dedicated editors may come together and work towards their common goal.
For more information on projects, please see the community portal.
This is the Project Character Art Tweak Nominations Page
Discussions should be routed to the discussion page, New art should be routed to the approval page, and all Art tweaks should be routed to the tweak page.
Want help or feedback on chararts? Join our Discord server and check out the #charart-help channel!
Archives

Approved
Archives 1-38
[39] [40] [41]
[42] [43] [44]
[45] [46] [47]

Declined
Archives 1-10
[11] [12] [13]
[14]

TWEAK AND REDO NOMINATIONS ARE CURRENTLY:

  • OPEN - Nominations can be posted.
  • CLOSED - Nominations cannot be posted, barring the ones already on this page.

Before editing this page, make sure you are clear on the guidelines for editing it.

Nominations

If you wish to nominate an image, you link the image (like so - [[:File:image.png]]) underneath the appropriate subheading, and list the reason(s) you wish it to be redone/tweaked. Project members with the ranking of warrior or above can vote, and only five votes are necessary for the vote to pass or fail. If you have the ability to archive, make sure that at least a day has passed after it has a consensus before archiving.


Tweaks

Feathertail (W) ~ Tweak Nomination

warrior,

The warrior needs some smudging.

-Glacier (14:35, 5/08/2020)

Comment The lineart is fine on the ToEH; that's just a style choice. I honestly think most of what the warrior needs is just some smudging- it's not a stripe texture. Jayce(15:46, 5/08/2020)
Comment I honestly think its just the warrior that needs tweaking; the StarClanner is fine in my opinion as well, colour wise? max it is the real thing, (21:28, 08/5/2020)


Half Moon (Sp) - Redo Nomination

File:Half Moon.softpaw.png The light source is very inconsistent. Especially on the —> front leg and the back. Some depth could maybe be added too.

-Glacier (18:34, 5/14/2020)

Comment Ivy's image. I want it full stop. Jayce(18:56, 5/14/2020)​​​
Vote-yay --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 18:57, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment I feel like this could be done as a tweak. Vec I am Iron Man! 👾 18:58, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment I support this, but yeah, stuff like this is tweakable (Cora, Smokepaw, and others were tweaks) --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 19:04, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-nayI feel like a redo is unnecessary. A tweak would be fine. Bluestar Leaf flying in the wind 19:09, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment moving to tweaks-Glacier (20:30, 5/14/2020)
Vote-yayBluestar Leaf flying in the wind 20:32, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
CommentI’d like to take this if no one else does-Glacier (20:37, 5/14/2020)
Comment I claimed it earlier. I'm sorry, but Ivystripe's images are special to me. Jayce(20:49, 5/14/2020)
Commentthat’s fine!-Glacier (20:53, 5/14/2020)
Vote-nay Sorry, but I don't agree with this nomination at all, especially the part about defining the shading depth. The image does not look at all flat, which I think should be the standard for judging whether an image has enough depth. White cats do not need to have super dark, defined shading, and you would pretty much have to add darker shading in order to define the depth on this image. I also don't think the light source is really that inconsistent either. I can tell where the light is supposed to be coming from, and the source that's used is actually fairly similar to the source that's used on the apprentice tutorials and on Fish Leap's image (1 of the other 4 softpaw images). —Ivy 23:34, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment The source is fine. As per the guidelines, the rules are that it must show a 3D object, which it does. I will not be changing the source, as Fish Leap does have a very similar one as well. This hyperobsession with sources needs to stop, perfectly fine images are being tweaked over this picky stuff. Jayce(01:38, 5/15/2020)
Vote-yay source is fine, this anatomy is extremely wack anyways so there's not really a technically correct light source to begin with LOL. but, it is flat - definitely, for that imo.spooky is that... a furry cat?!? 02:12, 5/18/2020

Whitewing (app) - Tweak Nomination

File:Whitewing.apprentice.png the shading on this needs to be defined. It also needs more depth. I‘ll take it if Jayce doesn’t want it

-Glacier (22:02, 5/14/2020)

Vote-yay I would say it only needs defining and an extra layer of depth added tbh. max it is the real thing, (22:45, 14/5/2020)
Vote-yay Yeah, I agree it needs more definition and depth. --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 22:50, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-yayBluestar Leaf flying in the wind 04:39, May 15, 2020 (UTC)

Tigerstar (AVoS) (set) - Tweak Nomination

File:Tigerstar (AVoS).kit.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).apprentice.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).warrior.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).deputy.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).gc.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).star.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).loner.png File:Tigerstar (AVoS).leader.png another tweak nomination I’m sorry if this seems nit picky but it’s been bothering me and I have to bring it up. Missing the tabby “M”. Yes, it can be argued that charart doesn’t have to be realistic. But I know we added stripes to a plain cats charart because all ginger cats have stripes.

-Glacier (04:21, 5/15/2020)

Vote-nay Realism is not a mandatory part of PCA, and these images are perfectly acceptable as they are. We also did away with the "all ginger cats have stripes" rule, and it is purely optional now. Jayce(04:24, 5/15/2020)
Vote-nay --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 04:29, May 15, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-nay wha Vec I am Iron Man! 👾 04:30, May 15, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-nayBluestar Leaf flying in the wind 04:39, May 15, 2020 (UTC)
Comment ok, I was just screaming at my iPad about this....-Glacier (04:41, 5/15/2020)
Comment if anything i would tweak them to be more tigery since they....dont look too tiger-ish anymore but eh 07:17, May 15, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-nay "tiger striped" and the "M" clash as a design with one another so it almost certainly wouldn't be logical in any sense to add it Hrafnsmál The raven's call 01:41, May 17, 2020 (UTC)

Redos

Feathertail (set) - Redo Nomination

The set doesn’t seem to match very well, especially the warrior/StarClan and the toeh doesn’t match the kit and apprentice. Would the be better as a tweak? -Glacier (16:40, 5/05/2020)

Comment The stripe placement looks fine but the colors and stripe texture could be tweaked on the warrior. I think the others match fine, except maybe for the toeh's tail, which is pointed rather than blunt on the set. Eggheart!🐥A True Warrior 04:39, May 7, 2020 (UTC)
Comment Agreeing with Egg; I think its mainly the warrior's placement which is off and that could be tweaked and not the entire set. It's actually quite well matched between each image pattern wise - but the tail on the toeh could possibly also be tweaked if Patch agrees? max it is the real thing, (07:54, 07/5/2020)
Comment i think these could be tweaks, honestly. a lot of the files for the recent ones are indeed around, in some form, and besides that, it doesn't warrant the entire set being redone.spooky is that... a furry cat?!? 14:28, 5/07/2020
Commentalright ill put these as tweaks-Glacier (14:11, 5/08/2020)


Half Moon (Sp) - Redo Nomination

File:Half Moon.softpaw.png The light source is very inconsistent. Especially on the —> front leg and the back. Some depth could maybe be added too.

-Glacier (18:34, 5/14/2020)

Comment Ivy's image. I want it full stop. Jayce(18:56, 5/14/2020)
Vote-yay --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 18:57, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment I feel like this could be done as a tweak. Vec I am Iron Man! 👾 18:58, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment I support this, but yeah, stuff like this is tweakable (Cora, Smokepaw, and others were tweaks) --Av Out of sight and out of mind () 19:04, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Vote-nayI feel like a redo is unnecessary. A tweak would be fine. Bluestar Leaf flying in the wind 19:09, May 14, 2020 (UTC)
Comment moving to tweaks-Glacier (20:30, 5/14/2020)

Approved Tweaks

Once an image is under this heading, it may be reserved on the project main page and crossed out with a <s> and a </s>. The image may only be removed from this list when it is approved and archived.

All project leads are to keep track of the number of images on this list, including those that are crossed out. Should the number rise above 50, nominations will close and remain closed until the number of images on the list is down to 40.

When placing images onto this list, please also add if a user has reserved said image. Reservations will last for one week after the nomination is archived and placed into the correct archive, unless there are other matters that interfere with a user not being able to complete said images by the time their reservation expires (such as a comment that would usually require an additional nomination, like adding stripes or changing a pattern completely).

A tweaked image on this list can be redone with permission from a project lead. If a project lead wishes to redo an image on this list (such as a solid that is not part of a set), they must contact another lead for permission. If it is an overhaul of a set, another nomination must be posted into the correct section, and the voting process will begin again.

Tweaks

Redos